Kryptolus C.L. wrote:
> psmith wrote:
>
>>Your downloading and checking out Cookie Pal was most appreciated.
>> Thanks for helping to explain what you see as the problem that
>> Mozilla has in receiving information about cookies from Windows
>> messages.
Christian Mattar wrote:
>Hi!
>
>psmith wrote:
>
>>Christian Mattar wrote:
>>
>>>Hi!
>>>
>>>psmith wrote:
>>>
>>>(psmith's ranbling snipped)
>>>
>>>I just checked, Mozilla's and Communicator cookie-fi
Christian Mattar wrote:
>Hi!
>
>psmith wrote:
>
>(psmith's ranbling snipped)
>
>I just checked, Mozilla's and Communicator cookie-files look exactly the
>same, the< use the same spec from
><http://www.netscape.com/newsref/std/cookie_spec.html>. I s
Mike Gratton wrote:
>
>
> psmith wrote:
> > So I suppose the real problem must be that the ignorant Mozilla
> > programmers don't know how to incorporate these features.
>
> No, the real problem is that Mozilla's programmers have better things to
>
My response was based on your being rude and also saying "I'm not sure
what you're on about:" Maybe you are English or maybe you are
fantasizing that you are, who knows
Anyhow, I am saying a pretty simple thing here. I don't expect
Mozilla to do a great job as the latest and greatest
Christopher Jahn wrote:
>And it came to pass that psmith wrote:
>
>(long rambling and partly incoherent tireade snipped)
>
>I'm not sure what you're on about: Mozilla's present Cookie
>management is leaps and bounds beyond Communicator's.
>
>If you&
a proprietary cookie handling method. I would prefer this tiny piece of
text that is transmitted back and forth, conveying habits or activities
or previously filled in entries, to be handled by the much praised
software Cookie Pal, Cookie Crusher, or any other 3rd party shareware
cookie blocki
ahmetaa wrote:
> did you check multizilla? maybe it has that.
>
>
> psmith wrote:
>
>>
>> Neither option would allow any reloading initiated by the website. I
>> suppose I left out a default option for not altering the web site's
>> reloading at a
Netscape Basher wrote:
> psmith typed:
>
>> Sören Kuklau wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/9/2002 2:26 PM, psmith apparently wrote exactly the following:
>>>
>>>> Neither option would allow any reloading initiated by the website.
>>>> I
Sören Kuklau wrote:
> On 3/9/2002 2:26 PM, psmith apparently wrote exactly the following:
>
>> Neither option would allow any reloading initiated by the website. I
>> suppose I left out a default option for not altering the web site's
>> reloading at all.
>
&
Neither option would allow any reloading initiated by the website. I suppose
I left out a default option for not altering the web site's reloading at
all. THANK YOU FOR IMPLEMENTING THIS FOR ME SOON!
psmith wrote:
>Mozilla cookie handling is too restrictive and annoying and would
> be much better if it were operating the standard way that Netscape 4
> and Internet Explorer do. Anyone who has used Cookie Pal for example
> knows how much smarter it can handle cookies. I
much better if it were operating the standard way that Netscape 4 and
Internet Explorer do. Anyone who has used Cookie Pal for example knows
how much smarter it can handle cookies. I am seriously considering
permanently getting away from Mozilla and not looking back because of
this problem.
Ortwin Glück wrote:
> Looking at the bug statistics at
>
>
>http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/reports.cgi?product=-All-&output=show_chart&datasets=NEW%3A&datasets=ASSIGNED%3A&datasets=REOPENED%3A&datasets=UNCONFIRMED%3A&links=1&banner=1
>
>
>
> Bugs are taking over!
>
> Fact:
> The number of bugs is
JTK wrote:
> Blake Ross wrote:
>
>> Maybe you "totally expect" tabs. The general IE-using population
>> doesn't.
>>
>
> For once Blake's right[1]: tabs are an almost-completely unused
> feature. Which is why somebody thought they'd spend all kinds of
> effort putting them in instead of addre
expected, for example. If you want to pick up some new people, your
tabs will need to save themselves at exit and you should make the tabs
schedule reloads (so the user gets updates when HE wants) for serious
users of a browser for research and that will be part of raising the
status of Mozil
16 matches
Mail list logo
