Hi all,
In discussing another issue with Paul Zimmermann, he noted the
following ugly jump in performance in the flint/mpir fft for
multiplying two integers of the given number of limbs together:
> mpn_mul_fft_main
> limbs time
> 10467800.556109766
> 10467810.55
I have fixed all the n_blah symbol conflicts in MPIR.
Tomorrow I'll get to work on the fft_blah symbol conflicts in MPIR.
The mpn_blah symbol conflicts in flint will have to wait until someone
has time to deal with this.
Bill.
On 17 October 2012 20:20, Bill Hart wrote:
> On 17 October 2012 20:
On 17 October 2012 20:17, Fredrik Johansson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Bill Hart
> wrote:
>> It's so long since I looked at this, I don't remember. But I had
>> thought it was because these functions were not universally exported
>> in mpir.
>>
>> If they are macros in flint, then
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
> It's so long since I looked at this, I don't remember. But I had
> thought it was because these functions were not universally exported
> in mpir.
>
> If they are macros in flint, then I don't see the problem anyway. They
> don't get exported as
It's so long since I looked at this, I don't remember. But I had
thought it was because these functions were not universally exported
in mpir.
If they are macros in flint, then I don't see the problem anyway. They
don't get exported as symbols in the flint library.
They will be picked up by any p
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
> On 17 October 2012 19:04, Fredrik Johansson
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Bill Hart
>> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I am just working on the release of MPIR 2.6.0 and it has been noted
>>> (by Fredrik I think) that there are symb
On 17 October 2012 19:04, Fredrik Johansson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Bill Hart
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am just working on the release of MPIR 2.6.0 and it has been noted
>> (by Fredrik I think) that there are symbol clashes between the two
>> libraries. This is not in genera
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am just working on the release of MPIR 2.6.0 and it has been noted
> (by Fredrik I think) that there are symbol clashes between the two
> libraries. This is not in general a problem if the library order is
> correct, but the mistake
-Original Message-
From: Bill Hart
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 5:10 PM
To: mpir-devel ; flint-devel
Subject: [mpir-devel] Symbol clashes between flint and mpir
Hi all,
I am just working on the release of MPIR 2.6.0 and it has been noted
(by Fredrik I think) that there are symbol c
Hi all,
I am just working on the release of MPIR 2.6.0 and it has been noted
(by Fredrik I think) that there are symbol clashes between the two
libraries. This is not in general a problem if the library order is
correct, but the mistake too easily occurs that the library order is
incorrect. It wou
-Original Message-
From: David Cleaver
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:27 AM
To: mpir-devel@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [mpir-devel] GMP-ECM and MPIR 2.6.0
On 10/15/2012 1:55 PM, Cactus wrote:
I have created a patch for GMP-ECM (the SVN version) that allows it to be
built
with M
11 matches
Mail list logo
