Bonjour, je ne sais pas s'il est très correct de parler de procmail
ici mais bon ... je me lance :)
Voilà j'aimerai savoir comment faire pour traiter les mails arrivant
sur leurs champ return-path, je n'ai rien trouvé sur ça dans la
documentation.
En l'occurrence je veux que tous les mails ayant
Nicolas C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri, Oct 18, 2002:
Voilà j'aimerai savoir comment faire pour traiter les mails arrivant
sur leurs champ return-path, je n'ai rien trouvé sur ça dans la
documentation.
En l'occurrence je veux que tous les mails ayant le return-path
toto-(quelque-chose) arrivent
* John Haviland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-18 03:04 +1000]:
I am using mutt (another newbie) as a sub-set of another process, i.e
unattended. The mutt section is intended to go into a mailbox and save mail
that matches a subject pattern, delete that mail and then quit
automatically. This is
Hi everyone,
I've been trying to write a macro to remap my $ key to sync my mailbox (and
delete marked emails), and then run an external script.
I've written the below macro, and it works except it doesn't ask me if I'm sure
I want to delete the messages. Thiisn't a really big deal, but it
Hello,
I am trying to figure out how to get mutt to execute some command specified
on the command line and then quit. This first effort is just to get mutt to
provide an index listing of new messages in a folder and then quit.
To do that, I defined the following macro in my muttrc:
macro index
Wait! Wait! I am seeing the light! Or is that the haze from a hangover?
I have cygwin installed. I will joyously investigate
--
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cdkrug;worldnet.att.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 7:57 PM
To: David Turetsky
Subject: Re:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 02:56:02PM +0200, René Clerc wrote:
* Alex Polite [EMAIL PROTECTED] [17-09-2002 14:24]:
How do I start composing a new message to a mailing list? What I
usually do now is push L for list-reply the remove the body and
appropriate headers.
Just send a new
Susan Kleinmann wrote:
To do that, I defined the following macro in my muttrc:
macro index ,n limit~N\nquit\n
Then I invoked mutt with the command:
mutt -e exec ,n
This produces the message:
,n: no such function
Error in command line:
Press any key to continue...
What am I
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 05:10:17PM +0200, Ren? Clerc wrote:
* Susan Kleinmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [17-10-2002 17:08]:
I am trying to figure out how to get mutt to execute some command specified
on the command line and then quit. This first effort is just to get mutt to
provide an index
* Susan Kleinmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [17-10-2002 17:08]:
I am trying to figure out how to get mutt to execute some command specified
on the command line and then quit. This first effort is just to get mutt to
provide an index listing of new messages in a folder and then quit.
To do that, I
I am using mutt (another newbie) as a sub-set of another process, i.e
unattended. The mutt section is intended to go into a mailbox and save mail
that matches a subject pattern, delete that mail and then quit
automatically. This is relatively easy using push, tag pattern, tag prefix,
save message;
Please excuse my apostasy... but how do I resign from the list. Sadly
I'm now almost totally in a Windows XP environment (is a mutt version
available?)
My previous attempt to the list-owner seems to have been totally ignored
--
David Turetsky
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From:
On Oct 15 at 21:59, Nicolas Rachinsky spoke:
What about
source `colorset.sh`
Where is colorset.sh available?
-Hanspeter
Hanspeter Roth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
On Oct 15 at 21:59, Nicolas Rachinsky spoke:
What about
source `colorset.sh`
Where is colorset.sh available?
Just write your own one :)
Michael
--
It's God. No, not Richard Stallman, or Linus Torvalds, but God.
(By Matt Welsh)
PGP-Key:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 02:40:27PM +0200,
Stephane Bortzmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 8 lines which said:
Is there a way to display the message Good signature from... *after*
the message, not between the headers and the messages? Or to hide it
unless specifically called?
OK,
* Chris Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] [17-10-2002 17:36]:
Apart from what would be the use of this, you shouldn't exec the
macro (because exec applies to functions only, as the error message
says), but you should push the key sequence.
... quote from manual - ``exec function'' is equivalent
* Stephane Bortzmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [18-10-2002 13:29]:
OK, after some tests, here is the solution I now use:
# I want to retrieve the keys automatically
set pgp_getkeys_command=gpg --recv-keys %r 2 /dev/null
You could add keyserver-options auto-key-retrieve to your
~/.gnupg/options
* Hanspeter Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-18 10:39 +0200]:
On Oct 15 at 21:59, Nicolas Rachinsky spoke:
What about
source `colorset.sh`
Where is colorset.sh available?
Write your own. Something like:
#!/bin/sh
if condition; then
echo colorset1
else
echo colorset2
fi
cut here###
* Stephane Bortzmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-16 14:40 (CEST)]
Is there a way to display the message Good signature from... *after*
the message, not between the headers and the messages? Or to hide it
unless specifically called? (Yes, I've look at the documentation and
in many .muttrc at
When I use uuencode (uuencode somefile somefile2 | mail address) it comes
across as an attachment in outlook but not in mutt. When I send an
attachment from mutt to mutt (or outlook to mutt) it comes in as an
attachment that doesn't require uudecode. I know that I can save the encoded
version from
Hi,
* John Haviland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
When I use uuencode (uuencode somefile somefile2 | mail address) it comes
across as an attachment in outlook but not in mutt.
This is because Outlook means to know it better and interprets the
begin file as an atachment.
Realy it is no
* John Haviland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-19 00:46 (CEST)]
My question is this - can I use uuencode to send an attachment
that mutt will see as an attachment without requiring the
uudecode.
Is there any special reason tu use the 'outdated' uudecode?
Why not using the base64, which seems to
REPENT!!!
Cygwin has a version of mutt, procmail, fetchmail, and ssmtp (send only
MTA).
Will that work for me at the office, where everyone runs Win2k,
Outlook, and Microsoft Exchange? Assuming nobody notices as I install
these cygwin tools, and I survive whatever disaplinary action, will
* MindFuq [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-18 15:19]:
REPENT!!!
Cygwin has a version of mutt, procmail, fetchmail, and ssmtp (send only
MTA).
Will that work for me at the office, where everyone runs Win2k,
Outlook, and Microsoft Exchange? Assuming nobody notices as I install
these cygwin
* David Turetsky wrote:
Wait! Wait! I am seeing the light! Or is that the haze from a hangover?
I have cygwin installed. I will joyously investigate
Also, check http://www.geocities.com/win32mutt/index.html
A great native win32 port.
//michael
I believe this is still correct. It's not really a bug in
Mutt, per-se, more the reality of using two completely
different mechanisms to access your mail spool.
-Dave
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 05:49:38PM -0400, Emil Sit mooed:
Someone asked on the mutt-dev list:
- Forwarded message from
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 12:15:36PM -0400, David Turetsky wrote:
Please excuse my apostasy... but how do I resign from the list. Sadly
I'm now almost totally in a Windows XP environment (is a mutt version
available?)
My previous attempt to the list-owner seems to have been totally ignored
Since
27 matches
Mail list logo
