Is there any way to get Mozilla Mail to open URL links in a different
browser? This applies to Linux and Windows. Thanks.
David Grant
You say this was inspired by Alan Cooper's /The inmates are running the
asylum/, but only one of your four personas (Ling) is a `user' as Cooper
would understand the term.
You appear to be describing people using the Mozilla *code*, rather than
those using a *product* which includes the
Hi all,
Is there a spelling checker module in Moz 0.9.8 ? I was using it very
often in Netscape v4.78 (with the french dictionnary). I am missing it
in mozilla...
Is there a way to get the netscape one working with Mozilla, or is this
feature not included yet ?
Thanks
Lassie
Lassie wrote:
Hi all,
Is there a spelling checker module in Moz 0.9.8 ? I was using it very
often in Netscape v4.78 (with the french dictionnary). I am missing it
in mozilla...
Is there a way to get the netscape one working with Mozilla, or is this
feature not included yet ?
dman84 wrote:
Peter Lairo wrote:
Christian Biesinger wrote:
I said you need not register it. The following page describes how to
get rid of the Activation Screen.
http://www.hmetzger.de/net6e.html#4
The activation occurrs *during* the installation. How do you delete
Christian Biesinger wrote:
Peter Lairo wrote:
I think it is being *deliberately* ignored because the Linux users in
charge of the bug don't understand why it is important to windows
users. :(
Could you explain why it is?
I see it this way: The PW protection is of course worthless.
On 03/11/2002 12:39 AM, Bamm Gabriana wrote:
I AM fully aware of how all this works. Kyle is confused by SERVER and
SERVER SOFTWARE !!
No, he is confused between hosting a newsgroup
and carrying the newsgroup.
Jay, I hope you cool down. You are a highly intellectual
person but your
On 03/11/2002 12:16 AM, Red wrote:
We all know Bundy is a troll. However I am disappointed at the
behavior of Jay Garcia and the fact that Kyle Bundy has made some
points about Jay Garcia not knowing what he was talking about and
giving out bad answers. However, Bundy doesn't need to gloat
On 03/11/2002 12:16 AM, Red wrote:
We all know Bundy is a troll. However I am disappointed at the
behavior of Jay Garcia and the fact that Kyle Bundy has made some
points about Jay Garcia not knowing what he was talking about and
giving out bad answers. However, Bundy doesn't need to gloat
Jay Garcia wrote:
Regarding most users, you are right. But what if you had a static IP
address and you had at some point ordered a Time Magazine subscription
using that IP address? Time Magazine is part of AOLTW's network, so in
that case, AOLTW would be able to find your name and address
daa wrote:
some ISPs are echoing them, but they are really local newsgroup and not part
of
usenet ( as are any groups not in (news|alt|sci|comp|net))
So the usenet is only for english-speaking groups and, for example, de.*
are not part of it?
--
They that can give up essential liberty to
dman84 wrote:
sorry, that was kinda harsh.. I meant to just say that you dont have to
go around removing code like a Hack when you can just hit the cancel
buttons to get out of activation..
Last time I checked, this was not possible.
--
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain
On 03/11/2002 7:53 AM, Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
I'm saying that they *could*. Not that they will, or that they are.
/Jonas
I agree. And I'll leave it that as my continued posting seems to be
pissing some folks off. :-[
--
Jay Garcia - Netscape Champion
Novell MCNE-5/CNI-Networking
Christian Biesinger wrote:
dman84 wrote:
sorry, that was kinda harsh.. I meant to just say that you dont have to
go around removing code like a Hack when you can just hit the cancel
buttons to get out of activation..
Last time I checked, this was not possible.
Well, sometimes it works to
Jay Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My statement/reply was in reference to the physical location of the
server that hosts these groups. It's in Mountain View California and
this SERVER feeds usenet.
A newsgroup isn't hosted on a specific host.
A mail-to-news gateway may be, but that is a
Mozilla uses 100% cpu time on this page.
- Holger
Maybe you right and I'm being a little too paranoid. I do see a
differnce though. Netscape has access to my PC and could therefore quite
easily slip my personal info in with the IP and search request. Maybe
not now, but in 3 months when this issue has settled. Who is going to
detect a
sorry, that was kinda harsh.. I meant to just say that you dont have to
go around removing code like a Hack when you can just hit the cancel
buttons to get out of activation..
