On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 08:13:15PM -0400, John Hawkinson wrote:
> Derek Martin wrote on Mon, 25 Oct 2021
> at 19:00:12 EDT in <20211025230012.gc9...@bladeshadow.org>:
>
> > Cost? I see no cost, other than the time needed to physically check
>
> My Oct. 7 email, to which you replied, enumerated
Derek Martin wrote on Mon, 25 Oct 2021
at 19:00:12 EDT in <20211025230012.gc9...@bladeshadow.org>:
> Cost? I see no cost, other than the time needed to physically check
My Oct. 7 email, to which you replied, enumerated several costs that I
perceived.
That you go on to state that you perceive
On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 11:52:02PM -0400, John Hawkinson wrote:
> ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್ wrote on Thu, 7 Oct 2021
> at 23:32:00 EDT in :
>
> > Any email client (including mobile email clients) worth its salt is
> > going to wrap the subject line (at least in the email view, if not
> > in the index
On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 06:50:24PM +1100, raf wrote:
> My advice is, don't worry about the default.
> If you don't like it, just change it.
>
> "man muttrc" and look for "forward_format".
>
> I think you want something like this in your ~/.muttrc:
>
> set forward_format = "Fwd: %s"
>
> or:
My advice is, don't worry about the default.
If you don't like it, just change it.
"man muttrc" and look for "forward_format".
I think you want something like this in your ~/.muttrc:
set forward_format = "Fwd: %s"
or:
set forward_format = "FW: %s"
They are both common patterns.
And they
So, in my opinion, communication is most effective if the recipient easily
comprehends what is conveyed to him/her. I suspect most recipients of our
e-mails do not know much about mutt except that you likely get it from a place
other than a breeder.
So, [mutt-users@mutt.org: Email Subject]
12021/06/39 09:94.47 ನಲ್ಲಿ, John Hawkinson ಬರೆದರು:
> ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್ wrote on Thu, 7 Oct 2021
> at 23:32:00 EDT in :
>
> > Any email client (including mobile email clients) worth its salt is
> > going to wrap the subject line (at least in the email view, if not
> > in the index view), so that
ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್ wrote on Thu, 7 Oct 2021
at 23:32:00 EDT in :
> Any email client (including mobile email clients) worth its salt is
> going to wrap the subject line (at least in the email view, if not
> in the index view), so that shouldn't really be an issue, right?
My principal concern is with
12021/06/39 09:52.97 ನಲ್ಲಿ, John Hawkinson ಬರೆದರು:
> I'd object to the proposal to add the "FW: " characters to the default. Space
> is at a premium in modern Subject lines, especially with the prevalence of
> mobile devices that have limited screen real estate, and cutting out 3
> characters
I'd object to the proposal to add the "FW: " characters to the default.
Space is at a premium in modern Subject lines, especially with the
prevalence of mobile devices that have limited screen real estate, and
cutting out 3 characters is very undesirable. I think it's pretty clear
from context
12021/06/39 09:27.23 ನಲ್ಲಿ, Globe Trotter via Mutt-users
ಬರೆದರು:
> When I foward my mutt-composed email, I have something like the following,
> which I believe is the default behaviour:
>
> [mutt-users@mutt.org: Email subject]
>
> which I think is very nice because it gives the recipient an
When I foward my mutt-composed email, I have something like the following,
which I believe is the default behaviour:
[mutt-users@mutt.org: Email subject]
which I think is very nice because it gives the recipient an idea of whether
the originator of this email is someone s/he should even bother
* On 21 Jul 2010, Roger wrote:
Since I'm always saving/moving email to $HOME/.maildir/.Spam... you
would think Mutt would catch-on after the 10th email. ;-)
I attach the following macros to the z key in my .muttrc
macro index z s=mutt/spam\n move message to spam
macro pager z
Hi all,
when I press s to save a mail to another folder, mutt suggest the foldername.
But mutt is mostly always wrong :-)
So I thought it would be nice if I could write my own script which would parse
the mail
and suggest a folder. Is something like this possible or feasable ?
