Martin Fritsche wrote:
>
> Stuart Ballard wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure what I think Mozilla should *do* about this - I've always
> > just chalked it up as the cost of having a secure password. Perhaps an
> > option to always prompt for the password when yo
ing to *read* the comments, and had no intention of posting one.
I'm not sure what I think Mozilla should *do* about this - I've always
just chalked it up as the cost of having a secure password. Perhaps an
option to always prompt for the password when you first start mozilla?
Stuart.
--
an get to a meaningful answer
to what is dangerously close to a meaningless question.
Stuart.
--
Stuart Ballard, Programmer
NetReach - Internet Solutions
(215) 283-2300, ext. 126
http://www.netreach.com/
;re using... is an
AOL user really going to make the distinction between "7.0 with Netscape
Gecko" versus "7.0"?
When was the last AOL version that didn't end in .0, I wonder? Perhaps
AOL should trademark all version numbers ending in "point oh"... ;)
Stuart.
--
Stua
ker-ready binary
tarballs. These would come with the chrome directory pre-unjarred (with
the jar files removed entirely) and patchmaker sitting in the same place
as the beonex binary, all ready to go.
--
Stuart Ballard, Programmer
FASTNET - Internet Solutions
215.283.2300, ext. 126
www.fast.net
e.com email address is
saying "should this turn out to be true". If an @netscape person who
*works* on gecko hasn't had it confirmed to him, it seems somewhat
unlikely that anything is set in stone yet.
Or maybe Blake does know, but just isn't allowed to *say* so yet...
Stuar
at this script would come
with mozilla so you wouldn't have to create it; if you have to do it by
hand anyway you might as well just run the commands yourself. It's
simpler that way anyway. And if you're doing it by hand all the dirname
and $dist_bin stuff becomes redundant sin
hose publically available builds, because they're outside the netscape
firewall.
Oh, and in case you even care, you'll notice that Gerv *wasn't* agreeing
with you: he implied pretty clearly that you "don't understand" the
release-numbering system. A correction from so
g.cgi?id=$1
I may have the syntax slightly wrong, but it's something like that.
--
Stuart Ballard, Programmer
FASTNET - Internet Solutions
215.283.2300, ext. 126
www.fast.net
ture really requires complexity to implement it,
unfortunately. Feel free to prove me wrong! :)
Stuart.
--
Stuart Ballard, Programmer
FASTNET - Internet Solutions
215.283.2300, ext. 126
www.fast.net
ut it does require a change in
the chromelist syntax. If the syntax has changed incompatibly (as it
seems to have now) it might be a good time to require all new versions
of patchmaker to ignore lines they don't understand, so that this later
change *won't* be an incompatible one.
St
I've seen two of them...
You mean like http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122411 ?
The scary thing is that there actually seems to be a serious attempt at
addressing the issue!
Stuart.
--
Stuart Ballard, Programmer
FASTNET - Internet Solutions
215.283.2300, ext. 126
www.fast.net
enough away that detailed
feature-planning for the betas hasn't started yet. Either way they
*probably* won't be based on 0.9.8 - although I could be proven wrong.
Stuart.
--
Stuart Ballard, Programmer
FASTNET - Internet Solutions
215.283.2300, ext. 126
www.fast.net
7;re going to answer the people asking
*intelligent* questions first, rather than the people demonstrating
nothing but laziness and still somehow expecting people to drop
everything and respond.
Stuart.
--
Stuart Ballard, Programmer
FASTNET - Internet Solutions
215.283.2300, ext. 126
www.fast.net
P theme, bright colors and all, if you use the
classic theme. Wait a week or so :)
Stuart.
--
Stuart Ballard, Programmer
FASTNET - Internet Solutions
215.283.2300, ext. 126
www.fast.net
Well gee, look at that.
5 replies full of facts, and JTK replies only to a (admittedly
justifiable) personal attack in a subthread.
Wanna take bets that he *will* respond to this, but *won't* go back and
respond to any of the 5 previous fact-laden posts?
Stuart.
--
Stuart Ba
I am doing wrong?
This suggests that /usr/local/bin/pm is not executable. Try chmod +x
/usr/local/bin/pm.
Stuart.
