Received header field

2002-04-07 Thread José Romildo Malaquias
Hello. Why mutt (1.3.27) is not showing the Received fields from the header of the messages? How can I configure it to show those fields? Regards. Romildo -- Prof. José Romildo Malaquias Departamento de Computação http://iceb.ufop.br/~romildo Universidade Federal de Ouro

Re: Received header field

2002-04-07 Thread Nicolas Rachinsky
* José Romildo Malaquias [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-07 09:17:07 -0300]: Why mutt (1.3.27) is not showing the Received fields from the header of the messages? How can I configure it to show those fields? try pressing h You want to look in the manual for weed and ignore. Nicolas

Re: Received header field

2002-04-07 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * José Romildo Malaquias [04/07/02 14:17:07 CEST] wrote: Why mutt (1.3.27) is not showing the Received fields from the header of the messages? How can I configure it to show those fields? Try pressing 'h' and look at the manual for 'ignore' and 'unignore'. HTH, Cheers, Rocco.

Re: web interface to procmail?

2002-04-07 Thread Sven Guckes
* David DeSimone: Of course, if you can teach Mutt to do that, then you can also teach procmail to put the mail in that folder to begin with. * Wim Kerkhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-07 02:12]: Yup. I really need to finish the web-based interface to procmail that I started a while ago...

Re: un-alternates?

2002-04-07 Thread Peter T. Abplanalp
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 10:12:46PM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: Here you go: while (STDIN) { if (m/the regex you are testing/) { print It matches!\n; } else { print It doesn't match!\n; } } i would suggest you pass in both the regex and the email. that way

Re: un-alternates?

2002-04-07 Thread David T-G
Rob -- ...and then Feztaa said... % % Alas! David T-G spake thus: % % Use perl or python or egrep of emacs or some of the more modern vi % % clones etc. % % Agreed; a little perl one-liner was what I had in mind, since I vaguely % recall that egrep is *not* the same as mutt. % % Here you

Re: web interface to procmail?

2002-04-07 Thread David T-G
Sven -- ...and then Sven Guckes said... % % * Wim Kerkhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-07 02:12]: % Yup. I really need to finish the web-based interface % to procmail that I started a while ago... % % is this a configuration interface? % i'd rather not filter the spam i get myself - %

Re: How can I shorten the 'To' list?

2002-04-07 Thread Bo Peng
Thanks to Gary Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), my problem is solved perfectly with his mail-to-filter2 perl code. 1. Add set display_filter=mail-to-filter to .muttrc 2. Save http://www.spocom.com/users/gjohnson/mutt/mail-to-filter2 as mail-to-filter. (Do not forget to chmod +x )

Re: un-alternates?

2002-04-07 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
--WChQLJJJfbwij+9x Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! David T-G spake thus: % Here you go: =20 [snip] =20 You call that a one-liner? Good grief; who taught you how to count?? Why settle for a one liner

basic config help

2002-04-07 Thread VB
HI, I've got my learn on and trying to get basic mail configured. Presently, I'm using mutt + sendmail + fetchmail. I figured how to *receive and read* mail via mutt/fetchmail, but I can't figure out how to send. On my local FBSD listserv, some people say I have a sendmail problem, some say

Re: un-alternates?

2002-04-07 Thread Nicolas Rachinsky
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-07 10:37:45 -0500]: Rob -- ...and then Feztaa said... % % Alas! David T-G spake thus: % % Use perl or python or egrep of emacs or some of the more modern vi % % clones etc. % % Agreed; a little perl one-liner was what I had in mind, since I

Re: basic config help

2002-04-07 Thread Patrick
* VB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [04-07-02 14:22]: HI, I've got my learn on and trying to get basic mail configured. Presently, I'm using mutt + sendmail + fetchmail. I figured how to *receive and read* mail via mutt/fetchmail, but I can't figure out how to send. On my local FBSD listserv, some

Blank index?!?

2002-04-07 Thread jennyw
I was using mutt and everything was fine. Then I exited and ran mutt again ... The index didn't show any subjects, froms, etc.! I logged out and logged in again ... same thing. I su'ed to root and ran the same muttrc and it worked okay. Very weird. Then I su'ed to another user and ran

Re: Blank index?!?

2002-04-07 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 02:12:55PM -0700, jennyw wrote: I was using mutt and everything was fine. Then I exited and ran mutt again ... The index didn't show any subjects, froms, etc.! I logged out and logged in again ... same thing. I su'ed to root and ran the same muttrc and it worked

Re: Blank index?!?

2002-04-07 Thread David T-G
Jenny -- ...and then jennyw said... % % I was using mutt and everything was fine. Then I exited and ran mutt % again ... The index didn't show any subjects, froms, etc.! I logged out Did you check in =mbox for your moved messages? % and logged in again ... same thing. I su'ed to root

Re: Blank index?!?

2002-04-07 Thread jennyw
Turns out another process had put a lot of temp files in /tmp filling up the root partition (I'm using very simple partitions -- I'll probably change that in the near future ...). Once those files were deleted, everything worked okay for all users. Not sure why the root user was working when

Re: Blank index?!?

2002-04-07 Thread Mark S. Reglewski
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 02:58:16PM -0700, jennyw wrote: Turns out another process had put a lot of temp files in /tmp filling up the root partition . . . . Once those files were deleted, everything worked okay for all users. Not sure why the root user was working when the other users

editing to/from etc in compose window was Re: Que pasa? [groups in alias's]

2002-04-07 Thread Volker Kuhlmann
and then, while holding down the finger on backspace for the next 2 minutes clearing out the to: field, you think mutt is a great program, but something here is very seriously stuffed. At least I couldn't find a key which clears the whole field. Ctrl-U, there are lots of other nifty