On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 03:57 +0200, lorenz pressler wrote:
> fonts for print are designed with the background, that they are displayed
> at much higher resolution/dpi than regular displays. fonts for screen are
> aiming at an easy legibility on many types of devices. distance to the eye
> is
Perhaps someone can code a Greasemonkey script to do that?
Op 17-6-2011 18:18, lorenz pressler schreef:
>> If you're creating a project for a non-print environment you can easily
>> convert "fancy" punctuation back to ascii.
> i can't convert it while browsing MB.
>
>> If your mp3 player has troub
> If you're creating a project for a non-print environment you can easily
> convert "fancy" punctuation back to ascii.
i can't convert it while browsing MB.
> If your mp3 player has trouble using these characters you should use a
> tagger which can do this conversion for you (picard has the opti
lorenz pressler wrote:
>
> Am 17.06.2011, 01:17 Uhr, schrieb Paul C. Bryan :
>
>> And in your opinion, in a print environment, it's not nonsense? If so,
>> I'd like to better understand why this is your position.
>
> fonts for print are designed with the background, that they a
Hello,
On 17/06/11 03:57, lorenz pressler wrote:
> Am 17.06.2011, 01:17 Uhr, schrieb Paul C. Bryan:
>
>> And in your opinion, in a print environment, it's not nonsense? If so,
>> I'd like to better understand why this is your position.
>
> i do quite some layout and typesetting work and i like usi
Am 17.06.2011, 01:17 Uhr, schrieb Paul C. Bryan :
> And in your opinion, in a print environment, it's not nonsense? If so,
> I'd like to better understand why this is your position.
fonts for print are designed with the background, that they are displayed
at much higher resolution/dpi than regu
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:43, lorenz pressler wrote:
> usability > typographical correctness
Just FYI, I and a few others made all these same arguments in a
monster thread a few years back. We managed to put off the pedants
for a little while, anyway. ;)
--
-:-:- David K. Gasaway
-:-:- Emai
And in your opinion, in a print environment, it's not nonsense? If so,
I'd like to better understand why this is your position.
Paul
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 20:43 +0200, lorenz pressler wrote:
> i really do think, that typographical correct punctuation is nonsense in a
> non-print environment.
>
i really do think, that typographical correct punctuation is nonsense in a
non-print environment.
it adds inconsitency and noise to the database since most users are only
able (or willing) to use the chars ' and " and - and an automatic
determination is not reliable imho. also most fontsets
2011/6/16, jacobbrett :
>
> Per Starbäck wrote:
>>
>> At least Bogdan Butnaru has planned to write typography assisting
>> software. See
>> http://musicbrainz-mailing-lists.2986109.n2.nabble.com/Mechanically-assisted-updating-of-typography-on-MusicBrainz-td5978214.html
>> from early this year.
>>
>
Per Starbäck wrote:
>
> At least Bogdan Butnaru has planned to write typography assisting
> software. See
> http://musicbrainz-mailing-lists.2986109.n2.nabble.com/Mechanically-assisted-updating-of-typography-on-MusicBrainz-td5978214.html
> from early this year.
>
>> song's title → song’s
Piotr Szotkowski wrote:
> The problem with apostrophes is that it’s
> not trivial to script the replacement:
And that's only English...
I would probably not go as far as using the hyphen character, I've seen
reports that it's not available in the standard fonts in Windows, e.g.
http://bugs.musi
At least Bogdan Butnaru has planned to write typography assisting
software. See
http://musicbrainz-mailing-lists.2986109.n2.nabble.com/Mechanically-assisted-updating-of-typography-on-MusicBrainz-td5978214.html
from early this year.
> song's title → song’s title
> a 'quoted' text → a ‘q
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
>> Personally, I don't think there's any utility in replacing
>> characters which could be done with a script. Only if there's
>> some kind of judgement call involved does it really make any sense.
The proble
> Personally, I don't think there's any utility in replacing characters
> which could be done with a script. Only if there's some kind of
> judgement call involved does it really make any sense.
> Cleaning up
> only some releases will just leave things in a seemingly inconsistent
> state, so I'd r
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:53, Piotr Szotkowski wrote:
>> Yeah, me again. Still most grateful fot MusicBrainz. :)
>>
>> While I was on a recent Picard-powered metadata-cleanup spree on my
>> music I noticed http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Sty
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:53, Piotr Szotkowski wrote:
> Yeah, me again. Still most grateful fot MusicBrainz. :)
>
> While I was on a recent Picard-powered metadata-cleanup spree on my
> music I noticed http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Style/Miscellaneous saying
> that ‘typographically-correct punctuati
Yeah, me again. Still most grateful fot MusicBrainz. :)
While I was on a recent Picard-powered metadata-cleanup spree on my
music I noticed http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Style/Miscellaneous saying
that ‘typographically-correct punctuation is preferred’, so I started
updating MB with my local fixes to
18 matches
Mail list logo