Try installing Netscape 6 in a computer without an internet connection
like I did in my friend's computer (in
Holger Metzger wrote:
http://www.ohrbelag.de/mozilla-bug-01.html
Mozilla uses 100% cpu time on this page.
Use the URL query field, Luke!
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130055
/Jonas
Christopher Jahn wrote:
by access I mean it is installed on my system and can
access my registry and addressbooks, basically anything on
my PC. :(
How can it do this? Please reference the code in question.
You mean your apps all don't make settings into the registry or create
directories,
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Holger Metzger wrote:
http://www.ohrbelag.de/mozilla-bug-01.html
Mozilla uses 100% cpu time on this page.
Use the URL query field, Luke!
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130055
/Jonas
Well, that bug was posted after I wrote my initial posting :-D
WFM, mozilla uses just as much CPU as it normally does.
Holger Metzger wrote:
http://www.ohrbelag.de/mozilla-bug-01.html
Mozilla uses 100% cpu time on this page.
- Holger
Mark Slater wrote:
Read rejoice:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/24364.html
-mark
And the best part of the whole deal (considering I'll never be an AOL user)?
The only thing that might delay -- not stop, just delay -- AOL's
change from Explorer to a Mozilla-based browser
Dan Howard wrote:
And the best part of the whole deal (considering I'll never be an AOL
user)?
a greater userbase for gecko?
--
Morten Nilsen, aka Dr. P
We are the borg^]dbdbiMicrosoft.
Prepare to be assimilated^]dbiembraced and extended.
Resistance is futile^]dbdbdbiWe know you want
Red wrote:
We all know Bundy is a troll. However I am disappointed at the
behavior of Jay Garcia and the fact that Kyle Bundy has made some
points about Jay Garcia not knowing what he was talking about and
giving out bad answers. However, Bundy doesn't need to gloat about it.
The two of
On 03/11/2002 8:39 AM, Erik Corry wrote:
Jay Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My statement/reply was in reference to the physical location of the
server that hosts these groups. It's in Mountain View California and
this SERVER feeds usenet.
A newsgroup isn't hosted on a specific host.
It
Hi All,
Here is a thread of mine from alt.html that I thought might be a bug in
Mozilla...
Can anyone confirm this?
My current div is:
div
style=position:absolute;text-align:center;margin-top:15em;z-index:-1img
src=\images\logos\WorldTrans2.gif alt=
style=width:810px;height:389px/div
WDA wrote:
I downloaded a spellchecker for milestone 0.9.8 off of the mozdev.org
site. I would like to download the version for 0.9.9 but can't find it
on their site. Does anyone know exactly where I can locate it?
Thanks
Hey, that sounds really cool. I to mozdev.org, but could not
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
Many plugins That Communicator can use, do not work in netscape 6 or
Mozilla because they use Live Connect.
My understanding as stated on this very newsgroup is That liveconnect
was a proprietary code that netscape used. As such
Which to do? If download, which do I get? MacroMedia can't make up
it's mind for me.
Help appreciated
Stan
Garth Wallace wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
Many plugins That Communicator can use, do not work in netscape 6 or
Mozilla because they use Live Connect.
This is true. It also is irrelevant to the claim that the W3C banned
LiveConnect.
My understanding as stated on this
Need to open piffiles or batfiles that run some old DOS applications
through Netscape 6.2.
Don't want to save them first, however currently not even getting that
option.
Worked fine w/Navigator 4.08 as well as IE.
OS is 2k.
D
Jason Parker wrote:
WDA wrote:
I downloaded a spellchecker for milestone 0.9.8 off of the mozdev.org
site. I would like to download the version for 0.9.9 but can't find it
on their site. Does anyone know exactly where I can locate it?
Thanks
Hey, that sounds really cool. I to
On 03/11/2002 12:24 PM, philbrunner wrote:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/24364.html
-- using Mozilla 0.99 (nightly) on Linux - looks good!