Alternatively I
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 09:36:54AM +0200, Christoph Kluenter wrote:
when I press s to save a mail to another folder, mutt suggest the
foldername.
But mutt is mostly always wrong :-)
So I thought it would be nice if I could write my own script which would
parse the mail
and suggest a
* Am Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:02:08AM +0200 , schrieb Joost Kremers:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 09:36:54AM +0200, Christoph Kluenter wrote:
when I press s to save a mail to another folder, mutt suggest the
foldername.
But mutt is mostly always wrong :-)
So I thought it would be nice if I
=- Christoph Kluenter wrote on Wed 21.Jul'10 at 10:30:34 +0200 -=
Thank you very much. save-hooks is exactly what I want.
There are some vars controlling save-location, if you want to make
it constant.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least
email address!
A likely more appropriate suggestion would be to have Mutt use the last
save to folder name used as a suggestion (along with the usual ? to list
folder names).
Since I'm always saving/moving email to $HOME/.maildir/.Spam... you
would think Mutt would catch-on after the 10th email
appropriate suggestion would be to have Mutt use the last
save to folder name used as a suggestion (along with the usual ? to list
folder names).
there is a *default* save-hook location, even mentioned in the fine
documentation.
Since I'm always saving/moving email to $HOME/.maildir/.Spam
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 06:50:12PM +0200, Rado S wrote:
=- Christoph Kluenter wrote on Wed 21.Jul'10 at 10:30:34 +0200 -=
Thank you very much. save-hooks is exactly what I want.
There are some vars controlling save-location, if you want to make
it constant.
force_name save_name?
Around 07:56pm on Wednesday, July 21, 2010 (UK time), Roger scrawled:
Since I'm always saving/moving email to $HOME/.maildir/.Spam... you
would think Mutt would catch-on after the 10th email. ;-)
I attach the following macros to the z key in my .muttrc
macro index z s=mutt/spam\n move
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:12:34PM +0100, Steve Searle wrote:
Around 07:56pm on Wednesday, July 21, 2010 (UK time), Roger scrawled:
Since I'm always saving/moving email to $HOME/.maildir/.Spam... you
would think Mutt would catch-on after the 10th email. ;-)
I attach the following macros to the
Hi,
* Edd Barrett wrote:
What do you think of a progress indication when you close a large
mailbox. I use mutt with gmail and frequently when I close a mailing
list folder it takes a while. User feedback would be nice :)
I have a patch in my queue at bitbucket that does this:
Hi Guys,
What do you think of a progress indication when you close a large
mailbox. I use mutt with gmail and frequently when I close a mailing
list folder it takes a while. User feedback would be nice :)
--
Best Regards
Edd Barrett
(Freelance software developer / technical writer /
16000 emails. 395M. - 10 seconds.
Best,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: owner-mutt-us...@mutt.org [mailto:owner-mutt-us...@mutt.org] On Behalf Of
Edd Barrett
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 11:53 AM
To: mutt-users@mutt.org
Subject: Quick suggestion
Hi Guys,
What do you think
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Paul Grinbergpgrinb...@nyc.saic.com wrote:
16000 emails. 395M. - 10 seconds.
Is that a gmail account?
--
Best Regards
Edd Barrett
(Freelance software developer / technical writer / open-source developer)
http://students.dec.bournemouth.ac.uk/ebarrett
Not gmail. thought you are asking in general.
Best,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Edd Barrett [mailto:vex...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 12:16 PM
To: Paul Grinberg
Cc: mutt-users@mutt.org
Subject: Re: Quick suggestion
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Paul
I think it's a good idea to have a facility like shell expansion when
adding attachments to mail.
For example, I have files named 1.zip 2.zip and so on. I want adding all
of them to a mail as attachments when composing the mail. It will be
good to specify things like *.zip when pressing the 'a'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thus spake Nicolas Rachinsky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
3. When I get clearer with gpg, I try to make my 'uid' more informative
for others. But I found gpg doesn't provide good maintaining method
to update them. You can not update uid except
Hi, all --
Since I'm a definite contributor, though I hope not terribly often, I
probably ought to chime in...
...and then Derek D. Martin said...
