www.t3t.com
Scott
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger
Lacroix
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 7:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Renting / buying Mainframe time (OS/390 or z/OS)
Thanks.
Do you have a link or company name?
Emulati
We get something like this fairly regularly on hp when processes are
performing operations against local queues with high depth (> 2000
msgs). We get FDC files showing long semaphore lock waits. If we wait
long enough, it eventually resolves itself.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: MQSeri
Title: Message
If you
combine binary and text data in a single message you may have to write your own
data conversion exit if you plan to cross platforms.
Scott
-Original Message-From: MQSeries List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim
ArmstrongSent: Tuesday, Octobe
-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott
Gray
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 10:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Disappearing cluster queues
Refer to T Robs note that quotes the manuals as saying this is a
requirement. I wouldn't think it would have to
PL'd we have to issue the refresh command or we begin to
get the dreaded 2085 return code.
Maybe it is as simple as including the refresh in a command string at
startup. I don't know, just a thought.
Alan
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf O
tonyB.
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: Disappearing cluster queues
> From: "Scott Gray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, September 20, 2004 6:28 pm
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> We had that problem between sun/hp and z/os...we were told to have at
>
We had that problem between sun/hp and z/os...we were told to have at
least one static cluster sender between full repository and leaf node.
We were relying on dynamic clussdrs from full repos to leaf node. Once
we did this, that problem has not reoccured. No explanation for the
behavior was prov
Heinz,
We had all sorts of problems running AMI under WAS 3.5 ranging from lockups
to coredumps...worked with support for weeks but got the run around between
the WAS and MQ support teams...we finally gave up and rewrote our app using
the base mq java classes. The best answer we got was that the
actually you can...there is a MAXCONN channel exit. Look at:
http://www-3.ibm.com/software/integration/support/supportpacs/individual/me7
1.html
Source is provided.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill
Anderson
Sent: Thursday, October 2
I did exactly as you describe, but in java using the java PCF support pack.
It uses client connections, is multithreaded and Ive had it watching as many
as 15 queue managers in our performance test environments. It also works
with OS/390 using COMMAND messages...The output is comma delimited and
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Randy J
Clark
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 8:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CommerceQuest free tool
When I try to logon to the tool using a shortcut and the run as different
user option.
As I recall I had to select "hide" for the MQ icon on the services bar in
order to get around this...even after the service was stopped.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Luc-Michel Demey
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 6:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTE
IC35242 - Error message AMQ5615 occurred when trying to issue
CRTMQM commands after installing CSD05.
Its fixed in CSD 7.
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IY33347
Scott
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Antony
Boggis
Sent
We had the same requirement last year. In our case, our 390 box was running
at 100% constantly and we were looking for ways to offload processing. The
performance engineer was saying that conversion was a relatively expensive
operation. We assumed we could turn conversion on sender off and use
M
Jeff,
You can find samples that dynamically load the mq libraries at:
http://www.developer.ibm.com/tech/sampmq.html
It should be fairly simple to modify them to do what you are asking.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff A
Tressler
Sent
cmqc.h: #define MQFB_APPL_CANNOT_BE_STARTED 265L
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Conklin, William
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 2:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DLQ reason code = 265
Hi There,
I've seen threads discussing the reason
cmqc.h: #define MQFB_BIND_OPEN_CLUSRCVR_DEL 281L
MQFB_BIND_OPEN_CLUSRCVR_DEL
Cluster-receiver channel deleted.
The message was on the SYSTEM.CLUSTER.TRANSMIT.QUEUE intended for a cluster
queue that had been opened with the MQOO_BIND_ON_OPEN option, but the remote
cluster-receiver channel to be use
, September 12, 2003 12:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sonic MQ Bridge?
Thanks, Scott! Had found that one but am doing due diligence to try and
find any others that are out there.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 11:05 AM
To
http://www.sonicsoftware.com/sonicmq/documentation/mqseriesbridge.pdf
Scott
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Wyatt,
T. Rob
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 10:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Sonic MQ Bridge?
I just got a call from a client
This appears in the latest edition of Business 2.0: (its subscription, so
Ive included the entire article inline rather than a link):
The Coming Job Boom
Forget those grim unemployment numbers. Demographic forces are about to put
a squeeze on the labor supply that will make it feel like 1999 all o
We have very similar requirements...We decided on acquiring CommerceQuests
DataIntegrator product which gives us single file, full directory level
transfer, full PDS transfers, message to file, file to messages, etc...Its
also as scalable as your machines will allow and can accomodate as many
paral
http://www.sonicsoftware.com/products/enterprise_messaging/sonicmq_bridges/i
ndex.ssp
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sony
Varghese
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 8:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IBM MQSeries and SonicMQ
RE: MQCONN FAILEDHi,
A colleague passed along what I thought was a pretty funny mini-editorial on
the state of IT in the states...Under the heading of "Essential Tools for
Survival in the NEW new economy" was:
http://www.indianembassy.org/consular/passport.pdf
No hate mail please :)
Scott
-Original Message-
We looked at it last year and it was a solid product, but imho unbelievably
expensive. MQSoftware now offers a business dashboard capability in their
QPasa V3 product that has similar capabilites...We own QPasa now and it's
been a struggle since day one, but YMMV.
