Valeri Todorov wrote:
Hello,
Huh? You mean where your Favorites are on the left side of the
screen? That's been in IE forever.
Yeah, but the Mozilla Sidebar is MUCH more than just a bookmarks pane. It is
like a secondary mini-browser, displaying a set of content YOU define with ease.
thank you for explaining that to me. I need to get my head out of the
sand and stop developing asic's to get back to code. I will read
that page and see what it says
thanks again
chris
Carlfish wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001 23:40:06 -0400, Chris Inacio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JTK wrote:
It's looking pretty polished folks, I suggest you take a look. The
world ain't standing still while Maozilla figues out how to draw
controls inside the lines.
Polished? Of course it is. IE 6 should have been called 5.6. Wasn't 6.0
supposed to be a significant rewrite of the html
David Wilson wrote:
Friends of Mozilla
I do contribute fairly regularly by submitting bug reports in the
standard one item/issue per report as best suits fixing and am a
strong Moz supporter to the end.
This, however, is a mixed bag of suggestions directed to folks who may
be
Asa Dotzler wrote:
JTK wrote:
Blake Ross wrote:
snip
That's not true at all; you're making broad statements without providing
any support. Contributors to Mozilla can work on whatever they want.
Perhaps an AIM-compatible IM client? Yeah, didn't think so.
AOL does not
Depends on your operating system. Usually win98 version is released first.
DeMoN_LaG wrote:
JTK wrote:
Marc Leger wrote:
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
It's looking pretty polished folks, I suggest you take a look. The
world ain't
Sol Hell wrote:
Depends on your operating system. Usually win98 version is released first.
I'm looking at the Windows Update site and at the IE6 preview site,
neither seem to have anything newer. I do, however, notice that IE6's
minimum install size on Win NT/2k is 75Megs, on 98/SE it's
JTK wrote:
Perhaps an AIM-compatible IM client? Yeah, didn't think so.
Well, I know someone who is writing a Jabber client for Mozilla, and
since Jabber supports AIM, Yahoo! Messenger, MSN Messenger, ICQ, and
IRC, that would be that there IS a AIM client for Mozilla besides the
Netscape
Hi, using win/98, through the communicator tap I access address book. As
I scroll through the names in the address book the address's disappear
and causes netscape communicator 4.77 to crash. I get the following
error. Can anyone please advise.
Please e mail to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you
Steve Dekter/P.I. Video Production wrote:
Hi, using win/98, through the communicator tap I access address book. As
I scroll through the names in the address book the address's disappear
and causes netscape communicator 4.77 to crash. I get the following
error. Can anyone please advise.
Stuart Ballard wrote:
DLLs (or SOs on unix; don't know
the Mac equivalent)
Shared Libraries
Asa Dotzler wrote:
DeMoN_LaG wrote:
*gasp* You are going to say that Mozilla can't access a web based
news service through the news client??? Oh my god, how has this
feature been left out. I mean, IE has had this for, what, 5, 10 years
now? Oh? IE doesn't have this feature? What
I've restarted my computer, re-installed NS6-PR1 twice nothing seems to
work!!!. Any ideas would be very welcome. Let me know if you need any more
diagnostic info.
JT
Oh yeah here's the error message
NETSCP6 caused an invalid page fault in
module XPCOM.DLL at 0167:60ec26dc.
Registers:
Stuart Ballard wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">RV wrote:
... an one more time Microsoft is caught with its pants down with theirlatest FreeBSD (OPEN SOURCE) latest fiasco/embarrassment. I wonder abouthow many lines of GPLed code might illegally reside in MS products aswell.. After all their
JTK wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">RV wrote:
JTK wrote:
RV wrote:[snip]
They have equated Open Source as being insecure. I have severalpeopleapproach me already at the college where i teach and ask me why Iamusing an Open Source web browser. They are afraid someone caninsertcode (back
DeMoN_LaG wrote:
JTK wrote:
Blake Ross wrote:
Yeah, pretty much: You work on the stuff we don't want to, we'll take
it and bundle it with a bunch of stuff that's proprietary, and you get
nada. So long, sucker!
