should *do* about this - I've always
just chalked it up as the cost of having a secure password. Perhaps an
option to always prompt for the password when you first start mozilla?
Stuart.
--
Stuart Ballard, Programmer
NetReach - Internet Solutions
(215) 283-2300, ext. 126
http://www.netreach.com/
Martin Fritsche wrote:
Stuart Ballard wrote:
I'm not sure what I think Mozilla should *do* about this - I've always
just chalked it up as the cost of having a secure password. Perhaps an
option to always prompt for the password when you first start mozilla?
Stuart.
Preferences
of
Lords and the theoretical veto power of the Queen if you really wanted
to).
Of course, Christianity isn't mandated in the UK, but it is the state
religion. That's about the closest you can get to a meaningful answer
to what is dangerously close to a meaningless question.
Stuart.
--
Stuart Ballard
going to make the distinction between 7.0 with Netscape
Gecko versus 7.0?
When was the last AOL version that didn't end in .0, I wonder? Perhaps
AOL should trademark all version numbers ending in point oh... ;)
Stuart.
--
Stuart Ballard, Programmer
NetReach - Internet Solutions
(215) 283-2300, ext
(with
the jar files removed entirely) and patchmaker sitting in the same place
as the beonex binary, all ready to go.
--
Stuart Ballard, Programmer
FASTNET - Internet Solutions
215.283.2300, ext. 126
www.fast.net
to do it by
hand anyway you might as well just run the commands yourself. It's
simpler that way anyway. And if you're doing it by hand all the dirname
and $dist_bin stuff becomes redundant since you *know* what the
directories are called.
Stuart.
--
Stuart Ballard, Programmer
FASTNET - Internet
is
saying should this turn out to be true. If an netscape person who
*works* on gecko hasn't had it confirmed to him, it seems somewhat
unlikely that anything is set in stone yet.
Or maybe Blake does know, but just isn't allowed to *say* so yet...
Stuart.
--
Stuart Ballard, Programmer
FASTNET - Internet
even care, you'll notice that Gerv *wasn't* agreeing
with you: he implied pretty clearly that you don't understand the
release-numbering system. A correction from someone with an mozilla.org
email address ought to be enough for you, oughtn't it?
Stuart.
--
Stuart Ballard, Programmer
FASTNET
slightly wrong, but it's something like that.
--
Stuart Ballard, Programmer
FASTNET - Internet Solutions
215.283.2300, ext. 126
www.fast.net
wrong! :)
Stuart.
--
Stuart Ballard, Programmer
FASTNET - Internet Solutions
215.283.2300, ext. 126
www.fast.net
has changed incompatibly (as it
seems to have now) it might be a good time to require all new versions
of patchmaker to ignore lines they don't understand, so that this later
change *won't* be an incompatible one.
Stuart.
--
Stuart Ballard, Programmer
FASTNET - Internet Solutions
215.283.2300, ext
hasn't started yet. Either way they
*probably* won't be based on 0.9.8 - although I could be proven wrong.
Stuart.
--
Stuart Ballard, Programmer
FASTNET - Internet Solutions
215.283.2300, ext. 126
www.fast.net
the people asking
*intelligent* questions first, rather than the people demonstrating
nothing but laziness and still somehow expecting people to drop
everything and respond.
Stuart.
--
Stuart Ballard, Programmer
FASTNET - Internet Solutions
215.283.2300, ext. 126
www.fast.net
the
classic theme. Wait a week or so :)
Stuart.
--
Stuart Ballard, Programmer
FASTNET - Internet Solutions
215.283.2300, ext. 126
www.fast.net
Well gee, look at that.
5 replies full of facts, and JTK replies only to a (admittedly
justifiable) personal attack in a subthread.
Wanna take bets that he *will* respond to this, but *won't* go back and
respond to any of the 5 previous fact-laden posts?
Stuart.
--
Stuart Ballard
it? There's
plenty of other things to work on, as you admit.
Stuart.
--
Stuart Ballard, Programmer
FASTNET - Internet Solutions
215.283.2300, ext. 126
www.fast.net
/local/bin/pm is not executable. Try chmod +x
/usr/local/bin/pm.
Stuart.
--
Stuart Ballard, Programmer
FASTNET - Internet Solutions
215.283.2300, ext. 126
www.fast.net
George Wright wrote:
when I edit, add the line given above, save it and start moz, it
hasn't worked. checking the file, it seems the addition has been
overwritten - does mozilla overwrite this on startup?
It overwrites it on *exit* - was mozilla running when you made the
change?
The
JTK wrote:
jesus X wrote:
JTK wrote:
Huh? You mean where your Favorites are on the left side of the
screen? That's been in IE forever.
Yeah, but the Mozilla Sidebar is MUCH more than just a bookmarks pane.
