List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/06/2004 11:15 PM
Please respond to MQSeries List
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: George J Shedlock/DTCC)
Subject:Re: Comparison of MQ monitoring tools
Nowe are not...only one of you which is now two, too many
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/06/2004 11:15 PM
Please respond to MQSeries List
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: George J Shedlock/DTCC)
Subject:Re: Comparison of MQ monitoring tools
Nowe are not...only one of you which is now
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: George J Shedlock/DTCC)
Subject:Re: Vendor involvement (was: Re: Comparison of MQ
monitoring tools)
Like when I purchase a DVD at the store. I have to sit through 20 minutes
of
advertising before I get to the movie.
bobbee
by: cc
MQSeries List
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject
n.AC.AT Re: Vendor involvement (was: Re:
Comparison of MQ monitoring tools)
11/09/2004 09
: Comparison of MQ monitoring
tools)
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 10:14:13 -0600
Although Bboobbee is a radical individual there are times I must support
his responses even if they are sometimes harsh. I have been guilty of this
also. If a vendor is cherry picking the list server for marketing/sales
: Donnerstag, 4. November 2004 21:42
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Comparison of MQ monitoring tools
We are currently investigating MQSeries monitoring tools. The environment is z/OS 1.5,
MQ 5.3.1. We are looking for some comparisons of products with regard to
feature/function and pro/con for any
. It is all a matter of
time!!!
From: Barry Lamkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Comparison of MQ monitoring tools
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 20:58:35 -0600
Ok, now that we are giving vendor responses.
I am a former Candle SE, now
of MQ monitoring tools
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 15:42:23 -0500
We are currently investigating MQSeries monitoring tools. The environment
is z/OS 1.5, MQ 5.3.1. We are looking for some comparisons of products
with regard to feature/function and pro/con for any of these products. Any
opinions are most
Comparison of MQ monitoring
tools
We are currently investigating MQSeries monitoring
tools. The environment
is z/OS 1.5, MQ 5.3.1. We are looking for some comparisons of products
with regard to feature/function and pro/con for any of these products.
Any
opinions are most welcome.
George Shedlock Jr
Subject
Comparison of MQ
monitoring tools
We are currently investigating MQSeries monitoring tools. The
environmentis z/OS 1.5, MQ 5.3.1. We are looking for some
]
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
Comparison of MQ
monitoring tools
We are currently investigating MQSeries monitoring tools
OH!! I forgot.
The current place I am at uses SiteMinder as an inter solution.
bobbee
From: Tuben, Gregg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Comparison of MQ monitoring tools
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 11:23:26 -0600
I don't think George
PROTECTED]
Sent by: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/05/2004 12:23 PM
Please respond to
MQSeries List
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
Re: Comparison of MQ monitoring
tools
I don't think George was looking for vendor responses
but I wanted to elaborate on Rick's comment below
We are currently investigating MQSeries monitoring tools. The environment
is z/OS 1.5, MQ 5.3.1. We are looking for some comparisons of products
with regard to feature/function and pro/con for any of these products. Any
opinions are most welcome.
George Shedlock Jr
Instructions for managing your
You might want to look at Tivoli Monitoring for MQSeries
Karla E. Kirkpatrick
MQSeries, System Administrator for Special Events
Work: (919) 486-2213
Cell: (919) 824-1574
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kirkpatrick
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 3:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Comparison of MQ monitoring tools
You might want to look at Tivoli Monitoring for MQSeries
Karla E. Kirkpatrick
MQSeries, System Administrator for Special Events
Work: (919) 486-2213
Cell: (919) 824-1574
e
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Richard Jackson/DTCC)
Subject:Re: Comparison of MQ monitoring tools
Yes, especially the former Candle products that are now under Tivoli. We use Omegamon XE/DE here.
Ò¿Ó
Bob Juch
Citigroup
MQ Mainframe Support Team
Weehawken, NJ
201-974
to MQSeries List
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Fred Oddo/DTCC)
Subject:Re: Comparison of MQ monitoring tools
You might want to look at Tivoli Monitoring for MQSeries
Karla E. Kirkpatrick
MQSeries, System Administrator for Special Events
Work: (919) 486-2213
Cell: (919
Omegamon XE DE and QPasa are your best of breed
products.
If you have Candle (aka Tivoli) Omegamon inhouse, you
can integrate CICS, MVS and distributed platforms
easily.
If you do not already use Candle/Tivoli (IBM bought
Candle 4/1/04 and is rebranding it as Tivoli), take a
loke at MQSoftware's
, November 04, 2004 4:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Comparison of MQ monitoring tools
Robert
How do you like XE??? We still have Mainview but with WBI (FN) and the other
Omegamons GUI plugins, XE may
be a good fit.
Thanks
Rich Jackson
212-855-8297
Archive: http://vm.akh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: MQSeriescc:
List Subject: Re: Comparison of MQ
monitoring tools
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
n.AC.AT
21 matches
Mail list logo