Dude, you don't know what you're talking about.
I know all too
jesus X wrote:
JTK wrote:
Huh? You mean where your Favorites are on the left side of the
screen? That's been in IE forever.
Yeah, but the Mozilla Sidebar is MUCH more than just a bookmarks pane.
No, it's little more, and not executed as well (eg, the IE ones
disappear completely when
jesus X wrote:
Stuart Ballard wrote:
[snip] DLLs (or SOs on unix; don't know
the Mac equivalent)
Seeds? :)
MAH! Now I get it! Seeds, Apple...
You still got it rabbi, even after 2000 years!
--
jesus X [ Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism. ]
email [
JTK wrote:
jesus X wrote:
JTK wrote:
Huh? You mean where your Favorites are on the left side of the
screen? That's been in IE forever.
Yeah, but the Mozilla Sidebar is MUCH more than just a bookmarks pane.
No, it's little more, and not executed as well (eg, the IE ones
Asa Dotzler wrote:
[snip]
Actually Mozilla is very close. A couple of hackers have developed a
Mozilla add-on called forumzilla which gives the user a mail-news
interface for reading weblogs like mozillazine, kuro5hin, slashdot, etc.
Sah-weet! So who want to run the pool for guessing
DeMoN_LaG wrote:
Valeri Todorov wrote:
Hello,
Huh? You mean where your Favorites are on the left side of the
screen? That's been in IE forever.
Yeah, but the Mozilla Sidebar is MUCH more than just a bookmarks pane. It is
like a secondary mini-browser, displaying a set of
darkchrome wrote:
I've restarted my computer, re-installed NS6-PR1 twice nothing seems to
work!!!. Any ideas would be very welcome. Let me know if you need any more
diagnostic info.
JT
Oh yeah here's the error message
NETSCP6 caused an invalid page fault in
module XPCOM.DLL at
Orrin Edenfield wrote:
JTK wrote:
Perhaps an AIM-compatible IM client? Yeah, didn't think so.
Well, I know someone who is writing a Jabber client for Mozilla, and
since Jabber supports AIM, Yahoo! Messenger, MSN Messenger, ICQ, and
IRC, that would be that there IS a AIM client for
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, JTK wrote:
Except 20MB and 8 times slower rendering.
Well, 10MB and 4 times, but who can blame you for exaggerating.
I refer people who want to know the accurate numbers to the
n.p.mozilla.performance newsgroup.
--
Ian Hickson )\
Hi, I've been using mozilla nightlies, but recently I installed NS6.1
beta to check it out. After I uninstalled NS6.1 and went back to
mozilla, I noticed that the bookmarks sidebar tab didn't work any more.
This has happened before, so I unchecked bookmarks and removed the tab
in the
Just wanted to make sure nobody thought that Netscape is any different
now than it was when Netscape 6.0 was released. From
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,44617,00.html:
Netscape 6 was absolutely the right product at the right time. It
delivered the standards support the market was
JTK wrote:
Sounds like a real furball about to start, huh?
Isn't that what makes open source so beautiful? Anyone can make
anything they want. Netscape can make a browser, someone else can make
a cross-platform, cross-company IM app, other people are making games,
calulators, and some
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, JTK wrote:
Except 20MB and 8 times slower rendering.
Well, 10MB and 4 times, but who can blame you for exaggerating.
Touche, mon ami. The difference between IE's memory usage and
Mathuzilla's is in fact not ~20MB (that's Maozilla's total
Those who have worked on this product should be ashamed!
It is a complete waste of time.
It is unreliable and unworthy of the effort.
It is a joke!
JTK wrote:
Just wanted to make sure nobody thought that Netscape is any different
now than it was when Netscape 6.0 was released. From
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,44617,00.html:
Netscape 6 was absolutely the right product at the right time. It
delivered the standards
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, JTK wrote:
Just wanted to make sure nobody thought that Netscape is any different
now than it was when Netscape 6.0 was released. From
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,44617,00.html:
Netscape 6 was absolutely the right product at the right time. It
bob wrote:
Those who have worked on this product should be ashamed!
