Re: format=flowed (was: If List Reply Fails, Fall Back to Group Reply or Reply)

On 06Sep2015 22:54, Patrick Shanahan wrote: * Cameron Simpson [09-06-15 22:41]: On 06Sep2015 21:38, Patrick Shanahan wrote: >* Grady Martin [09-06-15 21:32]: >>Hello, fellow puppies. The mutt mailing list is

format=flowed (was: If List Reply Fails, Fall Back to Group Reply or Reply)

On 06Sep2015 21:38, Patrick Shanahan wrote: * Grady Martin [09-06-15 21:32]: Hello, fellow puppies. The mutt mailing list is magical. Executing a regular results in a prompt that confirms the recipient (list or sender). [...] line wrapping

group-rpley, was: Sent attached doc from Libreoffice

* Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de [05-27-15 15:07]: El día Wednesday, May 27, 2015 a las 07:57:29PM +0200, Matthias Apitz escribió: El día Wednesday, May 27, 2015 a las 12:35:18PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan escribió: I just used group-reply with the MUA 'dekko' on Ubuntu phone. May

Re: Group replying: set To: instead of Cc:

On 2014-10-13, Derek Martin wrote: - edit_headers This is what I do now to solve my problem. -- Greetings Elias

Re: Group replying: set To: instead of Cc:

Hi Chris On 2014-10-16, Chris Bannister wrote: Oooops, sorry, I meant shift-l, i.e: L Ok ;-) No it doesn't. See my previous post. -- Greetings Elias

Re: Group replying: set To: instead of Cc:

On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 06:01:24PM +0200, Elias Diem wrote: Hi Chris On 2014-10-14, Chris Bannister wrote: try CTRL-L Does it do what you want? Hmmm. From the manual, CTRL-L is used to refresh the screen. What do I miss here? Oooops, sorry, I meant shift-l, i.e: L -- If you're

Re: Group replying: set To: instead of Cc:

' is my address: header From: A To: B, ME /header Now I'd like to reply to A and B and I want those addresses to be both in the To: field. The new header would look something like this: header From: ME To: A, B /header At the moment when I press 'g' to group-reply, the header looks like

Re: Group replying: set To: instead of Cc:

Hi Chris On 2014-10-14, Chris Bannister wrote: try CTRL-L Does it do what you want? Hmmm. From the manual, CTRL-L is used to refresh the screen. What do I miss here? -- Greetings Elias

Re: Group replying: set To: instead of Cc:

On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 05:59:13PM +0200, Elias Diem wrote: So let me precise it. I don't talk about mailing lists but messages that come from one person to many. [...] Now I'd like to reply to A and B and I want those addresses to be both in the To: field. The new header would look

Re: Group replying: set To: instead of Cc:

Hi Derek On 2014-10-14, Derek Martin wrote: That said, I believe the intended behavior is to put only the To addresses in the To: field, and everything else in the Cc: field. The difference between To: and Cc: is basically that if the author puts you in the To: field, the author expects

Group replying: set To: instead of Cc:

Hi all I often group reply to messages. I'd like to set the To: field with the reply addresses instead of the Cc: field. Is this possible? I didn't find anything on the list archive. -- Greetings Elias

Re: Group replying: set To: instead of Cc:

Greetings! *** Elias Diem li...@webconect.ch [2014-10-13 21:24]: I often group reply to messages. I'd like to set the To: field with the reply addresses instead of the Cc: field. Is this possible? I didn't find anything on the list archive. I think that article is good for explaining

Re: Group replying: set To: instead of Cc:

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 07:20:36PM +0200, Elias Diem wrote: I often group reply to messages. I'd like to set the To: field with the reply addresses instead of the Cc: field. Is this possible? I didn't find anything on the list archive. I think your question is a little vague to get good

Re: Group replying: set To: instead of Cc:

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 07:20:36PM +0200, Elias Diem wrote: Hi all I often group reply to messages. I'd like to set the To: field with the reply addresses instead of the Cc: field. Is this possible? I didn't find anything on the list archive. try CTRL-L Does it do what you want

Mutt manual: %L w.r.t. group [Was: Inbox and Sent messages in one thread. How To? [Off topic question]]

'%L fam_grp' family ^^ Where is the use of '%L and other such magic documented? In mutt, press F1¹, then either search for %L (about the third hit includes the text GROUP), or go to section 3.1. Pattern Modifier. (It's the same place.) ... Where is -group within an alias

Reply Group but not myself when CC'd?

