How to send mail to groups of recipients?

My question is wether there is a feature in mutt to allow this. TIA Erwin

Re: OT: replace POP3 with IMAP directly

On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 08:10:37AM +0800, Rino Mardo wrote: > hi. a little OT here i'm wondering what are the requirements to replace > POP3 with IMAP? in my fetchmail i download emails using POP3. now i've > learned that IMAP doesn't require the user to do POP-before-SMTP hence > with that i do

Re: How to send mail to groups of recipients?

Erwin Kaiser [12/09/01 10:10 +0200]: > My question is wether there is a feature in mutt to allow this. Aliases - better create them in sendmail though. -suresh

Re: How to send mail to groups of recipients?

On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 10:10:29AM +0200, Erwin Kaiser wrote: > My question is wether there is a feature in mutt to allow this. > TIA Erwin alias will do it... e.g. alias mylist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Will allow you to use "mylist" as a To address.. -- Regards Cliff Sending a

Re: My first macro..not quite doing what I want

On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 08:58:19PM -0400, Jim Toth wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 03:15:07PM +0200, Cliff Sarginson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) >said: > > Hello, > > A common sequence for me when reading new messages is to delete then > > move to the next new message. My macro is as follows: > > > > m

Re: My first macro..not quite doing what I want

On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 08:58:19PM -0400, Jim Toth wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 03:15:07PM +0200, Cliff Sarginson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) >said: > > Hello, > > A common sequence for me when reading new messages is to delete then > > move to the next new message. My macro is as follows: > > > > m

Re: easy question... :)

On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Matthias LOITSCH wrote: > how can i filter my messages so that, for example, all mails from > [EMAIL PROTECTED] get into a specific mailbox when they arrive? > I'd recommend maildrop... http://www.flounder.net/~mrsam/maildrop/ http://www.courier-mta.org/download.php#maildro

mutt & exchange

Hi, how do I use mutt with an EXCHANGE server ? Actually I can already READ mail by having set imap_user="" set imap_pass="" set imap_checkinterval="30" # bind index "\Ca" 'imap-fetch-mail' set folder={EXCHANGE} set spoolfile={EXCHANGE}INBOX but if I try to SEND mail, it tells me Error 127 ..

Re: mutt & exchange

Johannes Zellner [12/09/01 12:04 +0200]: > how do I use mutt with an EXCHANGE server ? > Actually I can already READ mail by having > set imap_user="" > set imap_pass="" > but if I try to SEND mail, it tells me > Error 127 .. Exec error. Mutt doesn't have a builtin smtp client of any kind. Se

send-hook, folder-hook

Hi everyone, I thought I had this working, but seems that I have broken something, and I'm not sure I'm using send and folder-hook correctly. What I need to have happen is that my .sig changes, my From address is correct (which it is) and the reply-to: header is correct, and remove the vanitity

Re: mutt & exchange

Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > > Johannes Zellner [12/09/01 12:04 +0200]: > > how do I use mutt with an EXCHANGE server ? > > Actually I can already READ mail by having > > set imap_user="" > > set imap_pass="" > > > but if I try to SEND mail, it tells me > > Error 127 .. Exec error. > > Mutt

Re: mutt & exchange

> Another good reason to include SMTP capabilities into mutt. They don't belong there. Check the archives, this has been discussed to death already.

send-hook, folder-hook??

Hi everyone I have a folder that I have procmail chuck all email for my company's address into. When I send from this folder though, I want to get rid of the "vanity" headers (X-Operating-System and X-Uptime), but it doesn't work. Here's what i have: # Setup the defaults. folder-hook .set

Re: nfrm/frm in mutt ?

Paul de Weerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said something to this effect on 09/11/2001: > I recently switched to using Mutt for all my mail. Sure do like > it ! But I do miss some tools I had back when using ELM, namely > frm and nfrm. frm listed all mails in a specified mailbox (or > $MAIL if none was spe

Fix for PGP copyright thing...

I don't know about you guys, but I got tired of PGP's (version 6.5.8) copyright message. Here's a little script I wrote called 'pgp-no-copyright': ---BEGIN--- #!/bin/sh PGP_ERR="/tmp/pgperr.$$" PGP_OUT="/tmp/pgpout.$$" PGP_EXIT="0" pgp $* 2>$PGP_ERR 1>$PGP_OUT PGP_EXIT="$?" egrep -v '^(Pretty

Outlook patch...

I've read about the 'outlook patch' in a few messages, but haven't been able to find it anywhere. Can someone point me to a URL with the patch for mutt v1.2.5? Thanks, js. -- Jean-Sebastien Morisset, Sr. UNIX Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Personal Homepage This i

Re: Fix for PGP copyright thing...

