Re: Message exit length for alteration

2002-09-05 Thread Paul Clarke
Hi, I also noticed that in the documentation there is a mention that the previous exitBuffer address is returned in the next invocation of the message exit, so I guess I can free the memory then...That should be fine...but in any case if there is something wrong with this approach...or if there

MQSeries Cluster Problem

2002-09-05 Thread Kritsana
Hi All, I encounter a problem when I try to make a cluster from 2 AIX machines and 1 windows 2000 machine. Note: MQSeries on AIX is version 5.2.0.2 MQSeries on Win 2000 is version 5.2 I choose 2 AIX to be repository of cluster. Both of them are working properly. I mean when I add a

Re: AIX runmqlsr problem

2002-09-05 Thread Pavel Tolkachev
Erik: Just in case you did not do it already: check with netstat -a if anybody is already listening on this port. Pavel Erik Klemetti erik_klemetti@HOTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TMAIL.COM cc:

Effective user id for permissions and CSD03 on Solaris 8

2002-09-05 Thread Pavel Tolkachev
Hello all, I remember something similar was discussed before but I cannot find in archives :-(. The problem is: I use setuid scripts wrapping around MQSeries control commands to let non-mqm users fully administrate only their respective queue managers. For example, for runmqsc cut here

Re: Message exit length for alteration

2002-09-05 Thread Philip, Aby
Thanks Paul, Will do it that way. I was thinking that at MQXR_TERM time I would have the exitBuffer address with me so that I could free it off..anyway this looks to be a solution. In my case the pointer would have to be reallocated for every MQXR_MSG call because I would not know what was the

Re: Message exit length for alteration

2002-09-05 Thread Paul Clarke
Thanks Paul, Will do it that way. I was thinking that at MQXR_TERM time I would have the exitBuffer address with me so that I could free it off..anyway this looks to be a solution. In my case the pointer would have to be reallocated for every MQXR_MSG call because I would not know what was the

Re: MQ Client Question

2002-09-05 Thread philip . distefano
you have the same security issues for MQClient, but solving them may be a bit different. How do you solve the security issue for External customers using MQServer ? [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] OM cc:

Re: MQRC_NOT_AUTHORIZED

2002-09-05 Thread Joshi, A (Anant)
Hi, Set some authorizations using following 2 commands: setmqaut -m QM_1 -t qmgr -g mqm +all setmqaut -m QM_1 -n TEST_QUEUE1 -t q -g mqm +all QM_1 is QueueMgr and TEST_QUEUE1 is Queue on MQServer (on WinNT) The user on Solaris is mqm in group mqm The error was found in file amqerr01.log in

Re: MQRC_NOT_AUTHORIZED

2002-09-05 Thread Barry Lamkin
Take a look at the ID being used by the Client Channel connecting to the Queue Manager. Barry D. Lamkin Senior Solutions Architect Candle Corporation office: 508-389-6231 fax: 781-659-3805 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Joshi, A (Anant) [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Message exit length for alteration

2002-09-05 Thread Philip, Aby
Hi Paul, I was doing the message exit on NT and i was trying to fit an MQRFH2 header in front of the data i.e. trying to convert a plain message into one which would have an MQRFH2 header in front of it. I also had to set the 'Format' field of the message to MQFTM_RF_HEADER. Strange thing is

Effective user id for permissions and CSD03 on Solaris 8: things are getting worse

2002-09-05 Thread Pavel Tolkachev
Hello All: I installed the latest CSD (CSD05) in a hope it would solve effective UID program. But instead things became worse. Now I cannot even create a queue manager in a regular way, *under mqm account*. Here is what I am getting: -cut here-- $ id uid=1091104(mqm) gid=7232(mqm) $

TOPCAT Testing Site

2002-09-05 Thread MQSeries
Title: TOPCAT Testing Site Does anyone know what happened to the TOPCAT Testing Site? Access used to be via http://192.35.232.39/cgi-bin/TC2/1 Thanks,

Re: TOPCAT Testing Site

2002-09-05 Thread Adiraju S Rao
you can now try the same at http://www.topcat2.com/ and from there it is self-explanatory From: MQSeries [EMAIL PROTECTED]@AKH-Wien.AC.AT on 09/05/2002 06:21 PM EST Please respond to MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by:MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:

Re: WebSphere MQ Integrator 2.1 and WebSphere MQ 5.3

2002-09-05 Thread Alan Stewart
No problems on W2K for me either. I have CSD03 installed also for WMQI 2.1 Alan Roger Meli [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED] 31/08/2002 03:58 AM Please respond to MQSeries List To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: WebSphere MQ

Message exit length for alteration (got the problem)

2002-09-05 Thread Philip, Aby
Hi Paul, Got the reason on why the message exit was working on the sender side of NT but was not working on the receiver side which was on AIX. The code which was setting the MQRFH2 header part of the message was setting the values in the UNIX way for the MQLONGs which was Big Endian and the NT

ActiveX setting GroupID

2002-09-05 Thread WR
According to the MQSeries Automation Classes for ActiveX manual, the GroupID Property on the Message object can be set to any value. However, when I do the following code... TheMsg.GroupId = ABC ...and break the execution at the statement immediately following, I find that TheMsg.GroupId is

Re: MQSeries Secured Connection

2002-09-05 Thread Perera, Guy
Title: Message Hi Ammar, You can push it to MQ, but you need to be running v5.3 on both ends. With MQ v5.3 can use SSL on server to server channels on SVRCONN channels. We've found it a challenge so far to setup the environment, which we still haven't got correct. And there are no good

Re: MQSeries Secured Connection

2002-09-05 Thread Ashir T1
Hi Kevin, I would like to have a look at that document. Cheers. T. Ashir Software Specialist Snail Mail: eBusiness Software Centre, Region West, IBM India Ltd, 4th Floor, G Block, The ILFS Financial Centre, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051, India.