I use this every day, great free tool for Remote Desktop. They finally released
an updated version 2.7!
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=44989
Daniel Ratliff
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which
it is addressed
and may contain
Yay!!
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Daniel Ratliff dratl...@humana.com wrote:
I use this every day, great free tool for Remote Desktop. They finally
released an updated version 2.7!
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=44989
*Daniel Ratliff*
The information
Daniel,
Personally I prefer http://www.mremoteng.org/. You can apply credentials to
folders and drag and drop computers around to pick up the new settings.
Haven't used RDCMan in years so not sure if this functionality is included
in it.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Daniel Ratliff
I use Terminals. Love the program.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 6:06 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] OT: New RDCMan! Finally!
Pay the $40 for RoyalTS. It's far
How about this?
https://terminals.codeplex.com/
It has most of the functions that other tools does and its FREE and i Love it :)
It saves password, connect to vnc and many other functions in it.
Regards,
Eswar Koneti
www.eskonr.com
Sent from Mobile Device, excuse any typo's as a result.
---
Scott,
After reviewing your script and modifying it a bit to suit our needs, I have a
question on how I can make something work. The background information has
changed, such that the need is for monthly IE updates in 1 package each month,
monthly OS updates in 1 package each month, and
Honestly, it still doesn't compare to the well-polished commercial product that
RoyalTS is.
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com listsad...@lists.myitforum.com on behalf
of Eswar Koneti eswarkon...@outlook.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 9:52 AM
To:
Has anyone seen that show up in the SMSPXE log before? I'm in a situation
where I can't PXE boot. Even though both the x86 and the x64 boot images are
checked off for PXE deployment, I still get a failure. Even more strange, I
can create a bootable USB drive and it is boots the task sequence
the error above is because you are tryiung to boot x64 uefi hardware but
configuration manager is responding with an x86n boot wim, most likely
because the last task sequence deployed to your OSD collection contains an
x86 boot wim, think of LIFO, last in, first out, so if you last deployed a
task
oh and make sure to *Deploy this boot image from the PXE service point* is
selected for both boot wims
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Niall Brady any...@gmail.com wrote:
the error above is because you are tryiung to boot x64 uefi hardware but
configuration manager is responding with an
Currently my boot images are deployed to two groups—All Systems (encompassing
literally everything), and All Unknown Systems. You’re recommending I separate
All Systems into x86 and x64 collections?
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of
Yes, those are checked.
I checked that folder location...good tip. I'm only seeing two boot images.
Both are x86 ones. One is a 6.2 version, and another the 6.3 version that came
into place after the 2012R2 upgrade. I take it I should be seeing the x64 and
I'm not. Not sure why.
From:
I would follow on the instructions Neil provided. Basically, make sure your
task sequences are using the desired boot image. i.e., double check the TS
properties. . .
Jeff
From: mbrad...@quiktrip.com
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Matching Processor Architecture Boot
Even though I’ve checked the x86 and x64 PXE availability checkbox 10 times
each, even with Microsoft watching, I’m looking again, and it’s not checked.
So I check it, and it shows back up in SMSImages and now we’re back to PXE
working again. BUT, it’s still sending the x86 version every time
I used trail royalts but then switched to terminals. Will look at its comparison
Regards,
Eswar Koneti
www.eskonr.com
Sent from Mobile Device, excuse any typo's as a result.
--- Original Message ---
From: Jason Sandys ja...@sandys.us
Sent: November 20, 2014 12:31 AM
To:
If you do set your default boot image to x64, when a x86 TS runs it will stage
the proper bitness of PE. One thing to keep in mind, if you are encrypting the
drives. PE needs enough disk space free on a non-encrypted volume to stage
itself. If your using BitLocker the default “BDEDrive”
Gotcha… We’ll see how it goes. :)
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2014 2:28 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com; mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Managing Servers in a DMZ
I’ve created the x64 and x86 Unknown Computer collection as seen in your
screenshots (thank you very much). I set the limiting collection as All
Unknown Computers. Is that correct? If so, is the next step to delete all
deployments from task sequences that currently go to All Unkown
what happens when you initiate the client install from console ..right click on
the machine and choose client install.if you still get same error,try to assign
or choose different site ,that will mostly solve the problem.but for sure,there
will be record in the database that conflicts other
Ok
- Ursprungligt meddelande -
Från: christopher.catl...@us.sogeti.com christopher.catl...@us.sogeti.com
Skickat: 2014-11-19 22:41
Till: mssms@lists.myitforum.com mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Ämne: Re: [mssms] Matching Processor Architecture Boot Image Not Found
If you do set your
I've followed a few blogs about creating reporting only role so users can
access SSRS to run reports without giving them any no access to SCCM console
Brian Mason Blog
http://www.mnscug.org/blogs/brian-mason/162-report-user-role
Coretech
We already use https for our intranet so guess that is not an option. Most
servers is on the DMZ is not member of a domain/forest only in workgroup
mode, does these need to be joined to new domain or can you dictate MP/SUP
preference on these? Are SUP preference just not a GPO, why do you need an
22 matches
Mail list logo
