On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 12:59:19AM +0200, Mipam wrote:
> Anyway, some things are different. Normally when i wish
> to sign a message with pgp or completly encrypt a message
> then it asks for the key id for that adress.
> Normally, when i type a name its good enough, or just pressing
> enter gives
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 10:40:31AM +0200, Åsmund Skjæveland wrote:
> > im using mutt with pgp 2.6.something,
> > and I get the occasional message that I should upgrade to a newer version
> > of pgp ..
> >
> > What version of PGP is recommened for use with mutt ?
>
> gpg.
No. Handling of the tru
Hi!
On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 11:07:49PM +0200, Jan Houtsma wrote:
> Maybe i was unclear. It's not the + that i dont like,
> its the missing spaces in the multipart that are wrong.
> read the original again please. I meant the second text
> where at the end of the line between two words there is n
On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 04:00:26AM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> That's good as an option, but then the problem would be that you can't
> have an independent stand-alone binary that works even with no resource
> files... It would be useless (without a .muttrc), you couldn't even add
> your own c
Hi!
On Sun, May 21, 2000 at 07:44:58PM +0100, Manuel Arriaga wrote:
> I believe I configured postfix correctly, but now I haven't got *a clue*
> on how to use mutt. And I did try to read the provided manual and the
> man page for mutt, but they don't seem to cover the basics... can anyone
> point
On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 06:33:43PM +0200, Christian Ordig wrote:
> > configure comand used:
> > ./configure --with-included-zlib --prefix=/home/frandebo/prog/local/
> > --enable-locales-fix --with-charmaps --enable-nfs-fix
Yup. The default is enabled, and configure appears to be able
Hi!
On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 10:32:42PM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> It doesn't appear to be necessarily consistent that the subject lines are
> just one off. If I jump down the list a ways, the subject lines are
> several lines off.
This sounds more like having the wrong terminal settings than
On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 07:52:08PM +0200, clemensF wrote:
> > Gero Treuner (Sun 14.0500-18:48):
> >
> > If there is a problem (bounce) with your e-mail account, you are
> > automatically removed from the list. Re-subscribe in this case.
>
> this has already
On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 05:29:10PM +0200, Mark Weinem wrote:
> Is Mutt-Users still alive? Last messages arrive here on Tuesday, May
> 09.
Yes.
If there is a problem (bounce) with your e-mail account, you are
automatically removed from the list. Re-subscribe in this case.
Gero
Hi!
On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 01:53:51AM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Isn't exec now deprecated in favour of being able to do directly:
>
> push
Correct, I knew that something has changed, but didn't remember exactly
what.
> Not sure about this... Besides, shouldn't that be:
>
> fol
Hi!
> I know this would user quite a lot of time parsing the folders, but since
> I am using Maildir style eMail folders this would be speeded up quite much.
> Is there any way to achieve this? The docs only tell me about the folder-
> permission and owner stuff for the folder_format setting.
Yo
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 05:01:59PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How can I start mutt with the threads collapsed, like
> 'collapse-all'? Thanks.
Put the following in your muttrc file:
push "exec collapse-all\n"
Gero
Please use the more generic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> address of the mailing
list!
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 12:02:21PM -0700, Daniel Chetlin wrote:
> Item one: letting the user know when new mail has arrived. $timeout and
> $mail_check work fine when I'm in the message index of my inbox. However, if
[..
On Mon, Apr 17, 2000 at 10:20:41AM -0500, Jason Helfman wrote:
> well i have this in my directory of ~/.mutt/mutt.set
>
>
> ##.mutt.sets 1.29.00
>
> # autoview
> auto_view application/zip
> auto_view application/x-gzip
[...]
> auto_view image/tiff
Then image/tiff overwrites the previous type
On Mon, Apr 17, 2000 at 12:53:12PM -0500, Jason Helfman wrote:
> I remember their being a way to check the given value of a $ set
> parameter in mutt
:set ?variable
> Looking through docs
I know some trivial things are hard to find in the manual. Please make
suggestions where to place d
On Mon, Apr 17, 2000 at 11:33:54AM -0500, Jason Helfman wrote:
> I don't get itI have added the auto view to my .muttrc and sourced
> my ~/.mutt/mutt.mailcap file and it can't find the file.