--
Stuart Ballard, Programmer
FASTNET - Internet Solutions
215.283.2300, ext. 126
www.fast.net
e effort will be devoted to achieving the same thing with memory
usage. I don't know whether Mozilla will ever be a great performer on
32Mb machines, but I'm sure it will be great on 64Mb machines within a
year - despite *more* features being added to it in the interim.
> Like the cache? I beat that drum. Like the news editor? I'm pretty
> vocal about that too. What say you AOL should fix, Lord?
Well, that seems to me to be a pretty good reason not to waste time
rewriting everything from the ground up without XUL, doesn't it? There's
plenty of other things to work on, as you admit.
Stuart.
--
Stuart Ballard, Programmer
FASTNET - Internet Solutions
215.283.2300, ext. 126
www.fast.net
George Wright wrote:
>
> when I edit, add the line given above, save it and start moz, it
> hasn't worked. checking the file, it seems the addition has been
> overwritten - does mozilla overwrite this on startup?
It overwrites it on *exit* - was mozilla running when you made the
change?
The c
JTK wrote:
>
> jesus X wrote:
> >
> > JTK wrote:
> > > Huh? You mean where your "Favorites" are on the left side of the
> > > screen? That's been in IE forever.
> >
> > Yeah, but the Mozilla Sidebar is MUCH more than just a bookmarks pane.
>
> No, it's little more, and not executed as well (eg
JTK wrote:
>
> > That's not true at all; you're making broad statements without providing
> > any support. Contributors to Mozilla can work on whatever they want.
>
> Perhaps an AIM-compatible IM client? Yeah, didn't think so.
http://jabberzilla.mozdev.org/ - an AIM (and ICQ, and Yahoo, and I
JTK wrote:
>
> "Static build" refers to a build in which some of the DLLs (or shared
> objects if you're on one of those 'alternative' OSs) are built as static
> libraries and are statically linked into the program. What this does is
> effectively make the library an intergral part of the progra
Chris Waterson wrote:
>
> Christopher Blizzard wrote:
>
> Getting a= hurts (probably you -- drivers@ -- more than me!), but I
> think it did make a positive difference.
> I'll be a bit sorry to see it go. My $0.02.
Me too!
Admittedly I've only ever made one patch to Mozilla, but it was duri
RV wrote:
>
> ... an one more time Microsoft is caught with its pants down with their
> latest FreeBSD (OPEN SOURCE) latest fiasco/embarrassment. I wonder about
> how many lines of GPLed code might illegally reside in MS products as
> well.. After all their EULA makes it illegal to disassemble/
JTK wrote:
>
> Garth Wallace wrote:
> >
> > No. Webmail access, like AIM and Net2Phone, is one of the features that
> > Netscape adds to Netscape 6.x but does not contribute to Mozilla.
>
> That doesn't sound very "Open" of them. Oh that's right, the whole
> "Open" thing was a sham from the get
Garth Wallace wrote:
>
> JTK wrote:
>
> > I think it was Gerv or Garth telling me that. I'll see if'n I can find
> > one of the many quotes.
>
> I'd certainly like to see if you can back that assertion up...
I suspect what was actually said was "Netscape Communicator" or
"Netscape 4.x" is tot
Garth Wallace wrote:
>
> A Concerned Denizen wrote:
>
> > I am using the latest release build of Mozilla 0.91 {2001060703}Win32.
> >
> > Can I download my Netscape WebMail imap account with Mozilla?
> > It looks like I have all of my settings correct, but fail to connect
> > to server.
>
> No.
Fernando Cassia wrote:
>
> Which brinds one question: why didn't Netscape just call the Mozilla
> project "Open Netscape" and the browser "Open Netscape". So
> mozilla=netscape=netscape.
Because Netscape is a trademarked name and they want to have some
assurance as to what products get associate
There is a note on bugzilla saying:
"Bugzilla will be unavailable on Tuesday, June 12 for up to two hours
starting at 6pm for a system upgrade"
But there's no mention of what timezone this 6pm refers to.
I'm assuming that this is in Pacific Time, but since Mozilla has
contributors from all over
Gervase Markham wrote:
>
> You might like to update D's dup count as well, but you can't, because the
> only place in C where it's recorded that it's a dup of D is the comments,
> and parsing comments is icky and horrible.
