> Actually, Gerv, they're not required to. Section VI of the NPL:
>
> IV. Inability to Comply Due to Contractual Obligation.
> Prior to licensing the Original Code under this License, Netscape has licensed
> third party code for use in Netscape's Branded Code. To the extent that Netscape
> is lim
JTK wrote:
> Netscape 6 is not an "Open Source"
> project in any way, shape, or form. Mozilla may be "Open Source", but
> Netscape 6 is a proprietary (as in, "where do I download the AIM
> source?") piece of software.
In that case. the Linux kernel isn't open either, because I can't download the
On 06 Jul 2001 15:57:38 -0500, JTK wrote:
> Gervase Markham wrote:
> >
> > JTK wrote:
> > >
> > > Gervase Markham wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > No, in principle it is not open source whatsoever. Netscape 6 branches
> > > > > from Mozilla at certain points in development and features propietary to
> >
Gervase Markham wrote:
>
> JTK wrote:
> >
> > Gervase Markham wrote:
> > >
> > > > No, in principle it is not open source whatsoever. Netscape 6 branches
> > > > from Mozilla at certain points in development and features propietary to
> > > > 6.x are added/refined, etc.
> > >
> > > That's not tru
JTK wrote:
>
> Gervase Markham wrote:
> >
> > > No, in principle it is not open source whatsoever. Netscape 6 branches
> > > from Mozilla at certain points in development and features propietary to
> > > 6.x are added/refined, etc.
> >
> > That's not true;
>
> That is 100%+ true and you damn wel
JTK wrote:
> > Netscape should, if we read the license,
> *IF*.
You should do this, as I demonstrate below.
> So where's the code for that sweet AIM program? Yeah.
AIM is not part of the browser, thus would not be required to have available
source code, even if NS were required to release thei
Gervase Markham wrote:
>
> > No, in principle it is not open source whatsoever. Netscape 6 branches
> > from Mozilla at certain points in development and features propietary to
> > 6.x are added/refined, etc.
>
> That's not true; Netscape should, if we read the license, be making source
> releas
On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Gervase Markham wrote:
>>
>> No, in principle it is not open source whatsoever. Netscape 6 branches
>> from Mozilla at certain points in development and features propietary to
>> 6.x are added/refined, etc.
>
> That's not true; Netscape should, if we read the license, be making
JTK wrote:
> Gervase Markham wrote:
>
>>>No, in principle it is not open source whatsoever. Netscape 6 branches
>>>from Mozilla at certain points in development and features propietary to
>>>6.x are added/refined, etc.
>>>
>>That's not true;
>>
>
> That is 100%+ true and you damn well know it M
Gervase Markham wrote:
>
> > No, in principle it is not open source whatsoever. Netscape 6 branches
> > from Mozilla at certain points in development and features propietary to
> > 6.x are added/refined, etc.
>
> That's not true;
That is 100%+ true and you damn well know it Mr. Markham. Do not
> No, in principle it is not open source whatsoever. Netscape 6 branches
> from Mozilla at certain points in development and features propietary to
> 6.x are added/refined, etc.
That's not true; Netscape should, if we read the license, be making source
releases (at the same time it makes binary r
Bren.. wrote:
> i'd wait.. i'm sure netscape will throw out another release in a month.
Saw a comment on a Bugzilla bug that indicated that NS planned to build
the first NS6.1 RTM candidate this past tuesday. Won't be very long now
until 6.1 is released.
--
http://www.classic-games.com/
ZZT wrote:
> Jay Garcia wrote:
>
>
>>Mozilla is the "Mozilla Open Source Project" being developed by
>>engineers connected to Mozilla.Org as well as contributing
>>engineers/programmers outside of the Mozilla infrastructure. Netscape 6
>>is a co-branded version of Mozilla being developed by eng
Edwin Overmeer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> See subject...
>
personally i prefered netscape's PR1 release over the then current mozilla
release 0.9.1. however, as always the latest release contains a few things
that make it worth using over older releases.
if you don't have anything better to do and the
And it came to pass that ZZT wrote:
> Jay Garcia wrote:
>
>> Mozilla is the "Mozilla Open Source Project" being
>> developed by engineers connected to Mozilla.Org as well as
>> contributing engineers/programmers outside of the Mozilla
>> infrastructure. Netscape 6 is a co-branded version of
>> M
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ZZT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I don't understand, how mozilla 0.9x and Netscape Navigator 6.x
> coherent.
Netscape 6.1 PR1 is Mozilla 0.9.1 without Chatzilla and with Netscape
Instant Messenger, bundled plug-ins, Netscape partner stuff, branding
and mar
Jay Garcia wrote:
> Mozilla is the "Mozilla Open Source Project" being developed by
> engineers connected to Mozilla.Org as well as contributing
> engineers/programmers outside of the Mozilla infrastructure. Netscape 6
> is a co-branded version of Mozilla being developed by engineers employed
> b
ZZT wrote:
>
> Edwin Overmeer wrote:
>
> > See subject...
>
> in my opinion yes, because I have the impression that bugs are removed faster.
>
> What I don't understand, how mozilla 0.9x and Netscape Navigator 6.x coherent.
>Somebody here who can tell me more about the philosophy behind this
Edwin Overmeer wrote:
> See subject...
in my opinion yes, because I have the impression that bugs are removed faster.
What I don't understand, how mozilla 0.9x and Netscape Navigator 6.x coherent.
Somebody here who can tell me more about the philosophy behind this 2 productlines?
bye
Hi,
See subject...
20 matches
Mail list logo