A mailcap file is nothing to source. Just set up $mailcap_path.
Gero
Hi!
On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 08:36:05PM -0600, Tom Hall wrote:
> When I go to reply to a message that was sent in HTML format,
> mutt doesn't quote the original message. The reply body just
> has the $attribution string.
> Is there a way to get mutt to pipe the message through lynx
> and include i
Hi!
On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 10:42:19PM +, kromJx wrote:
> Is there a copy of doc/manual.txt online somewhere?
http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual.txt (1.0.1 version)
> I don't have installed the required sgmltools on my machine
> and thus cannot convert the provided SGML source to text.
doc/man
Hi!
On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 09:11:29AM -0700, Danny Alvendia wrote:
> I have problems setting up the mutt mailer. I use a Unix station, when I
> enter mutt,
> I get the mailer but do not have the muttrc anywhere to be found. I got
> some of
> the .muttrc from the site and copied it and it's still
> I just played around with the $sort_aux variable and I came to the
> opinion that a third sorting key is needed. It's a bit annoying that
> $sort_aux controls how threads are sorted against other threads _and_
> the thread internal sorting.
No, it's not that to be annoying.
> My problem:
> I w
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 03:18:46PM +0100, Patrick wrote:
> > If non-us-ascii characters are displayed as '?', then you need to
> > adjust your locale (export LANG=tr or export LC_CTYPE=tr). If they are
> > displayed as different characters with diacritics, then you need a
> > different font. Proba
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 02:55:38PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> ? That's what he did !
> He added: time_t t = 0; /* to avoid compiler warning */
> And removed: The comment in /* */
It is not the size of the source file discussed here, but the size of
the resulting binary. This tends to be big
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 10:09:31AM -0600, Jason Helfman wrote:
> however last week some mentioned a gnu.rc file sent out with
> mutt. I browsed through the file system and found nothing of the sort.
A gpg.rc is in the contrib directory of the 1.1.x versions, don't know
about a gnu.rc
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 09:38:58PM +, Lars Hecking wrote:
> Terje Elde writes:
> > I've got a rather nice PGP setup with mutt, using the gpg-2comp prog as shown
> > in the examples (1.1.9i IIRC)
Fine.
> 1.1.9i doesn't use gpg-2comp anymore.
If one of the message recipients is using PGP-2,
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 01:46:11PM +0100, Erik Thiele wrote:
> c) something else ;)
Is this manual enhancement something for you?
Gero
--- manual.sgml.headSun Mar 19 15:40:02 2000
+++ manual.sgml.head.newWed Mar 22 15:29:41 2000
@@ -1147,7 +1147,8 @@
Hi!
On Tue, Mar 21, 2000 at 11:08:41PM +0100, Michael Thies wrote:
> at my new job, I have an account on a slowlaris-machine.
> the one and only mua is pine *argh*
Quoting your header:
Organization: IT Services - Thies
It's not a new job in your own company, isn't it?
> But all my incoming m
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 03:39:20PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> ...and then Mikko Hänninen said...
> % Not really an option, but a supported method would be to set up a
> % folder hook in your .muttrc, which matches all folders:
> %
> % folder-hook . 'push "1"'
If Aleksey meant to start with the
Hi!
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 01:58:47PM +0100, Clemens Wohld wrote:
> ## Show TXT-documentation when pressing :
> macro generic "!less /usr/local/doc/mutt/manual.txt\n" \
> "Show Mutt documentation"
This looks ok.
> Always he want to look in /usr/doc/packages.
> Somebody can help me? But please
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 12:29:19AM -0600, Jason Helfman wrote:
> As I understand it, in order for me to communicate with someone with
> pgp, send them encrypted data, I would need to sign with their public
> key and then they would decrypt it with their private key.
No, you _encrypt_ with other's
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 10:10:40PM -0600, Jason Helfman wrote:
> gnupg-rsaref-1.0-2.src.rpm
Take this when your are in the US.
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 10:10:40PM -0600, Jason Helfman wrote:
> wanting to try the gnu pgp, what srpms would i need to download, being
> in the us.
GnuPG doesn't contain any restricted algorithms, feel free to download
the version you prefer. The externally available module for rsa
is not fo
Hi!