%
% At some point hitherto, Roman Neuhauser hath spake thusly:
..
% mutt-chat, so that those who feel the urge to send non-technical, OT
%
As Tom Gilbert has it in his sample .muttrc:
set indent_str= # change this and I'll kill you! ;-)
I have have this:
set indent_string=# Dont' be a moron. Leave it as is.
igor
--
Uptime : 31 days, 28 min
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Roman Neuhauser hath spake thusly:
I guess that quite a few of the subscribers are just devoted to
flooding this list with chitchat. I would suggest creating
mutt-chat, so that those who feel the urge to send
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Derek D. Martin hath spake thusly:
[SNIP]
discussions almost always result directly from discussions that
originally WERE on-topic, and are unavoidable. Humans have a penchant
for going off on tangents, and you can not
I guess that quite a few of the subscribers are just devoted to
flooding this list with chitchat. I would suggest creating
mutt-chat, so that those who feel the urge to send non-technical, OT
stuff to mutt-users would have a place to go.
Yeah, but the problem is that
... On 01/10/02, Knute decided to write ...
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Nick Croft wrote:
This is quoted text:
This is quoted text:
This is quoted text: * Imre Vida ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
This is quoted text: somewhat different but related:
This is quoted text:
This is quoted text:
Agree with you, too. Your post showed one well-tailored. :-)
best,
charlie
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 08:55:24AM +0100, Volker Moell wrote:
Charles Jie wrote:
I Agree. For an hacker, his message should be as well tailored as his
programs.
But please: Don't snip *everything*! Just reading
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Anh Lai wrote:
... On 01/10/02, Knute decided to write ...
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Nick Croft wrote:
This is quoted text:
This is quoted text:
This is quoted text: * Imre Vida ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
This is quoted text: somewhat different but
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 07:46:15AM -0600, Anh Lai wrote:
... On 01/10/02, Knute decided to write ...
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Nick Croft wrote:
This is quoted text:
This is quoted text:
This is quoted text: * Imre Vida ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
This is quoted text: somewhat
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 08:27:47 -0800
From: J. Scott Dorr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Anh Lai [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Suggestion for List Etiquette
snip what=OTBS /
Nah. :) He coulda just highlighted the appropriate lines (via shift-v or some
such) then ':s
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 06:37:52PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
I guess that quite a few of the subscribers are just devoted to
flooding this list with chitchat. I would suggest creating
mutt-chat, so that those who feel the urge to send non-technical, OT
stuff to mutt-users
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 06:24:47PM +, Benjamin Smith wrote:
Yeah, but the problem is that when 'chitchat' spins off from another
thread, it rarely (in my experience) ends up getting moved. Although if
people think that it will actually get used, I would support it
We had the chitchat on
Alas! Roman Neuhauser spake thus:
I guess that quite a few of the subscribers are just devoted to
flooding this list with chitchat. I would suggest creating
mutt-chat, so that those who feel the urge to send non-technical, OT
stuff to mutt-users would have a place to go.
I
Alas! Knute spake thus:
This is quoted text: - End forwarded message -
So what do you think?
(I think I need to put on my asbestos long john's!)
You die. You die and go to hell!
Just kidding ;)
9o)
BTW, what the heck is that thing?
--
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] [11 Jan 2002 16:37 -0700]:
9o)
BTW, what the heck is that thing?
He has a big nose and a monocle, obviously.
--
http://www.epic.org - Electronic Privacy Information Center
msg22976/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
somewhat different but related:
wouldn't it be better to use as a quote-marker char
consistently?
some of the alternatives like % i realy dislike
imre
Alas! Imre Vida spake thus:
wouldn't it be better to use as a quote-marker char consistently?
some of the alternatives like % i realy dislike
This point has come up before. Although I personally like to use ''
just because I think it's a good character for quoting (it looks like an
arrow,
* Imre Vida ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
somewhat different but related:
wouldn't it be better to use as a quote-marker char
consistently?
some of the alternatives like % i realy dislike
imre
As Tom Gilbert has it in his sample .muttrc:
set indent_str= # change this and I'll kill
Thank you, Justin. I've just gone thru your tutorial. It's helpful.
