--+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ok, I've spent the better part of this evening searching google, the
procmail website, and mutt archives, but I just can't find how to do
this. I'm sure I've seen
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote Sven Guckes thusly...
>
> * parv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-19 19:39]:
> > wrote Sven Guckes thusly...
...
> > > :0
> > > * ^[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > IN.MUTT
> > >
> > > :0
> > > * ^TOmutt(-dev|-users)?@.*(cs.hmc.edu|mutt.org|yahoogroups.com)
> > > IN.MUTT
>
At 4:26 PM EDT on April 19 John Iverson sent off:
> * On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Rob Reid wrote:
>
> > Return-Path works (for now anyway) and is "cheaper" than ^TO.
>
> My understanding is that some people prefer ^TO or ^TO_ to handle
> mail sent to both the list their personal address
Ah. I'm not o
At 9:50 PM EDT on April 19 Sven Guckes sent off:
> * Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-18 22:17]:
> > ?Sven Guckes? sagte am 2002-04-18 um 22:31:50 +0200 :
> > > beats me. do you have some more examples for which this happens?
> > > does mutt do the splitting of lines when the line is
Incoming from Sven Guckes:
> * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-18 15:37]:
> > ...and then s. keeling said...
> > % - Kibo probably already has the fix implemented.
> > There he is! I knew it would come to this soon :-)
>
> I wonder whether Kibo will catch
> these message from the google
* David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-08 19:11]:
> > * Sven Guckes wrote:
> > > | Message-ID: <20020403210712.A1308@PROGENY>
> > > | User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.19i
> > > broken MID and old mutt version.
> > > upgrade and get a FQDN! :-p
> I think you're wrong: a dot in the Message-ID's RHS is
>
Incoming from Dan Lowe:
> Previously, s. keeling wrote:
> >
> > Does this actually work for you? I just tested it and it doesn't for
> > me, and I can find no ^Return-Path: header in your mail at least.
>
> The Return-Path header is added by the final delivery MTA - so whether or
> not it's adde
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-18 15:37]:
> ...and then s. keeling said...
> % - Kibo probably already has the fix implemented.
> There he is! I knew it would come to this soon :-)
I wonder whether Kibo will catch
these message from the google archive..
Sven [dont worry - be ha
* John Iverson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-19 20:48]:
> Why not Just use the regular OR operator?:
>
> :0
> * ^TOmutt(-dev|-users)?@(ns.)?gbnet.net|\
> ^[EMAIL PROTECTED]|\
> ^TOmutt(-dev|-users)?@.*(cs.hmc.edu|mutt.org|yahoogroups.com)
> IN.MUTT
How do you *quickly* turn off recognition
for "[
* parv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-19 19:39]:
> wrote Sven Guckes thusly...
> > === http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/setup/procmailrc
> > # 000710 - catch messages from gateway address on sonytel.be
> > :0
> > * ^[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > IN.MUTT
> >
> > # 000710 - added yahoogroups.com
> > :0
* Rob Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-19 17:06]:
> At 6:19 AM EDT on April 19 Sven Guckes sent off:
> > so here are some of the addresses:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [EMAIL PROT
Previously, s. keeling wrote:
>
> Does this actually work for you? I just tested it and it doesn't for
> me, and I can find no ^Return-Path: header in your mail at least.
The Return-Path header is added by the final delivery MTA - so whether or
not it's added to a message will vary from one pers
* Bernard Massot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-19 19:47]:
> it's :
> If (date written=a_monday) then quote with "D'al ..."
> Else quote with "D'ar ..."
> In brezhoneg language, you must write "d'al lun"
> (on monday) but "d'ar meurzh" (on tuesday), "d'ar yaou"
> (on thursday), etc... *That* is
* Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-18 22:17]:
> »Sven Guckes« sagte am 2002-04-18 um 22:31:50 +0200 :
> > beats me. do you have some more examples for which this happens?
> > does mutt do the splitting of lines when the line is shorter?
> > what happens now?
> Yes, it does. All the ti
* Eric Christopherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-18 23:21]:
> [Sorry if this is a repeat; I initially tried sending it to mutt-users and
> mutt-dev, but it only seems to have made it onto mutt-dev.
not subscribed to the list?
> I'm having a bad problem with mutt: it tends to hang whenever
> it
Incoming from Rob Reid:
>
> I see a lot of gbnet grumbling but I've never had a problem because I use a
> minimum match philosophy:
>
> # Sort away mails from the mutt (mail user agent) mailing list
> :0
> * ^Return-Path:
* Patrik Wallstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-19 10:38]:
> I just received a file split up into 87 emails.
> Is there any way for mutt to decode those mails,
> all of which are of the MIME type message/partial?
mutt is not a partial file decoder.
tag them all, then use tag-prefix
to "pipe" to u
begin Patrik Wallstrom quotation:
>
> > Pat, I couldn't find your key... Is it known to be on a particular
> > server?