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 08:03:37PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> Changes against 1.1.8 are a couple of bug-fixes. Unless
> someone has some real show-stoppers, I'd consider this to
> be a release candidate for 1.2, and release that version
> later that week.
A pgp6.rc file to use PGP 6 wi
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 04:18:20PM +0530, Mrinal Kalakrishnan wrote:
> No, the minor version is what shows whether it's beta or not. So in
> 1.1.8, second `1' shows that it's a beta version. The stable release
> will be 1.2.x.
Not exactly. There are development-only (non-BETA) versions, as
1.1 th
Hi!
On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 10:36:14AM -0500, Alec Habig wrote:
> However, for a stable-version mutt, it would be best to have the
> default/recommended setup be as straightforward as possible. If one
> doesn't have the need to make old signatures, then there should be no
> need to require an ex
Hi!
On Thu, Feb 17, 2000 at 03:33:58PM +0518, Vikram Vaswani wrote:
> I'm running a RH5.0 box with kernel 2.2.9. Have just downloaded mutt 1.0.1, but am
>unable to compile because of the following error:
>
> commands.c: In function `mutt_display_message':
> commands.c:131: `EPIPE' undeclared (f
Hi!
On Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 04:39:34PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Would anyone tell me what I have to do, to
> successfully build mutt -- I tried 1.1.1i and got
> many and varied errors -- in this environment?
I doubt anyone built mutt in this environment before.
First of all, without a
Hi!
On Wed, Jan 05, 2000 at 09:49:27AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Has anyone ever had the problem of gpg signed messages appearing
> to non-mutt users as only atatchments?
Actually this happens for non RFC2015-compliant mail user agent users.
> If this is a known bug, in a faq or otherwi
Hi!
On Fri, Dec 31, 1999 at 05:24:39PM +0100, Attila Csosz wrote:
> Could someone mail me the gpg-2comp program? The site mentioned in the gpg.rc
> file is unreachable for me.
The connection between the organization and the world was down for some
time at new year. The reasons are unknown to me,
On Thu, Dec 23, 1999 at 06:29:54PM +0530, Raju K V wrote:
> I can successfully sign my messsages but when I try to encrypt a
> message, mutt hangs with 'Invoking gpg...'.
Probably you forgot to say gpg-2comp the ID of your own (RSA type)
key. Because Gnupg doesn't have an encryptself option like
Hi!
On Fri, Dec 17, 1999 at 02:18:38PM +0100, Martin Lohner wrote:
> If I have an old pgp and a new gpg key in my secring and
> I know the pgp/gpg-version that the recipient uses (by having his
> pubring) I would like that the key for signing is chosen accordingly.
> Alternativly, if the recipien
On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 01:23:19PM +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> Does this make that much sense? Why do I encrypt some mails? --> because I
> only want same very few people to be able to read them. This excludes (IMHO)
> even the system administrator, which would happily be able to read mails
On Fri, Nov 26, 1999 at 05:48:10PM +0100, Dirk Nitschke wrote:
> Maybe someone can tell me why mutt_dotlock is linked
> against *curses or slang by default.
It's only nobody actually changed the makefile-generating files up to
now. You are right, mutt_dotlock doesn't need ncurses/slang.
Hi!
On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 05:41:12PM +, Sean Rima wrote:
> > But neverless: I use now the gpg.rc and the gpg-2comp. Signing works
> > fine, but encrypting (with or without signing) doesnt. Mutt just says
> > something like 'invoking PGP ...' but nothing happens ...
> >
> I use both and I c
On Mon, Nov 01, 1999 at 12:16:24AM +0100, Rejo Zenger wrote:
> When receiving a message that is both signed and encrypted i get the
> message "gpg: no secret key for decryption available". Message can be
> decrypted and the signature can be checked without a problem, both are
> ok. Any idea's?
I
On Sun, Oct 31, 1999 at 04:30:56PM -0600, Ronny Haryanto wrote:
> Hmm.. I found this by accident, not exactly in mutt but in a bash
> prompt in xterm. If you press Ctrl-S it enters some kind of a
> "no-echo" state (that's what I call it anyway), you can quit with
> Ctrl-Q. You might want to give t
Hi!