AH. This is where my logic went wrong - I had assumed that it was easy
to
Gervase Markham wrote:
>
> > 2) Couldn't this be accomplished more cleanly by adding a num_dups field
> > to the bug itself?
>
> No, because if something is un-dupped you get trouble.
Why doesn't doing this just involve the reverse of the algorithm for
dupping: subtract a.num_dups+1 from b.num_
Jesse Houwing wrote:
>
> Netscape: We're in media, not browser business now
Much as I'd love to see some of the Netscape employees here comment on
what this means for the amount of resources NS/AOL/TW will put into
Mozilla, I'd be surprised if the answer would be anything other than "we
can't co
Stuart Ballard wrote:
>
> I have to wonder though if there's a better way to solve this bug than
> just block access to port 25. Isn't it sufficient to refuse to connect
> to an ftp URL if CR or LF appear in the username or password (because
> those characters are pa
Rip Toren wrote:
>
> It seems to me it has just become more obscure. The real problem seems
> to be the server on port 25 accepting the mail for forwarding. That
> input could come from a perl script, a telnet, or a custom program as
> well as Mozilla. Maybe the connection should be blocked in Te
ry page, providing
the abilities that other people in this thread have been asking for (and
also making duplicates.cgi VERY easy to implement...)
Stuart.
--
Stuart Ballard
Programmer
NetReach, Inc.: Single-Source Provider of Internet Solutions
One eCommerce Plaza
124 South Maple Street
Amb
NeTDeMoN wrote:
>
> the tag is cool because it aligns both inline and block data. Is
> there a way to do a css markup that does the same things as center does?
>
> I know there is div.centerme {text-align: center} which only works on inline
> data and then there is div.centerme { margin-left: a
Charlie Zender wrote:
>
> I tried this but it did not work.
> First, I found my prefs.js in
>
> ~/.mozilla/zender/a4lk0swo.slt/prefs.js
>
> It contains a warning that it is a generated file.
> Sure enough, when I quit and restart mozilla, the changes
> I made manually are no longer there. What'
Chris Howells wrote:
>
> I was able to do all up to here...
>
> > touch chrome/user-{skins,locales}.rdf
>
> But I didn't really understand this bit I'm afraid. The only rdf files
> under chrome/ are:
>
> chris@venus: chrome$ ls *.rdf
> all-locales.rdf all-packages.rdf all-skins.rdf user-lo
Chris Howells wrote:
>
> I though that the procedure was like as follows:
>
> untar Mozilla into /usr/local/mozilla
>
> Run Mozilla once as root to allow it to set itself up
>
> Mozilla should now be able to run as a non-root user by running
> /usr/local/mozilla
I can't verify that this works
Mitchell Baker wrote:
>
> Got questions about the "super-review" process - what it's for, how it
> works, what to expect? You may find answers in this new Code Review
> FAQ. It's not yet linked to from other docs, but it will be shortly.
That FAQ is great!
I have a specific question that's va
At home, I'm using 0.9 with helper apps quite successfully. My profile
at home was freshly created with 0.9.
At work, I have a profile that's been around since maybe M18 or before,
using 0.8, 0.8.1 and 0.9. Helper apps don't seem to work at all on this
setup - the ones I had set up previously don
Christopher Jahn wrote:
>
> And it came to pass that Stuart Ballard wrote:
>
> >Christopher Jahn wrote:
> >>
> >> Call me a neanderthal, but WHAT'S WRONG WITH A GOOD OLD
> >> FASHINED MECHANICAL EJECT BUTTON, THAT WORKS EVEN IF THE
> >> C
Christopher Jahn wrote:
>
> Call me a neanderthal, but WHAT'S WRONG WITH A GOOD OLD FASHINED
> MECHANICAL EJECT BUTTON, THAT WORKS EVEN IF THE COMPUTER SHUTS
> DOWN?
I don't know, but that's what drives me crazy about the CD drive on my
PC... which isn't a mac.
Stuart.
Peter Lairo wrote:
>
> It seems that Mozilla now contains code that copies each url you visit
> into a OS readable textfile that can then be read by anyone on the
> internet (particulary Media Matrix).
This is crap. It means it can be read by any software ON YOUR MACHINE.