>
> I know it is on http://www.keyserver.net/ and another server (forgot
> which).
Your key is on the common keyservers. (BTW, keyserver.net has evidently
collapsed down to
I've been hanging around this list for about a week now and I've found
so many goodies floating by here, it's terrific. I think I have
folder hooks sorted out, I've learned some really slick procmail
stuff, and post.el makes emacs look as gorgeous editing mail as it is
at mangling scripts.
Despi
--qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Bernard Massot spake thus:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 02:13:31PM -0600, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
> > Then use the message-hooks idea that I posted, but repla
I'm using the Debian [unstable] packaged version of mutt [1.3.28-2]
against the Debian [testing] packaged version of uw-imapd
[2001adebian-6].
What I'm trying to do is set mailboxes to poll for new email.
Compounding factors are:
set spoolfile="imap://popess.manjusri.org/INBOX"
set folder="imap:
Previously, William Park wrote:
>
> Sendmail solution may be the only option, if the mailing list checks
> sender address on the envelope instead of 'From:' header.
Configuring masquerading is a bit extreme in some situations, and not
always possible either (many users don't control the local sen
Gregor Zattler wrote:
> * Michael Elkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Fre 19 Apr 2002 11:06:27 GMT]:
> > you need to use
> > ./configure --enable-exact-address
> > if you want this functionality. be aware it will use more memory this way
> > because mutt has to store the string it both the usable in
* On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, parv wrote:
> > Why not Just use the regular OR operator?:
>
> when one has to debug complex recipe (as procmail doesn't say what
> was actually matched), or during the creation of one, it's much
> easier to work w/ weighted recpie as one can easily (un)comment &
> test.
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 02:13:31PM -0600, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
> Alas! Bernard Massot spake thus:
> > In brezhoneg language, you must write "d'al lun" (on monday) but "d'ar
> > meurzh" (on tuesday), "d'ar yaou" (on thursday), etc...
> > *That* is what I want to do.
>
> Then use the message-ho
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote John Iverson thusly...
>
> * On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, parv wrote:
>
> > all these can be easily combined as one OR'd recipe (assuming mbox)...
> >
> > :0:
> > * 2147483647^0 ^TOmutt-users@mail\.sonytel\.be
> > * 2147483647^0 ^TOmutt(-dev|-users)?@(ns.)?gbnet\.ne
Hi Michael et al.,
* Michael Elkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Fre 19 Apr 2002 11:06:27 GMT]:
> you need to use
> ./configure --enable-exact-address
> if you want this functionality. be aware it will use more memory this way
> because mutt has to store the string it both the usable internal form,
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [19.04.02 20:39]:
> % Btw, am I right that there is no possibility to score by mailer with the
> % score function since ~h is not allowed? So is there any other way to
> No direct possibility, I think, but there are indirect options.
I do know about the possibili
* On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, parv wrote:
> all these can be easily combined as one OR'd recipe (assuming mbox)...
>
> :0:
> # 000710 - catch messages from gateway address on sonytel.be
> * 2147483647^0 ^TOmutt-users@mail\.sonytel\.be
> #
> # 981009 - catch messages from gateway address on gbnet.net:
>
* On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Rob Reid wrote:
[ ... ]
> Granted, this doesn't catch the other mutt lists (because I don't
> need to), and IN.mutt would be a better name than muttin.
> Return-Path works (for now anyway) and is "cheaper" than ^TO.
My understanding is that some people prefer ^TO or ^TO_
--sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Bernard Massot spake thus:
> In brezhoneg language, you must write "d'al lun" (on monday) but "d'ar
> meurzh" (on tuesday), "d'ar yaou" (on thursday), etc..
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 06:19:53PM +, Simon White wrote:
> 19-Apr-02 at 11:58, Rob 'Feztaa' Park ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> > I forgot why you want to pass the date to the script, though. What's so
> > special about your attribution that it can't be a simple "%n wrote:"?
>
> It was along t
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote Sven Guckes thusly...
>
> === http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/setup/procmailrc
...
> # 981009 - catch messages from gateway address on gbnet.net:
> :0
> * ^TOmutt(-dev|-users)?@(ns.)?gbnet.net
> IN.MUTT
>
> # 000710 - catch messages from gateway address
Rob, et al --
...and then Feztaa said...
%
% Alas! Bernard Massot spake thus:
% > > Easy fix. In your muttrc do this: "set attribution=`script %d`", and
...
%
% Ok, I've got it ;)
Are you sure? :-)
%
% The set attribution thing is expanded when mutt starts, not when the
% message is sent. T
Johannes, et al --
...and then Johannes Berth said...