Am Mit, 12 Sep 2001, schrieb Jean-Sebastien Morisset: > I don't know about you guys, but I got tired of PGP's (version 6.5.8) > copyright message. Here's a little script I wrote called I got tired of using non-free-software. Therefore I use GnuPG. Christoph -- Christoph Maurer - Paul-Röntgen-

Operations on tagged messages

Hello I have a question about tags. How can I save all tagged messages in one fell swoop ? As a corollary to that how can I save a thread in one fell swoop? What operations can I do on messages marked as important, for example I may want to mark messages as important that require some action from

Re: My first macro..not quite doing what I want

On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 10:54:53 +0200, Cliff Sarginson wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 08:58:19PM -0400, Jim Toth wrote: > > Try changing the "resolve" variable. > > > > Something like > > > > macro index "set noresolve;d;set resolve" "Delete then go to next new >msg" > > > > (untested) >

Re: Operations on tagged messages

Cliff Sarginson [12/09/01 17:03 +0200]: > How can I save all tagged messages in one fell swoop ? ;s =folder ; = "Apply operation to all tagged messages" > As a corollary to that how can I save a thread in one fell swoop? Tag the thread > What operations can I do on messages marked as importan

esc t ..why doesn't work when a message is displayed?

Hello The t toggle thread tagging only works when only the index is displayed, not if you have the index above and a message below in the screen. Is there a reason for this ? Seems a bit odd. -- Regards Cliff Sending an email as follows will get you my public gpg key... To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] S

Re: My first macro..not quite doing what I want

On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 05:25:32PM +0200, Byrial Jensen wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 10:54:53 +0200, Cliff Sarginson wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 08:58:19PM -0400, Jim Toth wrote: > > > Try changing the "resolve" variable. > > > > > > Something like > > > > > > macro index "set nores

"serial mail"

just another question :) i want to send a mail to many persons, but they shouldnt see that they mail is not sent only to them. with the Bcc i have to specify a To Adress... quite the same question : can i change one word in each mail ? for example : "hello name1" "hello name2"

Mail-Followup-To ...

i just did not understand the mail-follow-up function... and i dont see the connection with the 'subscribe ...' command. what is the difference between : 'subscribe ...' and 'lists ...' ?? . -- Matthias Loitsch O-- -- - - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - -- --> @

[OT] Content-Disposition: inline?

I've looked around a bit on several mailing list archives, but I can't seem to figure out what's causing this specific problem, though I think I've narrowed it down. Any help would be appreciated. I doubt it's a Mutt problem, but I'd like to learn what the deal is either way and this list has th

Re: "serial mail"

* Matthias LOITSCH ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010912 13:49]: > just another question :) > > i want to send a mail to many persons, but they shouldnt see that they mail is > not sent only to them. > with the Bcc i have to specify a To Adress... > > quite the same question : can i change one word in ea

Re: Mail-Followup-To ...

* Matthias LOITSCH ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010912 14:41]: > i just did not understand the mail-follow-up function... > and i dont see the connection with the 'subscribe ...' command. > > what is the difference between : 'subscribe ...' and 'lists ...' ?? Mail-Followup-To is a header that helps it s

Re: mutt & exchange

Lars Hecking wrote: > > > Another good reason to include SMTP capabilities into mutt. > > They don't belong there. Check the archives, this has been discussed > to death already. I know, and the arguments usually go along the lines of "Mutt is a MUA, not a MTA". This was a comment related to

Re: mutt & exchange

Magnus Stenman [13/09/01 03:01 +0200]: > if you run cygwin (and since mutt now is in cygwin more people will) > you might not be able to get ssmtp or similar running. So download a simple mail proxy like Mercury from http://www.pmail.com For a doze software it works quite well. Far better than

Re: [OT] Content-Disposition: inline?

Am Mit, 12 Sep 2001, schrieb Justin R. Miller: > I send my mail with Mutt and I always sign it with GnuPG. That results > in the message going out as two (or more) parts -- the message, and the > signature. Both have a 'Content-Disposition: inline' header, which I > take it means that the MUA i

Re: send public key

-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org mQGiBDuamOoRBAC8n1wDEKj1k6hFOhMFji4s27e+g+15tgGmViBMiiXWottugMWn L9FgOjKCDCXGnNKa0hxYsF/3qDlmv/EWT0XKzE07uXQGH9ibeuIYRuo3ou0XOVlV FOWqr7CItjm3eToR1DwcyBAKWS3HSp4tqVHrpN+ULoknFcZ9y//KG