However, I would suggest some more info to be included, which I've tried
hard (with 'man gpg' and google search) but can not yet get a clear
picture of pgp.
Don't blame me posting this in mutt mail listing, and asking your
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
Alas! Imre Vida spake thus:
wouldn't it be better to use as a quote-marker char consistently?
some of the alternatives like % i realy dislike
This point has come up before. Although I personally like to use ''
just because I think it's a
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Nick Croft wrote:
This is quoted text:
This is quoted text:
This is quoted text: * Imre Vida ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
This is quoted text: somewhat different but related:
This is quoted text:
This is quoted text: wouldn't it be better to use as a quote-marker char
Nick Croft wrote:
As Tom Gilbert has it in his sample .muttrc:
set indent_str= # change this and I'll kill you! ;-)
i also like the bit from the muttrc man page:
You are strongly encouraged not to change this
value, as it tends to agitate the more fanatical
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 12:24:17PM +0800, Charles Jie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
user id (short form, 8 hex digits) - an key ID for your convenience
to specify a key for gpg, not guaranteed to be unique (non-ambiguous)
user id (long form, 16 hex digits) - better ID but who'll use it?
I would like to suggest that people judiciously edit the text to which they are
replying and remove unnecessary sentences. I'm seeing a lot of messages
which I have to scroll down a ways on my 80x24 term before I can see the
text of the message, and its quite annoying. If you are going to
I Agree. For an hacker, his message should be as well tailored as his
programs.
charlie
Charles Jie wrote:
I Agree. For an hacker, his message should be as well tailored as his
programs.
But please: Don't snip *everything*! Just reading the answer or comment
(to an unknown question, because I deleted the original posting in the
meantime) ist more painful than ignoring superfluous
* Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011207 19:38]:
I think it would be really cool in the manual to see
at what version of mutt each config variable came in.
me, too! That's why I started writing my own manual
with exactly that in mind - but unfortunately this
was never included with the manual
Daniel --
...and then Daniel Eisenbud said...
%
% On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 08:16:08PM -0500, David T-G
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
%
% ...and then Ken Weingold said...
% %
...
% % Instead of something like -?-?-?-?- , maybe things like -?4?- or the
...
%
% That sounds pretty cool. Daniel
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 08:16:08PM -0500, David T-G
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ken --
...and then Ken Weingold said...
%
% The more I run 1.3.24, the more I am appreciating the multiple '?'s in
...
% Instead of something like -?-?-?-?- , maybe things like -?4?- or the
% like, replacing
The more I run 1.3.24, the more I am appreciating the multiple '?'s in
long threads, where some messages have been deleted, so I know which
messages are on equal levels and such. But, I wonder if this could be
done, which might have the same effect, but make the threads narrower.
Instead of
Ken --
...and then Ken Weingold said...
%
% The more I run 1.3.24, the more I am appreciating the multiple '?'s in
...
% Instead of something like -?-?-?-?- , maybe things like -?4?- or the
% like, replacing all the '?'s with a number representing them? Seems
% like a happy medium.
That
I think it would be really cool in the manual to see at what version
of mutt each config variable came in.
-Ken
On 2001.08.03, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
John Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just talking to someone about mutt flagging mail with + when it's to
you and T when it's to you and other, etc, and we were just wondering if
mutt either does or could have a flag for emails which are from
Shawn D. McPeek muttered:
And mention that a 32 line sig on a 3 line message is a bit excessive :)
[full quote deleted]
The same goes to full quoting of cause :-)
And - to whom it may concern - quoting sigs!
HTH,
Michael
--
Prof:So the American government went to IBM to come up with a
* fman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000628 04:16]:
The muttfaq says to send suggestions to this list.
I suggest someone write a book on how to use mutt.
Maybe a small book like those o'reilly pocket references.
Mutt is popular enought to deserve one, no?
I had suggested this to O'Reilly two years ago.
On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 09:25:10PM -0700, Shawn D. McPeek wrote:
And mention that a 32 line sig on a 3 line message is a bit excessive :)
Quoting style should get some attention too... ;)
Marius Gedminas
--
Science is to computer science as hydrodynamics is to plumbing.