%
% Btw, am I right that there is no possibility to score by mailer with the
% score function since ~h is not allowed? So is there any other way to
No direct possibility, I think, but there are indirect options.
% score (not only kill) by
Alas! Simon White spake thus:
> It was along these lines, IIRC:
>
> If (date written=today) then quote normal attribution
> Else quote some other attribution...
In that case, why not just use message-hooks with ~d or ~r in the
pattern? Something like this:
message-hook . "set attrib
James --
...and then James Sneeringer said...
%
% On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 08:24:27AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
...
% | Now to see if I can figure out how to change it away from /tmp, which is
% | small here...
%
% If it's the same "showpartial" I have on my system (from the metamail
% package), i
Rob --
...and then Feztaa said...
%
% Alas! David T-G spake thus:
% > % A better solution is simply to have duplicates sent to ~/mail/duplicates
% > % instead of /dev/null, so that way you know what's being filtered.
% >
% > ... but you'd still have the same problem even though you could manual
Hi Dave,
* Dave Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Fre 19 Apr 2002 10:37:54 GMT]:
[...]
> I use:
>
> ,
> | davep@hagbard:~$ head -7 /usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/muttrc-mode.el
> | ;;; muttrc-mode.el --- Major mode to edit muttrc under Emacs
> |
> | ;;; Copyright (C) 2000 Laurent Pelecq
> | ;;;
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 08:24:27AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
| ...and then Patrik Wallstrom said...
| % I don't know how showpartial works, but it did. I hope I will never
| % receive message/partial again. :)
|
| Now to see if I can figure out how to change it away from /tmp, which is
| small here
19-Apr-02 at 11:58, Rob 'Feztaa' Park ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> I forgot why you want to pass the date to the script, though. What's so
> special about your attribution that it can't be a simple "%n wrote:"?
It was along these lines, IIRC:
If (date written=today) then quote normal attributio
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, mutt-users wrote:
> Hm, with Netscape and Imap i have no problem at all, browsinf reading
> and writing fron the Public Folders.
> Unfortunatly the first level is also possible with mutt, so to say i
> can already do reading and writing in public Folders with mutt, but
> onl
you need to use
./configure --enable-exact-address
if you want this functionality. be aware it will use more memory this way
because mutt has to store the string it both the usable internal form, and
the display form.
Will Yardley wrote:
> if i try to set my header like:
> From: <[EMAIL
Alas! Bernard Massot spake thus:
> > Easy fix. In your muttrc do this: "set attribution=`script %d`", and
> > then in the script, $* will have the date of the mail in it.
> that's exactly what I've done but the script sees the litteral string "%d"
> instead of the date !
> my script is called like
Hi,
* Patrik Wallstrom [04/19/02 15:07:32 CEST] wrote:
> I don't know how showpartial works, but it did. I hope I will never
> receive message/partial again. :)
Well, I can image a reason to use message/partial. Some
mailversers do have limits set how large a single mail may be.
By splitting up
--Q0rSlbzrZN6k9QnT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! David T-G spake thus:
> % A better solution is simply to have duplicates sent to ~/mail/duplicates
> % instead of /dev/null, so that way you know what's bei
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [19.04.02 02:15]:
> great - yet another broken mailer
> which gets added to my killfile.
Btw, am I right that there is no possibility to score by mailer with the
score function since ~h is not allowed? So is there any other way to
score (not only kill) by mailer
At 6:19 AM EDT on April 19 Sven Guckes sent off:
> * Dan Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-17 17:18]:
> > Previously, s. keeling wrote: [whatever]
> > You seem to have sent this to something other than "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> > because my list-reply did not work. I had to enter the address manuall
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 04:15:52PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
> Christoph Kukulies ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> >
> > I changed my hostname but want to have
> > my previous hostname (which is a DNS CNAME alias to the new hostname)
> > in mail postings (I subscribed several mailing lists with
Christoph Kukulies ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
>
> I changed my hostname but want to have
> my previous hostname (which is a DNS CNAME alias to the new hostname)
> in mail postings (I subscribed several mailing lists with the old name)
>
> Is this possible with an entry in .muttrc/.mailrc?
-
I changed my hostname but want to have
my previous hostname (which is a DNS CNAME alias to the new hostname)
in mail postings (I subscribed several mailing lists with the old name)
Is this possible with an entry in .muttrc/.mailrc?
--
Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Patrik, et al --
...and then Patrik Wallstrom said...
%
% On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, David T-G wrote:
%
% > Pat, I couldn't find your key... Is it known to be on a particular
% > server?
%
% I know it is on http://www.keyserver.net/ and another server (forgot
% which).
Oh, right. I bet gpg actual
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, David T-G wrote:
> Pat, I couldn't find your key... Is it known to be on a particular
> server?
I know it is on http://www.keyserver.net/ and another server (forgot
which).