- still no formatting toolbar in the message composer (Windows version has it)
Its there under Linux. Are you sure you have Compose in HTML
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
If that's the case why can't live connect be used in Mozilla so that
Communicator plugins can be used?
As a matter of fact, I have wondered this as well.
--
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty
Jay Garcia wrote:
Also, according to your're explanation, if we list groups from our ISP,
then these very same groups should appear. They don't ... Why not? It's
usenet isn't it?
If you are talking about netscape.public.mozilla.* when you say the
very same groups, I can confirm that my
Pratik wrote:
On 03/11/2002 12:24 PM, philbrunner wrote:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/24364.html
-- using Mozilla 0.99 (nightly) on Linux - looks good!
- still no formatting toolbar in the message composer (Windows version has it)
Its there under Linux. Are you sure you have
Hi -
How 'bout it?
Stan
I looked it up on bugzilla:
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78087
--Ed
Ed S wrote:
Hi All,
Here is a thread of mine from alt.html that I thought might be a bug in
Mozilla...
Can anyone confirm this?
My current div is:
div
Thanks! - works great :-) - newsgroup post was accidental :-[
Phil
Pratik wrote:
On 03/11/2002 12:24 PM, philbrunner wrote:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/24364.html
-- using Mozilla 0.99 (nightly) on Linux - looks good!
- still no formatting toolbar in the message composer
Frank Sfalanga wrote:
According to this message (see attachment) I cannot do my online banking
because mozilla uses some weird communication method that it chose to
use. Can this be true? Who do we talk to about that?
-Frank
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd;
html
head
titleBlah/title
/head
body style=margin:0px 0px 0px 0px; z-index:5;
div style=position:fixed; width:100%; z-index:1; text-align:center;
img
Joyce Severt wrote:
Can someone tell me if there is a way to recapture a message folder if
that folder is gone but I still have the folders .snm file?
No - the snm file does not contain the contents of emails.
--
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety
Bamm Gabriana wrote:
Ok. I _have_ to ask. Why don't you just use the
keyboard shortcut? (for home, that is)
I do. Alt+Home is natural when my hands are on the keyboard.
ok :-) My curiosity got the better of me :o)
[...]
But my point is not *my* convenience. (I can work
around it.)
This is partly a bug in Mozilla, and partly due to the fact that the
default z-index of an element is supposed to be 'auto' and not '0', but
some of the other browsers mistakenly treat auto as '0', but I don't
fully understand it...
Ed S wrote:
Hi All,
Here is a thread of mine from
I'm more confused than ever. According to the Mozilla release notes,
you require the J2SDK to get the .dll (NPOJI610.dll) needed for the
plug-in to work, though I've also been informed that the JRE should be
good enough. However, that particular .dll isn't available in with any
JRE I've had
Christian Biesinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jay Garcia wrote:
Also, according to your're explanation, if we list groups from our ISP,
then these very same groups should appear. They don't ... Why not? It's
usenet isn't it?
Probably your ISP doesn't carry the netscape.* groups. I'm sure
Sid Vicious wrote:
Peter Lairo wrote:
dman84 wrote:
its not high on anyones priority list.. its futured too, unless
someone has time to work on it besides the assigned bug owner..
I thought there was a patch ready and waiting for this. I think it is
being *deliberately* ignored
Frank Sfalanga wrote:
According to this message (see attachment) I cannot do my online banking
because mozilla uses some weird communication method that it chose to
use. Can this be true? Who do we talk to about that?
-Frank
In article a6ivsn$[EMAIL PROTECTED], Stosh wrote:
Which to do? If download, which do I get? MacroMedia can't make up
it's mind for me.
Help appreciated
Stan
Copy it. Flash will only download for ie and netscape; the installer will
look for netscape.exe and if not found, won't
A browser shift by AOL is going to leave an awful lot of companies that
assume their Web sites only need to work with Explorer scrambling to
rewrite their code so that they don't lose AOL's 30 million-plus
subscribers, or about 30% of all U.S. Internet users.
--
Brian Heinrich wrote:
I'm more confused than ever. According to the Mozilla release notes,
you require the J2SDK to get the .dll (NPOJI610.dll) needed for the
plug-in to work
Really? I just checked and could not find that statement. Always JDK/JRE
was mentioned.