An update of the gpg-2comp script is available at
http://muppet.faveve.uni-stuttgart.de/~gero/gpg-2comp/
gpg-2comp is a script for usage with the Mutt mail user agent as a
wrapper for GnuPG allowing creation of encrypted and/or signed mails
which old PGP 2.6.x versions are able to decrypt
Hi!
On Sat, Oct 30, 1999 at 12:13:38AM -0400, Brendan Cully wrote:
> I can't think of a good reason to have voyager.localnet. Is localnet
> your loopback network, or a private network? Either way, you should
> probably not use the same hostname for two interfaces on the same
> machine - it's boun
Hi!
On Thu, Oct 21, 1999 at 02:14:02PM -0700, Clint Olsen wrote:
> If I go to the alias menu (using tab) and select many addresses, returning
> the to the send menu doesn't place the cursor at the end of the buffer. I
> can't seem to use ctrl-e to get there, either. Typing return anyway
> trunc
Hi!
On Fri, Oct 15, 1999 at 11:29:14PM +0200, Jan Houtsma wrote:
> Is there an operator on this mailing list who can take care that
> this stops??? Its very annoying!
Although you didn't include complete headers, it looks like something
goes wrong on the wipinfo.soft.net site. I think there is n
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 03:52:43PM -0500, W. Mark Hagler wrote:
> Is there any discussion or development to give mutt the ability to
> search LDAP directories to find addresses?
There is an interface for external address queries, a perl script
to do LDAP is available. Follow the "Links" link on h
Hi!
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 03:00:54PM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> I acquired xterm-117, which seems to support utf-8 at least to the
> extent that it looks right when I cat a utf-8 file to the terminal.
> However, if I run mutt in the xterm, with charset=utf-8, it doesn't
> look right:
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 05:11:57PM +0200, Gero Treuner wrote:
> Please complain to the packager of the rpm file if his/her setup
> is not correct. Reading Changelog is always a good idea, anyway.
^
Sorry, should have been NEWS , Changelog isn't nice to read.
Gero
Hi!
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 10:35:57AM -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> Hey guys. I just installed Mandrake 6.0, and things seem to be a little
> different. Mutt, or any other mail program for that matter, doesn't have
> permission to write to /var/spool/mail/ like in RedHat 5.1. Mutt
> o
Hi!
I went into the PGP data formats and managed to persuade GnuPG
to create signed and encrypted messages which can be verified and
read by PGP 2.6.x versions - really common in the German university
area, where a certification infrastructure based on this software
is currently created.
The new
Hi!
Tired of switching configuration to generate signed or encrypted
messages processable by PGP 2.x using folks (a lot here in Germany)
I wrote a wrapper for use with mutt which selects the proper options automatically
based on the chosen keys, which must be all of RSA
type. (The main reason wh
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 06:34:06PM -0500, Kevin Arnold wrote:
> I have a program that currently uses sendmail. I want to be able to send
> attachments so I was thinking about switching to MUTT. The program,
> however, sends the mail using a perl scriptso it is done through a CLI.
> Can I
On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 12:39:47AM -0400, Tom Goulet wrote:
> I have mutt configured to use GPG, and most of it works very well, but, Mutt
> can't find most of the keys that are on my GPG public key ring. It finds
> SOME. I don't know what the ones it finds has in common.
This can be related to
On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 07:44:05PM +0200, Horacio wrote:
> I'm trying to write a macro for copying a message from box A to box B,
> and having the msg. in box A deleted (ie. moving) ... well, that's what
> does, but it asks if I want to copy the msg. to a box named after
> the sender's name, unle
Hi!
On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 09:46:10PM +0200, Frederick Page wrote:
> I have exported the following variables:
>
> LC_CTYPE=de_DE
> LC_TYPE=ISO-8859-1
>
> And in ~/.muttrc I have:
>
> set locale="de_DE"
> set charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> That's it and I have "umlauts" just
Hi!
On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 02:54:37PM +, Leo Vegoda wrote:
> I would like to be able to use these domains to craete a Message-ID header,
> rather than using the message ID created by the MTA used by my shell
> account.
This is a bad idea IMO because the message IDs are supposed to be
unique
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 11:25:08AM -0400, Brendan Cully wrote:
> You can download a module that gives GnuPG the ability to read RSA keys.
