I switched from nmh to mutt about 6 months back, and overall I'm pretty
pleased. There are two things I used to do with nmh that I haven't
found a (good) way to do with mutt, though.
First of all, I'd like to see the hostname portion of the Message-ID in
the index (assuming there is one, of cou
Jeremy --
...and then Jeremy Hankins said...
% I switched from nmh to mutt about 6 months back, and overall I'm pretty
% pleased. There are two things I used to do with nmh that I haven't
Woo hoo!
% found a (good) way to do with mutt, though.
Well, let's dig in.
%
%
% First of all, I'd l
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 01:18:32PM -0400 I heard the voice of
David T-G, and lo! it spake thus:
> ...and then Jeremy Hankins said...
> %
> % First of all, I'd like to see the hostname portion of the Message-ID in
> ...
> % way to do this. I guess I could set up a procmail recipe to put it in
> %
Matthew, et al --
...and then Matthew D. Fuller said...
% On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 01:18:32PM -0400 I heard the voice of
% David T-G, and lo! it spake thus:
% > ...and then Jeremy Hankins said...
% > %
% > % First of all, I'd like to see the hostname portion of the Message-ID in
...
% > Yes, it d
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 01:55:37PM -0400 I heard the voice of
David T-G, and lo! it spake thus:
> ...and then Matthew D. Fuller said...
> %
> % See the {ignore,unignore,hdr_order} config params. Mine look something
> % like this:
>
> Index, not pager.
Ooh, ugh! Coffee BEFORE mail!
Well, you
Matthew, et al --
...and then Matthew D. Fuller said...
% On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 01:55:37PM -0400 I heard the voice of
% David T-G, and lo! it spake thus:
% > ...and then Matthew D. Fuller said...
% > %
% > % See the {ignore,unignore,hdr_order} config params. Mine look something
% > % like thi
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 01:02:26PM -0400, Jeremy Hankins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mh, of course, has an rmmproc, which I redefined to move messages to the
> archive folder rather than deleting them. If possible, I'd like to do
> something similar in mutt, so that I can use all the delete stuf
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 01:18:32PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> %
> % First of all, I'd like to see the hostname portion of the Message-ID in
> ...
> % way to do this. I guess I could set up a procmail recipe to put it in
> % the subject or something, but that seems rather ugly.
>
> Yes, it does;
Ah, mutt -- making the world smaller again.
On 2001.10.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jeremy Hankins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> First of all, I'd like to see the hostname portion of the Message-ID in
> the index (assuming there is one, of course). I find that quite useful
> on occa
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 04:01:56PM -0400, Daniel Eisenbud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 01:02:26PM -0400, Jeremy Hankins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > mh, of course, has an rmmproc, which I redefined to move messages to the
> > archive folder rather than deleting them. If
David Champion said:
> Ah, mutt -- making the world smaller again.
I wondered if you were on this list
> I'd recommend setting the MTA to pass mail from root literally, and
> setting each machine's root GECOS in /etc/passwd to "kimbark root",
> etc., but anyway
Yeah. There are other t
11 matches
Mail list logo
