On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 08:19:27PM +0200, E Forrest Carpenter wrote:
gpg: Warning: using insecure memory!
Press any key to continue...
Anyone know if there's a flag I'm missing or something to make this
output go away?
echo no-secmem-warning ~/.gnupg/options
--
Jos Backus
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 09:34:03PM +0200, Roberto Suarez Soto wrote:
On 10/Sep/1999, Chris Green wrote:
What I need is to be able to view my POP3 'folder' and delete
individual messages. Most of the newer Unix/Linux MUAs do in fact
work this way with POP3 folders, it makes them look
On Sat, Sep 11, 1999 at 03:35:05AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
What I need is to be able to view my POP3 'folder' and delete
individual messages. Most of the newer Unix/Linux MUAs do in fact
work this way with POP3 folders, it makes them look just like ordinary
local folders to the
Jeremy Blosser wrote:
Marco Giardini [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
I' desperately trying to better configure my mutt but I'm having problem
with the hooks. I need that all mail coming from BUGTRAQ and from some
other mailing list is stored in a separate file than inbox.
Mutt doesn't
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 10:28:20AM +0100, Mr.Axel Tillequin wrote:
I have installed procmail and already removed it. I do not like the way it works. I
think that save-hook is much more flexible. An, up to now, it works fine.
Marco
Jeremy Blosser wrote:
Marco Giardini [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Marco Giardini [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
I have installed procmail and already removed it. I do not like the way
it works. I think that save-hook is much more flexible. An, up to now, it
works fine.
If you want to sort mail as it arrives, you *cannot* use save-hooks to do
it. Mutt does not
"R. Marc" wrote:
I run windowmaker and would like to put an appicon on my desktop;
perhaps there is here somebody who prefers this combination of a mailer
and window manager and could help me a bit; any practical suggestions?
You can just make an xterm icon for it, but that's pretty
Axel Tillequin:
Mutt doesn't filter mail. Try procmail.
note:
If your MTA is exim (much simpler and as powerfull as sendmail)
then Procmail is not necessary. Look for "filtering mail"
in the exim doc...Actually you will just have to write a .forward file
with some special
commands
If it isn't a silly question how does mutt work with IMAP4?
I have some folders set up on an IMAP4 server, how do I access them
with mutt? Is there a simple way to give them names/aliases so they
can be accessed like local folders? Having to enter the full address
of the folder every time one
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS dijo:
Axel Tillequin:
Mutt doesn't filter mail. Try procmail.
note:
If your MTA is exim (much simpler and as powerfull as sendmail)
then Procmail is not necessary. Look for "filtering mail"
in the exim doc...Actually you will just have to write a
On Sat, Aug 07, 1999 at 07:02:59AM -0700, Leiden, Soren wrote:
| Simply put, %s is the url. COMMAND is required, and lynx is the program.
| COMMAND lynx %s
What are the lines/changes that goes into your .muttrc file to access lynx to
view the url ?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
On Monday, 13 September 1999 at 11:55, Chris Green wrote:
If it isn't a silly question how does mutt work with IMAP4?
I have some folders set up on an IMAP4 server, how do I access them
with mutt? Is there a simple way to give them names/aliases so they
can be accessed like local folders?
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 07:43:58AM -0400, Brendan Cully wrote:
On Monday, 13 September 1999 at 11:55, Chris Green wrote:
If it isn't a silly question how does mutt work with IMAP4?
I have some folders set up on an IMAP4 server, how do I access them
with mutt? Is there a simple way to
Well I've worked out what I need to do to access my IMAP4 folders,
it's not very user friendly yet is it!
I think mutt needs some sort of local cache/memory of folder names as
typing the full folder name every time one accesses a folder just
isn't reasonable (e.g. {mailandnews.co.uk}inbox).
In
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 10:31:16AM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
Mutt doesn't filter mail. Try procmail.
note:
If your MTA is exim (much simpler and as powerfull as sendmail)
then Procmail is not necessary. Look for "filtering mail"
in the exim doc...Actually you will
Hi,
I've just noticed that flag-message does not work with the tag-prefix
function : if I tag a bunch of messages with tag-pattern, can I mark them as
important ?