> It's in the contrib directory, I think.
With these modules gpg even signs and encrypts message in a pgp 2.6.3
compatible format. I didn't manage to make it b
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 03:39:37PM +0200, Frederic Gobry wrote:
> I've just noticed that flag-message does not work with the tag-prefix
> function : if I tag a bunch of messages with tag-pattern, can I mark them as
> important ?
Yes, with , bound to 'w' by default.
Gero
Hi!
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 02:37:47PM +0200, Cees van de Griend wrote:
> I can use GnuPG to sign my messages, but can't use it to encrypt them.
> It looks to me that mutt can't find my public-key-rings.
The name of the binary to access gnupg's keyring changed some versions
ago. I suggest upgrad
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 11:09:05PM +0200, Stefan Fleiter wrote:
> I use the international version (mutt-1.0pre2i.tar.gz) and studied
> the manual and the faq but didn´t find anything.
The configure script needs to find the PGP executables in order
to compile with PGP support. Check your PATH envi
On Tue, Sep 07, 1999 at 06:03:41PM +0200, Mark Weinem wrote:
> Does it only work with 1.0pre2?
No, I was able to patch the sources for 0.95.3i as well. If this
doesn't work for you, you must edit the sources by hand - the result
should work, however.
Gero
Hi!
On Wed, Sep 01, 1999 at 12:49:27PM +0200, Mark Weinem wrote:
> I'm running GnuPG 0.9.10-2. Gpg is the default in ~/.muttrc, and gpgm
> is a symbolic link to gpg. But sending my public key or encrypting
> still doesn't work. Mutt always asks for a key ID but every input
> seems to be wrong.
Hi!
On Sat, Sep 04, 1999 at 10:31:50AM +0200, J Horacio MG wrote:
> Silly question... but I just have to ask:
>
> What indicates whether a version is stable/unstable?
For the last 0.x versions the ones with the odd numbers behind the
point were stable, with the even numbers (0.96) unstable.
Th
Hi!
On Thu, Sep 02, 1999 at 05:53:28PM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> I'm trying mutt after having used rmail in Emacs and various other
> MUAs in the past. One thing I find I keep wanting to do is consult
> other e-mails while composing an e-mail. Is there a neat way of doing
> this, apart
Hi!
On Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 02:02:47PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> The problem with this is that we'd lose packaging with several
> distributions that only ship from the US, which makes it harder for people
> to get and try Mutt (RedHat immediately comes to mind, though why they
> don't yet ha
Hi!
On Wed, Aug 25, 1999 at 11:48:34AM -0400, Fairlight wrote:
> Seriously...there's one thing that I -can't- seem to find to reconfigure,
> ant that's the "-- Forwarded message by" ...or however it reads, when you
> forward a message.
You can configure it within your editor by substituting
Hi!
On Wed, Aug 04, 1999 at 12:00:58PM +0200, joel wrote:
>
>hello, i've installed MUTT.That's ok.My problem is:When i send e-mail
>the 'FROM: ' is false User is joel; Hostname is Kontzmail.lu; From is
>[1][EMAIL PROTECTED] i want that From is [2][EMAIL PROTECTED] How
>can i make
Hi!
On Mon, Aug 09, 1999 at 06:29:42PM +0200, Marco Goetze wrote:
> It should be noted that typing `0' (zero) currently doesn't trigger
> Mutt's jump feature, so that'll have to be changed too, or else you'd
> have to jump to another message (pray the one in question isn't the
> only one in th
Hi!
On Sun, Aug 08, 1999 at 09:14:51PM -0700, BJ Goodwin wrote:
> Are there any plans for adding a command in `pager mode' to re-open the
> current message? For me this would be useful in case I mistype my PGP
> password (which happens a bit), so it would ask for the password again without
> havi
Hi!
On Fri, Aug 06, 1999 at 02:50:11PM -0700, Robert Chien wrote:
> If I save it to a file, then attach that file, it sort of
> works but takes a lot of time, esp. if I'm attaching 3+
> emails. Would be nice if I can presss , and choose files
> or emails to attach. This is my wish list item.
Alm
Hi!
