what about things like The Rutles songs, which parody groups of songs at once.. for isntance "Hold My Hand" is a parody of BOTH She Loves You and I Wanna Hold Your Hand--they're sort of merged together...
should it be (X is a parody of Y) & (X is a parody of Z)or X is a parody of (Y and Z)???On 4
On 4/4/06, Nathan Noble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, is MB really supposed to be a music> > encyclopedia?>>> what else would you call it?Hmm, a music metadata database? well, specifically music metadata. anyway, all the data i'm talking about is metadata...
Ultimately, MB haslittle more in
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, derGraph wrote:
http://test.musicbrainz.org/trac/ticket/1261
I think it's a great idea since these types of songs aren't covers.
--
Matt Perry | matt at primefactor dot com
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lis
> Also, is MB really supposed to be a music
> > encyclopedia?
>
>
> what else would you call it?
Hmm, a music metadata database? Ultimately, MB has
little more info on anything than fits in an id3 tag.
No collection of id3 tags, no matter how large, could
match the informational power of a wri
On 4/4/06, Nathan Noble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This would imply creating perhaps hundreds of sparselypopulated db columns, or a more sophisticated schemawith dynamic attributes. Performance has to beconsidered.
i agreee this issue must be addressed. we would need input templated
for various e
This would imply creating perhaps hundreds of sparsely
populated db columns, or a more sophisticated schema
with dynamic attributes. Performance has to be
considered.
Also, is MB really supposed to be a music
encyclopedia? If it were like one, how many people
would use this info? I don't know t
On 05/04/06, derGraph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > for me, it remains that the majority of DVD 'rips' will have an
> > obvious titleing structure.
>
> a) Can you prove that claim? I could not, nor could I prove the
> opposite, because there is no database I know of which has such information.
On 4/3/06, Nathan Noble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you think the scope should be so broad? Remembertoo that someone has to find and enter all this data
manually, which might be fine for Beethoven's fifth(though I sure wouldn't bother finding half of thatmetadata), but not so much fun or imposs
for me, it remains that the majority of DVD 'rips' will have an
obvious titleing structure.
a) Can you prove that claim? I could not, nor could I prove the
opposite, because there is no database I know of which has such information.
b) Do you suggest creating a rule which only applies to a "
On 04/04/06, derGraph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Q1: Which DVD types should we add?
> A1: None. We don't have a data format to store even a part of the data.
> See [1], [2] and [3] for details.
for me, it remains that the majority of DVD 'rips' will have an
obvious titleing structure. eg, they w
On 4/4/06, Beth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like it!
as do i.
perhaps there could be a "pastiche" (or "style parody") relationship as well?
example:
Weird Al's "Germs" is a pastiche of Nine Inch Nails, and his "Dare to
Be Stupid" is a pastiche of Devo.
--
--dj empirical--
-
http://ww
Bogdan Butnaru wrote:
Just one thought about the live&acoustic thing.
Right, while we're on it, I have something related. The wording of
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/OtherVersionRelationshipType is bugging me, I left
a comment and a proposal for some additional attributes in the discussion
se
I like it!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of derGraph
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 4:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [mb-style] new relationship type "parody"
http://test.musicbrainz.org/trac/ticket/1261
After being disappointed many
http://test.musicbrainz.org/trac/ticket/1261
After being disappointed many times that there was no "parody" AR type,
I decided to create a trac ticket on this. It essentially suggests a
track-to-track relationship type to link parodies like
[track] is a parody of [track]
[track] was parodied
i'm talking about seperating audio from video, not ripping CDs.
But they're already separate things, you can't play the video to the
speakers or the audio to the display device.
They are separate after decoding. In the video files however, they are
mixed with each other to create a
For those who are not confused enough, let's create additional
confusion. ;-]
There currently seems to be a fraction supporting all DVDs to be added
as official releases, and another fraction that would rather see DVD
rips to be added as bootlegs. Since both fractions argue against each
othe
To the first question I would say yes; put the French name in parens. To the
second question no; genre information is not stored in MB.
Cristov (wolfsong)
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Ari Torhamo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: [mb-style] Pieces with two names (in
Hi,
I'm new to MusicBrainz and have a question about naming. I couldn't find
the anwser from the Style Guidelines.
On the CD in question most titles of individual pieces have their names
in two languages. They are presented like this:
1. PARIISIN TAIVAAN ALLA
-SOUS LE CIEL DE PARIS-
...and s
Chris Bransden wrote:
> On 04/04/06, Brian Gurtler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> what about an option to give live releases 2 titles?
>> one with the live/bootleg style and one with any possible DVD title or
>> even bootleg title? be able to select one of the two when tagging.
