Erik
I'm pretty sure you can update any LDAP server using the JMSAdmin tool. You just need
to add the URL to the JMSAdmin config file. You could theoretically use a triggered Q
to invoke this in Batch mode.
Not sure if that helps or not.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Erik Deer
Hi all,
Could any one in the list tell me where i can get the MQ V 5.2 OS/390 manuals in book
manager format. I could get only in the 'PDF' format from the IBM MQ web site
Thanks Regards,
Karthik
***The information contained in this message is legally privileged and confidential
information
Well it seems that DR recovery procedures are a manual method by the
response to my inquiry for a script. All of you left me no choise but
actually work for a living and do it my self. Being the nice GUY I am and
going on the premise that no one thought of this script before I am
officially
A good architectural solution would be to capture the MSGID when you put the
message to the XMIT queue and transmit that in the alternate method. Leave
the messages on the XMIT queue and let them go through. Let the receiver
then determine what are dups and what are not. You probably already have
Title: OS/390 client attachement fuature
Can anybody tell me in which MQ dataset on ver 5.2 the abovementioned software gets stored if I need to copy it.
Thank you
Pieter Voges
MQ Support
Nedcor Limited
Tel: (011) 881 4410
Sel: 083 6455 300
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Would something like this work?
echo 'dis chl(*) chltype(SDR)' | runmqsc MQIDEV1 | perl -nle 'next unless
/CHANNEL\(([^)]+)\)/; print RESET $1'
Modify as needed to reset RCVR channels.
HTH!
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Robert Broderick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
IBM has just changed the licensing model for WMQ 5.3 - it's now based on the
number of processors, rather than CUs.
See:
http://isource.ibm.com/cgi-bin/goto?it=usa_annredon=203-041
and
http://www.ibm.com/websphere/integration/pricing
The latter page is just a place holder today - I trust they
Hi all,
As the subject says, I'm trying to install WMQI 2.1 onto AIX 4.3.3.
Unfortunately it keeps telling me that Java 1.3.0.10 is a missing requisite,
despite the fact that I have both Java 1.1.8 and Java 1.3.1.0 installed.
Has anyone installed WMQI 2.1 with Java 1.3.1?
Cheers,
Paul
Before I waste my time and write on. Does anybody have a script that will
do
a RESET on all the server channels on a particular box
It can be .sh .ksh or .pl
bobbee,
I assume you don't want to do this too often. You can do this with my MO71.
Display the channel list, click on the channel
See comments in line...
Regards,
Ian Vanstone
WebSphere MQ for z/OS Development
mqm mqm
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
O.UKcc:
Sent by: MQSeriesSubject:
You can download a good many MQ Series publications in zipped HTML format from the generic 'IBM Publications' website. Book manager format is reserved for mainframe publications. - Original Message - From: P Karthikeyan Sent: 11 February, 2003 07:24 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MQ V
If you use saveqmgr to backup your queue manager, then you can specify that you
also want to include reset channel commands in the script. (-R switch)
--- Robert Broderick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Before I waste my time and write on. Does anybody have a script that will do
a RESET on all the
Title: msg on DLQ with Reason code 65535 ?
If VMS is involved,
that is the ERRNO value EVMSERR "error for non-translatable VMS
errors".
-Original Message-From: MQSeries List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Benjamin
ZhouSent: Monday, February 10, 2003 1:44 PMTo:
[EMAIL
Bruce,
Thanks for the info, I did try this and I get
When the Qmanager is down and I issue . /MQ REFRESH QMGR TYPE(EARLY)
I get :
MQ REFRESH QMGR TYPE(EARLY)
CSQ3105E MQ CSQ3UR00 - UNABLE TO LOAD EARLY PROCESSING PROGRAM
CSQ3EPX. IS NOT AVAILABLE
CSQ3104I MQ
That was my thought but not the powers that be!!
From: Gorse, Darry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Channel Reset
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 08:29:03 -0600
Perhaps you should wait until every body gets back from the Conference.
That is a good idea. I forgot about that. I have to include that in my
commands that run the QMGRSAVE. But the script I needed was after they
restored the box from backup tape. Running the runmqsc with the SAVEQMGR
output would probably not hurt but I didn't want anymore going on that
didn't have
If you want to be able to do this, your SCSQLINK library has to be LPA, not
Linklist. IBM does document their recommendation that this library now be
in the LPA rather than linklist. It might have made it clearer though if
they changed the name of the library to SCSQLPA.
Is it possible for messages to be delivered out of order? Please read the
following from our application programmer:
We had a problem last night. A couple of our MQ message were processed out
of order. The MQ messages are for Score Order Entry feedback from the
mainframe. The queue name is
I need to add. The mainframe is running OS/390 communicating with a
Windows 2000 server both running MQSeries 5.2.
-Original Message-
From: Anderson, Lizette T. (RyTull)
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 1:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: messages out of order
You could be getting data locks ( resource locking ) that is not allowing certain
records from being extracted in order. We had a problem like this and it was a
timing problem in a database.
One question:
What is the dead letter queues process?
-Original Message-
From: Anderson,
Paul,
you'll need at least patch level 9 or 10 for AIX 4.3.3. I had no trouble
installing WMQI on this system.
cheers
Joerg Wende
Consult. IT Specialist / Business Integration
IBM SWG Technical Sales Central (Mitte)
Paul Meekin
There have been many past discussions on message order and how MQ preserves it only
under a fairly strict set of conditions. The best practice is not to rely on messages
being delivered in the same order they were sent. I'd advise your programmer to use
message grouping (if it's available on
Our remote queue is the dead letter queue.
-Original Message-
From: Hill, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 1:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: messages out of order
You could be getting data locks ( resource locking ) that is not allowing
certain
Ok. Now the picture is getting more clear. We corrected our problem by delaying the
application on the receiving end as well as setting the channel to stay open for a
longer time. I am assuming that this DLQ is not on a mainframe.
-Original Message-
From: Anderson, Lizette T. (RyTull)
Its on the server.
-Original Message-
From: Hill, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 2:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: messages out of order
Ok. Now the picture is getting more clear. We corrected our problem by
delaying the application on the
Hi, One of the systems I support is at MQ version 1.2, OS/390 2.7.0, using
the CA IP stack and IUCV. After a recent IPL any sender channels that were
using DNS names instead of direct IP address would not connect/run. Once
the DNS names were changed to direct IP addresses they connected and ran
For MQ to always deliver messages in the same sequence they were sent, one of the
restrictions is that you not have a DLQ.
-Original Message-
From: Anderson, Lizette T. (RyTull) [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 12:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
The first thought that comes to mind is to use channel switching. Define an alternate
channel for the same XMIT queue. Then there are several ways you can administratively
or programmatically switch over.
-Original Message-
From: Wes Ramsdale [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
Did you try pinging using the DNS to see if your DNS server is functioning?
Copeland, Rick
rick.copeland@E To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DS.COM cc:
Sent by: Subject: MQ
Yep. The CA version of ping and nslookup were able to resolve the DNS
names. This lpar has the CA IP stack along with IUCV.
-Original Message-
From: Rick Tsujimoto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 2:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MQ 1.2 unable to
30 matches
Mail list logo
