I setup a new box yesterday, so installed mutt and moved my mailboxes and
config files over. For the most part things are fine, but there is one issue
that is really bugging me. Anytime mutt displays a mailbox from my folder
(which is set in my ~/.muttrc), the +/= gets expanded to the full path
Hi,
Maybe you will find this question a bit stupid, but I have a conceptual
problem.
My setting is fetchmail->procmail->mail folders. Then I use mutt to read the
mail folders.
Is there a need for a spool folder in this setting ? Am I doing something not
regular ?
Sure I can live without the answe
After reading through this thread, I realized I could benefit from
something similar, at least for some of my accounts. So far it has been
mentioned that A) setting the alternates option to match your other
accounts should do the trick, and B) setting reverse_name should also
reuse the To: header
Louis, et al --
...and then Louis LeBlanc said...
% How about piping those messages thru a procmail script? It may
...
% up with such a procmailrc, a macro could be used to pipe it through
% procmail, and delete the current one. Of course this is on the
I'm thinking more along the lines of for
On Thu, Aug 2, 2001, David T-G aptly wrote:
>
> I guess us mutt folks are just elitist bastards :-)
Yes, and for better or for worse, damn proud of it. :) At least there
are a FEW people who still appreciate proper formatting. :-/
-Ken
On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 02:06:11PM -0400, Dan Boger wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 07:54:58PM +0200, Gerhard Feiner wrote:
> > Hmm, i am using sendmail (and yes, i love it). This isn't the
> > problem so far, as i am just searching for way to specify the To:
> > of the original Mail as the From
On 2001-08-02 10:56:18 +0100, Sean Dempsey wrote:
>I am also using a key server to look up keys that aren't on my
>keyring. I have had no problems with anyone else, whether they
>are on the server or not.
>No big deal. I am just curious!
I'd suppose that gnupg tries to find out whether my k
has anyone come up with a way to export various stuff to the xterm titlebar
in mutt?
w
Hello,
I saw the wishlist bug report to enable moving messages that match a
pattern from $spoolfile to $mbox, and wonder if there is any
sophisticated workaround that people are using to achieve the same
effect?
Basically, I'd like to keep messages that I 'F'lag important to stay in
$spoolfile a
* Dumas Patrice ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010803 10:57]:
> Hi,
> Maybe you will find this question a bit stupid, but I have a conceptual
> problem.
> My setting is fetchmail->procmail->mail folders. Then I use mutt to read the
> mail folders.
> Is there a need for a spool folder in this setting ? Am I
On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 05:32:18PM -0400, Ed Robitaille wrote:
> I would like to integrate mutt and pgp but
> there doesn't seem to be much documentation
> conserning this. Where can I obtain a tutorial ??
Ed,
There is PGP-Notes.txt included in your mutt package or at
http://www.mutt.org/doc/PGP
Hallo Christoph Maurer,
on Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 03:51:37PM +0200, Christoph Maurer wrote:
> E.g. in my mailcap I have
Mee, too! :-)
BTW: it doesn't matter if I reply from the index or from within the pager.
ciao,
markus
--
Dieses Dokument wurde elektronisch erstellt und ist auch ohne Umlaut
I would like to integrate mutt and pgp but
there doesn't seem to be much documentation
conserning this. Where can I obtain a tutorial ??
--
_
Linux, the choice | Flugg's Law: When you need to knock on
of a GNU ge
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 08:39:57AM +0200, Bonhote Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am subscribed to some so-called sysadmin lists. Unfortunately, the
> list users don't seem to know much about E-Mail: They just hit Outlurks
> "Reply"-button, erase the subject and start another thread. The resu
Gerhard Feiner spake unto us the following wisdom:
> Hehe, that wasn't too confusing ;-) But it's not what i am
> searching for, as basically _any_ adress could come in. that would
> be a _very_ long alternates-list ;-)
>
> Isn't there any way of doing this on the fly?
Hmm, this isn't *exactly
On 2001.08.03, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"John Wright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just talking to someone about mutt flagging mail with + when it's to
> you and T when it's to you and other, etc, and we were just wondering if
> mutt either does or could have a flag for emails which are fro
Hello,
I have a slightly weird problem: I have one account, where any mail
not sent to a specific account, but to my domain, appears. It is
called 'whatever' here.
Now i want the following:
If anybody sends a mail to me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] this mail
arrives in 'whatever'. Now, if i want to
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 11:52:48AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> What does "PGP" mean here? GPG, PGP 5, PGP 6, ...?
I am using gpg.
I am also using a key server to look up keys that aren't on my keyring. I
have had no problems with anyone else, whether they are on the server or
not.
No big
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 12:09:57PM -0400, Mr. Wade wrote:
> Thomas Huemmler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Will,
> >
> > * Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010802 08:11]:
> > > I have: color indicator brightwhite brightblue in my .muttrc.
> > >
> > > For some reason if I check my mail on the
On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 10:32:00AM +0200, Marco Fioretti wrote:
> I respectfully suggest that nobody wastes one second to
> program ways to sort/prune/etc messages that where not
> threaded properly BY THEIR SENDERS.
Somebody did and sent a patch for 1.3.19 directly to me. I also asked
him to s
20 matches
Mail list logo