On Thu, Jul 22, 1999 at 03:42:23PM -0700, Rob Thomas wrote:
> I've been using mutt for a year on a shell, but just tried to run it
> locally with a fetchmail setup. The problem is, whenever I try to send a
> message I get "Error sending messsage, Child exited". However, I can
> send messag
Hi!
On Mon, Jul 19, 1999 at 10:55:09AM -0400, erik wrote:
> I have a genral question. i am pretty new to linux and
> therefore pretty new to mutt. i tried to forward an email with some
> attachments on them, but mutt (atleast fo me) didnt attach the files
> with it? how can I make it do this?
Hi!
On Sun, Jul 18, 1999 at 08:41:11PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> when trying to download my POP mail, I get the message "ERR unable to fork"
> Does anyone know what this means, how to fix it ?? I will not be able to
> download any replies until I get this fixed, but will be monitoring t
Hi!
On Mon, Jul
05, 1999 at 11:19:17AM +0200, Robin Gruyters wrote: > I've got a
liltle problem. If I send a message (to a
Hi!
On Tue, Jun 29, 1999 at 10:59:31PM +0200, J Horacio MG wrote:
> Are there very many changes? major or just minor? ...will I manage to
> finish it before v1.0? (I didn't take that long, but I'm not a full
> timer) ...or will the world end a few minutes before?
Don't panic ... :-)
Nothing m
Hi!
On Mon, Jun 28, 1999 at 12:23:01PM -0700, Martin Hillyer wrote:
> I have been using mutt for some time now and really like it.
> However, it has one behaviour that I have not been able to
> understand or change: the way it shows threads in the
> message list. I have ascii_chars set, and the
Hi!
On Wed, Jun 16, 1999 at 01:17:17PM +0200, Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote:
> Whopee, just right now mutt core dumped on me while sending a mail.
> (gdb) print i
> $1 = 0
> (gdb) print PidList
> $2 = (int *) 0x0
What was the value of PidListLen?
Hopefully the following patch fixes the problem (remo
On Thu, Jun 03, 1999 at 02:13:44PM -0400, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote:
> I've seen a few posts now regarding 0.96 but haven't seen it at guug.de
> to grab. If it's discussed that widely on mutt-users, would I be crazy
> to think that it's more than an unstable dev version?
It's not more than t
On Tue, Apr 27, 1999 at 10:21:56PM -0400, Stephen Maher wrote:
> I want to hit 's' in index mode to mark mesg for deletion, prompt me to
> save the mesg with default filename, and when I confirm the filename, more
> to the next undeleted mesg ( *as I used to do in elm ).
>
> Is there a better wa
Hi!
On Mon, Apr 19, 1999 at 03:49:59PM -0500, Martin Julian DeMello wrote:
> When I try to store a mail address under a preexisting alias, mutt complains
> that the alias is already in use, and returns. Wouldn't it make more sense
> to ask if I wanted to replace the address in the file? This is e
Hi!
On Mon, Apr 19, 1999 at 01:48:15PM +, Einar Indridason wrote:
> I have one complaint about mutt, however... It is too efficient... I can
> read/deal with my email a bit speedier than I could under Elm :-)
Not too efficient, it just saves you money: sell your computer
and get an older sec
Hi!
On Wed, Feb 10, 1999 at 12:14:07AM -0500, Randall J. Million wrote:
> set editor='echo ok > '
^ Did you forget a '%s' here?
Gero
--
> Hi! I'm Signature Virus 99! Copy me into your signature and join the fun!
On Thu, Jan 21, 1999 at 04:22:10AM -0600, Brian Bray wrote:
> whats wrong with this i got it and modified it from one of the mutt pages
>
> save-hook mutt-users@ +mutt-users-save
Hm, the manual says that the pattern is used against the From: address,
which usually is not [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
How
Hi!
On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 03:56:45PM +0100, Gero Treuner wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 01:35:53PM +0100, Markus Hofmann wrote:
> > Quoting Heikki Kantola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > According to Markus Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > i'm
On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 01:35:53PM +0100, Markus Hofmann wrote:
> Quoting Heikki Kantola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > According to Markus Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > i'm trying to read mails from a M$-Exchange Server with imap. it works
> > > but the german-umlauts aren't displayed correctly.
89 matches
Mail list logo
