Hello, Bill.
You wrote 24 июня 2010 г., 17:20:17:
> How would you deal with say a 6x6 limb multiply (where a limb is by
> the old definition). How would thid maintain performance for such
> sizes?
You are right. Now I see that it will work only for operations where
both operands are large.
Hello, Bill.
You wrote 22 июня 2010 г., 3:30:30:
> BSDNT
> ..
> scratch. One idea I had was to write all the low level routines in
> LLVM instead of assembly, then just build suitable optimisations into
> LLVM so that nice assembly is automatically produced. This is entirely
> feasible and wou
Hello, Bill.
> In fact, unless I am mistaken refresh your browser!
> Now let's all forget this ever happened and let's get on with our jobs.
+1!
--
With best regards,
Sergey mailto:sergey.bochka...@alglib.net
--
You received this message because you are subscribe
Hello, Bill.
> So it is established that we are being accused of academic fraud for
> removing the author information WHEN IT WAS DONE BY SOMEONE ON THE GMP
> TEAM in the actual version of GMP we forked from!!
Confirmed.
> I think what is currently on the GMP website is FAR more damaging to
> t
Hello, Bill.
> Now, we are looking into why this isn't appearing on the title page of
> the pdf documentation. That appears to be a technical issue! We will
> also add "The GMP Development Team" as per the latest GMP
> documentation.
I think that when you fix _everything_ someone still will be
Hello, Bill.
You wrote 6 мая 2010 г., 17:56:00:
> There are actually some Microsoft C# forums online where I would
> imagine people would be interested to hear about this.
The best things I've found so far are few forums for specific C#
numerical libraries. Looks like that there is no larg
Hello, Mpir-devel.
New version of X-MPIR 0.2 - C# wrapper for MPIR, is released. It can
be downloaded from http://www.alglib.net/x/xmpir/xmpir-0.2.zip
The most essential thing in the new version is Linux support. It was
only tested with Ubuntu, but should work with any Linux distribution.
W
Hello, Gonzalo.
You wrote 3 мая 2010 г., 20:46:41:
> Although I'm more of a GPL (v2) type, and I wouldn't write BSD code
> unless I had a very good reason, I could consider relicensing some
> interface code like this.
> I've actually relicensed this code to LGPL v2+ (for gmpy), but I'm not
> sure
Hello, William.
> In Sage we (=mostly Gonzalo Tornaria) spent an enormous amount of time
> writing two very efficient C functions, one to convert from mpz to
> Python ints, and one to convert back. Yes, writing this code is a
> lot of work. But no, the resulting code is not slow. Just because
Hello, Case.
You wrote 23 апреля 2010 г., 19:30:20:
> (1) Python numeric values are assumed to be immutable. If not, they
> cannot be used as dictionary keys. This forces all results to be new
> objects, hence source/destination operands cannot overlap, etc.
It is problem only when you want m
Hello, Antony.
You wrote 23 апреля 2010 г., 16:18:02:
> I think Java and Python bindings would be
> a very popular addition - python is used a lot in scientific
> computing. I believe there's already a wrapper for gmp? Gmpy?
Yes, GMPY. I've never studied it deeply yet, but they pursue slightly
Hello, MPIR-developers!
I want to inform you about new MPIR-related project called X-MPIR. The
idea is to develop a whole set of bindings for a wide set of
programming languages using automatic translation.
MPIR/GMP have overwhelming API - hundreds of functions with lots of
paramete
> The MIT license is more prestigious.
> -- William
>From Wikipedia:
> The MIT License is similar to the 3-clause "modified" BSD license,
> except that the BSD license contains a notice prohibiting the use of
> the name of the copyright holder in promotion.
>From that we can conclu
Hello, Bill.
You wrote 16 апреля 2010 г., 15:07:18:
> The things wrong with LGPL:
> * the number of contributors is too small even after two years of
> working on this project
> * companies are suspicious of it - worried the license will be changed
> to GPL (I know this for a fact, I'm not surmis
Hello, Bill.
You wrote 16 апреля 2010 г., 12:23:43:
> What you suggest is to effectively maintain two versions of MPIR, one
> version 2.1 the other 3.
No, quite the opposite. I am talking about plugin-based framework
where framework itself is 2.1, and some plugins are 3.0, some are 2.1
too
Hello, Mpir-devel.
I've read discussion about future of LGPL-licensed MPIR, and about new
BSD-licensed library. May be there is much more simpler solution to
the LGPL 3 issue than making new library.
As far as I can see, all updates may be divided into two distinct
groups:
* bugfixes
* im
16 matches
Mail list logo
