I see in here:
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/
builds that are OTIS rather than trunk.
What are they for?
Syd Logan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03 Nov 2001:
> Not knowing any better, my read of the whole thing is that they ran
> 6.2 in order to generate the IE vs. 6.2 evaluation in which we
> "tied" IE, but they did not produce an in-depth evaluation of
Not knowing any better, my read of the whole thing is that they ran 6.2
in order to generate the IE vs. 6.2 evaluation in which we "tied" IE,
but they did not produce an in-depth evaluation of 6.2 to replace their
earlier 6.1 in-depth evaluation (you'll notice that the link at the
bottom of th
Hey, just wondering if anyone knew how to change the sound it plays when
you have new mail and, if there's an option to have the little mail
thing go into the taskbar when you have new mail like it did in 4.78.
It seems to play the default sound, but I want it to point to something
else...
Jay Garcia wrote:
> jdavis wrote:
>
>
>>Anyone?
>>
>>
>>
>
> Anyone what ??
>
>
Does anyone see this feature anymore or know where it went for several
builds now? Has it been removed because someone doesn't think it should
be blocking advertisement? Is someone working on putting it back
> Not impressed by old articles eg., last updated in 1999
So, after the last update to 4.x's CSS support, then?
Gerv
jdavis wrote:
> Anyone?
>
>
Anyone what ??
--
Jay Garcia - Netscape Champion
Novell MCNE-5/CNI-Networking Technologies-OSI
UFAQ - http://www.UFAQ.org
I complained to CNet about their Netscape vs IE recent comparison. They
actually tested Netscape 5.1 vs IE, reported their results and then
later changed the article to read Netscape 6.2 instead of the tested
6.1. I got a letter from them which it it's quoted below. I am
flabergasted by the la
Joe Camel wrote:
> X-No-archive:yes
>
> Jay Garcia wrote:
>
>
>>4.78 does in fact support CSS and quite well unless it runs into
>>proprietary non-standard CSS.
>>
>>For 4.x issues please visit:
>>
>> snews://secnews.netscape.com/netscape.communicator
>>
>
> Sorry Jay but Netscape 4.7x CSS s
Anyone?
Hi!
I hope, I am at a right place in this NG.
My question:
Using Mozilla as my default browser either under Windows and Linux, I
want to share my bookmarks file on an extra FAT16-Partition. Is this
possible?
What do I eventually have to change in the prefs or liprefs files to
access one bookma
Duane Clark wrote:
> lal_truckee wrote:
>
>> Duane Clark wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote NS6.2/Moz9.5
>>>
>>> Other reasons for upgrading:
>>> Another preference allows me to set a minimum font size. Very handy
>>> for us old guys with weak eyes.
>>>
>>
>>
>> How? I don't see th
lal_truckee wrote:
> Duane Clark wrote:
>
>
>>Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote NS6.2/Moz9.5
>>
>>Other reasons for upgrading:
>>Another preference allows me to set a minimum font size. Very handy for
>>us old guys with weak eyes.
>>
>
>
> How? I don't see that in Preferences/Appearances/Fonts,
A little bit ago I got sick of popup ads and so I set
dom.disable_open_during_load to true. Then a myriad of problems started
to show up. During page load, do I want to read my mail? Sorry opening
mail involves a javascript window.open() call. How about clean up my
bookmarks? nope that requ
Duane Clark wrote:
> Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote NS6.2/Moz9.5
>
> Other reasons for upgrading:
> Another preference allows me to set a minimum font size. Very handy for
> us old guys with weak eyes.
How? I don't see that in Preferences/Appearances/Fonts, and as you
mention, it sure would
Chris Hoess wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jay Garcia wrote:
>
>>4.78 does in fact support CSS and quite well unless it runs into
>>proprietary non-standard CSS.
>>
>>
>
> Huh? I think you'd be hard-pressed to find a web developer who agrees
> with that. IIRC, 4.x's CSS support is a
"Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T." wrote:
> Richter wrote:
> >
> > Joe Camel wrote:
> >
> > > X-No-archive:yes
> > >
> > > I was just over in the Netscape 6 group and frankly, 6.2 still looks a
> > > little buggy for my tastes. I am now on 4.78, which other than no
> > > support of CSS, etc. and some in
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
>
>
> The reason why the the browser works but not necessarily mail and news.
> Is because all emphasis is being placed in the Browser. The Mail and
> news is considered an after thought.
Though to be fair, the recent couple of versions (Moz 0.93 and later)
hav
This is great seasoning and this is the first time it's been available to the general public.
Just click below.
www.blackandwhitemagic.com
Henri Sivonen wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > > Currently you can't run the two if installed on the same Hard drive
> > > > (or
> > > > same partition)
> > >
> > > That is incorrect. See my other post in reply to "DeMoN".
> >
> > Your statement is tru
On 11/02/01 03:49 PM, Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
> I've never run into CSS problems with Communicator using any version 4.5
> or later.
Take a look at http://www.geocities.com/pratiksolanki
The site uses CSS and doesn't render correctly on NS 4.72 on Linux. I
got the css and html validat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> X-No-archive:yes
>
> > I was just over in the Netscape 6 group and frankly, 6.2 still looks a
> > little buggy for my tastes. I am now on 4.78, which other than no
> > support of CSS, etc. and some instability basically works pretty
> > nicely. Is it worth it to c
I've never run into CSS problems with Communicator using any version 4.5
or later.
