Filters

Hello! I have 0.95.4 mutt version and i'd filter my mail. I've read the long manual but i don't understand very well the way to do it (hooks and regular expressions). I think I must use a -hook in the muttrc file. Can anyone give me an example, please? i.e. How can i put all the messages with

filters

would someone be kind enough to explain how I use filters with mutt? i'm trying to sort my mail into different folders based on different things like who it's from, or who it was sent to, and i'm not having much luck. so any help that anyone could provide would be greatly apprecia

filters

where has mutt been all my life?! it's great! although i'm having an issue when using the pop3 support, and filters (procmail). i'm pretty sure I know why mutt doesn't see the procmail filters (mutt doesn't use procmail as a MDA, mutt does it on it's own.), but t

filters

hi all, i have been using mutt for three days, and there are tons of things i haven't figured out yet. i haven't found anything in the man pages about mail filters; initially i decided to try procmail, but it is decisely too much insane for me: i'm a member of at least 15 MLs

Filters

Hi, everybody. Well, I'm new to mutt, I've used pine for a long time, and I can't filter the mail messages *after reading* them in the incoming folder, in the same manner that in pine was. Some help? Thank you, -- Fernando M. Maresca Monitoring Station S.A. 48 nº 812 La Plata (1900) BA - ARG

Re: Filters

possible ? > > Thanks. > Hello: filtering is not the easiest to be done with Mutt (I don't know about v 0.95.4), I think the best is to get some mail filters like procmail. it works great for me and it's very flexible. -- -*-*-*-*-*

Re: Filters

Warning Could not process message with given Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"

Re: Filters

++ 29.03.1999, 12:26:03 (+0200) = Antonio Mármol Albert: >example, please? i.e. How can i put all the messages with the from-header ( >[EMAIL PROTECTED]) in the folder "personal" ?? I use Procmail for filtering. For extremely easy filters (like the one you want) can be done eas

Re: Filters

Rejo dixit: > > [1] Don't know the url by heart, but i think you should be able to find > it from http://www.iki.fi/era/. If that doesn't work use one of the > official mirrors at http://www.xs4all.nl/~sister/mirror/procmail.i http://www.iki.fi/~era/ > [2] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Horacio. --

Re: filters

On Sat, 05 Jun 1999, phuzz phactor (Nathan Benson) wrote: > would someone be kind enough to explain how I use filters with > mutt? You can use the procmail mail processing program for such filterings. The latest version can be obtained from your friendly neighbour mirror site:

Re: filters

I can think of two different options: 1. Use external pop3 capabilities, such as fetchmail. 2. After downloading all the messages, tag them all and pipe though procmail. randy > pretty sure I know why mutt doesn't see the procmail filters (mutt > doesn't use procmail as a MDA,

Re: filters

On Sat, Jun 05, 1999 at 07:32:55PM -0500, phuzz phactor wrote: [cut] > I'm basically just trying to get a set of filters to sort my mail into > different folders based on things like who it's from, subject, or who > it's addressed to. > > could anyone give me som

Re: filters

On Sat, Jun 05, 1999 at 09:21:39PM -0500, phuzz phactor wrote: > would someone be kind enough to explain how I use filters with mutt? > i'm trying to sort my mail into different folders based on different You use filters (and from reading your previous post, I gather you mean procmai

Re: filters

On Mon, Jun 07, 1999 at 08:03:38AM -0500, Jim Graham wrote: > Now, as to how you use filters, lots of others have provided links to > the procmail web page(s), etc., I just took a closer look at the responses I mentioned above, and I'm correcting one error myself: make that ftp sit

Re: filters

* giorgian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > i haven't found anything in the man pages about mail filters; > initially i decided to try procmail, but it is decisely too much > insane for me: i'm a member of at least 15 MLs (plus this one :) ), > and my .procmailrc is an aw

Re: filters

On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:21:24PM +0100, giorgian wrote: > hi all, > i have been using mutt for three days, and there are tons of things i > haven't figured out yet. > > i haven't found anything in the man pages about mail filters; > initially i decided to try proc

Re: filters

Hi, * giorgian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-12-19 16:21]: >i haven't found anything in the man pages about mail filters; >initially i decided to try procmail, but it is decisely too much >insane for me: i'm a member of at least 15 MLs (plus this one :) ), >and my .procm

