Original Message
From: Aaron Cooper
To: MusicBrainz Style Mailing List
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 12:11 AM
Subject: [mailing] [mb-style] RFC: Opera Track Style
Okay, I think we need to finally make the OperaTrackStyle and
official style guideline.
Don Giovanni, Op. 500: Act I,
Il Monday, January 22, 2007 6:54 AM
Aaron Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
Multiple works, same type:
All ok for me, theory and pratice.
Symphonies Nos. 1, 2 (...)
String Quartets, Op. 127, 130-133, 135 (...) (disc 2)
Why Nos. and not Ops.? Someone known where No. comes from and if
Il Tuesday, November 28, 2006 8:31 AM
mll [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
Just take care of not scaring away good-will newcomers by reverting
their changes, a quick mail to explain the revert would suffice i
think.
Yes, I could have been more communicative.
Looks like Andrew reverted the
Il Monday, November 27, 2006 6:47 PM
mll [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
the case where a track is numbered 'Op. XX No. YY', like 'Mazurka in B
major, Op. 63
No. 1' (example at
http://musicbrainz.org/track/576a7830-8240-4611-804c-256ee0e4bce3.html).
I can see to ways of expressing it:
1)
mll wrote:
1) 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63 No. 1'
OR
2) 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63, No. 1'
Just be aware that there's a lot of 'Mazurka in B major, Op.
63/1' around:
are they allowed? should they be changed? are they simply not
part of this rule that is only about commas?
3) 'Mazurka in B
Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ClassicalReleaseArtistStyle
Not a veto, but isn't that performer should be designated both as
ReleaseArtist and TrackArtist a bit exagerated? I mean, assigning an
artist both as ReleaseARtist and TrackArtist is redundent in the
current
Don Redman wrote:
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ClassicalReleaseArtistStyle
For other references see
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/2006-January/thread.html#1371
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Dave Smey wrote:
My proposed language would be: Recitals by a particular artist: In
cases where a release contains works from multiple composers but all
works are attributable to a single group or performer, that group or
performer may
be designated the ReleaseArtist, with each TrackArtist
Don Redman wrote:
There are style issues which drop out of focus again, and I do not want
this to
happen. Do you know what happened to the latin capitalization style?
Correct me if I'm wrong but I recall you said you had sumbmitted the matter
to Ruoak and we're waiting for the answer.
Ciao
derGraph wrote:
Veto!
Second, and more grave, a Google search for De Bello Gallico [1]
shows that the proposed capitalization is almost exclusively used on
Italian sites, and the majority uses the capitalization I proposed
here.
http://www-tech.mit.edu/Shakespeare/hamlet/hamlet.1.1.html
derGraph wrote:
I disagree that the Carmina Burana uses pre-medieval Latin. It's a
rather new composition (written 1935/1936) with lyrics from the 11th
and 12th century.
Damn right, I've always tought it was some roman pagan verses.
Anyhow, I doubt you'll find anything pre-medieval which has
iao
MArco (ClutchEr2)
On 5/16/06, Marco Sola
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Il Tuesday, May 16, 2006 8:55
AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha
scritto: The comment on the change
is: terminology changes album-release. punctuation after
current practice. I didn't
guess it could be that easy: any
Il Monday, May 15, 2006 11:15 AM
Frederic Da Vitoria [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
I first thought Wwo was a mispelling, but I just learned that those
two abreviations have the same meaning. I know, it is not very common,
but it is used for a few (too?) well-known works. I think we should
Il Tuesday, May 09, 2006 10:03 AM
Frederic Da Vitoria [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
I had a feeling (but I may be wrong, since I couldn't find any written
confirmation about this) that in classical MB admitted entering
different releases (in terms of dates, country or publisher) as long
as the
Maurits Meulenbelt wrote:
I believe that that styleguide indeed precedes AR
No, it does not. And it clearly says ReleaseTitle *OR* AR: choose what you
prefere but you should add info to allow release disambiguation.
but for the moment I would prefer keeping that info in the album title,
So, after collecting comments for 9 days, and after 7 days of silence, I'm
asking for veto about the following addition to
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ClassicalStyleGuide for a couple of days as per
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/StyleCouncil
* '''Common names'''
* It is the way works are
Il Monday, April 10, 2006 6:38 PM
Age Bosma [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
Exmaples of waht I would do it's better than any explanation
03 - Concerto for Violin in E major Op. 8 No. 1, RV 269 La
primavera (Spring): III. Danza pastorale: Allegro
Why turn around 'Danza pastorale' and
Il Monday, April 10, 2006 6:38 PM
Age Bosma [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
Exmaples of waht I would do it's better than any explanation
03 - Concerto for Violin in E major Op. 8 No. 1, RV 269 La
primavera (Spring): III. Danza pastorale: Allegro
Why turn around 'Danza pastorale' and 'Allegro'?
