> and I got rid of the undesired text...but the margins still exist.
> I need to print clean pages, without any margins and without any
> additional text.
> Has any of you a solution for this?
You may be out of luck. At the 0.9.5 stage, our printing wasn't brilliant.
In
Hi
I must write some web pages for the Nokia Media Terminal which is
using Mozilla 0.9.5. But the Page setup option is missing. So by
default the printed pages will have a margin and in all 4 corners of
the page will be printed also the name of the page, the url of the
page, the page number and
ve been testing LiveConnect on Mozilla 0.9.5 using Sun's 1.3.1 JRE on
> RedHat 7.1 Linux. All I did to get Suns JRE installed was:
>
> # rpm -ivv jre-1.3.1_i386.rpm
> # ln -s /usr/java/jre/libjavaplugin.so /mozilla/dist/bin/plugins
>
> I've been using the t
I've been testing LiveConnect on Mozilla 0.9.5 using Sun's 1.3.1 JRE on
RedHat 7.1 Linux. All I did to get Suns JRE installed was:
# rpm -ivv jre-1.3.1_i386.rpm
# ln -s /usr/java/jre/libjavaplugin.so /mozilla/dist/bin/plugins
I've been using the testcases from
Thanks Ben. I experienced the same problems Matt described on 0.9.6.
Your workaround (I guess that's what it is) made it work for me.
Ben Ruppel (slate) wrote:
> I have been able to work around the plugin copying procedure by adding
> this to my user.js file:
> user_pref("plugin.do_JRE_Plugin_
Joni K. wrote:
> Fabian Schach wrote:
>
>
>>Focus stealing has never been a feature, it was a bug, but it is fixed.
>>It definitely does not happen on Windows 98 anymore. You should try
>>Mozilla 0.9.6 or a newer build, and maybe you should create and use a
>>new profile. If the problems don't
> i have more than one browser windows opened
> in the focused window i click on a link and right after clicking
> i change focus to another browser window.
> after a short while the other window steals the focus back.
> when i change the focus again immediately the other window steals it
> back
This problem seem to appear in several milesstones:
i have more than one browser windows opened
in the focused window i click on a link and right after clicking
i change focus to another browser window.
after a short while the other window steals the focus back.
when i change the focus again imme
Hi
I had installed Mozilla 0.9.5 and The SUN JDK 1.3.
This Configuration workes without any problems, but since a few days i get
allways a message "Load Applet" but nothing happened.
I do not change anything on mozilla or JAVA ( because the user i use do not
have rights to do that )
; wrote:
>>>> http://www.testequity.com/
>>>
>>>I'd guess this is FreeBSD-specific because, on Red Hat 7.2, it looks
>>>just right in Mozilla and far too small in 4.x.
>>>
>>>Gerv
>>>
>>I'm using RedHat 6.2, and I'm
cause, on Red Hat 7.2, it looks
>>just right in Mozilla and far too small in 4.x.
>>
>>Gerv
>>
>I'm using RedHat 6.2, and I'm experiencing the same thing. With 0.9.4
>everything looks fine, but with 0.9.5 small fonts gets unreadable.
I think I've foun
I have the same problem. My plugins are in the C:\PROGRAM
FILES\MOZILLA.ORG\MOZILLA\plugins\NPJava130_01c.dll directory. And no go.
Have you find the solution yet?
"Emre Tezel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
>
> Since I installed the Ne
Tim Wunder wrote:
> Jay Garcia wrote:
>
>> madog wrote:
>>
>>
>>> with the newest version 0.9.5+ (11.8), something new is added, as you
>>> can see in the pic attached
>>>
>>> the question is, how can it get rid of it ?
>>>
Jay Garcia wrote:
> madog wrote:
>
>
>>with the newest version 0.9.5+ (11.8), something new is added, as you
>>can see in the pic attached
>>
>>the question is, how can it get rid of it ?
>>this new function is not very useful to me and i have
madog wrote:
> with the newest version 0.9.5+ (11.8), something new is added, as you
> can see in the pic attached
>
> the question is, how can it get rid of it ?
> this new function is not very useful to me and i have not found any
> setting about it in the prefe
with the newest version 0.9.5+ (11.8), something new is added, as you
can see in the pic attached
the question is, how can it get rid of it ?
this new function is not very useful to me and i have not found any
setting about it in the preferences
thanks
Hi,
Since I installed the Netscape Java Plugin, Mozilla always hangs
whenever I go to web site with a java applet.