Re: filters

On Dec 19 at 04:21PM giorgian wrote: [...] > now, is there a way to tell mutt to put received messages in folders > according to some matching rules? if you're just dealing with mailing lists, getmail will likely suffice. you can find it at freshmeat, and it's easy-as-pie to configure. -- tim

Re: filters

Hi, On Wed, 19 Dec 2001 giorgian spewed into the ether: > hi all, > i have been using mutt for three days, and there are tons of things i > haven't figured out yet. > > i haven't found anything in the man pages about mail filters; > initially i decided to try proc

Re: filters

sorry if i reply only now, but i had some troubles with my mail... :( many thanks, now i use procmail and i'm almost happy. i still have a problem: there are some MLs which use a strange return path: focus-linux: Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> where 1081 changes every time... a worse exa

Re: filters

Giorgian -- ...and then giorgian said... % % sorry if i reply only now, but i had some troubles with my mail... :( Glad to see you're back! % % many thanks, now i use procmail and i'm almost happy. % i still have a problem: there are some MLs which use a strange return % path: % % focus-

Re: filters

> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 13:07:04 +0100 > From: giorgian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: filters > > sorry if i reply only now, but i had some troubles with my mail... :( > > many thanks, now i use procmail and i'm almost happy.

Re: filters

ok, now everything seems to work. but i still have 3 questions: 1) when i reply to someone in this list, mutt chooses someone's email, while i'd like to reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] What can i do? 2) this is what i see at the beginning of your email: [-- PGP output follows (current time: Fri

Re: filters

On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 02:34:54PM +0100, giorgian wrote: > ok, now everything seems to work. > > but i still have 3 questions: > > 1) when i reply to someone in this list, mutt chooses someone's email, >while i'd like to reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] What can i do? > First, tell mutt about t

Re: filters

On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:21:24PM +0100, giorgian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | i haven't found anything in the man pages about mail filters; | initially i decided to try procmail, but it is decisely too much | insane for me: i'm a member of at least 15 MLs (plus this on

Re: Filters

Fernando -- ...and then Fernando M. Maresca said... % % Hi, everybody. Hello, and welcome! % Well, I'm new to mutt, I've used pine for a long time, and I can't filter the mail messages *after reading* them % in the incoming folder, in the same manner that in pine was. If you really insist

Pretty print filters

This may be outside the scope of "mutt" per se, but can anyone recommend a good "pretty print filter" for mboxes? I used to use "mp" under Solaris until a system upgrade somehow broke it, and I do not know of equivalents elsewhere. mp would send an mbox to the printer with pruned headers and a f

Re:Pretty print filters

Tom, 1) Check if muttprint works under solaris too: http://home.t-online.de/home/f.walle/muttprint/ 2) Personally I don't use it because I have relatively old computers, and installing a mammoth like latex just to pretty print some messages doesn't look smart in that situat

Re:Pretty print filters

On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Marco Fioretti wrote: > 1) Check if muttprint works under solaris too: > http://home.t-online.de/home/f.walle/muttprint/ Thank you! I see this has moved to http://muttprint.sourceforge.net, I see that muttprint depends on LaTeX. I still telnet to a Solaris mac

Re: Pretty print filters

Thomas Baker [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > This may be outside the scope of "mutt" per se, but can anyone > recommend a good "pretty print filter" for mboxes? I used to use "mp" > under Solaris until a system upgrade somehow broke it, and I do not > know of equivalents elsewhere. I use a program

Re: Pretty print filters

On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Robert Berkowitz wrote: > Thomas Baker [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > > This may be outside the scope of "mutt" per se, but can anyone > > recommend a good "pretty print filter" for mboxes? I used to use "mp" > > under Solaris until a system upgrade somehow broke it, and I do n

Re: Pretty print filters

Quoting Thomas Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [25 Feb-02 14:50]: > On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Marco Fioretti wrote: > > 3) Don;t you have enscript on your solaris box? It might work. > > Yes, but I don't believe it has any special functions for > filtering and formatting email headers. Enscript does; pass

Re: Pretty print filters

On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, darren chamberlain wrote: > Quoting Thomas Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [25 Feb-02 14:50]: > > On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Marco Fioretti wrote: > > > 3) Don;t you have enscript on your solaris box? It might work. > > > > Yes, but I don't believe it has any special functions for > > fi

Re: Pretty print filters

Quoting Thomas Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [26 Feb-02 02:10]: > I had never noticed that before. The command > > enscript --help-pretty-print > > lists about twenty other file types that can be prettified. > Great stuff. Tom: Try printing to a color printer too; it works very well