Scott
-Original Message-
it isnt on zOS, it is on the others...
Scott
- Original Message -
From: "Stefan Sievert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 4:59 PM
Subject: Re: AMI
> Nope
>
> Stefn
>
> >From: Robert Broderick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: MQSeries
what time are we on for? its
convention...
Regards,Scott Gray202 962 0795703 431 1808 - cellsjgray8 -
AIM
- Original Message -
From:
Janet Elliot
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:27
PM
Subject: Pos-dup flag
I recall having used a p
Bob,
Now that youve outed yourself as a Hursley DPL bridge expert:
Can you explain why an IBM supplied component doesn't implement proper
poison message handling? Putting a message to the DLQ when backoutcount <
backoutthreshold seems to contradict standard poison message processing.
Scott
--
get(disable) the bridge queue.
Scott
- Original Message -
From: "JoE JK" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 9:38 PM
Subject: CICS Bridge(CKBR) - how to stop CKBR?
> Hi,
>
> How to stop the CKBR transaction? Other than issue
> 'purge' or 'disable
Completion code 2 (AMRC_ERROR) together with reason code 110
(AMRC_TRANSPORT_NOT_AVAILABLE) returned by amInitialize or amSesOpen (or the
equivalent in COBOL, C++ and Java) normally indicates that the underlying
MQSeries queue manager the AMI is attempting to use is not started (or does
not exist).
interested in knowing if the proposed design
> meets the Gonzalo's original needs. His programming requirements reflect
a
> programming style that's used in real-time systems (MQ is not real-time).
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Scott Gray
>
sday, January 07, 2003 11:12 PM
Subject: Re: Demultiplexing instead of polling?
> You could use the high and low depth events to regulate the number of
> getting processes... ?
>
> Sid
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Scott Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sen
The problem with trigger-on-first comes when volume is high and a single
process cant keep up with volume or response time requirements.Yes, you
can always start multiple instances via a script/wrapper which is triggered
but its not sensitive to volume so I dont consider that much of a solution
Open source MOM efforts (as well as other middleware):
http://www.jmiddleware.com/opensource_links_page.html
- Original Message -
From: "Gonzalo Diethelm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: Newbie questions
> > So far the FAQ
Does mqje work against os/390 like mo71 does?
- Original Message -
From: "Brian S. Crabtree" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: Freeware for remote administration on MQ Objects,
> Vivek
>
> MQJExplorer is better than MO71 and
I seem to recall there was a ZAP at mq 2.1 for
increasing the number of TCBs used by the CICS adapter from the standard 8, but
cant find reference to it anywhere. If anyone knows anything about it or
can point me to something equivalent for mq 5.2 Id greatly appreciate
it.
Thanks,
Scott
We've had the same problem with the bridge...you can look up our PMR in
IBMLINK (48401, 487) and request the same patch IBM just gave us.
Scott
- Original Message -
From: "Miller, Dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: MQ
level 2 never
seems to know anything about it.We have rewritten major sections of code
and are moving away from AMI not simply because we dont feel we can rely on
IBM if there are problems with this interface.
Regards,
Scott Gray
- Original Message -
From: "Tony Devitt" <[EM
You arent crazy...The unique portion of the dynamic
queue name was based on date/time...We had processes that (foolishly)
depended on it. When we went to V5.2 (direct from V5) we noticed the
change.
Scott
- Original Message -
From:
DiLauro, Nick
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If youre really interested in round-robin for this case you can write a
custom workload exit. Both queues will be presented as options to the exit
and youre own algorithm can decide which to use.
Scott
- Original Message -
From: "Marc Verhiel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
One gotcha with the MQCIH is that the distributed platforms (at least at
v5.2) do not have support for converting them so you will need to do it on
your sender channels.
Scott
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Sloper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October
When receiving messages back from the CICS bridge, the
following error is occurring on an hp 11.0 MQ 5.2 server when the receiving
application is a client. When a server app receives the replies, all is
well. Since "MQCICS" is one of the built-in formats, Im not sure what I'm
missing here
Does the IBM JMS MQ implementation honor the use of
FAIL_IF_QUIESCING options? Its doesnt appear as such, but if anyone
can confirm this Id appreciate it.
Scott
From what we have been able to determine it appears
that the userid and password used when starting MQSI is used for *all* ODBC
access from nodes within custom flows. The userid and password entries in
the .odbc.ini appear to be ignored. This would mean having to
propagate the db2 uid/pwd
Does anyone know if channel pipelining supported in
V5.2 on OS/390? The OS/390 books don't make any mention of
the attribute to turn on/off pipelineing in csq6chip, but the other books say
this works with TCP 5.2 channels, with no exclusion for 390.
Thanks,
Scott
44 matches
Mail list logo