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 01:19:20PM +0200)
* fman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000628 04:16]:
The muttfaq says to send suggestions to this list.
I suggest someone write a book on how to use mutt.
Maybe a small book like those o'reilly pocket references.
Mutt is popular
On 2000-06-28 14:20:02 +0200, Gerhard den Hollander wrote:
(note, this does involve some more or less complicated (c) issues with
contributors to the online docs ...
Not necessarily; Open Content with restrictions on printing is
always an option (this is how "The Cathedral and the Bazar"
On 06/27 21:12 -0700, fman wrote:
The muttfaq says to send suggestions to this list. I suggest someone write a
book on how to use mutt. Maybe a small book like those o'reilly pocket
references. Mutt is popular enought to deserve one, no?
but then clueless people would start using it...
--
On Wed, Jun 28, 2000, Sven Guckes wrote:
* fman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000628 04:16]:
The muttfaq says to send suggestions to this list.
I suggest someone write a book on how to use mutt.
Maybe a small book like those o'reilly pocket references.
Mutt is popular enought to deserve one, no?
Is there plans to make enable mutt to read the news from a news server?
-juan
--
PGP signature
fman proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Is there plans to make enable mutt to read the news from a news server?
-juan
See http://www.mutt.org - there is an NNTP patch. Read the archives -
this (and other alternatives such as newsfetch) were discussed a few weeks
back.
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian
On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 09:25:10PM -0700, Shawn D. McPeek wrote:
And mention that a 32 line sig on a 3 line message is a bit excessive :)
Shawn
I hadn't realized how big it was, becuase I was reading it through an xterm
window. Should be ok now
On Wed, Jun 28, 2000, fman wrote:
Is there plans to make enable mutt to read the news from a news server?
Yeah, it already can. Hit 'qtin' or 'qslrn'. Works great. ;-)
-Ken
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]AIM: ScopusFest
Juan --
...and then fman said...
% Is there plans to make enable mutt to read the news from a news server?
Plans for official development: no
Plans for unofficial support: yes, discussed a few times in the past.
Take a wander through the mail archives for more info, including at least
one or
* fman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is there plans to make enable mutt to read the news from a news server?
I don't know, but I doubt it.
See some of the nntp patches though:
http://www.mutt.org/links.html#patch
The muttfaq says to send suggestions to this list. I suggest someone write a
book on how to use mutt. Maybe a small book like those o'reilly pocket
references. Mutt is popular enought to deserve one, no?
--
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For
And mention that a 32 line sig on a 3 line message is a bit excessive :)
Shawn
Previously, fman wrote:
% The muttfaq says to send suggestions to this list. I suggest someone write a
% book on how to use mutt. Maybe a small book like those o'reilly pocket
% references. Mutt is popular enought
for
% [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
%
% Yes. But something more. I have improved my
Hokay. Got that so far.
% suggestion. The command would be something like
%
% aka {alias} {regexp}
%
% It will rewrite any address that match regexp with
% the one that is defined in the alias, *when
Hi again :-)
I just thought of a simpler and potentially easier answer to this whole
thing. Since you've already stepped up to the work of configuring *your*
environment (the aliases file) for these folks who can't get it together,
why not just configure your procmail setup to recognize any of
Daniel --
My, I'm busy this morning :-)
...and then Daniel González Gasull said...
% Hi! :-)
%
% David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote To Mutt users:
%
% You may find everything you wanted for the
% pgpmimeuser setting in v1.2 and up (currently
% 1.2.2 AFAIK), since there is now a clearsign
Daniel --
...and then Daniel González Gasull said...
% Hi! :-)
%
% Myself wrote To Mutt users:
%
% list to ask it, but, are there any standard email
% headers to say something like this?:
This was the important part of your first post, we note.
%
% X-PGP-Advocacy: Hey, I prefer to
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 01:00:47AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
I, for one, had trouble following your aka proposal. Do I understand
that a configuration like
aka [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
would automatically readdress any email for [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
My
Marius Gedminas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 21 Jun 2000:
My understanding was that *replying* to a mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] would
address the reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I can find uses for this too. Some mailing lists around here can be
reached via multiple aliases -- [EMAIL
Dave --
...and then Dave Pearson said...