Does any body run into the same problem? Do I need to set any special
environment variables like CLASSPATH. I have JDK 1.3.1 installed.
Any help would be deeply appriciated.
Emr
edHat 6.2, and I'm experiencing the same thing. With 0.9.4
everything looks fine, but with 0.9.5 small fonts gets unreadable.
Steinar Kaarø
OK. Is there a list of things to do when a new release is cut?
Surely announcing this on n.p.m.announce this doesn't require
bureaucratic intervention...especially when it's announced on (yawn)
www.mozilla.org anyway.
?
Luke
een trying to get the Java plugin to install in Mozilla 0.9.5 /
> Windows 2000 - but no luck.
>
> If I go to a site that requires Java it asks me to click on the Icon to
> install the plugin - I do this and it downloads and installs the plugin
> into windows - tells me that it is in
Verry Good !! I hope that helps. Another possability would be to upgrade
to one of the newer "Mozilla daily Builds" See;
http://mozilla.org.
Art
requa wrote:
> In desperation, largely because I have a Java script in my personal home
> page that I wanted to be able to view, I eventually resu
e installer may have installed
>into it's directory. Do a search on "plugins" and look in all the directorys found.
>If you find it just copy the contents of the \plugins directory into the mozilla
>equivalent.
>>>>Art
>>>>
>>>>Matt H
In desperation, largely because I have a Java script in my personal home
page that I wanted to be able to view, I eventually resulted to the
following drastic measures, which seem to be working (on Win 98):
In Control Panel, I uninstalled Mozilla and all versions of Java listed.
Then I manually
the contents of the \plugins directory into the mozilla
>equivalent.
>>>Art
>>>
>>>Matt Hyne wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>I have been trying to get the Java plugin to install in Mozilla 0.9.5 / Windows
>2000 - but no luck.
>>>>If I go
ts of the \plugins directory into the mozilla
>equivalent.
>>Art
>>
>>Matt Hyne wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I have been trying to get the Java plugin to install in Mozilla 0.9.5 / Windows
>2000 - but no luck.
>>>If I go to a site that requires Java it
he contents of the \plugins directory into the mozilla
>equivalent.
>>Art
>>
>>Matt Hyne wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I have been trying to get the Java plugin to install in Mozilla 0.9.5 / Windows
>2000 - but no luck.
>>>If I go to a site that requires Java
27;s directory. Do a search on "plugins" and look in all the directorys found.
>If you find it just copy the contents of the \plugins directory into the mozilla
>equivalent.
>Art
>
>Matt Hyne wrote:
>
>>I have been trying to get the Java plugin to install in Mozi
>
> Which is supposed to be the mozilla plugin directory equivalent ?
>
>
>
>>Art
>>
>>Matt Hyne wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I have been trying to get the Java plugin to install in Mozilla 0.9.5 / Windows
>2000 - but no luck.
>>>If I go to
he contents of the \plugins directory into the mozilla
>equivalent.
Which is supposed to be the mozilla plugin directory equivalent ?
>Art
>
>Matt Hyne wrote:
>
>>I have been trying to get the Java plugin to install in Mozilla 0.9.5 / Windows 2000
>- but no luck.
>>If I g
yne wrote:
> I have been trying to get the Java plugin to install in Mozilla 0.9.5 /
> Windows 2000 - but no luck.
>
> If I go to a site that requires Java it asks me to click on the Icon to
> install the plugin - I do this and it downloads and installs the plugin
> into windows
I have been trying to get the Java plugin to install in Mozilla 0.9.5 /
Windows 2000 - but no luck.
If I go to a site that requires Java it asks me to click on the Icon to
install the plugin - I do this and it downloads and installs the plugin
into windows - tells me that it is installing it
try a new up-to date nightly. Delete any windows references to Mozilla
in the registry, uninstall 0.9.5 too, before installing a new nightly.
-dman84
ske wrote:
> Me: Win98SE, Athalon
>
> 0.9.5 Installs & runs for me fine.
>
> I've tried 3 or 4 of the nightlies sin
> http://www.testequity.com/
I'd guess this is FreeBSD-specific because, on Red Hat 7.2, it looks
just right in Mozilla and far too small in 4.x.
Gerv
0.9.5 Installs & runs for me fine.
I've tried 3 or 4 of the nightlies since then and get a GPF at startup,
every time. I recently moved the entire mozilla profile structure to
cause moz to create a new, virgin profile but even that didn't help. I'm
using a talkback nigh
er to
have a reasonable idea as to how things are going to look on Windows,
regardless of what other OS's get involved.
