On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 11:43:53PM +0200, Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote:
>
> In my .muttrc I have this vor gpg- encryptions:
>
> set pgp_encrypt_only_command="gpg -v --batch --output - --encrypt --textmode
> --armor --always-trust -- -r %r -- %f"
>
> set pgp_encrypt_sign_command="gpg --passphrase-fd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mutt-users] <13/08/01 23:14 +0200>:
> BTW, my rc.conf for the sendmail daemon reads (this is a BSD
> system):
> sendmail_flags="-bd -q30m"
> I recall reading somewhere that passing the -bd flag to sendmail and
This runs sendmail in daemon mode
> then passing the -d flag to fo
Hi all..
ich have a small problem (I think) with mutt and gpg.
I'v got mutt-1.3.19 with gnupg-1.0.6 and all went fine, but when I want to
encrypt a mail, I got this:
usage: gpg [options] --encrypt [filename]
I seems something wrong, but i do not find this error.
In my .muttrc I have this vor g
Hi all..
ich have a small problem (I think) with mutt and gpg.
I'v got mutt-1.3.19 with gnupg-1.0.6 and all went fine, but when I want to
encrypt a mail, I got this:
usage: gpg [options] --encrypt [filename]
I seems something wrong, but i do not find this error.
In my .muttrc I have this vor g
On 010813, at 16:00:36, Jean-Sebastien Morisset wrote
> I'd like to limit matches to the To: and From: fields, skipping the Cc:
> and Bcc: fields. I figure the following would probably work, but is there
> a more elegant (i.e. less redundant) method?
>
> fcc-save-hook ~t [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ~f [E
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 07:29:00PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Horacio [mutt-users] <12/08/01 06:08 +0200>:
> > Sorry, my mistake. This is what happens when you go back to using
> > sendmail after time using qmail and forget to change the line in
> > .fetchmailrc:
> > mda /usr/loc
I use fcc-save-hooks like:
fcc-save-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] =".Clients.CompanyX.People.joe bob"
I'd like to limit matches to the To: and From: fields, skipping the Cc:
and Bcc: fields. I figure the following would probably work, but is there
a more elegant (i.e. less redundant) method?
fcc-save-
* Nate Johnston ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010813 05:34]:
> Suresh Ramasubramanian spake thus: (Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 07:51:11AM +0530)
>
> > Nate Johnston [mutt-users] <10/08/01 14:51 -0500>:
> > > I am running mutt, but I do not want to submit my mail to the running
> > > Sendmail daemon for reliabil
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 08:02:25PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>
> But does this work with Mozilla (the current version is now 0.9.3)?
>
Mea culpa!
I just tried with Mozilla 0.9.3 (Navigator only). The prefs.js file is
fine, but muttzilla does not open for me either.
Has anyone tried netsca
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 13:12:26 -0400, Michael Sanders wrote:
> I have version 0.40 (the most recent listed at
> http://www3.telus.net/brian_winters/mutt/ )
> working without problems. What is v 0.92?
But does this work with Mozilla (the current version is now 0.9.3)?
--
Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAI
On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 06:42:18PM -0400, Kyle Knack wrote:
> Has anyone gotten muttzilla and/or altmail to work with the latest
> releases of Mozilla (ie: 0.92) ? It seems as though the prefs.js (I
> can't remember the exact name) is generated dynamically or by some
> similar action. I could al
On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, David Ellement wrote:
> Since mutt uses the first matching save-hook, a default save-hook
> needs to be appear last.
Woohoo, it works! Thank you.
-Andrei
"The galaxy is, in other words, an immensely, intrinsically,
and inexhaustibly interesting place." -- Iain M. Banks
On 010813, at 10:50:53, Andrei Zmievski wrote
> > Perhaps 'save-hook . =people/%u' or 'save-hook !~l =people/%u' will
> > do what you want.
>
> It works but it disables all other save-hooks I have. For example:
>
> save-hook . =people/%u
> save-hook ~Lphp-dev +OpenSource/PHP
Since m
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 11:41:48AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
: ...and then Eugene Lee said...
: %
: % Is '%u' documented in the Mutt 1.2.5 docs as a valid save-hook sequence?
:
: Now that you know what it is and searching is trivial, you should look
: it up for yourself and see.
:
: It is. Well,
On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, David Ellement wrote:
> > [...] Right now if I have email from
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I hit 'save', it prompts me for where to save it to
> > and the default location is "=joeman". What I want it to be is
> > "=people/joeman"..
