With due respect, if the STARTED transaction fails the request message
gets rolled back along with everything else. That's why the SIL program
browses the request queue. Request messages are consumed by the service
program and in the same unit of work that the data messages are
consumed.
I agree
Could someone provide some insights, documentation, "Hello World" sample on
how to get WSAD working with WMQ Client V5.3.
Thanks
Frank
-
This e-mail message and any attachments contain confidential information from Medco
Health Solutions, Inc. If you a
Having some confusion as to the source of a problem. We have MQ
connecting to PeopleSoft via JMS (JMS Listening Connector). We send an
XML message, and expect one back, but the reply is not XML. We do,
however, get a reply. This tells me that PeopleSoft Integration Broker
is correctly reading the R
MA01. We use it here.
Ruzi R
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OM> cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: AMQSPUTW and AMQSPUT4C -
sample programs with file inpu
Tom -
This is from one of our Sun Solaris servers v5.2:
/opt/mqm/samp/bin
-r-xr-xr-x 1 mqm mqm10252 Jun 24 2003 amqsput
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 29 Jun 5 2002 amqsputc ->
/opt/mqm/samp/bin/amqsputc_nd
-r-xr-xr-x 1 mqm mqm10236 Jun 24 2003 amqsputc
Tom,
I don't think these programs are supported any longer.
You can use the free supportack q.exe (I don't
remember the name) for putting a file on a queue. Or
another free supportpack MS0H which we make use of
quite extensively.
Regards,
Ruzi
--- Tom Nauta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of o
I have used AMQSPUTC to do this. Provided each line in the text file ends
with a carriage return, it works fine.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Nauta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 1:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AMQSPUTW and AMQSPUT4C - sample programs wit
One of our developers was asking for a program that would input a file and
put each line of the file onto a MQ queue. The V5.2 Application Programming
Guide (Chapter 34) talks about sample programs called 'amqsputw' and
'amqsput4c' which appears to be what I want. However, I can not find these
prog
Right, that's what I tend to do. I create .ERROR queues, associated with
every .LISTEN queue, so that the app has a place to put poison messages
without tying up the queue, and without closing the input queue and stopping
mesage processing.
That's why I did not think that another application was
Right on. Applications should use a poison message queue.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Richard
Brunette
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 11:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: messages jumps from localq to dlq
Marc
This is where I
Hi,
Has anyone encountered any issues trying
to use the WBI MB (or MQSI) on Sun Solaris with Oracle as the internal
broker Database and the same Database instance also as a Database for your
messaging needs (i.e. routing, transformations, batching, etc)? I
would be interested if anyone has done
Marc
This is where I don't like to see applications using the DLQ themselves. To
many do not follow the lead of how IBM uses the DLQ. When the CHIN moves a
message to the DLQ it passes all context from the original message and
simply identifies itself in the appropriate fields in the DLH. So in an
Hello all,
((( I sent this message this morning, yet it looks like it never got around to
anyone, so here it is again best as I remember what I wrote )))
I got in early this morning and attacked the problem again. Here's is what I
discovered.
The Swift Alliance application grabbed the message f
Kulbir,
>>>Can someone confirm that the Database used by the WBI MB broker is used
>>>just for deployment, startup and shutdown purposes only and is not used
for
>>>processing of messages by message flows that are executing?
The broker database is accessed during runtime if you have message flows
Actually after taking another look the DLH time stamp is before the MD time
stamp, which is odd. I'm guessing that some clocks are not in sync or
possibly more likely the MD context was not simply passed from the original
message to the DLQ message.
Rick
Instructions for managing your mailing lis
Look at the MQMD.PutApplName of the DLQ message this should provide some
hint as to what application placed the message on the DLQ.
Marc
>>>
I remember seeing the 65540 reason code when message were put to the DLQ by
MQSI. So, are you using MQSI ?
David Awerbuch
Hello all,
Philip, No, I am not using MQSI. The receiving application is Swift Alliance.
Peter, regarding another appl, this is the tool I am using on a regular basis,
and just gave up last night and went home after reporting the secondary
results.
HOWEVER . this is what I've learned in t
FYIHere is a link for info on computer communication standard for port numbers.
http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers"Awerbuch, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Peter,This can vary from system to system, but here are a few clues ...First of all, we should only use ports above 1024. Then
Dave,
I think WMQI is putting the messages on DLQ (I don't
know why though). As far as I remember the reason
codes for the mssages put on DLQ by WMQI are in the
form of 6.
Regards,
Ruzi
--- David Awerbuch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have an interesting situation. I have a loc
I think your looking the wrong direction when you focus on Paul's tool and
your attempts to browse the queue.
Quite the opposite, I believe it is the output that you received using
Paul's tool to display the DLQ message that should be providing you with a
direction to look.
Your message on the DL
Denis,
A lot gets lost or misconstrued in the written word. As a result, some
folks get a little touchy and overreact. I wouldn't get too upset about
it.
"Blondiaux Denis
Don,
THANK YOU! THANK YOU! THANK YOU! THANK YOU! THANK YOU! THANK YOU! THANK YOU! THANK
YOU!
THANK YOU! THANK YOU! THANK YOU! THANK YOU! THANK YOU! THANK YOU! THANK YOU! THANK
YOU!
THANK YOU! THANK YOU! THANK YOU! THANK YOU! THANK YOU! THANK YOU! THANK YOU! THANK
YOU!
One large virtual case
I remember seeing the 65540 reason code when message were put to the DLQ by
MQSI. So, are you using MQSI ?
David Awerbuch
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AHOO.COM>cc:
Hi,
Can someone confirm that the Database used
by the WBI MB broker is used just for deployment, startup and shutdown
purposes only and is not used for processing of messages by message flows
that are executing?
Can someone also please confirm that the
Database does not need to be installed loca
But even if this was the problem, the message would just stay in the
original queue. It wouldn't jump to the DLQ. This is a weird on Dave. I use
MO71 all day long and have never seen this.
Does the same thing happen if you browse the message with another app (not
MO71)?
-Original Message
Hi,
First of all, I would like to apologize for my previous mail.
I was very surprised by some reaction, because I was thinking that this mail would be
understand like an 'humour fed up mail'. (thank you Paul R. Mitchell). But know, I
understand that it was a stupid reaction against a lot of lit
Hi David,
do you a GET with CONVERT? Maybe, the conversion fails during the GET call.
Check your language settings.
Regards
Hubert
-Ursprungliche Nachricht-
Von: David Awerbuch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 13. Februar 2004 02:23
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Fwd: messa
27 matches
Mail list logo