And the JRE should indeed
Sounds too good to be true. I would like to see an official statement
from aol. Or can you confirm this as a fact? :)
Blake Ross wrote:
A browser shift by AOL is going to leave an awful lot of companies that
assume their Web sites only need to work with Explorer scrambling to
rewrite
Good points.
Nigel L vouchsafes:
Christian Biesinger wrote:
Brian Heinrich wrote:
I'm more confused than ever. According to the Mozilla release notes,
you require the J2SDK to get the .dll (NPOJI610.dll) needed for the
plug-in to work
Really? I just checked and could not find that statement.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 10 Mar
2002:
Okay you are the idiot who demanded the developers rewite some of
the download dialogue box since you didn't like how it worked and
buggered up the Mac build which caused Mac developers a week's
worth of
PeEmm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on
11 Mar 2002:
A troll doesn't act this way. A troll is a kind of freak, posting
a false statement, then sitting in front of the monitor, eagerly
watching the incoming replies and the thread growing bigger. This
is
You've just described Bundy and JTK, you realize?
I tend to disagree. A troll knows he is wrong and it gives him
pleasure seeing others correct him.
Bundy sincerely believes he is right and wants Mozilla to succeed,
but he believes the developers are taking Mozilla in the wrong
direction.
Blake Ross typed:
A browser shift by AOL is going to leave an awful lot of companies that
assume their Web sites only need to work with Explorer scrambling to
rewrite their code so that they don't lose AOL's 30 million-plus
subscribers, or about 30% of all U.S. Internet users.
--
Thomas typed:
Sounds too good to be true. I would like to see an official statement
from aol. Or can you confirm this as a fact? :)
Blake Ross wrote:
A browser shift by AOL is going to leave an awful lot of companies
that assume their Web sites only need to work with Explorer
Netscape Basher wrote:
Blake Ross typed:
A browser shift by AOL is going to leave an awful lot of companies that
assume their Web sites only need to work with Explorer scrambling to
rewrite their code so that they don't lose AOL's 30 million-plus
subscribers, or about 30% of all U.S.
And it came to pass that Peter Lairo wrote:
Christopher Jahn wrote:
by access I mean it is installed on my system and can
access my registry and addressbooks, basically anything on
my PC. :(
How can it do this? Please reference the code in question.
You mean your apps all don't make
Mark Slater typed:
Read rejoice:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/24364.html
-mark
Story is based on a rumor site that is very pro-Linux.
None of the major tech news sites is reporting this. If it had been a
total legit story, CNET and ZDNET among others would eat this up.
--
Jay Garcia typed:
On 03/11/2002 12:16 AM, Red wrote:
We all know Bundy is a troll. However I am disappointed at the
behavior of Jay Garcia and the fact that Kyle Bundy has made some
points about Jay Garcia not knowing what he was talking about and
giving out bad answers. However, Bundy doesn't
And it came to pass that Christian Biesinger wrote:
Joyce Severt wrote:
Can someone tell me if there is a way to recapture a
message folder if that folder is gone but I still have the
folders .snm file?
No - the snm file does not contain the contents of emails.
I confirm this. SNM
philbrunner typed:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/24364.html
-- using Mozilla 0.99 (nightly) on Linux - looks good!
- still no formatting toolbar in the message composer (Windows version
has it)
- wonder why?? Why don't they use Composer (the HTML editor)? I'll ask.
Phil
And it came to pass that Frank Sfalanga wrote:
According to this message (see attachment) I cannot do my
online banking because mozilla uses some weird communication
method that it chose to use. Can this be true? Who do we
talk to about that?
No, Suntrust has chosen not to follow W3C
PeEmm typed:
Red wrote:
We all know Bundy is a troll. However I am disappointed at the
behavior of Jay Garcia and the fact that Kyle Bundy has made some
points about Jay Garcia not knowing what he was talking about and
giving out bad answers. However, Bundy doesn't need to gloat about it.
Netscape Basher wrote:
They picked up the story from newsforge.com, a pro-Linux site. If the
story had merits, the big boys like CNET would eat this up. AOL has no
plans to switch it's customers to Netscape. They are considering Linux
because it's a lot cheaper.