It is a complete waste of time.
It is unreliable and unworthy of the effort.
It is a joke!
Why don't you download/install/run the latest build. You're running a
VERY old build.
--
Jay Garcia - Netscape Champion
Novell
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, JTK wrote:
As for the 4 times, it was stated by somebody in .performance only
a week or so ago to be ~8 times slower [than IE].
Yes. Things are moving fast.
I have no way to directly compare myself, so I can only repeat what
I've heard from others.
On local network
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, JTK wrote:
Just wanted to make sure nobody thought that Netscape is any different
now than it was when Netscape 6.0 was released. From
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,44617,00.html:
Netscape 6 was absolutely the right product at
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, JTK wrote:
The defense rests.
The prosecution left three or four months ago...
What are you talking about? You persecute me every day!
Since word plays rely on the _same_ word or concept being used in two
different scenarios, your attempt at humour fails dismally.
Jay Garcia wrote:
bob wrote:
Those who have worked on this product should be ashamed!
It is a complete waste of time.
It is unreliable and unworthy of the effort.
It is a joke!
Why don't you download/install/run the latest build. You're running a
VERY old build.
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, JTK wrote:
As for the 4 times, it was stated by somebody in .performance only
a week or so ago to be ~8 times slower [than IE].
Yes. Things are moving fast.
At the speed of light, I'd say! As in three light-YEARS and counting.
I have no
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, JTK wrote:
The defense rests.
The prosecution left three or four months ago...
What are you talking about? You persecute me every day!
Since word plays rely on the _same_ word or concept being used in two
different scenarios, your
JTK wrote:
DeMoN_LaG wrote:
Valeri Todorov wrote:
Hello,
Huh? You mean where your Favorites are on the left side of the
screen? That's been in IE forever.
Yeah, but the Mozilla Sidebar is MUCH more than just a bookmarks pane. It is
like a secondary mini-browser, displaying a set
JTK wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, JTK wrote:
Except 20MB and 8 times slower rendering.
Well, 10MB and 4 times, but who can blame you for exaggerating.
Touche, mon ami. The difference between IE's memory usage and
Mathuzilla's is in fact not ~20MB (that's Maozilla's
JTK wrote:
Just wanted to make sure nobody thought that Netscape is any different
now than it was when Netscape 6.0 was released. From
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,44617,00.html:
Netscape 6 was absolutely the right product at the right time. It
delivered the standards
JTK wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, JTK wrote:
As for the 4 times, it was stated by somebody in .performance only
a week or so ago to be ~8 times slower [than IE].
Yes. Things are moving fast.
At the speed of light, I'd say! As in three light-YEARS and counting.
Do
JTK wrote:
Take it anyway you want to Hixie, just as long as you take it with ya
when you leave!*
*That's just a little more humor for ya Hixie, I neither want nor expect
you to leave, nor care whether you do.
Why do you assume that someone named Hickson is southern?
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 22:23:08 -0400, DeMoN_LaG
[EMAIL PROTECTED] somehow managed to type:
You must not use Mozilla. It visibly renders the same speed as IE on my
system. Faster on some pages, actually. Usually ones with complex
tables throughout them, and the browser is much more
JTK wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">jesus X wrote:
JTK wrote:
Huh? You mean where your "Favorites" are on the left side of thescreen? That's been in IE forever.
Yeah, but the Mozilla Sidebar is MUCH more than just a bookmarks pane.
No, it's little more, and not
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, JTK wrote:
Hence the hilarity. We call 'em puns 'round these parts.
Well, I'm not one to criticise people for having different senses of
humour, so instead, to get a laugh of my own, I passed your reply
through the blender. I hope others like this too. :-)
| JTK is a
And it came to pass that JTK wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, JTK wrote:
The defense rests.
The prosecution left three or four months ago...
What are you talking about? You persecute me every day!
Since word plays rely on the _same_ word or concept being
used
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, JTK wrote:
Yes. Things are moving fast.
At the speed of light, I'd say! As in three light-YEARS and
counting.
Never mind the dimensional flaw in that statement.