Just last night Mozilla 0.9.5 hit the FreeBSD ports tree. Galeon also
got updated to the latest support for this milestone as well. On both of
these browsers the font ren
The MSN site http://www.msn.com does show up in Netscape 6.1, but not
in Mozilla 0.9.5
I wonder why, if Netscape 6.1 (based on an earlier Mozilla release) can
render MSN, Microsoft thinks that Mozilla 0.9.5 is not "fit" enough to
do the same.
- Ajoy
gavin long wrote:
> A
"D. D. Brierton" wrote:
> They are available from galeon's sourceforge site:
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/galeon/
But note that installing a newer Mozilla using an RPM will totally hork
the Nautilus HTML viewer under RedHat 7.2. You might wait for an
unofficial update provided by rhcontri
"Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T." wrote:
>
> Well you know why that is: (Re)publicans are in charge of the White
> house and one chamber of Congress.
>
> If the Democrats ha d remained in WH and Congress MicroSoft would have
> chopped up in a Gazilliuon pieces now.
>
> (Re)publicans always favor big b
Well you know why that is: (Re)publicans are in charge of the White
house and one chamber of Congress.
If the Democrats ha d remained in WH and Congress MicroSoft would have
chopped up in a Gazilliuon pieces now.
(Re)publicans always favor big business and scr**ing the little people.
Al Rider w
gavin long wrote:
> Under
> current EU Law, that brings the possibility of a rather hefty fine. I've
> seen figures of $1-2 Billion mentioned. That would make even
> Microsoft's eyes water.
Yeah. Bill might have to forego his after dinner mints for months ...
That's why I put the "won" in quotes. Technically, MS hasn't won per se; but
practically they have won the US federal case.
In additon to the federal suit, several states are actively persuing their
own suit against MS.
Let's all hope someone suceeds and competition returns to the software
indu
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "eeevans"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Same thing happens with the 0.9.4 rpm files.
>
> eeevans wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to upgrade to 0.9.5 using the rpm files for RedHat7.2 and run
>> the command rpm
Same thing happens with the 0.9.4 rpm files.
eeevans wrote:
> I'm trying to upgrade to 0.9.5 using the rpm files for RedHat7.2 and run
> the command rpm -Uvh moz*.rpm but get
> error: failed dependencies:
> mozilla = 0.9.2.1 is needed by galeon-0.11.3.2
>
> H
Al Rider wrote:
> Get use to it. MS has essentially "won" the law suit and will only get
> more agressive in stifling competition from now on.
[asbestos suit on]
Ahem. They had the "remedy" overturned, and the judge removed from the
case. The verdict (guilty) still stands. Arguments (lega
I was experimenting with moz's preliminary support for the CSS3 property,
border-radius (-moz-border-radius). I tried adding some borders with curved
corners to my online CV which I've been working on (design rather shamelessly
ripped off from Eric Meyer I have to admit). But in
I have a small problem with 0.9.5. Some javascript I have which changes the
style property of a class from display:block to display:none does not seem to
be working correctly anymore. In moz < 0.9.3 it was working fine. Then in
0.9.3 it crashed moz every single time. I didn't get to u
Hey guys...
Get use to it. MS has essentially "won" the law suit and will only get
more agressive in stiffling competition from now on.
JP White wrote:
> Using Mozilla 0.9.5 to go to the msn website http://www.msn.com I get
> the following disturbing message.
>
>
Holger Metzger wrote:
> Microsoft actually promised today to remove those customizations again.
> Seems like many users complained about it.
> I like Opera's press release concerning that matter (Opera did/does not
> work as well):
> http://www.opera.com/pressreleases/20011026.html
>
> Holger
> -
check previous Visse posting ...
Holger Metzger wrote:
> On 10/26/2001 3:53 PM, JP White wrote:
>
>> Using Mozilla 0.9.5 to go to the msn website http://www.msn.com I get
>> the following disturbing message.
>>
>>
>>
>>> Attention: Web Browser Up
On 10/26/2001 3:53 PM, JP White wrote:
> Using Mozilla 0.9.5 to go to the msn website http://www.msn.com I get
> the following disturbing message.
>
>
>
>> Attention: Web Browser Upgrade Required to View MSN.com
>>
>> If you are seeing this page, we have detec
Using Mozilla 0.9.5 to go to the msn website http://www.msn.com I get
the following disturbing message.