Which is the most common, or the most active server to poll keys from
other servers?
> % I don't kn
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 04:26:14PM -0600, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
> Alas! Bernard Massot spake thus:
> > > try this:set attribution=`script`
> > > im mutt, of course.
> > good idea but I need a way to give the script the date of the mail
> > if I launch it with %d, the script doesn't see the
Patrik, et al --
Pat, I couldn't find your key... Is it known to be on a particular
server?
...and then Patrik Wallstrom said...
%
% On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, David T-G wrote:
%
% > % I just received a file split up into 87 emails. Is there any way for
% > Ouch!
%
% Yes, it seems that Outlook Exp
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, David T-G wrote:
> % I just received a file split up into 87 emails. Is there any way for
> Ouch!
Yes, it seems that Outlook Express can send those ugly things.
> % mutt to decode those mails, all of which are of the MIME type
> % message/partial?
>
> What happens if tag t
Rob, et al --
...and then Feztaa said...
%
% Alas! Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS spake thus:
% > Pointless paranoia really, but imagine this: someone could subscribe
...
% > first, the real messages could be deleted by your formail script.
%
% A better solution is simply to have duplicates sent to ~/mai
Patrik --
...and then Patrik Wallstrom said...
%
% I just received a file split up into 87 emails. Is there any way for
Ouch!
% mutt to decode those mails, all of which are of the MIME type
% message/partial?
What happens if tag them and then feed them to munpack?
%
% --
% patrik_wallstr
Will --
...and then Will Yardley said...
%
% so i know this *should* be easy, but i haven't had any luck.
Well, I don't know that it should...
%
% if i try to set my header like:
% From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Will Yardley)
%
% instead of:
% From: Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm curio
> Unless you can come up with how it's already been done, I
> don't expect that you'll find it. Public Folders and news
> are not the same as mail.
Hm, with Netscape and Imap i have no problem at all, browsinf reading and writing fron
the Public Folders.
Unfortunatly the first level is also p
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04/19/02 12:19]:
> I have appended my procmail rules
> which sort them into IN.MUTT mostly - enjoy!
You do not need a rule for each alias (mutt.org, gbnet.net, etc.).
Filtering on the Sender field, you catch them all. Basically, for
Mutt lists I have:
:0
* ^Sen
On Friday, Apr 19, 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> * mstevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-18 19:40]:
> > From: mstevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: mstevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: Replying with headers
> > Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 12:40:09 -0700 (PDT)
> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL P
On 2002-04-19 Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> > > how can I set the envelope-from independently from From: ? As is, mutt
>
> > AFAIK envelope_from does nothing but invokes sendmail with parameter
> > -f
>
> Correct
>
> > By setting sendmail directly you can call it with the -f paramater
> > set freel
David T-G (1st level) and Mutt-Users (2nd level)...
> % I already searched the newsgroups concerning imap and mutt and didn´t find
>anything helpful.
> % But i am seeking to read my mailinglists and news on exchange with my mutt.
>
> Unless you can come up with how it's already been done, I do
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-18 22:42:51 +0200]:
> --
> "Jr arrq xvyysvyrf gung npghnyyl *xvyy*!"
Including killing those who don't use proper sig dashes, presumably?
--
Dave Pearson: | mutt.octet.filter - autoview octet-streams
http://www.davep.org/ | mutt.vcar
so i know this *should* be easy, but i haven't had any luck.
if i try to set my header like:
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Will Yardley)
instead of:
From: Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
the message still comes across like the second example, even if i
comment out 'set envelope_from', 'set real
I just received a file split up into 87 emails. Is there any way for
mutt to decode those mails, all of which are of the MIME type
message/partial?
--
patrik_wallstrom->foodfight->[EMAIL PROTECTED]>+46-709580442
* Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-18 08:21]:
> BTW: Some lists tag the subject with [listname] and are aesy to filter
> even on less capable systems like freemail services.
Subject munging just takes away space from the Subject lines
and creates even more problems than it
> > how can I set the envelope-from independently from From: ? As is, mutt
> AFAIK envelope_from does nothing but invokes sendmail with parameter
> -f
Correct
> By setting sendmail directly you can call it with the -f paramater
> set freely, i.e. to your real email adress. This is independent
18-Apr-02 at 22:42, Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> this also earns you a
> line in my killfile.
I checked up on Google "Sven Guckes" killfile to remind myself about
killfiles and work out what this actually meant. Sven, all your pages are
access forbidden, and I see you are redirecting
* Rob Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-18 19:32:52 -0400]:
> All it does is syntax highlighting, and not even perfectly, but I like it.
> It's especially handy if like me you installed jed's muttrc.sl but use
> emacs far more often than jed.
I use:
,
| davep@hagbard:~$ head -7 /usr/local/s
71 matches
Mail list logo