The textfield isn't exp
David Hallowell wrote:
>
> Scott Tran wrote:
>
> >>
> > Stuart, there is a line but it doesn't remove the text from the Get
> > Message or Print in Mail as long as the back forward and Print in
> > Navigator if it is turned on basically any icon with a menu nwill not
> > get its text removed. I
I can probably figure this out for myself if I investigate hard enough
but I'm posting first because I'm sure that somebody has done this
before me and can just tell me the way to do it.
I assume there is something you can put in your userChrome.css file that
will set display:none on the text lab
JTK wrote:
>
> So let me get this straight: You're saying it's simply a matter of
> degree? That a file save dialog is so 'semantically' similar across
> platforms that wrapping the native one makes sense, but that a *text
> box* is so wildly different that it doesn't? Or a ***scroll bar***?!?!
JTK wrote:
>
> Stuart Ballard wrote:
> >
> > The chain of decision did not go "How can we make
> > a browser that's skinnable - I know, let's use XML for our user
> > interface". It went "Ooh - since we're using XML for our user interfa
JTK wrote:
>
> Well, that only brings up two more questions:
>
> 1. Why does Mozilla not need such control over the open/save dialog?
> Why is this not skinnable like literally everything else is? Doesn't
> that violate the whole design concept of "skinnability"?
Skinnability was not the "des
Eric Hanson wrote:
>
> Thanks for the info. I am unsure whether to submit an enhancement bug
> to Bugzilla or not.
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68314
It already exists :)
Stuart.
"Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T." wrote:
>
> While Beonex efforts are all well and good. They are targeting "only"
> the "Windows" Market.
>
> I've been in touch with them and the have stated unequivocally. "We have
> no interest at this time in developing a Mac version of Beonex".
Utter crap. I've se
Daniel Veditz wrote:
>
> No, I don't (and giving out data might run afoul of our privacy statement
> anyway) -- I just noticed it while tracking down crashes. A surprising
> number, though.
Perhaps some of these were people who fell afoul of the fact that for a
significant part of a day, Netscap
"benway.com" wrote:
>
> I've got a quandry. I loath the "commercial" N6 is going to be. I love
> what Mozilla is and will be. I've been using Moz nightlies since the
> beginning. What I'm wondering is: Will I be able to settle in with
> Mozilla and STAY with it? I don't want to conv
Frank Hecker wrote:
>
> Garth Wallace wrote:
> > Doesn't "The Cathedral and the Bazaar" cover the decision
> > to make Moz open source?
>
> Not really; it just discusses the aftermath of the decision.
Is this a new version of CatB? I thought that esr's article *inspired*
the release of the code
NeTDeMoN wrote:
>
> Same here. ???
> "Myke Geiger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Okay - I've been following mozilla for a *VERY* long time... but I've
> > never seen mention of this site till now
> >
> > > http://mozillaquest.com
Mark Anderson wrote:
>
> Stuart Ballard wrote:
> >
> > Hmm. I didn't think of this during the original discussions on newsgroup
> > renaming, but suddenly I can imagine the new ".quality" group getting
> > posts like:
> >
> > "Netscap
Gervase Markham wrote (on the topic of "qa" being interpreted as "Q&A"):
>
> > hahahahahahhaa this is a good one, I'll remember it.
>
> I wouldn't laugh. Many people make the same mistake. That's why the new
> version will be called ".quality". :-)
Hmm. I didn't think of this during the origina
Christian Mattar wrote:
>
> I don't understand how this is supposed to work.
> Perhaps the location where the anchor would lead to could blink on the
> scrollbar.
Does Mozilla still allow javascript to overwrite this location? If so,
putting the js status message somewhere else (so the target is
Olaf Titz wrote:
>
> > But then the owners of the original Mosaic said, `Here! You can't use
> > our name!' And Jim and Marc said, `Fine then, see if we care!', and they
> > changed the name of Netscape Mosaic to `the Netscape Navigator'. And
> > they determined that their browser would be the `M
Robbie wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> best sellers
> boxes
>
>
>
IANAHE (I am not an HTML expert) but I can see one obvious possible
reason for this:
is an inline element, and is a block-level element. You
aren't supposed to have block-level elements inside inline elements.
Try replacing the wit
Sorry for the partially OT post, but I was wondering if anybody here
knew how cvs-mirror.mozilla.org is done.