I don't know if this is possible. When someone CCs me and I reply group it of course includes my email address (I have several). Anyway of having it not reply to my email(s)? If I remember then I edit the To: field, but of course I sometimes forget. Ideas? Dave

Re: Reply Group but not myself when CC'd?

On 2012-07-03, David Woodfall wrote: I don't know if this is possible. When someone CCs me and I reply group it of course includes my email address (I have several). Anyway of having it not reply to my email(s)? If I remember then I edit the To: field, but of course I sometimes forget

Re: Reply Group but not myself when CC'd?

On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 05:41:28PM +0100, David Woodfall wrote: When someone CCs me and I reply group it of course includes my email address (I have several). Anyway of having it not reply to my email(s)? Set 'alternates'[1] to match your email addresses. Ensure 'metoo'[2] is unset. [1

Re: Reply Group but not myself when CC'd?

On (18:24 03/07/12), Simon Ward si...@bleah.co.uk put forth the proposition: On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 05:41:28PM +0100, David Woodfall wrote: When someone CCs me and I reply group it of course includes my email address (I have several). Anyway of having it not reply to my email(s)? Set

Re: Compiling mutt without mail group

On 10May2012 01:23, Stephen Butler stephe...@hotmail.com wrote: | My grateful thanks for the comments and advice. | Once I've packaged mutt for microcore (with mail group) and reboot | into stock system, I can send an email via mutt without mail group via | smtp fine. Does mutt need the mail group

Re: Compiling mutt without mail group

On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 01:12:03AM +, Stephen Butler wrote: So anyway, I created the mail group and everything compiled fine after that. I was wondering if its possible to change the required group from mail to something else, such as a group called staff ? You probably really don't want

Re: Compiling mutt without mail group

My grateful thanks for the comments and advice. Once I've packaged mutt for microcore (with mail group) and reboot into stock system, I can send an email via mutt without mail group via smtp fine. Does mutt need the mail group for general email, maintenance, or interaction with other software

Compiling mutt without mail group

Can't fix mutt_dotlock's permissions! 2 ; exit 1 ; } \fichgrp: invalid group: `mail'Can't fix mutt_dotlock's permissions!make[4]: *** [install-exec-hook] Error 1make[4]: Leaving directory `/mnt/hdb1/mutt/mutt-1.5.21'make[3]: *** [install-exec-am] Error 2make[3]: Leaving directory `/mnt/hdb1/mutt

Re: Compiling mutt without mail group

\        chmod 2755 /tmp/package/usr/local/bin/mutt_dotlock || \        { echo Can't fix mutt_dotlock's permissions! 2 ; exit 1 ; } \fichgrp: invalid group: `mail'Can't fix mutt_dotlock's permissions!make[4]: *** [install-exec-hook] Error 1make[4]: Leaving directory `/mnt/hdb1/mutt/mutt

Re: Compiling mutt without mail group

nobody else would be able to access things belonging to the mail group. Your staff group has one or more people in it. Even on a system with only one person using it, separation of privileges is good. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce

group command syntax

I have two questions about groups. Up until now, I've created all of my groups while creating aliases. I now realize there is a distinction between the two, and don't really need most of the aliases for the groups, just the group definitions themselves. Whereas before I would write: alias

Re: Ask for group reply

On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 02:47:45PM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote: On 13May2010 09:53, Udo Hortian udo_hort...@web.de wrote: | I tend to use reply accidentally instead of group reply if I reply to | messages sent to a group of persons. Is there a way to be asked by mutt | if one wants to use

Ask for group reply

Dear mutt users, I tend to use reply accidentally instead of group reply if I reply to messages sent to a group of persons. Is there a way to be asked by mutt if one wants to use group reply instead of reply in case that there is more than one recipient in the mail one is answering? Udo

Re: Ask for group reply

On 13May2010 09:53, Udo Hortian udo_hort...@web.de wrote: | I tend to use reply accidentally instead of group reply if I reply to | messages sent to a group of persons. Is there a way to be asked by mutt | if one wants to use group reply instead of reply in case that there | is more than one

Re: Sending a reply to a group

On 20100411_200302, Michael Elkins wrote: On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 04:59:19PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote: On 20100409_103212, Michael Elkins wrote: It was unclear from your message exactly where the problem lies. Are you seeing the address list truncated in the compose menu? I do see that