% On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 04:03:34PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
%
% grepmail keyword /tmp/mutt-11241
%
% and then loads /tmp/mutt-11241 or whatever as the current box.
...
%
% grepmail wrapper that does all this for you. I've got something
Dave --
...and then Dave Pearson said...
% On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 07:59:55AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
%
% What a cool idea. Care to share it?
%
% My pleasure, on the understanding that installing and using glimpse is left
% as an exercise for the reader. g
No problem. All I have to do is
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 07:59:55AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
Dave --
% grepmail wrapper that does all this for you. I've got something similar that
% I use with glimpse. It does the search and, if something was found, it fires
% up mutt with all the found messages in a folder. It ever writes
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 01:00:47AM -0400 or thereabouts, David T-G wrote:
Daniel --
I, for one, had trouble following your aka proposal.
I did, also. I know this sounds silly, but was Daniel actually looking
for the 'alias' setting?
I am so used to the term 'alias' because I've always
At 10:35 AM 6/21/00 +0100, Telsa Gwynne wrote:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 01:00:47AM -0400 or thereabouts, David T-G wrote:
Daniel --
I, for one, had trouble following your aka proposal.
I did, also. I know this sounds silly, but was Daniel actually looking
for the 'alias' setting?
Stan Ryckman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 21 Jun 2000:
This is sort of a guess as well, since I'm going from memory, but
what I think was asked.
My understanding was that he wanted to specify the "display name" for
several mail addresses, in the mail folder view. This is what
I just had a suggestion for what might be a nice feature for Mutt.
The grepmail program is nice since it greps for e-mails containing something
and spits them out in standard mail format. We could add a search mail
function that does:
grepmail keyword /tmp/mutt-11241
and then loads /tmp/mutt
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 04:03:34PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We could add a search mail function that does:
grepmail keyword /tmp/mutt-11241
and then loads /tmp/mutt-11241 or whatever as the current box.
Mutt already has that feature.
l ~b keyword
will limit the messages
Daniel --
You may find everything you wanted for the pgpmimeuser setting in v1.2
and up (currently 1.2.2 AFAIK), since there is now a clearsign mode.
With a [few] send-hook[s], you should be able to define whatever settings
you wish for whatever recipients you have. You shouldn't have ever had
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My idea is to use Mutt to encode the attachments and produce the
headers.
This is not a bad idea, but Mutt is really designed more for interactive
use, and thus, there may be other tools better suited. Have you looked
at the "mpack"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My idea is to use Mutt to encode the attachments and produce the
headers.
This is not a bad idea, but Mutt is really designed more for interactive
use, and thus, there may be other tools better suited. Have you looked
at the "mpack"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My idea is to use Mutt to encode the attachments and produce the
headers.
This is not a bad idea, but Mutt is really designed more for interactive
use, and thus, there may be other tools better suited. Have you looked
at the "mpack"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My idea is to use Mutt to encode the attachments and produce the
headers.
This is not a bad idea, but Mutt is really designed more for interactive
use, and thus, there may be other tools better suited. Have you looked
at the "mpack"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My idea is to use Mutt to encode the attachments and produce the
headers.
This is not a bad idea, but Mutt is really designed more for interactive
use, and thus, there may be other tools better suited. Have you looked
at the "mpack" utility? It
David DeSimone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 31 Mar 2000:
Have you looked
at the "mpack" utility? It encodes attachments and sends them in a
batch mode.
At least according to the docs, and my brief testing, mpack will only
include *one* file as attachment. I think the person who is asking
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to create "mailling lists" using mutt, that's to say, sending
news to some users, but the users need not reply my mails. As i want
to implement the list using scripts, I can not invoke mutt
interactively, all i can do is to use commandline
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to create "mailling lists" using mutt, that's to say, sending
news to some users, but the users need not reply my mails. As i want
to implement the list using scripts, I can not invoke mutt
interactively, all i can do is to use
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