I would like to set up a readonly mirror of the cvs repository for my
projects, but I can't find any documentation anywhere (I tried all cvs
docs I could find and searched the web) on how
Christoph Bratschi wrote:
>
> rvj wrote:
> >
> > Under IE I used two element to separate elements i.e. to generate
> > a single line space
> >
> > However under Mozilla this generates two lines spaces. Since is not
> > well formed what should I use to generate single line spacing?
I don't be
elbarto wrote:
>
> do not install a nightly at the moment. they are very buggy. install
> mozilla 0.6. www.mozilla.org
The original poster was asking for something better than NS6
(specifically, an NS 6.01 release). Suggesting Mozilla 0.6 is fairly
pointless because it's almost exactly the same
"Simon P. Lucy" wrote:
>
> >It is an optimal solution if you define optimal to be the best possible cost
> >versus benefit. Most users use win9x which has virtually NO "Permission
> >management". Anyhow, the password would be far from not doing "anything". 99%
> >of unintentional or novice snoopi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I know there is a tag in IE Autocomplete="off". . .
> > We need this as a security issue for credit card # entry. Is there a
>
> I hope to God that you're not putting something that sensitive in a URL.
> If so, you're not asking for trou
Gervase Markham wrote:
>
> No. Because Newsgroups are a "pull" mechanism, you can't do something like
> this. Hence the planned "auto-add-FAQ-URL" magic for some of the new
> newsgroups.
Could we also do something inside the robo-moderator along the lines of
checking whether the poster has poste
Henri Sivonen wrote:
>
> Currently, www.mozilla.org indeed encourages the use of milestones and
> makes nightly build appear scary. Rather than asking potential users
> (who might also be potential contributors!) take a hike, the importance
> of milestones could be downplayed and links could be m
jesus X wrote:
>
> I agree that optimizations need to be made, we all know that. But to what level
> should we drop to support wise? How slow a machine do we really need to code
> for? If we want to code for slow Pentiums with 32MB of RAM, why not 486's with
> 16? I just think it's time to cut lo
jesus X wrote:
>
> I frequently see people with 200 MHz Pentiums (and even the occasional 486)
> complain about Mozilla (among other apps) running slowly on their machine.
> Ditto with people who have 16 or 32 megs of RAM. I don't mean to offend, but
> expecting modern apps to run on hardware tha
"Sebastian Späth" wrote:
>
> Yes, it is indeed a controversal statement and I don't agree with it
> (and not only because my personal computer falls into that 233 Mhz
> category :-)).
My computer is 600Mhz with 128Mb, and I *still* agree.
An app should use the amount of memory / resources neces
"Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T." wrote:
>
> I've set preferences to use Quoted Printable and sent a message both in
> HTML and Plaintext. I've also turned it back off and sent a test in html
> and plaintext . No difference in show Full header information show this
> on all my test post Content-Transfer
"Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T." wrote:
>
> Netscape Communicator has an option to turn this on or off. So Netscape
> can inflict this on readers at the other end. Its easily found in
> Preferences. I've left it off because of the experience I've had with
> it. I'm not sadistic like that.
Have you tri
Charles Borner wrote:
>
> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17-21mdk i686; en-US; m18) Gecko/20001121
>
> After opening Mozilla, I go into GTop and notice that there are four (4)
> instances of Mozilla running. All with identical amounts of memory
> usage. Current usage on my machine as reported
Asa Dotzler wrote:
>
> > Do you really think that anyone is going to say, "Oh it's open source, they
> > don't understand what customers are, much less need, so we'll let them
> > off.'?
(Let me turn that around - do you expect us to say "Oh, it's John Welch,
he doesn't understand that open sour
perhaps, is that other people
were running out of patience, since you are at least the fifth person
(that I remember) to address this issue in the last month or two.
> On 11/28/00 11:05 AM, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Stuart
> Ballard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
John Welch wrote:
>
> On 11/27/00 5:28 PM, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Stuart
> Ballard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 1) Persuade Netscape to let these Netscape engineers write it for
> > Mozilla. Just because it's in Mozilla doesn't me
John Welch wrote:
>
> If the only feedback on bugs comes from Mozilla, and Netscape is saying that
> NS6 is Mozilla with some AOL-ish features, and the only useful bug info
> comes from Mozilla, and Netscape's attitude is, we'll foist it off on
> Mozilla, guess what you are telling corporate Amer
77 matches
Mail list logo