Re: Sending a reply to a group

On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 04:59:19PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote: On 20100409_103212, Michael Elkins wrote: It was unclear from your message exactly where the problem lies. Are you seeing the address list truncated in the compose menu? I do see that Mutt truncates the *display* of the address

Re: Sending a reply to a group

On 20100409_103212, Michael Elkins wrote: Paul, On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 08:42:06AM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote: A group of my personal friends have an informal mailing list in which each member has a long list of the email addresses that they use as the Cc: list for their emails

Sending a reply to a group

In the default setup of mutt from debian, the 'g' key starts a reply, but with the headers set to include the recipients of the email to which I am replying. But ... A group of my personal friends have an informal mailing list in which each member has a long list of the email addresses

Re: Sending a reply to a group

Paul, On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 08:42:06AM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote: A group of my personal friends have an informal mailing list in which each member has a long list of the email addresses that they use as the Cc: list for their emails to the group. When I use 'g' the Cc: list is truncated

Re: How to append address to a group alias?

Currently Mutt doesn't have any way to accomplish creating a group alias in this manner. I think the easiest implementation would be to make the alias creation honor the tag-prefix such that the user can tag several emails. For the most part, the user should be using an external address

How to append address to a group alias?

Hi, I did some search on google but didn't find any native solution for mutt. If I press a in the index then mutt will ask me if I would like to append this address to alias. Sometimes I want to define a group alias which contains several contacts. I wish there would be such a function: when I

group reply exclude self?

All, I'm wondering if there's some way to tell mutt to automatically remove self from group replies. I find this to be a pain sometimes when on long email threads. Thoughts? -j

Re: group reply exclude self?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Tuesday, August 18 at 08:55 AM, quoth James: All, I'm wondering if there's some way to tell mutt to automatically remove self from group replies. I find this to be a pain sometimes when on long email threads. To quote the muttrc man page

Re: group reply exclude self?

: All, I'm wondering if there's some way to tell mutt to automatically remove self from group replies. I find this to be a pain sometimes when on long email threads. To quote the muttrc man page:     metoo         Type: boolean         Default: no         If unset, Mutt will remove your

Re: group reply exclude self?

and now it's so simple and does exactly what I want (include me on group reply but not on normal replies). I just set this to 'yes' in my .muttrc – thank you very much. :-) Greets Alex -- »With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first

Re: creating an alias of a group email?

Hi Marianne! On Sat, 13 Sep 2008, Marianne Promberger wrote: The macro would pipe the message to formail, which would extract the To: headers, then pipe that through sed or awk to give a meaningful mutt alias line and append that to your mutt aliases file. Possibly the macro could as a last

Re: creating an alias of a group email?

Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 04:14:26PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sometimes I receive an email that is sent to a group of people. I want to alias all such addresses in the To: list. What is the easiest way to do it. I do it like this: in my alias file

Re: creating an alias of a group email?

On Saturday, 13 September 2008, 10:57 (UTC-0700), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 04:14:26PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sometimes I receive an email that is sent to a group of people. I want to alias all such addresses in the To: list

Re: creating an alias of a group email?

On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 04:14:26PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sometimes I receive an email that is sent to a group of people. I want to alias all such addresses in the To: list. What is the easiest way to do it. I do it like this: in my alias file : alias name-of-alias [EMAIL PROTECTED

creating an alias of a group email?

Sometimes I receive an email that is sent to a group of people. I want to alias all such addresses in the To: list. What is the easiest way to do it. Another question is, sometimes I don't want to make an alias but nonetheless want to send an email to all the people in the To: list (like group

Re: creating an alias of a group email?

On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 04:14:26PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sometimes I receive an email that is sent to a group of people. I want to alias all such addresses in the To: list. What is the easiest way to do it. Sorry, I don't know this one. Another question is, sometimes I don't want

Re: creating an alias of a group email?

Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For this, if you have the edit_headers option set, then your mail editor will display the full message to you with the headers. The easiest way to achieve your goal would be to scrap the In-Reply-To header. You can, of course, edit the subject. Good tip

group

I would like to set up a group and an alias for that group. I read the manual and the wiki and the recent post and still to dumb to figure it out. I want the group name to be fargo. I would like the alias to be fargo if the group name and alias can be the same. The email addreses are [EMAIL

Re: group

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, July 29 at 06:59 PM, quoth Tom: I would like to set up a group and an alias for that group. I read the manual and the wiki and the recent post and still to dumb to figure it out. I want the group name to be fargo. I would like

Re: group

On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 08:43:58PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: On Tuesday, July 29 at 06:59 PM, quoth Tom: I would like to set up a group and an alias for that group. I read the manual and the wiki and the recent post and still to dumb to figure it out. I want the group name to be fargo

Re: unable to use send2-hook / group pattern for automatic

Hi Kyle, thank you very much for your help especially with respect to infinite loops (I was traped in one). * Kyle Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05. Nov. 2007]: Don't trigger the hook except on messages that are not already signed/encrypted: send2-hook '!~g !~G ^%C gpg-full' 'push

Re: unable to use send2-hook / group pattern for automatic

Gregor Zattler wrote: I configured a group gpg-full which matches all emailaddresses to which a valid gpg key exists in my keyring. I'm able for instance to search for emails matching %Cgpg-full in the index and the scroll bar jumps to the next message which is addressed to somebody who's

Re: unable to use send2-hook / group pattern for automatic

* Todd Zullinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-06 02:47 -0500]: Gregor Zattler wrote: I want to use this group feature to switch encryption on and off depending on emailaddresses: FWIW, another way I think you can achieve your goal is to use Nicolas Rachinsky's crypt-autohook patch[1

unable to use send2-hook / group pattern for automatic encryption

Dear Mutt users, I configured a group gpg-full which matches all emailaddresses to which a valid gpg key exists in my keyring. I'm able for instance to search for emails matching %Cgpg-full in the index and the scroll bar jumps to the next message which is addressed to somebody who's gpg key I

Re: unable to use send2-hook / group pattern for automatic

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, November 5 at 05:01 PM, quoth Gregor Zattler: I want to use this group feature to switch encryption on and off depending on emailaddresses: :) I do that a lot myself. send2-hook . set crypt_autosign=no send2-hook . set

removing self from group reply

I know this has come up before, but I can't find it anywhere: When I group reply to a message, is there any way to remove my own address from the recipient list? -- David Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] msg30933/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: removing self from group reply

David Rock wrote: I know this has come up before, but I can't find it anywhere: When I group reply to a message, is there any way to remove my own address from the recipient list? unset metoo should do what you want. if that doesn't work, perhaps you don't have $alternates set correctly

Re: removing self from group reply

* David Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020912 21:02]: When I group reply to a message, is there any way to remove my own address from the recipient list? Mutt should do this for you if you have set alternates correctly... -Johan -- Johan Almqvist http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/

Re: removing self from group reply

* Johan Almqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-12 21:10]: * David Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020912 21:02]: When I group reply to a message, is there any way to remove my own address from the recipient list? Mutt should do this for you if you have set alternates correctly... Duh, worked great

Re: removing self from group reply

Alas! David Rock spake thus: 6.3.96. metoo Type: boolean Default: no If unset, Mutt will remove your address from the list of recipients Mutt can only know who you are by $alternates. Neither of these really explains that metoo needs alternates

Re: removing self from group reply

* David Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-12 19:32]: * Johan Almqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-12 21:10]: * David Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020912 21:02]: When I group reply to a message, is there any way to remove my own address from the recipient list? Mutt should do this for you

group reply question

Hi all. How should i configure my muttrc to make mutt don't include my address in group replies messages? The variable metoo is unset, but my address is still there (CC). TIA -- Eduardo Gargiulo ^ejg(-.*)?@ar\.homelinux\.org$ msg27635/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: group reply question

On 2002-04-25 Eduardo Gargiulo wrote: How should i configure my muttrc to make mutt don't include my address in group replies messages? The variable metoo is unset, but my address is still there (CC). Did you set alternates correctly, so that mutt knows, who you are? Regards, Christoph

Re: group reply question

Christoph Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2002-04-25 Eduardo Gargiulo wrote: How should i configure my muttrc to make mutt don't include my address in group replies messages? The variable metoo is unset, but my address is still there (CC). Did you set alternates correctly, so

Re: group reply question

Eduardo -- ...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said... % ... % set alternates=egargiulo@ingdesi.(net|com)? % set alternates=ejg(-.*)?@ar.homelinux.org Unlike mailboxes or lists, alternates is a basic regexp, so your second setting will step on your first and no egargiulo addresses will be recognized.