I have no way to directly compare myself, so I can only repeat
what I've heard from others.
On local
Valeri Todorov wrote:
Well, it is same in IE, and I think from IE4 - you may add toolbard and
pannels, which could be anything you want, including another instance of
the browser itself. I think by the time IE4 was out, no one knew what
mozilla is
By the time IE4 was out MOZILLA DIDN'T EXIST
JTK wrote:
At the speed of light, I'd say! As in three light-YEARS and counting.
A light year is not a measurement of time, it is a measurement of distance.
Daily numbers? Sorry Mr. Hickson, .performance often goes *days*
without ANY posts whatsoever! You must be reading off Netscape's
JTK wrote:
No, it's little more, and not executed as well (eg, the IE ones
disappear completely when they're disabled).
No, it's much more. the sidebar can contain almost anything you want to put in
it. It can display RDFs from your favorite sites (sometimes called tickers),
bookmarks, java
JTK wrote:
Yep. Sure be nice if some Open mail/newsreader wouldn't be so afraid
to innovate and came up with a way to interface to these systems and
bypass all those godforsaken banner ads.
The problem in doing this is authentication. Most webmail services are not
simply a webpage accessing
Orrin Edenfield wrote:
Isn't that what makes open source so beautiful? Anyone can make
anything they want. Netscape can make a browser, someone else can make
a cross-platform, cross-company IM app, other people are making games,
calulators, and some day even a office suite!
I'm working on
JTK wrote:
Just wanted to make sure nobody thought that Netscape is any different
now than it was when Netscape 6.0 was released. From
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,44617,00.html:
Netscape 6 was absolutely the right product at the right time. It
delivered the standards
Ian Hickson wrote:
I am glad, however, that you consider my e-mails annoying. I will take
that as a compliment too.
Obviously my merciless onslaught of fact has left him weak, as he has stopped
responding to my posts almost altogether. I think I may have found the
anti-troll serum: large doses
bob wrote:
Those who have worked on this product should be ashamed!
It is a complete waste of time.
It is unreliable and unworthy of the effort.
It is a joke!
Then why are you running it? At least get a new build. There have been MASSIVE
changes in the past 3 months.
--
jesus X [
On 23 Jun 2001 03:37:05 GMT, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
somehow managed to type:
As has been mentioned by others in this thread, this statement would
seem to indicate you have misconfigured your browser.
benefit-of-the-doubt
Netnews propagation is inherently unreliable, and JTK doesn't
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], jesus X says...
JTK wrote:
Just wanted to make sure nobody thought that Netscape is any different
now than it was when Netscape 6.0 was released. From
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,44617,00.html:
Netscape 6 was absolutely the right product at
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], jesus X says...
JTK wrote:
At the speed of light, I'd say! As in three light-YEARS and counting.
A light year is not a measurement of time, it is a measurement of distance.
Thank you, Lord, Mr. Lag, Mr. Hixie, et al, for informing me of a fact which my
six
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Marcin Januchta wrote:
You may find this question silly, but what/who is RMS and GPL?
Not a silly question at all.
RMS is Richard Stallman, the founder of the Free Software Foundation (FSF)
and the GNU (which stands for GNU's Not Unix) project.
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Marcin Januchta wrote:
You may find this question silly, but what/who is RMS and GPL?
Not a silly question at all.
RMS is Richard Stallman, the founder of the Free Software Foundation (FSF)
and the GNU (which stands for GNU's Not Unix) project.
Phil Edwards wrote:
Every time I try to do an advanced Bugzilla query, Moz 0.9.1 shoots to
solid CPU usage as the results are being displayed. I have to SIGKILL
it from an xterm. It's repeatable every time. (Using linux.) I have no
idea what it's doing. Even with only 50 or so matches,
Bagus Mahawan wrote:
Hi,
I've seen gtkembed's memory leak test results on
netscape.public.mozilla.embedding, but I couldn't find any leak information
of mozilla itself.
How is mozilla memory leak tested ? Is there any docs on leak test and its
results ?
Regards,
Bagus
gtkembed is
63 matches
Mail list logo
