After reading through this thread, I realized I could benefit from
something similar, at least for some of my accounts.  So far it has been
mentioned that A) setting the alternates option to match your other
accounts should do the trick, and B) setting reverse_name should also
reuse the To: header in the original e-mail (or so I think that's what
it's supposed to do).  Well, neither seem to work for me ;)  My
alternates option is set as:

set alternates = "phineas@only-linux\.com|skwerl@telocity\.com|
skwerl@eathlink\.net|skerl-0@home\.com"

which I think -should- match my other addresses exactly, unless it looks
at the real name section of the address as well.  I also tried setting
reverse_name, but that didn't seem to have any effect either.  Are there
some other options I may have in my configs that would cause this to be
overridden ?  I did have a send-hook to force a From: header, but I
commented that out before I started playing with this.  Any insight
would be appreciated ;)


* Gerhard Feiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010803 13:26]:
>Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 19:23:01 +0200
>From: Gerhard Feiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Automatic Generation of Sender-Adress?
>User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
>
>Hello,
>
>I have a slightly weird problem:  I have one account, where any mail
>not sent to a specific account, but to my domain, appears.  It is
>called 'whatever' here.
>
>Now i want the following:
>
>If anybody sends a mail to me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] this mail
>arrives in 'whatever'.  Now, if i want to answer this guy, i don't
>want [EMAIL PROTECTED] to appear as the sender-address, but:
>
>I want the address, the sender entered ([EMAIL PROTECTED] in
>this example) to be the sender of the reply.
>
>And i want this to be automatically set in that specific folder.
>eg. setting the sender of the reply the same as the To: from the
>original mail was.
>
>Is there any way to accomplish this with mutt and it's friends?
>
>mfg,
>Gerd
>
>-- 
>/"\
>\ /     ASCII Ribbon Campaign
> x      Say NO to HTML in email and news !!
>/ \
>
>

-- 
Kyle Knack
([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Reply via email to