Jay Garcia wrote:
>
> Joe Camel wrote:
>
> > X-No-archive:yes
> >
> > I was just over in the Netscape 6 group and frankly, 6.2 still looks a
> > little buggy for my tastes. I am now on 4.78, which other than no
Richter wrote:
>
> Joe Camel wrote:
>
> > X-No-archive:yes
> >
> > I was just over in the Netscape 6 group and frankly, 6.2 still looks a
> > little buggy for my tastes. I am now on 4.78, which other than no
> > support of CSS, etc. and some instability basically works pretty
> > nicely. Is i
Michael Gratton wrote:
>
> Kent Scheidegger wrote:
>
> >
> > I gather that means this program remains nonfunctional,
> > for practical purposes. Anyone know when, if ever,
> > Netscape intends to restore this essential function?
>
> Out of curiosity, what is a preview so important for you,
Flash Plugin is included as part of the Ntescape 6.2 download Package as
well as RealPlayer 8 which in not compatible with ReplayerPlus which is
most current.
Mozilla doesn't have any included plugins other than the Java Plugin and
the Default plugin.
As Mozilla is a opensource project it has no
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jay Garcia wrote:
>
> 4.78 does in fact support CSS and quite well unless it runs into
> proprietary non-standard CSS.
>
Huh? I think you'd be hard-pressed to find a web developer who agrees
with that. IIRC, 4.x's CSS support is a hack that turns CSS into JSSS,
DeMoN LaG wrote:
>
> Henri Sivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01 Nov
> 2001:
>
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, DeMoN LaG
> > wrote:
> >
> >> If he is unable to run Netscape 4.x and Mozilla/Netscape 6
> >> concurrently because he uses a Mac,
"Malodushnïkh" wrote:
>
> There are also long-standing authentication problems with Netscape mail
> in that your username and password will work in the browser, but fail in
> Netscape Mail.
>
> This has been happening for me for the past two years, and nobody at NS
> gives a damn.
>
> (Think th
Minko Markov wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Mozilla 2001110112 (latest build), Linux, with flash
> plug-in Shockwave Flash 5.0 r47.
>
> I am tempted to do a bug report, but
> I am not sure whether it is appropriate.
> Is the plug-in part of mozilla? Probably
> not, I got it from the home page of
> flas
Forrest Taylor wrote:
> Forrest Taylor wrote:
>
>> I am rebuilding mozilla 0.9.5 on Redhat Linux, and I am wondering
>> where to set the default theme. I want to use the modern theme by
>> default.
>>
>> TIA,
>>
>> Forrest
>>
>
> I found the local /usr/lib/mozilla/chrome/user-skins.rdf file,
Mike Koenecke wrote:
>...
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> allegedly wrote:
>...
> > By any chance is your image settings at "accept images from
> > originating server only"
>...
> Oh, for crying out loud. I'll just slink away now, with my tail
> between my legs.
>...
Not your fault -- it's a practically us
Is anyone else seeing this
1. Open Navigator (tab pref set to hide tab if only 1 tab is present)
2. Open a new tab.
3. Close a tab so that there is only 1 tab and tabs go away.
4. Try typing in URL bar
Result - I can never seem to type in it. URL bar becomes unusable for
this window and I have
On 11/02/01 07:22 AM, Martin C. Messer wrote:
> I know this has been asked before, but _is_ there a list of all the
> keyboard shortcuts for the various Mozilla components?
>
none that I know of. sorry :-(
Pratik.
Joe Camel wrote:
> X-No-archive:yes
>
> I was just over in the Netscape 6 group and frankly, 6.2 still looks a
> little buggy for my tastes. I am now on 4.78, which other than no
> support of CSS, etc. and some instability basically works pretty
> nicely. Is it worth it to check out Netscape 6
THIS FEATURE IS PERMANENTLY GONE NOW???
Pratik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> On 11/01/01 10:37 AM, Martin C. Messer wrote:
>
> > David Hyatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >
> >>I just checked in a slew of tab browsing changes and fixes. Here's a list:
> >>
>
Joe Camel wrote:
> X-No-archive:yes
>
> I was just over in the Netscape 6 group and frankly, 6.2 still looks a
> little buggy for my tastes. I am now on 4.78, which other than no
> support of CSS, etc. and some instability basically works pretty
> nicely. Is it worth it to check out Netscape 6.
I would never ever go back to 4.78. Some pages freeze 4.78 while
loading, doesn't happen with netscape 6 and its much faster in
displaying pages. NS6.2 has much better interface. Crashes less. To be
honest 6.2 never crashed. And I surf alot. 4.7 crashed a least once a
day. 6.2 has the best CSS
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Currently you can't run the two if installed on the same Hard drive
> > > (or
> > > same partition)
> >
> > That is incorrect. See my other post in reply to "DeMoN".
>
> Your statement is true if you use windows or UNIX. On Mac OS
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Past versions of Netscape 6 would over take Communicator preferences,
> The system OS would overwrite Communicator File icons with netscape 6
> icons.
No, Netscape 6.2 does not corrupt or take over Communicator's preference
files. Finde
41 matches
Mail list logo
