monxton wrote:
> You'll have noted Nikki's response where he says that the distinction
> between collaboration and member-of-band has not changed with NGS.
> Short-term or one-off projects are collaborations.
I'm not the same person as Nicolás. ;)
Nikki
On 09/06/2011 16:35, Alex Mauer wrote:
> On 06/08/2011 09:16 AM, monxton wrote:
>> "This (collaboration) relationship type is only intended for short-term
>> projects consisting of independent artists, who move on after the
>> collaboration is finished. If the target artist was not this type of
>>
+1. I agree with the attribute order you suggested.
On Jun 9, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
> This would be pretty useful to make sure we don't claim "recording X
> (instrumental)" has lyrics by Y once we start showing the
> relationships at release level. Also, it would solv
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 20:47, Nikki wrote:
> Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
>> IMO, the sortname is useless for non-Latin scripts, or at least for
>> Chinese. In order to get anything like a sane sorting you'd have to
>> use the same transliteration system (say Hanyu Pinyin) for all
>> artists, but that
Lemire, Sebastien wrote:
> +1 here as well, I also there should be an attribute for the Karaoke version!
We already have a relationship for linking karaoke versions together.
Nikki
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 15:59 -0400, Lemire, Sebastien wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Calvin Walton
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 15:55 -0400, Calvin Walton wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 22:46 +0300, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
> >> > This would be pretty useful to make sure
+1 here as well, I also there should be an attribute for the Karaoke version!
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Calvin Walton wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 15:55 -0400, Calvin Walton wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 22:46 +0300, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
>> > This would be pretty useful to m
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 15:55 -0400, Calvin Walton wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 22:46 +0300, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
> > This would be pretty useful to make sure we don't claim "recording X
> > (instrumental)" has lyrics by Y once we start showing the
> > relationships at release level. Al
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 22:46 +0300, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
> This would be pretty useful to make sure we don't claim "recording X
> (instrumental)" has lyrics by Y once we start showing the
> relationships at release level. Also, it would solve my doubts when
> dealing with instrumental ve
This would be pretty useful to make sure we don't claim "recording X
(instrumental)" has lyrics by Y once we start showing the
relationships at release level. Also, it would solve my doubts when
dealing with instrumental versions of hip hop tracks: it would allow
me to merge them as a same work unl
Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> IMO, the sortname is useless for non-Latin scripts, or at least for
> Chinese. In order to get anything like a sane sorting you'd have to
> use the same transliteration system (say Hanyu Pinyin) for all
> artists, but that makes no sense for Hong Kong artists whose native
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 20:07, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> I guess you'd want to normalize capitalization as well, I'm
> really not sure about that bit...
Disregard that bit, I think it's luks that's been arguing for that :)
--
Philip Jägenstedt
___
M
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:10, Kuno Woudt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 05/06/11 21:06, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
>> 2011/6/5 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren:
>>
>> The problem is in interpreting the cover. What is the distinction
>> between an artist being mentioned in a comment on the sleeve and being
>> credi
On 06/08/2011 09:16 AM, monxton wrote:
> "This (collaboration) relationship type is only intended for short-term
> projects consisting of independent artists, who move on after the
> collaboration is finished. If the target artist was not this type of
> project, then Member Of Band Relationship
thanks Paul!
i still think the criteria for a remix becoming a work rather than a
recording need a bit more discussion. credits for additional lyrics or
compositions on such things are going to be the exception rather than
the rule. in fact i would argue that in the vast majority of cases
remixes
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 08:43 +0200, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> 2011/6/8 Yin Izanami :
> > The artist "AAA" is literally and physically sorted as "TORIPURU-EE" /
> > "Triple A" in Japan. You can see this in Japanese bookstores and on
> > avexnet's listing of all its artists - it is sorted under the
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 17:15 +0300, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
> Just a (fairly straightforward, I expect) update to limit the
> collaboration relationship to cases where we can't use artist credits.
>
> See
> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Reosarevok/Collaboration_Relationship_Type_update
Now with infinitely more wiki page templates, and its very own RFC
number!
This proposal is to add or change two ARs:
* Official Homepage
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Kepstin/Official_Homepage_Relationship_Type_Proposal
A new Release Group → URL relation will be added to the Of
> Not only it is not easy, I believe it also is not desirable. The semantic
> difference between a work and a work part / sub-work is tiny. The history of
> some movements shows that some composers conceive the movements
> independently and later assemble them into a main work. And also, in the
> o
Hello,
On 07/06/11 13:48, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
> 2011/6/7 Lukáš Lalinský:
> We have recordings and works to unify all the songs internally, so the
> "FreeDB clone" thing is being *way* too negative, luks – we also
> expect people to follow the guidelines, of course, but we've always
>
Hello,
On 05/06/11 21:06, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> 2011/6/5 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren:
>
> The problem is in interpreting the cover. What is the distinction
> between an artist being mentioned in a comment on the sleeve and being
> credited as an artist. Consider these (fictional) examples:
>
Hello,
On 07/06/11 09:05, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> Are we getting a cover scan feature? Do you have more information
> about this? That would be extremely helpful for proof-reading edits.
ruaok is in discussion with the archive.org people to cooperate on
a cover art archive. no code has been w
22 matches
Mail list logo