So lets see if I follow
Jonas Jørgensen typed:
Holger Metzger wrote:
http://www.ohrbelag.de/mozilla-bug-01.html
Mozilla uses 100% cpu time on this page.
Use the URL query field, Luke!
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130055
/Jonas
Which brings up a point. Check out this reporting and
Kyle,
On the day when AOL releases software to their end-users uses Mozilla Gecko
will you go away and stop trolling here?
On Mon, 11 Mar 2002 23:43:40 GMT esteemed Netscape Basher did hold forth
thusly:
Blake Ross typed:
A browser shift by AOL is going to leave an awful lot of companies
Parish typed:
Netscape Basher wrote:
Blake Ross typed:
A browser shift by AOL is going to leave an awful lot of companies
that assume their Web sites only need to work with Explorer
scrambling to rewrite their code so that they don't lose AOL's 30
million-plus subscribers, or about
I will tell you this, if AOL did change it's customers to Netscape, MSN
business booms.
You're so naive to believe that any of the 30 million users will even
notice the switch. Sounds like you're preparing your backup story
should this story turn out to be true. Worried, are we? ;-)
Blake
If Java doesn't work, make sure the following is true:
On Windows:
Copy the NPOJI610.DLL from C:\JDK*\jre\bin to \plugins directory of
your installation.
If you install the JRE, the path would be C:\Program
Files\JavaSoft\jre\bin\ ('JavaSoft' may be two words); installing the
J2SDK gives a
Does anyone know how to get the URL from Window.Open when a pop up is
being called from within a site?
On 03/11/2002 3:30 PM, Erik Corry wrote:
Christian Biesinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jay Garcia wrote:
Also, according to your're explanation, if we list groups from our ISP,
then these very same groups should appear. They don't ... Why not? It's
usenet isn't it?
Probably your ISP
On 03/11/2002 6:30 PM, Randall Parker wrote:
Kyle,
On the day when AOL releases software to their end-users uses Mozilla Gecko
will you go away and stop trolling here?
Probably not, he'll dismiss it as a publicity stunt when all 30
gazillion AOL users are running the Gecko engine. He's
On 03/11/2002 6:23 PM, Netscape Basher wrote:
Jonas Jørgensen typed:
Holger Metzger wrote:
http://www.ohrbelag.de/mozilla-bug-01.html
Mozilla uses 100% cpu time on this page.
Use the URL query field, Luke!
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130055
/Jonas
Which
This web site, http://www.mitv.co.uk/, has some problems with their
Javascript, and have different code for IE, etc. I've given them the
mozilla.org URL, but I'm wondering if there isn't a way to have someone
in the Mozilla org. contact them with specific things they can do to
make their site
It was also on the Register, which I think is a pretty reputable source.
Netscape Basher wrote:
Thomas typed:
Sounds too good to be true. I would like to see an official statement
from aol. Or can you confirm this as a fact? :)
Blake Ross wrote:
A browser shift by AOL is going to leave
Is there any way to get Mozilla Mail to open URL links in a different
browser? This applies to Linux and Windows. Thanks.
David Grant
Christian Biesinger wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
If that's the case why can't live connect be used in Mozilla so that
Communicator plugins can be used?
As a matter of fact, I have wondered this as well.
Live connect can't be used with plugins because it required a
Tim Johnson wrote:
This web site, http://www.mitv.co.uk/, has some problems with their
Javascript, and have different code for IE, etc. I've given them the
mozilla.org URL, but I'm wondering if there isn't a way to have someone
in the Mozilla org. contact them with specific things they can
David Grant wrote:
Is there any way to get Mozilla Mail to open URL links in a different
browser? This applies to Linux and Windows. Thanks.
David Grant
In Windows, set IE to handle http and https protocols and not moz, it
works with other stuff, but I'm unsure about mailnews itself.
Bamm Gabriana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in news:a6jf24$4cb3
@ripley.netscape.com, on 11 Mar 2002:
Bundy sincerely believes he is right and wants Mozilla to succeed,
but he believes the developers are taking Mozilla in the wrong
direction.