>
> Perhaps 'save-hook . =people/%u' or 'sav
Eugene --
...and then Eugene Lee said...
% On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 08:24:25AM -0700, David Ellement wrote:
% : On 010813, at 09:47:00, Andrei Zmievski wrote
% : >
% : > [...] Right now if I have email from
% : > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I hit 'save', it prompts me for where to save it to
% : > and
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 08:24:25AM -0700, David Ellement wrote:
: On 010813, at 09:47:00, Andrei Zmievski wrote
: >
: > [...] Right now if I have email from
: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I hit 'save', it prompts me for where to save it to
: > and the default location is "=joeman". What I want it to
On 010813, at 09:47:00, Andrei Zmievski wrote
> [...] Right now if I have email from
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I hit 'save', it prompts me for where to save it to
> and the default location is "=joeman". What I want it to be is
> "=people/joeman"..
Perhaps 'save-hook . =people/%u' or 'save-hook !~
* Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08/13/01 16:25]:
> | You just have to define some macros. For instance :
> |
> | macro index d "" "delete and sync"
> | macro pager d "" "delete and sync"
> |
>
> Of course !
>
> But slight problem, the sync-mailbox command does not work on my Mutt
> 1.2.5i in t
On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, Sam Roberts wrote:
> > Of course I can do that for each individual email address, but it would
> > suck. I need to know if there's a way to do it for any email address
> > that's not already caught by other save-hooks.
>
> Did you look at "save_name"? I think it also interact
Noesis [mutt-users] <13/08/01 08:37 -0500>:
> I added "set envelope_from" in your .muttrc and it works perfectly. Even
> before messing with sendmail?! I don't even know where I added my smtp
> server!? How can this be?
Mutt uses your local sendmail.
> Looks like this is my last question r
Quoting Andrei Zmievski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, who wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Of course I can do that for each individual email address, but it would
> suck. I need to know if there's a way to do it for any email address
> that's not already caught by other save-hooks.
Did you look at "save_name"? I think i
According to Cedric Duval on Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 01:03:48PM +0200:
| Hi Eric,
|
| * Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08/13/01 12:03]:
| > Is this possible to implement without pathcing the source?
| >
| > I mean, Instead of having to explicitly calling it with '$'
|
| You just have to define som
I added "set envelope_from" in your .muttrc and it works perfectly. Even
before messing with sendmail?! I don't even know where I added my smtp
server!? How can this be?
Looks like this is my last question regarding this topic, thanks for all
your help!
-Noesis
On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> have you tried:
> save-hook '~f [EMAIL PROTECTED]' =people/foo
> save-hook '~f [EMAIL PROTECTED]' =people/jester
Hi,
Of course I can do that for each individual email address, but it would
suck. I need to know if there's a way to do it for any emai
Hi Andrei!
On Thu, 09 Aug 2001, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> I have a few save-hooks set up to save my mailing list stuff into
> different folders. However, I'd like to set up a default save-hook that
> would save anything that is not caught by the other save-hooks into
> another directory according
Nate Johnston [mutt-users] <13/08/01 07:28 -0500>:
> This is a multi-user system and I do not have superuser priveliges. My
> impression is that compiling and installing a home-directory local copy
> of sendmail is an exercise best avoided if possible.
Then you are better off with Masqmail /
> My issue is not with sendmail, per se, but with a new set of policies
> that have been implemented locally. Redirecting all mail from the Unix
> host to a Windows NT machine to be virus and "content" screened is a
> decision I disagree with. And seeing as that screening server has
> already
Suresh Ramasubramanian spake thus: (Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 07:51:11AM +0530)
> Nate Johnston [mutt-users] <10/08/01 14:51 -0500>:
> > I am running mutt, but I do not want to submit my mail to the running
> > Sendmail daemon for reliability reasons. I am looking for a utility
>
> Erm, how (un)rel
Hi Eric,
* Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08/13/01 12:03]:
> Is this possible to implement without pathcing the source?
>
> I mean, Instead of having to explicitly calling it with '$'
You just have to define some macros. For instance :
macro index d "" "delete and sync"
macro pager d "" "delet
Is this possible to implement without pathcing the source?
I mean, Instead of having to explicitly calling it with '$'
Whatever I do in mutt I would like my mailbox flags to be updated in
real time.
Thanx
--
Eric Smith
31 matches
Mail list logo