No, it's little more, and not executed as well (eg, the IE ones
JTK wrote:
Static build refers to a build in which some of the DLLs (or shared
objects if you're on one of those 'alternative' OSs) are built as static
libraries and are statically linked into the program. What this does is
effectively make the library an intergral part of the program,
JTK wrote:
That's not true at all; you're making broad statements without providing
any support. Contributors to Mozilla can work on whatever they want.
Perhaps an AIM-compatible IM client? Yeah, didn't think so.
http://jabberzilla.mozdev.org/ - an AIM (and ICQ, and Yahoo, and IRC,
Chris Waterson wrote:
Christopher Blizzard wrote:
Getting a= hurts (probably you -- drivers@ -- more than me!), but I
think it did make a positive difference.
snip
I'll be a bit sorry to see it go. My $0.02.
aolMe too!/aol
Admittedly I've only ever made one patch to Mozilla, but it
RV wrote:
... an one more time Microsoft is caught with its pants down with their
latest FreeBSD (OPEN SOURCE) latest fiasco/embarrassment. I wonder about
how many lines of GPLed code might illegally reside in MS products as
well.. After all their EULA makes it illegal to
Fernando Cassia wrote:
Which brinds one question: why didn't Netscape just call the Mozilla
project Open Netscape and the browser Open Netscape. So
mozilla=netscape=netscape.
Because Netscape is a trademarked name and they want to have some
assurance as to what products get associated with
There is a note on bugzilla saying:
Bugzilla will be unavailable on Tuesday, June 12 for up to two hours
starting at 6pm for a system upgrade
But there's no mention of what timezone this 6pm refers to.
I'm assuming that this is in Pacific Time, but since Mozilla has
contributors from all over
Gervase Markham wrote:
You might like to update D's dup count as well, but you can't, because the
only place in C where it's recorded that it's a dup of D is the comments,
and parsing comments is icky and horrible.
AH. This is where my logic went wrong - I had assumed that it was easy
to
Gervase Markham wrote:
2) Couldn't this be accomplished more cleanly by adding a num_dups field
to the bug itself?
No, because if something is un-dupped you get trouble.
Why doesn't doing this just involve the reverse of the algorithm for
dupping: subtract a.num_dups+1 from b.num_dups?
Jesse Houwing wrote:
Netscape: We're in media, not browser business now
Much as I'd love to see some of the Netscape employees here comment on
what this means for the amount of resources NS/AOL/TW will put into
Mozilla, I'd be surprised if the answer would be anything other than we
can't
Rip Toren wrote:
It seems to me it has just become more obscure. The real problem seems
to be the server on port 25 accepting the mail for forwarding. That
input could come from a perl script, a telnet, or a custom program as
well as Mozilla. Maybe the connection should be blocked in Telnet
that other people in this thread have been asking for (and
also making duplicates.cgi VERY easy to implement...)
Stuart.
--
Stuart Ballard
Programmer
NetReach, Inc.: Single-Source Provider of Internet Solutions
One eCommerce Plaza
124 South Maple Street
Ambler, PA 19002
215.283-2300, x126
Chris Howells wrote:
I though that the procedure was like as follows:
untar Mozilla into /usr/local/mozilla
Run Mozilla once as root to allow it to set itself up
Mozilla should now be able to run as a non-root user by running
/usr/local/mozilla
I can't verify that this works with
Mitchell Baker wrote:
Got questions about the super-review process - what it's for, how it
works, what to expect? You may find answers in this new Code Review
FAQ. It's not yet linked to from other docs, but it will be shortly.
That FAQ is great!
I have a specific question that's vaguely
At home, I'm using 0.9 with helper apps quite successfully. My profile
at home was freshly created with 0.9.
At work, I have a profile that's been around since maybe M18 or before,
using 0.8, 0.8.1 and 0.9. Helper apps don't seem to work at all on this
setup - the ones I had set up previously
Christopher Jahn wrote:
And it came to pass that Stuart Ballard wrote:
Christopher Jahn wrote:
Call me a neanderthal, but WHAT'S WRONG WITH A GOOD OLD
FASHINED MECHANICAL EJECT BUTTON, THAT WORKS EVEN IF THE
COMPUTER SHUTS DOWN?
I don't know, but that's what drives me crazy about
Christopher Jahn wrote:
Call me a neanderthal, but WHAT'S WRONG WITH A GOOD OLD FASHINED
MECHANICAL EJECT BUTTON, THAT WORKS EVEN IF THE COMPUTER SHUTS
DOWN?
I don't know, but that's what drives me crazy about the CD drive on my
PC... which isn't a mac.
Stuart.
Peter Lairo wrote:
It seems that Mozilla now contains code that copies each url you visit
into a OS readable textfile that can then be read by anyone on the
internet (particulary Media Matrix).