Then Bundy is just a delusional troll.
IMHO
--
AIM:
RV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 11 Mar 2002:
it up) but yet you quote the same article in terms of AOL
switching to Linux because is a lot cheaper as if it was true.
Make up your mind. you
Would switching to Gecko not be cheaper for AOL also?
In Windows, set IE to handle http and https protocols and not moz, it
works with other stuff, but I'm unsure about mailnews itself.
Hi,
Unfortunately this doesn't work (at least for me). Moz mail
always opens links in Navigator whichever app is set to handle
http and https protocols.
This
I've gotta say, nice job guys. I've been using .98 for awhile and .99
the mail/news seems faster when loading messages. I've liked the
browser for awhile.
Keep up the good work.
Tim Ashman wrote:
I've gotta say, nice job guys. I've been using .98 for awhile and .99
the mail/news seems faster when loading messages. I've liked the
browser for awhile.
Keep up the good work.
I just got it going, too. Yes, this is really 0.9.9, from the Releases
directory.
And
I tried the full screen option with 0.9.9 just now, it's nice but I have
a problem on a Windows 98se box.
I run 2 monitors, a 15 lcd on the left running at 1024x768 which is the
main monitor running the task bar and a 19 monitor on the right running
at 1280x1024.
I always run Mozilla on the
Jay Garcia wrote:
Probably not, he'll dismiss it as a publicity stunt when all 30
gazillion AOL users are running the Gecko engine. He's probably one of
those that still believes the Armstrong Moon landing actually occured in
Arizona.
Actually it was in New Mexico :)
Travis Crump wrote:
WFM, mozilla uses just as much CPU as it normally does.
Holger Metzger wrote:
http://www.ohrbelag.de/mozilla-bug-01.html
Mozilla uses 100% cpu time on this page.
- Holger
task manager is at 100% CPU usage in build 3-10.. w2k.
-Dennis
Dan Howard wrote:
Tim Ashman wrote:
I've gotta say, nice job guys. I've been using .98 for awhile and .99
the mail/news seems faster when loading messages. I've liked the
browser for awhile.
Keep up the good work.
I just got it going, too. Yes, this is really 0.9.9, from the
Windows specific?? I am using linux.
dman84 wrote:
Travis Crump wrote:
WFM, mozilla uses just as much CPU as it normally does.
Holger Metzger wrote:
http://www.ohrbelag.de/mozilla-bug-01.html
Mozilla uses 100% cpu time on this page.
- Holger
task manager is at 100% CPU usage in
Its there under Linux. Are you sure you have Compose in HTML checked
under Mail/news Prefernces-Account?
He'd better not have it checked for posting to /this/ NG ;-)
Uhm... here everyone uses Mozilla, and everybody seems to be pretty
educated. I don't share this HTML fear of some people.
Christian Biesinger wrote:
daa wrote:
some ISPs are echoing them, but they are really local newsgroup and
not part
of
usenet ( as are any groups not in (news|alt|sci|comp|net)
So the usenet is only for english-speaking groups and, for example, de.*
are not part of it?
AIUI, yes.
Blake Ross wrote:
I will tell you this, if AOL did change it's customers to Netscape,
MSN business booms.
You're so naive to believe that any of the 30 million users will even
notice the switch. Sounds like you're preparing your backup story
should this story turn out to be true.
David Grant wrote:
It was also on the Register, which I think is a pretty reputable source.
Netscape Basher wrote:
Thomas typed:
Sounds too good to be true. I would like to see an official statement
from aol. Or can you confirm this as a fact? :)
Blake Ross wrote:
A browser shift
Are there mirror sites besides ftp.mozilla.org?
I just downloaded the nightlies and had a hell of time getting them
downloaded and I have broadband. Shows a lot of interest in the
official release of .9.9
Which is good.
--
Kyle
Netscape's hardest to please customer
Jason Parker wrote:
Dan Howard wrote:
Tim Ashman wrote:
I've gotta say, nice job guys. I've been using .98 for awhile and .99
the mail/news seems faster when loading messages. I've liked the
browser for awhile.
Keep up the good work.
I just got it going, too. Yes, this is really
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
