On 2000-06-12 15:46:03 +1000, CaT wrote:
Which version of mutt should I try to see if I can
reporduce this? I've noticed there have been
official-looking patches about and wanna see if I can
get this to happen again.
I think we have already been reproducing what you
describe, and there are
On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 09:17:48AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
On 2000-06-12 15:46:03 +1000, CaT wrote:
Which version of mutt should I try to see if I can
reporduce this? I've noticed there have been
official-looking patches about and wanna see if I can
get this to happen again.
I
On Sun, Jun 11, 2000 at 11:09:56PM +0200 or thereabouts, Nils Vogels wrote:
On Sun, Jun 11, 2000 at 04:44:28PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
We'll all love that :-) If I may be so bold as to make a suggestion,
Seconded.
take a moment *now* to remember those things that were most confusing,
John --
...and then John Poltorak said...
% On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 09:44:54AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
%
% Select 'O' to specify a reverse order, and then 'u' for unsorted.
%
% Many thanks for that.
Sure thing!
%
% You're probably in the 'o'rder menu instead of reverse-'O'rder. Check
%
David T-G proclaimed on mutt-users that:
I think that the short answer is "no". You throw your name address at
mutt pretty much however you like, and mutt (clever guy that he is)
rewrites it correctly(*1). Unless you were to hack the sources, I think
you're, um, stuck with the address as it
Telsa, et al --
...and then Telsa Gwynne said...
% On Sun, Jun 11, 2000 at 11:09:56PM +0200 or thereabouts, Nils Vogels wrote:
% On Sun, Jun 11, 2000 at 04:44:28PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
%
% AND write them down so that you won't forget them, so that you can look
%
% Definitely seconded
At 12 June, 2000 Telsa Gwynne wrote:
On Sun, Jun 11, 2000 at 11:09:56PM +0200 or thereabouts, Nils Vogels wrote:
On Sun, Jun 11, 2000 at 04:44:28PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
As a new and excited happy user of mutt, and only 6 months into Linux, I
would suggest something similar to the newbie
On Sun, Jun 11, 2000 at 04:17:42PM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
One problem: There is another program of the same name at
ftp://ftp.u-aizu.ac.jp/pub/lang/pdf/pdf2txt/
I came up with this after a google.com search but this URL does not seem
to be up. Has anyone had any luck with it?
On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 12:40:42AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
A rather trivial question - but I want to change my from address format -
from the existing
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
The INSTALL file
Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which I suspected ... the [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Me) is depreciated, and seems to
be more common on usenet than on e-mail.
If you configure Mutt with --enable-exact-address, it will not rewrite
the address in the preferred format.
--
David
David DeSimone proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which I suspected ... the [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Me) is depreciated, and seems to
be more common on usenet than on e-mail.
If you configure Mutt with --enable-exact-address, it will not rewrite
the
Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote that:
David DeSimone proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which I suspected ... the [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Me) is depreciated, and seems to
be more common on usenet than on e-mail.
If you configure Mutt
Dale Morris muttered:
As a new and excited happy user of mutt, and only 6 months into Linux
Well, then welcome to the mailclient that just sucks less and to the
wonderfull - but sometimes confusing - world of unix.
I would suggest something similar to the newbie files on
Linuxnewbie.org,
On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 04:26:44PM -0400, Erik Jacobsen wrote:
Since when are rfc 822 comments deprecated?
There's an update for RFC822 which says:
Also, because some legacy implementations interpret the comment,
comments SHOULD NOT generally be used in address fields to avoid
I've never been able to get slrn to open or autoview an image file after
it's downloaded. I'm pretty new to all this, but I'm sure that's it's a
function of .mailcap file. Can someone post the proper command to enter in
my .mailcap file? Here's what I've got in there now:
While composing a resend to a potential employer, I thought, now
wouldn't it be nice if there was an option to almost bounce it. Example,
I am asked for the new address beneath, as in a bounce, but it is resent
to a different address.
This may not be a great thing, but not all options are great,
On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 07:20:06PM -0700, Jason Helfman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
While composing a resend to a potential employer, I thought, now
wouldn't it be nice if there was an option to almost bounce it. Example,
I am asked for the new address beneath, as in a bounce, but it is resent
Figured I'd better seek help before I start fixing things.. I am using gpg
for encryption in mutt. It seems to work fine. Tonight I installed pgp
6.5.3 on the wife's machine and sent myself an email, encrypted, of
course. Mutt didn't decrypt it. I sent her an encrypted/signed mail and
her box
I just got a strange message while trying to send mail with a new
install of mutt 1.0. It's on a new computer, so I *may* have fudged some
config stuff. Qmail works fine outgoing and the sendmail replacement is
in /usr/bin. Seems like everything is the same as on my desktop at home,
but it's 3000
19 matches
Mail list logo