Re: group reply question

David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Eduardo -- ...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said... % ... % set alternates=egargiulo@ingdesi.(net|com)? % set alternates=ejg(-.*)?@ar.homelinux.org Unlike mailboxes or lists, alternates is a basic regexp, so your second setting will step on your first

Re: group reply question

Eduardo -- ...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said... % % David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: % % ...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said... % % % ... % % set alternates=egargiulo@ingdesi.(net|com)? % % set alternates=ejg(-.*)?@ar.homelinux.org ... % %set

group reply without loopback CC

When I do a group-reply, how can I automatically filter out *my* email address? I'm already writing all sent messages to folders with save_name and I'm getting a second useless mail unless I manually remove my name from the To or CC list -- Andrew Bell

Re: group reply without loopback CC

On 2002.03.01, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andrew P. Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When I do a group-reply, how can I automatically filter out *my* email address? I'm already writing all sent messages to folders with save_name and I'm getting a second useless mail unless I manually remove

Q: how to not reply to myself in a group-reply?

Let's say person A mails me and cc:'s person B. Now, I want to reply to all of them, so I do a `g'roup-reply. It seems that mutt's default behavior is to compose a message to person A and cc:'d to me and person B. What's the rationale for this? I would prefer that 'g' only send the message to

Re: Q: how to not reply to myself in a group-reply?

msg.pgp

Re: Q: how to not reply to myself in a group-reply?

, and it is also off by default. i am pretty sure that metoo works for group reply as well. my guess is that you don't have 'alternates' set correctly or set at all... what is your 'alternates' line? i have this in my .muttrc set alternates = (will|william).*@.*(newdream|infinitejazz\.net|unixverse

Re: Q: how to not reply to myself in a group-reply?

On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 12:11:52PM, David Petrou wrote: [clip] set followup_to=no david ---end quoted text--- -- Para La Queja Mexica Este Sueño De America Celebramos La Aluna De Siempre, Ahorita -- Bertrand Cantat, Tostaky (Le Continent) Benjamin Michotte[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Q: how to not reply to myself in a group-reply?

i am pretty sure that metoo works for group reply as well. my guess is that you don't have 'alternates' set correctly or set at all... what is your 'alternates' line? that was it! thanks! w david

deleting group of messages

Hello, Is there a way to delete a group of messages from the message index in a way like: delete all messages from the currently selected message to #49 inclusive Thanks, Viraj.

Re: sending mail from commandline to a group

Masand, Manish [mutt-users] 19/06/01 17:11 +0200: Could anyone pls help me out with this. I want to fire mutt from commandline so that it mails to a group of people Basically, something that i can set up in muttrc...for eg product_users ([EMAIL PROTECTED] , [EMAIL PROTECTED] , .and so

Re: sending mail from commandline to a group

Masand, Manish [mutt-users] 19/06/01 17:26 +0200: Thanks for your prompt reply,Suresh. how to use mutt -x ..could u pls give an example. Thanks a lot. man mutt ... please. -suresh [and also trim your signature, and most if not all of the reply ...] -- Suresh Ramasubramanian

Re: sending mail from commandline to a group

Masand, Manish [mutt-users] 19/06/01 17:38 +0200: Oh...sorry about the signature part. Actually there is no manual entry for mutt, hence... What? Oh well, then search for the mutt documentation - that should be there. i did a mutt -x , but i specified 2 different mail id's. Is it

Re: sending mail from commandline to a group

into it on stdin, in summary. Read about mutt's alias command if you want to define a group, rather than putting all the destination addresses on the command line. Read the popen() man page, if you haven't done this kind of thing before from C before, or the equivalent in whatever language you're

Re: sending mail from commandline to a group

Masand, Manish ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something to this effect on 06/19/2001: i was looking at the /etc/aliases file a sample set up would be :- # Alias for distribution list, members specified here: staff:wnj,mosher,sam,ecc,mckusick,sklower,olson,rwh@ernie so would staff be the

Re: sending mail from commandline to a group

Sam Roberts [mutt-users] 19/06/01 11:51 -0400: Have you tried this, Suresh? It says emulates mailx, and that's it. And on my system (RedHat, which is fairly mainstream) mailx does not exist. So? It'll work. And mailx == /bin/mail, more or less. to do this programmatically, I'd like to

Re: sending mail from commandline to a group

Quoting Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED], who wrote: Sam Roberts [mutt-users] 19/06/01 11:51 -0400: Have you tried this, Suresh? It says emulates mailx, and that's it. And on my system (RedHat, which is fairly mainstream) mailx does not exist. So? It'll work. And mailx ==

Re: sending mail from commandline to a group

Sam Roberts [mutt-users] 19/06/01 12:50 -0400: Huh? What will work? mailx? And the man page for mail also only describes it's use as an interactive mail program, not for programmatic injection of mail into the mail transfer system. Do me a favor, try it first. suresh@blackehlo:~$ cat

Set up a group of addresses - how?

