On 12/02/2008, Aaron Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12-Feb-08, at 11:28 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
I was foll of work these last weeks, do I am late commenting here,
sorry.
Welcome to the discussion! :)
On Feb 4, 2008 4:53 AM, Aaron Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think
On 13/02/2008, Brian Schweitzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Box Sets, aka: what defines a unique classical release?
This one is a pain, but not just in classical. In classical, though,
we tend to run into it a LOT more - Led Zep may put out one or two box
sets, whereas the same classical CD may
Brian Schweitzer wrote:
Box Sets, aka: what defines a unique classical release?
This one is a pain, but not just in classical.
I don't agree, I find BoxSetNameStyle sensible and good.
(This is not to say that there aren't problematic cases. Here is an
AddReleaseEdit for the second disc of
On 13-Feb-08, at 4:45 AM, Chris B wrote:
On 12/02/2008, Aaron Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12-Feb-08, at 11:28 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
Nothing to do? If he hadn't composed it in the first place, the
release would be full of silence. The inheritors of recent composers
(Stravinsky,
snip
why treat classical box sets any different to normal box sets?
if released separately: don't add the box set
if only released in boxset: add the box set
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/BoxSetNameStyle
if part released only in the box set, and part not, add the whole box
set for context
On 13/02/2008, Brian Schweitzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
why treat classical box sets any different to normal box sets?
if released separately: don't add the box set
if only released in boxset: add the box set
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/BoxSetNameStyle
if part released only in
On Feb 12, 2008 9:52 PM, Olivier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/2/12, Jim DeLaHunt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The MusicBrainz StyleGuideline is to always use the earliest released Track
or Release as the target of this relationship. This applies even if the
earliest-released one was obscure, and a
2008/2/13, Bogdan Butnaru [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Since we're discussing this: Is there some criteria for what to do
with simultaneous releases?
Not that I know of.
I've seen in some (admittedly rare) cases
two or three versions of an album, and maybe a single too, released on
the same date.
On Feb 13, 2008 1:54 AM, Brian Schweitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1 Label A releases a classical CD.
2 Label B licenses that classical CD and includes it as disc 6 of a box set.
3 Label A releases a box set, also including that CD.
4 Label C licenses that CD and includes it as disc 9 of a box
Olivier:
Thanks for your reply.
I like your suggestion for making the wording about Don't use the Cover AR
with Classical more concise. I'll do that.
I'll make another draft of my proposal which is all written out, instead of
making reference to the existing page. I can see that that is
On Feb 13, 2008 1:53 AM, Brian Schweitzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Trying to clean out the last of the issues...
Classical Release Titles:
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ClassicalReleaseTitleStyle
Presents a structure of:
MainTitle [SubTitle(s)] [VolumeNumber [VolumeTitle]] [ [?BoxNumber
11 matches
Mail list logo