SPAM filters and mutt

Hey, guys I'm not on the mailing list, but I have a quick question: Is there a way to do mail filtering by body text/attachment reading? Thanks, Justin Hibbits -- Registered Linux user 260206

Re: SPAM filters and mutt

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Said Justin Hibbits on Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 03:53:47PM -0500: > Is there a way to do mail filtering by body text/attachment reading? Mutt goes by the UNIX philosophy of "do one thing, do it well". Procmail (or yes, Maildrop) as an add-on tool would

how to setup spam filters

m the spam filters so next time it will end up in the inbox. I would of course like to be able to do 2 and 3 from within mutt. What spam filters do others here use? I'm using fetchmail to fetch my mail, and procmail as my mta. I of course use mutt as my client, and if it's important,

Re: how to setup spam filters

o be spammed, a way for me to remove it from > the spam filters so next time it will end up in the inbox. > I would of course like to be able to do 2 and 3 from within mutt. Same here. Move it to a subfolder and have it picked up? > What spam filters do others here use? SMTP session contr

Re: how to setup spam filters

10-Oct-2009 числа в 15:01 часов, ты написал(а) следующее: > Could someone please point me to some documentation, or give me some > ideas on how I can set up a good spam filter that will: > 1. Move spam to a folder titled junk > > What spam filters do others here use? > > I

Re: how to setup spam filters

On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 01:33:33PM -0700, Buzzer wrote: > Install bogofilter, then add in following strings > In ~/.procmail Thanks, I'll check this out, it seems that spam assasin is the most popular, but I came across this in my research so will read up on it a little. > First time you need to t

Re: how to setup spam filters

> Usually a spam filter classifies a message and another program, a LDA such as > procmail, moves it to a special location e.g. a subfolder. > Oh ok. > If you use SpamAssassin to detect spam, take a look at this tutorial: > > > Thanks > SM

Re: how to setup spam filters

16-Oct-2009 числа в 17:19 часов, ты написал(а) следующее: > On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 01:33:33PM -0700, Buzzer wrote: > > Install bogofilter, then add in following strings > > In ~/.procmail > > Thanks, I'll check this out, it seems that spam assasin is the most > popular, but I came across this in

Re: three new questions (was "Re: filters")

Giorgian -- ...and then giorgian said... % % ok, now everything seems to work. % % but i still have 3 questions: You should have started a new thread :-) % % 1) when i reply to someone in this list, mutt chooses someone's email, %while i'd like to reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] What can i d

Recommended mail filters for use with mutt?

I currently use a custom (perl) mail filter for delivering mailing list (and other) mail to appropriate mailboxes. I'm not a perl expert, in fact I rather dislike perl, it's only in perl because I copied it from somewhere else and modified it for my own use. I want to do some changes and was thin

Re: Recommended mail filters for use with mutt?

On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 02:20:33PM +0100, Chris G wrote: > I currently use a custom (perl) mail filter for delivering mailing > list (and other) mail to appropriate mailboxes. I'm not a perl May post your script? I am really interested in it. > I want to do some changes and was thinking of movin

Re: Recommended mail filters for use with mutt?

On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 05:03:26PM +0200, René Wilhelm wrote: > On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 02:20:33PM +0100, Chris G wrote: > > I currently use a custom (perl) mail filter for delivering mailing > > list (and other) mail to appropriate mailboxes. I'm not a perl > > May post your script? I am really

Re: Recommended mail filters for use with mutt?

On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 05:03:26PM +0200, René Wilhelm wrote: > On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 02:20:33PM +0100, Chris G wrote: > > I currently use a custom (perl) mail filter for delivering mailing > > list (and other) mail to appropriate mailboxes. I'm not a perl > > May post your script? I am really

Re: Recommended mail filters for use with mutt?

> > Have a look at maildrop, it's filter file is not _that_ simple, but > > I like it more than procmail. > > I think its getting the regexps right. Otherwise its quite easy: > > if (/^Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/) > { > to "$HOME/Mail/IN-mutt-users/" > } How much easier than :0: * /^Sender: [E

Re: Recommended mail filters for use with mutt?

by th-shell-1.gradwell.net with local (Exim 4.63) You could use 'Exim filters' and have Exim do the work for you. An 'Exim filter' is just a .forward file with '# Exim filter' on the first line followed by a number of rules to sort mail around. It's kind-of like Si

Re: Recommended mail filters for use with mutt?