This is crap. It means it can be read by any software ON YOUR MACHINE.
The textfield isn't
David Hallowell wrote:
Scott Tran wrote:
Stuart, there is a line but it doesn't remove the text from the Get
Message or Print in Mail as long as the back forward and Print in
Navigator if it is turned on basically any icon with a menu nwill not
get its text removed. I suggest you
I can probably figure this out for myself if I investigate hard enough
but I'm posting first because I'm sure that somebody has done this
before me and can just tell me the way to do it.
I assume there is something you can put in your userChrome.css file that
will set display:none on the text
JTK wrote:
Stuart Ballard wrote:
The chain of decision did not go "How can we make
a browser that's skinnable - I know, let's use XML for our user
interface". It went "Ooh - since we're using XML for our user interface,
we can make it skinnable!".
I don't bel
JTK wrote:
So let me get this straight: You're saying it's simply a matter of
degree? That a file save dialog is so 'semantically' similar across
platforms that wrapping the native one makes sense, but that a *text
box* is so wildly different that it doesn't? Or a ***scroll bar***?!?!
JTK wrote:
Well, that only brings up two more questions:
1. Why does Mozilla not need such control over the open/save dialog?
Why is this not skinnable like literally everything else is? Doesn't
that violate the whole design concept of "skinnability"?
Skinnability was not the "design
"Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T." wrote:
While Beonex efforts are all well and good. They are targeting "only"
the "Windows" Market.
I've been in touch with them and the have stated unequivocally. "We have
no interest at this time in developing a Mac version of Beonex".
Utter crap. I've seen
Daniel Veditz wrote:
No, I don't (and giving out data might run afoul of our privacy statement
anyway) -- I just noticed it while tracking down crashes. A surprising
number, though.
Perhaps some of these were people who fell afoul of the fact that for a
significant part of a day, Netscape's
"benway.com" wrote:
I've got a quandry. I loath the "commercial" N6 is going to be. I love
what Mozilla is and will be. I've been using Moz nightlies since the
beginning. What I'm wondering is: Will I be able to settle in with
Mozilla and STAY with it? I don't want to convert
Frank Hecker wrote:
Garth Wallace wrote:
Doesn't "The Cathedral and the Bazaar" cover the decision
to make Moz open source?
Not really; it just discusses the aftermath of the decision.
Is this a new version of CatB? I thought that esr's article *inspired*
the release of the code, and
Gervase Markham wrote (on the topic of "qa" being interpreted as "QA"):
hahahahahahhaa this is a good one, I'll remember it.
I wouldn't laugh. Many people make the same mistake. That's why the new
version will be called ".quality". :-)
Hmm. I didn't think of this during the original
Mark Anderson wrote:
Stuart Ballard wrote:
Hmm. I didn't think of this during the original discussions on newsgroup
renaming, but suddenly I can imagine the new ".quality" group getting
posts like:
"Netscape is such poor quality!!!"
How about ".
Robbie wrote:
span id="winloc" style="position:relative; visibility:hide"
form name="winform"
img src="gifs/seeme.gif"
select name="seloc" size="1" onChange="javascript:warp()"
option value="bestsellers.asp"best sellers/option
option value="boxes.asp"boxes/option
/select
/form
/span
"Simon P. Lucy" wrote:
It is an optimal solution if you define optimal to be the best possible cost
versus benefit. Most users use win9x which has virtually NO "Permission
management". Anyhow, the password would be far from not doing "anything". 99%
of unintentional or novice snooping is
Gervase Markham wrote:
No. Because Newsgroups are a "pull" mechanism, you can't do something like
this. Hence the planned "auto-add-FAQ-URL" magic for some of the new
newsgroups.
Could we also do something inside the robo-moderator along the lines of
checking whether the poster has posted
jesus X wrote:
I frequently see people with 200 MHz Pentiums (and even the occasional 486)
complain about Mozilla (among other apps) running slowly on their machine.
Ditto with people who have 16 or 32 megs of RAM. I don't mean to offend, but
expecting modern apps to run on hardware that is
"Sebastian Späth" wrote:
Yes, it is indeed a controversal statement and I don't agree with it
(and not only because my personal computer falls into that 233 Mhz
category :-)).
My computer is 600Mhz with 128Mb, and I *still* agree.
An app should use the amount of memory / resources
"Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T." wrote:
Netscape Communicator has an option to turn this on or off. So Netscape
can inflict this on readers at the other end. Its easily found in
Preferences. I've left it off because of the experience I've had with
it. I'm not sadistic like that.
Have you tried
"Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T." wrote:
I've set preferences to use Quoted Printable and sent a message both in
HTML and Plaintext. I've also turned it back off and sent a test in html
and plaintext . No difference in show Full header information show this
on all my test post
54 matches
Mail list logo