> Attention: Web Browser Upgrade Required to View MSN.com
>
> If you are seeing this page, we have detected that the browser that you are using
>will not render MSN.c
I'm trying to upgrade to 0.9.5 using the rpm files for RedHat7.2 and run
the command rpm -Uvh moz*.rpm but get
error: failed dependencies:
mozilla = 0.9.2.1 is needed by galeon-0.11.3.2
How do I get an rpm file for galeon?
TIA,
eeevans
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Bernard Perrot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I just tried Mozilla 0.9.5 on a Linux RedHat 7.1 box, and now, the fonts when
>I print a page or a mail are twice the size it was with version 0.9.4...
>
>Is it a know problem ?
refusal to repaint window, and perhaps
>>most weirdly, CDROM (if mounted) starts to whirr. This is on Debian
>>Linux (Woody) from the .tar.gz binary installation of 0.9.5, with a
>>2.4.10 SMP kernel (and two CPUs).
>>
>>
>>>I'm now back on 094. Pity
page looks like it
>>has scrolled down slightly, with the top inch or so displayed again at
>>the top, intense CPU hogging, refusal to repaint window, and perhaps
>>most weirdly, CDROM (if mounted) starts to whirr. This is on Debian
>>Linux (Woody) from the .tar.gz binary inst
On 10/18/2001 11:01 PM, Brian Clark wrote:
> Jay Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
>
>>The next release of 6.x is based on 0.9.4+ I believe. The + simply means
>>I have no idea where the actual cutoff is or will be.
>>
>
> Anyone know when the next updat
Scott Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ST> the 6.1 themes havent been working for a while now, guess you have to
ST> wit for updated ones
Interesting. The new "American Flag" one (or whatever) and the other one
they have/had there did work with .9.4 -- just not 0.9.5. I
op inch or so displayed again at
>the top, intense CPU hogging, refusal to repaint window, and perhaps
>most weirdly, CDROM (if mounted) starts to whirr. This is on Debian
>Linux (Woody) from the .tar.gz binary installation of 0.9.5, with a
>2.4.10 SMP kernel (and two CPUs).
>
Jay Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> The next release of 6.x is based on 0.9.4+ I believe. The + simply means
> I have no idea where the actual cutoff is or will be.
Anyone know when the next update to Netscape 6.x will be? Inquiring
minds want to know.
Sometimes I have a lot of text
to put into a little, scrollable, HTML form box. Sometimes it will
disappear, and I have to start over because I don't know if my text is
really in there or not.
And FYI: This happens for me on 0.9.5 on Win2k.
Brian!
t;
Sounds like bug 97674. Fixed on the trunk, but it didn't make it for the
0.9.5 branch.
--
Chris Hoess
Just throught I'd mention it, in case anyone else having the same
problem was wondering if it is just them.
Sometimes when I select and delete a portion of a quoted message
in my composition window in Mail-News, I get a blank space where
other text is lost. Scrolling up and down doesn't refres
Scott Tran wrote:
> corey wrote:
>
>> Out of curiousity, were there any XUL changes made in 0.9.5 that resulted
>> in the NS6.1 themes being unusable? The themes at
>> 'http://home.netscape.com/themes/6_1/index.html' worked fine with 0.9.4,
>> but n
On 10/18/2001 8:15 AM, WDA wrote:
> Tell me if this correct - Netscape 6.1 is behind Mozilla 0.9.5 as far as
> functionality and features are concerned. Reason being: 0.9.5 is in
> continual development while Netscape 6.1 is frozen at that stage. Is
> this true or false? And,
WDA wrote:
>
> Tell me if this correct - Netscape 6.1 is behind Mozilla 0.9.5 as far as
> functionality and features are concerned. Reason being: 0.9.5 is in
> continual development while Netscape 6.1 is frozen at that stage. Is
> this true or false? And, if Netscape 6.1 i
My experiences - Linux redhat 7.1.
- On the whole, it works great. No crashes etc.
- Finally "click to open the application" works.
I had to do some tweaking of ~/.mime.types, and within mozilla
profile, mimeTypes.rdf.
- Drag and drop of URLs into a folder defined within the visible bookmark
Tell me if this correct - Netscape 6.1 is behind Mozilla 0.9.5 as far as
functionality and features are concerned. Reason being: 0.9.5 is in
continual development while Netscape 6.1 is frozen at that stage. Is
this true or false? And, if Netscape 6.1 is indeed behind Mozilla, do
we know
67 matches
Mail list logo