On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 10:24:12PM +0200, Vladimir Marek wrote: > > > Have a look at maildrop, it's filter file is not _that_ simple, but > > > I like it more than procmail. > > > > I think its getting the regexps right. Otherwise its quite easy: > > > > if (/^Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/) > > { >

Re: Recommended mail filters for use with mutt?

* Vladimir Marek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-02-08 16:25]: > > > Have a look at maildrop, it's filter file is not _that_ simple, but > > > I like it more than procmail. > > > > I think its getting the regexps right. Otherwise its quite easy: > > > > if (/^Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/) > > { > > to "$

Re: Recommended mail filters for use with mutt?

On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 02:20:33PM +0100, Chris G wrote: > > The main requirement is that the configuration file is very simple, > not like procmail for example. My existing configuration file is > simply one line per list with the list name and my alias for it (which > is also the mailbox name).

Re: Recommended mail filters for use with mutt?

gt; Seems like you're on a system running a recent version of Exim: > | Received: from isbd by th-shell-1.gradwell.net with local (Exim 4.63) > > You could use 'Exim filters' and have Exim do the work for you. > > An 'Exim filter' is just a .forward file

Re: Recommended mail filters for use with mutt?

* Patrick Shanahan on Wednesday, April 02, 2008 at 17:26:30 -0400 > * Vladimir Marek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-02-08 16:25]: >> How much easier than >> >> :0: >> * /^Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> $HOME/Mail/IN-mutt-users/ >> >> >> Sorry couldn't hold myself :) > > :^) > > #

Re: Recommended mail filters for use with mutt?

* Christian Ebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-03 13:30]: > > # Catch lists on List-Post > :0 > * ^List-Post:.*mailto:\/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Lists/$MATCH/ > # Brillant! Thank you very much :-D swimmer

Re: Recommended mail filters for use with mutt?

> > # Catch lists on List-Post > > :0 > > * ^List-Post:.*mailto:\/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Lists/$MATCH/ > > # I wish that sieve would be as capable also :( Nice one -- Vlad pgpCIJ1WhKu1l.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Recommended mail filters for use with mutt?

=- Chris G wrote on Wed 2.Apr'08 at 21:46:28 +0100 -= > Well I still think my config file is by *far* the simplest:- > > muttmutt-users@mutt.org procmail can be setup to work with such syntax, too. But I'd prefer: FOLDER="mutt" ADDR="mutt-users@mutt.org" INCLUDERC="$PROC/listche

Re: Recommended mail filters for use with mutt?

On 04/03/08 13:19, Christian Ebert wrote: # Catch lists on List-Post :0 * ^List-Post:.*mailto:\/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Lists/$MATCH/ I have in .muttrc lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] mutt-users@mutt.org but the above formula did not sort the incoming mail into the corre

Re: Recommended mail filters for use with mutt?

On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 02:29:23PM +0200, Vladimir Marek wrote: > > > # Catch lists on List-Post > > > :0 > > > * ^List-Post:.*mailto:\/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Lists/$MATCH/ > > > # > > I wish that sieve would be as capable also :( e.g. something along the lines of: require "variables";

Re: Recommended mail filters for use with mutt?

On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 01:19:20PM +0200, Christian Ebert wrote: > * Patrick Shanahan on Wednesday, April 02, 2008 at 17:26:30 -0400 > > * Vladimir Marek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-02-08 16:25]: > > > > > > :0: > > > * /^Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > $HOME/Mail/IN-mutt-users/ > > > > :0: > > * ^Se

Re: Recommended mail filters for use with mutt?

* Joseph on Thursday, April 03, 2008 at 10:43:33 -0600 > On 04/03/08 13:19, Christian Ebert wrote: >> # Catch lists on List-Post >> :0 >> * ^List-Post:.*mailto:\/[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Lists/$MATCH/ > > I have in .muttrc > lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mutt-users@mutt

Re: Recommended mail filters for use with mutt?

On 04/03/08 20:41, Christian Ebert wrote: # Catch lists on List-Post :0 * ^List-Post:.*mailto:\/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Lists/$MATCH/ I have in .muttrc lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] mutt-users@mutt.org but the above formula did not sort the incoming mail into the correc

Re: Recommended mail filters for use with mutt?