Thanks,
Frédéric
this package (fetched from replay) unfortunately was compiled with pgp2-support only.
I use pgp5 and I cant compile the muttsource for my
own cause this leads to strange troubles (another story - unfortunately I can only use
the rpm at this moment).
Now I always get errors like
sh: v: command
I was using mutt for a long time without any problems. A few days ago I decided to
upgrade to mutt1.0pre2i and now I am doomed.
Mutt opens the defaultmailbox ($mail) and shows me the mails. as soon as I want to
open another mailbox or quit mutt (so when mutt has to
close the current
I was wondering, being new to Mutt, if it is possible to choose the
receive_pgp version on the fly. I use GnuPG but there are a lot of
People out there who use RSA key types. I know if they use Diffie-Hellman
Keys I can use GNUPG. I still, even in the Linux world, run into alot of
RSA keys.
On Saturday, 11 September 1999 at 21:12, Allan K. Neal wrote:
I was wondering, being new to Mutt, if it is possible to choose the
receive_pgp version on the fly. I use GnuPG but there are a lot of
People out there who use RSA key types. I know if they use Diffie-Hellman
Keys I can use
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 03:39:37PM +0200, Frederic Gobry wrote:
I've just noticed that flag-message does not work with the tag-prefix
function : if I tag a bunch of messages with tag-pattern, can I mark them as
important ?
Yes, with set-flag, bound to 'w' by default.
Gero
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 11:25:08AM -0400, Brendan Cully wrote:
You can download a module that gives GnuPG the ability to read RSA keys.
It's in the contrib directory, I think.
With these modules gpg even signs and encrypts message in a pgp 2.6.3
compatible format. I didn't manage to make it
In my opinion, wmmail is useless until you have a permanent connexion.
I'm sure you have reason for this opinion, but if you use fetchmail
wmmail is simply grand, permanent connection or no, IMHO.
[snip]
and most of the time people are trying to minimise their connexion time...so.
Salvatore Greco [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 07, 1999 at 07:02:59AM -0700, Leiden, Soren wrote:
| Simply put, %s is the url. COMMAND is required, and lynx is the program.
| COMMAND lynx %s
What are the lines/changes that goes into your .muttrc file to access lynx to
view the url
McKisson, Shawn [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Would you say that mutt is probably the best mail client for handling
mailing lists?
Yes. List-reply, threading (not just viewing, but deleting/etc. as well),
intelligent handling of stupid reply-to munging, correct mail-followup-to
handling, and
put
auto_view text/html
in ~/.muttrc
and
text/html; lynx -dump %s; copiousoutput; nametemplate=%s.html
in ~/.mailcap
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 01:43:04PM +0200, Salvatore Greco wrote:
On Sat, Aug 07, 1999 at 07:02:59AM -0700, Leiden, Soren wrote:
| Simply put, %s is the url. COMMAND
Are there any other reasonable alternatives?
Not that I'm aware of. I'm not even sure of any others that have a working
list-reply.
If you're the kind that expects the MUA to filter mail for you you may be
suprised if you use Mutt and find it doesn't do its own filtering, but this
oh. this is to view html mail. 'scuse me.
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 01:13:34PM -0700, Mark Luntzel wrote:
put
auto_view text/html
in ~/.muttrc
and
text/html; lynx -dump %s; copiousoutput; nametemplate=%s.html
in ~/.mailcap
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 01:43:04PM +0200,
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 09:39:22AM -0700, R. Marc wrote:
[...]
[snip]
and most of the time people are trying to minimise their connexion time...so.
Hrm...what completely different worlds we live in. Even when I had a modem,
I, and most of my friends, tried for 24x7 connections; didn't
Fairlight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 13 Sep 1999:
The bug is that while all messages should be flagged deleted, in truth
only those VISIBLE were deleted. Articles hidden in collapsed threads were
-not- flagged nor deleted, and were written back out to the folder at quit
time.
I
30 matches
Mail list logo