Il Tuesday, March 28, 2006 2:39 AM
Jan van Thiel [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
I'm just deducing the current system doesn't work yet, because of
personal misunderstanding between people.
Or full agreement, like when an instrument is played by a secretary. Sorry
if it seems rude but it simply
1) Do CSG override cover art? IMHO cover art and liner notes are overridden
so much that when is really needed it has to be.
2 and 8 what? No.? Op.? [catalog]?
-
2) Also IMHO, approving moderation with pending Nos should be a) disabled b)
anyway avoided by any automod.
Ciao
MArco
Sorry, link missing
http://musicbrainz.org/showmod.html?modid=4488092
Ciao
MArco (ClutchEr2)
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
- Original Message -
From: Björn Krombholz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MusicBrainz style discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 8:50 PM
Subject: [other] Re: [mailing] Re: [mb-style] Re: Two issues here
IMHO CoverArt should be followed paying much attention even in popular
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Il Thursday, March 23, 2006 3:15 PM
Chris Bransden [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
i'm a rock moderator at discogs - i've researched 1000s of releases,
and it really is 1% that are genuinly europe-wide releases of the same
pressing
We are the ones of the vacuum-cleaner instrument: even if it
Sorry, I'm without IRC access (and I wont have it for a while) otherwise I
would not bother here.
Generally, should Release Language go with phisical media liner notes or
with the part of them we decide to bring into MB?
More discussion here http://musicbrainz.org/showmod.html?modid=4383837
I don't have very much to add to comments here
http://musicbrainz.org/showmod.html?modid=4213547 I'm just asking for some
feedback.
The (possibily) change could be done directly in
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/MultipleTitleStyle if we feel it could involve
other Album than classical ones or as
Original Message From: Michel RudoyTo:
MusicBrainz style discussionSent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 6:46
PMSubject: Re: [mb-style] Call for help on Spanish
Capitalization
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/CapitalizationStandardSpanish And now, how
or who changes the "Guess case" button
Il Monday, January 30, 2006 8:17 AM
Schika [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cameo_(band)
to reach the same information. Note that in MB's interface, the last
) is not dropped as it is here in this email so it's perfectly
usable.
wrong, you provided the proof for
Il Monday, January 30, 2006 12:34 PM
Simon Reinhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
Wikipedia produces these URLs. And they really
don't have to be readable because you know from the conext where you
are led to (Artist X has a wikipedia page at says it all!).
I wish just to poit out that is
Il Monday, January 30, 2006 2:57 PM
Steve Wyles [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
I wish just to poit out that is not only a matter of readability:
those links with % does not work on some pc I use and I hears other
users complaining with this.
I'd be interested to know what OS and browser they
I didn' see any official statement yet so I feel free to write down some
thoughts.
I saw only recently that Picard is ready to manage AlbumArtist and TrackArtist.
Also for this reason we need to give users a consistent way to tag their track,
I mean we have to choose where performer and
On Wednesday, January 25, 2006 11:53 PM,
Björn Krombholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you think about it, this could help to soften the infamous (and
hardly understand by users) classical exception rule of composer as
Artist and narrow a bit classical and other music rules.
I'm not sure
Not edited by me.
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ReleaseAnnotationStyle
http://musicbrainz.org/edit/annotation/show.html?annotationid=17195
How could these experienced moderators talk about an EU release?
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
On Thursday, January 19, 2006 8:45 PM,
Björn Krombholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I proposed a definition of release. Do you agree with that one? If
not what would you define a release to be?
The release event? Yep, I agree, because it's the definition used
everywhere else.
No, almost not
Il Monday, January 09, 2006 6:46 PM
Björn Krombholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
No, there's a problem underlying: how do you define a release?
To me a release is the physical cd which is boild so to be sold in a
market: a brasilian release has portuguese liner notes and a Eu
reelase has
On Sunday, January 08, 2006 5:28 PM,
Schika [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The EU is clearly defined and also has an ISO code, like other
countries, even though it's not technically a country (although it
exhibits several properties of a country). I will gladly submit a
patch to include the EU, but
36 matches
Mail list logo