On 4/3/08, Christian Ebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Also above rule is for Maildir, not mbox. For mbox, and your > naming scheme, it should be something like: > > :0: > * ^List-Post:.*mailto:\/[^>]+ > Lists/$MATCH/ Don't you need to omit the trailing slash for mbox? -- Breen Mullins Menlo

Re: Recommended mail filters for use with mutt?

* Breen Mullins on Thursday, April 03, 2008 at 12:43:29 -0700 > On 4/3/08, Christian Ebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Also above rule is for Maildir, not mbox. For mbox, and your >> naming scheme, it should be something like: >> >> :0: >> * ^List-Post:.*mailto:\/[^>]+ >> Lists/$MATCH/ > > Don'

Re: Recommended mail filters for use with mutt?

> > > > # Catch lists on List-Post > > > > :0 > > > > * ^List-Post:.*mailto:\/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Lists/$MATCH/ > > > > # > > > > I wish that sieve would be as capable also :( > > e.g. something along the lines of: > > require "variables"; > > if header :matches "List-Post" "*

Re: Recommended mail filters for use with mutt?

On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 10:12:29AM -0700, George Davidovich wrote: > On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 01:19:20PM +0200, Christian Ebert wrote: > > * Patrick Shanahan on Wednesday, April 02, 2008 at 17:26:30 -0400 > > > * Vladimir Marek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-02-08 16:25]: > > > > > > > > :0: > > > > * /^S

Re: Recommended mail filters for use with mutt?

++ 04/04/08 10:53 +0100 - Chris G: >That of course was the reasoning behind my original posting, I want >the 'configuration' file to be trivially easy to add and remove lists >from and I want it to drive my muttrc requirements as well. The thing I am doing, for what it is worth, is to subscribe wi

Re: Recommended mail filters for use with mutt?

Hello Chris, On Wednesday, April 2, 2008 at 16:08:51 +0100, Chris Green wrote: >| #!/usr/bin/perl >| use Mail::Audit qw/KillDups PGP/; Are you sure it didn't munge the delivered mails? In the past Mail::Audit has been known to do odd modifications to passing mails, especially visible as som

Re: Recommended mail filters for use with mutt?

On Wednesday, April 2, 2008 at 21:46:28 +0100, Chris Green wrote: >| muttmutt-users@mutt.org > And the following lines in muttrc set up lists and subscribe >| lists `awk '!/^#/ {printf("%s ", $2)}' <~/.mutt/lists` >| subscribe `awk '!/^#/ {printf("%s ", $2)}' <~/.mutt/lists` What abo

Re: Recommended mail filters for use with mutt?

On Friday, April 4, 2008 at 10:53:02 +0100, Chris Green wrote: > [MDA] removes those annoying "[]" insertions in the subject > lines Removing list tags cleans your index, and is good for you. However when you followup to such lists, you introduce a title variation, which might confuse the th

Re: Recommended mail filters for use with mutt?

On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 10:24:12PM +0200, Vladimir Marek wrote: > > > Have a look at maildrop, it's filter file is not _that_ simple, but > > > I like it more than procmail. > > > > I think its getting the regexps right. Otherwise its quite easy: > > > > if (/^Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/) > > { >

Re: Recommended mail filters for use with mutt?

On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 11:43:17PM +0200, Alain Bench wrote: > On Friday, April 4, 2008 at 10:53:02 +0100, Chris Green wrote: > > > [MDA] removes those annoying "[]" insertions in the subject > > lines > > Removing list tags cleans your index, and is good for you. However > when you followup

Re: Recommended mail filters for use with mutt?

On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 11:36:51PM +0200, Alain Bench wrote: > Hello Chris, > > On Wednesday, April 2, 2008 at 16:08:51 +0100, Chris Green wrote: > > >| #!/usr/bin/perl > >| use Mail::Audit qw/KillDups PGP/; > > Are you sure it didn't munge the delivered mails? In the past > Mail::Audit has

Re: Recommended mail filters for use with mutt?

On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 11:43:17PM +0200, Alain Bench wrote: > On Friday, April 4, 2008 at 10:53:02 +0100, Chris Green wrote: [...] > Something like a $display_filter acting on index but not on replies > would surely be good, but it doesn't exist yet. Aside: back in 2006 I implemented something l

Re: Recommended mail filters for use with mutt?

On 02Apr2008 14:20, Chris G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | I currently use a custom (perl) mail filter for delivering mailing | list (and other) mail to appropriate mailboxes. I'm not a perl | expert, in fact I rather dislike perl, it's only in perl because I | copied it from somewhere else and modi