Policy Changes in a Sysplex environment

2002-12-04 Thread Dijkerman, E (Erik)
Dear Listeners, In our 7*24h Sysplex environment we have a problem. My question is do you recognize this and if so (how) dit you solve it. As I said it is a 7*24h Sysplex environment with CICSplex and Qsharing (MQ 5.2). MQ trigger messages are send from the CF to the CICS-listeners for futher dis

Re: Weblogic/MQJMS

2002-12-04 Thread mmh
AFAIK, nothing special needs to be done to create a JNDI object for remote queue. But we have to make sure that we do _not_ use this object for receiving. This object can only be used while creating QueueSender's but not the QueueReceiver's. Also it would be helpful if you post the error

Weblogic/MQJMS

2002-12-04 Thread Jay Jayatissa
Hi, does anyone know when using JMS to create JNDI objects, if it is possible to have a JNDI object as a remote queue? Iam having difficulty binding to a remote queue on MQSeries from Weblogic. many thanks, Jay

Re: WMQI5.2 CSD2 : drag and drop nodes in a message flow in WMQI 5.2

2002-12-04 Thread jesse h. goode jr.
assumed you've installed/configured db2 and created your wmqi configmgr and broker app. 5 wmqi related windows groups are created. make sure the windows account you are logged in as is a member of these groups. jesse goode jr valero energy corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Mes

Re: WMQIv2 shutdown problem

2002-12-04 Thread John Abbott
Kulbir,   we downloaded it from the web site do you want me to provide a link?   Regards John Abbott>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/12/2002 7:18:28 pm >>>John, Are you on WMQSI 2.1 CSD04?  Where did you get CSD04 from? Regards, Kulbir. "John Abbott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by

WMQI5.2 CSD2 : drag and drop nodes in a message flow in WMQI 5.2

2002-12-04 Thread Carlos Castellanos
I installed WMQI 5.2 CSD 2 with MQSeries 5.3 on Windows 2000 professional. The installation was succesfull. To test the installation and configuration I created a message flow called simple_flow, but I can't drop any nodes in the Message Flow Definition area. Some idea? Regards Carlos Cas

Re: V5.3/V5.3.1 etc

2002-12-04 Thread Michael F Murphy/AZ/US/MQSolutions
On this I have answers from IBM. 1)  The CMVC level is a build date.  It is year, month, day.  So where you see L021011 is 2002-10-11.  Thanks James Kingdon. 2)  IBM support tells me they acknowledge this is not the way mqver should work.  There isn't a PMR on it but they will fix it probably in

Re: MQ under transaction server 1.3

2002-12-04 Thread Bullock, Rebecca (CSC)
Lizette, we are running TS 1.3 and MQ V5.2. We've had no problems, but I'd check PSP buckets for anything critical that may need to go on. You know, SOP stuff :-) -- Rebecca -Original Message- From: Anderson, Lizette T. (RyTull) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 200

MQ under transaction server 1.3

2002-12-04 Thread Anderson, Lizette T. (RyTull)
We are running MQSeries for OS/390 5.2. Are there any known problems with running MQSeries under transaction server 1.3? --- Legal Disclaimer: The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally privil

Re: problem with MO12 support pack

2002-12-04 Thread Bruce Giordano
I was using the Starttool product to display the module. Looking into this further, it appears that the file transfer product we are using has problems with PDSE libraries. I tried transmitting the PDSSEQ library to the system I was working on and issuing the receive there and no longer encounte

Re: Large record size

2002-12-04 Thread Miller, Dennis
MQ can easily handle a million 1K messages. Whether you have the resources (queue space, log space, network bandwidth, etc.) is another question that will take a little elbow grease on your part. You also need to factor in how much time you have to send/process the messages, service time requir

Re: CICS Bridge Start

2002-12-04 Thread Miller, Dennis
CKBR needn't tie up a terminal; you can start it any number of ways without a terminal resource attached. Trigger on first, works quite nicely since CKBR will then start/end dynamically in response to message traffic. > -Original Message- > From: Jill Grine [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Se

Re: problem with MO12 support pack

2002-12-04 Thread john gilmore
This message is generated, by the Loader, when it detects a PDS directory entry for the entry/alias/whatever it is being asked to bring into storage that is not that of a load module.   It is possible for a library/load-module PDS to contain a bad directory entry, but are you sure you are not askin

Re: CICS Bridge Start

2002-12-04 Thread Jill Grine
Thanks for your response, Rebecca. I was assuming the sequential terminal would be my best bet outside of an exit, but that seemed like such an "old" way of doing things that there might be a better choice. (Lists are great for suggestions by those who have worked with a product for a while and a

Re: Large record size

2002-12-04 Thread Anderson, Lizette T. (RyTull)
Thanks. I have managed to convince the programmer to send it non-persistent. Should I still worry about syncpoint? or use a wait interval? Also, could it be advantages to send it batch? -Original Message- From: Stefan Sievert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002

Re: Sizing a Server

2002-12-04 Thread Saar, Andrew
When you say 95,000 messages, in what time period does that reference. Is that per 8 hour day, per 24 hour day, per hour, etc? Assuming you meant the load to be spread out over an 8 hour period even a fairly basic Unix/Linux/NT server could handle this load. -Original Message- From: W