Hi Mutters, I would like to set up a group of addresses, and send email to all of the members of the group with just using the name of the group as an alias. This is what I think of: similarly to saving a message to a folder, I would like to use the "a" command, and get a prompt whet

Re: Set up a group of addresses - how?

- Original Message - From: "Viktor Lakics" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 4:37 AM Subject: Set up a group of addresses - how? Hi Mutters, I would like to set up a group of addresses, and send email to all of the members of the group

no Group-Reply to myself

hi, Question as the subject. I dont need to get a CC when Group-Reply. I know, I can remove it manually, but is there any hook could be used here? thanks, jack

Re: no Group-Reply to myself

On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 03:40:19PM -0500, Jack wrote: Question as the subject. I dont need to get a CC when Group-Reply. I know, I can remove it manually, but is there any hook could be used here? unset metoo If you have different addresses, make sure that you set up $alternates

is there a way to create a group

Hello, I just started using mutt today and I was wondering if anyone knows a way to create a group for broadcast messages...I can't find anything in the man pages or the documentation. Thanks

Re: is there a way to create a group

Jeff -- ...and then Jeff Morris said... % Hello, I just started using mutt today and I was wondering if anyone knows a way to create a group for broadcast messages...I can't find anything in the man pages or the documentation. Yes, you can; aliases can be either single or multiple. Check out

remove from group reply

Hi I'm using mutt 1.1.5 and I have q. if is possible tell mutt to remove my adress from recipients when I'm group replying ? unset metoo is in my understanding different but I tryed it and it does not work. -- Keso don't worry about

Re: remove from group reply

On 2000-02-25 10:42:12 +0100, Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE wrote: I'm using mutt 1.1.5 and I have q. if is possible tell mutt to remove my adress from recipients when I'm group replying ? unset metoo is in my understanding different but I tryed it and it does not work. metoo

Re: remove from group reply

Thomas Roessler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : On 2000-02-25 10:42:12 +0100, Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE wrote: I'm using mutt 1.1.5 and I have q. if is possible tell mutt to remove my adress from recipients when I'm group replying ? unset metoo is in my understanding different

group reply problem

I posted this a week or so ago and got no response, so I thought I would try again with a different (and hopefully more appropriate) subject line. I am using mutt 1.0i and am have a problem with group reply. In my .muttrc file I have remapped the g and ^G keys as follows: bind

Re: group reply problem - cannot bind CTRL-G

* Jeffery Small [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000204 01:20]: In my .muttrc file I have remapped the g and ^G keys as follows: When I am in the index or pager and type ? it reports: ^G group-replyreply to all recipients However, when I type ^G nothing happens. The ^G is used

is there an ask-group-reply? (WAS: Re: From: line per folder)

On Sat, Jun 19, 1999 at 05:29:50AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote: set reply_to=ask-yes (or something) [snip] group-reply will go to everyone in the To: and Cc: fields unless there is On a somewhat related subject (well, related to these two bits, anyways), is there a feature in Mutt (that I've

Re: automatic group reply (was Re: is there an ask-group-reply?)

Jim -- ...and then Jim Graham said... % On Sat, Jun 19, 1999 at 05:29:50AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote: % % set reply_to=ask-yes (or something) % [snip] % group-reply will go to everyone in the To: and Cc: fields unless there is % % On a somewhat related subject (well, related to these two

Re: automatic group reply (was Re: is there an ask-group-reply?)

Warning Could not process message with given Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"

Re: automatic group reply (was Re: is there an ask-group-reply?)

On Tue, Jun 22, 1999 at 09:48:56AM -0400, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote: [I wrote:] do a group-reply when I hit 'r'? I often need to do a group-reply, but forget and do a normal reply Well, since a group of one could still be a group reply, why not just use 'g' all of the time

Re: group reply (was: Turning off highlighting)

Warning Could not process message with given Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=kfjH4zxOES6UT95V; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"

Re: sending to a group

Warning Could not process message with given Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=oJ71EGRlYNjSvfq7; micalg=pgp-sha1;protocol="application/pgp-signature"

<    1   2   3   >