On 2001-05-13 19:59:00 -0700, Osamu Aoki wrote:
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, May 11, 2001 at
08:25:07PM +0200S
You could of course delete In-Reply-To, which would at
the same time take care of References.
--
Thomas Roessler
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 08:25:07PM +0200, Wilhelm Wienemann wrote:
I am searching for a way defining a default TO: address depending on
list-reply (default: L)
Reply to the current or tagged message(s) by extracting any addresses
which match the addresses given by the ``lists or
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Using a large mallet, Mr. Wade whacked out:
folder-hook .'unmy_hdr To:'
folder-hook =IN-L-mutt-users 'my_hdr To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
A problem with this, though, is that list-replies tend to have
the list address twice in the To:
Hello Osamu!
On Sat, 12 May 2001, Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 08:25:07PM +0200, Wilhelm Wienemann wrote:
I am searching for a way defining a default TO: address depending
on
list-reply (default: L)
Reply to the current or tagged message(s) by extracting any
Using a large mallet, Mr. Wade whacked out:
This was an attempt to have Mutt use a default To: address for
a mailbox folder, as I understand it.
Yes. And I use procmail with other headers (say Sender: - usually distinctive
to the list) to filter each list into a separate mbox
--
Suresh
Hi, I know you quoted manual... But context made me worry. I am not
sure we are talking same thing but try explaining what I meant:
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 08:13:28PM +0200, Wilhelm Wienemann wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 08:25:07PM +0200, Wilhelm Wienemann wrote:
I am searching for a
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Using a large mallet, Mr. Wade whacked out:
This was an attempt to have Mutt use a default To: address for
a mailbox folder, as I understand it.
Yes. And I use procmail with other headers (say Sender: - usually distinctive
to the list) to filter each
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Using a large mallet, Mr. Wade whacked out:
I do this as well. I think that perhaps I misunderstood the
original question. I was under the impression that the asker
wanted to know how to have a default To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
header specified when he
Using a large mallet, Mr. Wade whacked out:
I agree,... but what about messages which are NOT replies? I
think that's what the original question was about. If he invokes
the mail function, (bound to m by default), he must then
specify a To: header address. I think that's what he was
Hi,
I am searching for a way defining a default TO: address depending on the
actual folder. Let's say I am in the mutt's Mailinglist folder. If I
press m I want a default address [EMAIL PROTECTED] there.
I think it is an folder-hook thing, but I have no idea how to implement
this. Any
Kai Weber wrote:
I am searching for a way defining a default TO: address depending on the
actual folder. Let's say I am in the mutt's Mailinglist folder. If I
press m I want a default address [EMAIL PROTECTED] there.
I think it is an folder-hook thing, but I have no idea how to implement
Kai Weber wrote:
I am searching for a way defining a default TO: address depending on the
actual folder. Let's say I am in the mutt's Mailinglist folder. If I
press m I want a default address [EMAIL PROTECTED] there.
I think it is an folder-hook thing, but I have no idea how to implement
Hello Kai!
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Kai Weber wrote:
I am searching for a way defining a default TO: address depending on
the actual folder. Let's say I am in the mutt's Mailinglist folder. If
I press m I want a default address [EMAIL PROTECTED] there.
I think it is an folder-hook thing, but
Using a large mallet, Mr. Wade whacked out:
folder-hook .'unmy_hdr To:'
folder-hook =IN-L-mutt-users 'my_hdr To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
A problem with this, though, is that list-replies tend to have
the list address twice in the To: field. I haven't spent any
time
14 matches
Mail list logo