>> hell maybe all rel
On 04/04/06, Brian Gurtler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what about an option to give live releases 2 titles?
> one with the live/bootleg style and one with any possible DVD title or
> even bootleg title? be able to select one of the two when tagging.
> hell maybe all releases could use an alternate
i liked this email!
Orion wrote:
> Alright, then picture this situation: I take a live DVD I purchased,
> place it in my DVD drive, hit play, and minimize the player. I continue
> working on my computer and would like to look up the info on a
> particular track quickly. The case doesn't have a t
Actually I thought it was doing some magic. Apparently not!
bash-2.05b# ./disc_id /dev/acd0c
libdvdread: Using libdvdcss version 1.2.9 for DVD access
3dd959cdd9c8122e569450d86ba195a9
bash-2.05b# cat /mnt/video_ts/*.ifo | md5
3dd959cdd9c8122e569450d86ba195a9
Steve
Not an ideal solution then, it
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 12:00:21PM -0400, Brian Gurtler wrote:
> i'm talking about seperating audio from video, not ripping CDs.
But they're already separate things, you can't play the video to the
speakers or the audio to the display device.
There's nothing to stop people minimising the video,
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Nikki wrote:
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 04:22:52PM +0100, Steve Wyles wrote:
I feel that if DVD's are added, they should have a DVD-discid (this can
be obtained using libdvdread) attached to them. This is the probably the
best way to determine if something is an official relea
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 04:22:52PM +0100, Steve Wyles wrote:
> I feel that if DVD's are added, they should have a DVD-discid (this can
> be obtained using libdvdread) attached to them. This is the probably the
> best way to determine if something is an official release or not.
Oh? Care to elabora
Alright, then picture this situation: I take a live DVD I purchased,
place it in my DVD drive, hit play, and minimize the player. I continue
working on my computer and would like to look up the info on a
particular track quickly. The case doesn't have a tracklisting on it
and I don't want to
i'm talking about seperating audio from video, not ripping CDs.
Cristov Russell wrote:
> No. Following that logic, every ripped format (mp3, wav, flac, aac, mp4, ogg,
> etc.) that was not released via an artist or their label is a Bootleg. The
> original media source should be the determinate of
No. Following that logic, every ripped format (mp3, wav, flac, aac, mp4, ogg,
etc.) that was not released via an artist or their label is a Bootleg. The
original media source should be the determinate of what is Official or Bootleg.
Cristov (wolfsong)
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Brian G
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Brian Gurtler wrote:
Beth wrote:
My thoughts...
Q1. Which DVDs to add?
A1. All DVD musical rips.
Arguments: it was argued MB was a music database. Music
DVD's are based on music and bands. That in itself seems to be a good reason
to add them. If MB is supposed to be
On 04/04/06, Brian Gurtler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Beth wrote:
> > My thoughts...
> >
> > Q1. Which DVDs to add?
> > A1. All DVD musical rips.
> > Arguments: it was argued MB was a music database. Music
> > DVD's are based on music and bands. That in itself seems to be a good reason
>
Beth wrote:
> My thoughts...
>
> Q1. Which DVDs to add?
> A1. All DVD musical rips.
> Arguments: it was argued MB was a music database. Music
> DVD's are based on music and bands. That in itself seems to be a good reason
> to add them. If MB is supposed to be an archive of band's music at
My opinions too:
Q1. Which DVDs to add?
A1. All DVD rips, discourage non-musical ones.
Arguments:
(1) I'll usually have some sort of mp3 rip of whatever music DVDs I
buy; however this is (in my opinion) useful only for (a) live concerts
and (b) not released anywhere else tracks, because I'll proba
My thoughts...
Q1. Which DVDs to add?
A1. All DVD musical rips.
Arguments: it was argued MB was a music database. Music
DVD's are based on music and bands. That in itself seems to be a good reason
to add them. If MB is supposed to be an archive of band's music at least.)
Q2. DVD to title
Don Redman wrote:
I think we should stick to your three questions and tackle them one
after the other.
Which DVDs to add?
For a bit of real life data on types -
I have ~375 music related DVDs in my collection. The break down is as
follows:
Singles: 133
Music video collections: 74
Live conce
I am not sure whether the third one needs an oficial ruling by Robert
right now. If we get a decision on the first two, this might be well
enough for the tinme being. People will start to structure DVDs in the
db, this will shake things up again, and maybe the answer to the last
question will
2006/4/3, Nathan Noble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Do you think the scope should be so broad? Remember
> too that someone has to find and enter all this data
> manually, which might be fine for Beethoven's fifth
> (though I sure wouldn't bother finding half of that
> metadata), but not so much fun or i
36 matches
Mail list logo