Re: CICS Bridge Start

2002-12-04 Thread Bullock, Rebecca (CSC)
Jill, no, we don't use the 3270 Bridge, but that's not relevant to your general question on how to start something up in CICS. How about using a sequential terminal? That's how we start up some stuff (or at least, I know for a fact that we used to do it that way). The CICS guy says we still do, so

Re: Large record size

2002-12-04 Thread Bright, Frank
Lissette, We had a similar challenge recently on OS/390. In addition to Bob's comments below and others, the most limiting factor I found by far is logging because of the persistence. You will not be able to go any faster than the logging speeds of your disk. There is a support pac, MP16, that

Re: WMQIv2 shutdown problem

2002-12-04 Thread Heus, M. - SPLXM
Hi, We regularly see this problem on our development Broker. It usually occurs after a deploy and results in the execution group using a large amount of CPU. On our Production Broker we sometimes see each flow disconnecting from it's queue (without any error/message from WMQI). In both cases the

Sizing a Server

2002-12-04 Thread Wesley Shaw
I need help sizing a server to handle the following: This project is in support of a Call Center used during major system outages. We need to size a server which is connected to a frame relay connected to a external call center on one side and MVS querying DB2 on the inhouse side. This server/QM

CICS Bridge Start

2002-12-04 Thread Jill Grine
Hello MQ Listers, Well, I'm verturing into another new subsystem and wondered if anyone is using the MQ-CICS 3270 Bridge? If so, how are you starting it? If the CKBR transaction ties up a terminal until the monitor ends, sounds like a bad choice. I prefer not to have an operator have to issue

ZAP for increasing number of TCBs for CICS adapter

2002-12-04 Thread Scott Gray
I seem to recall there was a ZAP at mq 2.1 for increasing the number of TCBs used by the CICS adapter from the standard 8, but cant find reference to it anywhere.  If anyone knows anything about it or can point me to something equivalent for mq 5.2 Id greatly appreciate it.   Thanks, Scott

Problem with MO12 Support Pack

2002-12-04 Thread Bruce Giordano
I've installed the MO12 support pack to get information from the MQSeries log data sets. However, when I try to run the modified version of CSQ1LOGP, I'm getting the following error: IEW4007I FIND FOR MODULE CCP1LRPL FAILED BECAUSE DIRECTORY ENTRY IS NOT VALID FOR A LOAD MODULE. Has anyone else ru

Re: MQ JMS query

2002-12-04 Thread Chris A. Dahl
Vinodh, JMS will set the 'application identity data' on send meaning it will be overwritten by JMS when the message is sent. You will have to find another way of passing your application identity information. Good Luck, Chris N Vinodh

Re: WMQIv2 shutdown problem

2002-12-04 Thread Robert Broderick
we had this same problem yesterday. I cannot remember if the EXG was 'default' We naturally assumed it was because the developer had a debug session going and the EXG could not terminate the transaction. We too killed the process and everything was ok after that.

Re: Large record size

2002-12-04 Thread Robert Broderick
Lissette, We had an application that sent about 8,000 2k-4k MT942 reports from the MF to an Windows frontend server farm where the data was parsed and applied to a data warehouse. When we were sending those messages persistent and one at a time the amount of time was substantial. Granted there ma

Re: Large record size

2002-12-04 Thread Ronald Weinger
Make sure your logs and pagesets are large enough to hold everything if there is any kind of failure, and your log archiving can handle it fast enough The messages may block other messages along the same channel so you might consider a separate channel if traffic warrants it.

MQ JMS query

2002-12-04 Thread N Vinodh
Hi I am using IBM MQSeries 5.1 and trying to put messages from IBM WAS4.0 using JMS. I am required to set 'application indendity data' on the MQ message and send it. I am unable to do using JMS api? Plz help me in this, Thanks in advance, Rgds Vinodh * * * The information contained in th

Re: Keep Alive vs Heartbeat - What's the diff?

2002-12-04 Thread Paul Meekin
Funny - I'm sure I remember reading this on one of IBM's Hints and Tips web pages (a long time ago). Still, I can't find it now so I'll just have to put it down to old age! But Paul's explanation was very clear so thanks for asking the question. Cheers, Paul "Potkay, Peter M (PLC, IT)" <[EMAIL

Re: WMQIv2 shutdown problem

2002-12-04 Thread John L. Gavin
Actually we have CSD 3, but an lslpp shows 2.1.0.4 -Original Message- From: Kulbir S. Thind Sent: Wed 12/4/2002 08:18 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: WMQIv2 shutdown problem John,

Re: V5.3/V5.3.1 etc

2002-12-04 Thread Kulbir S. Thind
Hi there, Our Windows 2000 memo.ptf say it has no CSD applied, I'm assuming we have an old media package.  What is the best way of getting hold of the CSD that we need to apply?  When is CSD2 expected? Thanks, Kulbir. "Michael F Murphy/AZ/US/MQSolutions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: WMQIv2 shutdown problem

2002-12-04 Thread Kulbir S. Thind
John, Are you on WMQSI 2.1 CSD04?  Where did you get CSD04 from? Regards, Kulbir. "John Abbott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "MQSeries List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 04-Dec-2002 00:22 Please respond to "MQSeries List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                                         To: