On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 12:36:54PM +0100, Mihai Lazarescu
wrote:
> On Friday, November 26, 2021 at 23:41:46 -0600, mai...@email.com wrote:
>
> > Basically, if the email is postponed and called from the draft, it uses my
> > work account (because that is set up to be the default). Is it possibl
On Friday, November 26, 2021 at 23:41:46 -0600, mai...@email.com wrote:
Basically, if the email is postponed and called from the draft, it uses my work
account (because that is set up to be the default). Is it possible to set
things up so that mutt will look at the sending address (@email dot
On Fri Nov26'21 05:53:54PM, Mihai Lazarescu wrote:
> From: Mihai Lazarescu
> Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 17:53:54 +0100
> To: mutt-users@mutt.org
> Subject: Re: [Mutt] help on complicated per-folder or per-sender sending
> email hooks
>
> On Thursday, November 25, 2
On Thursday, November 25, 2021 at 18:32:50 -0600, mai...@email.com wrote:
I had a few more questions. Is it possible to have a hook based on where the
email is coming to? So, if I am in this folder, then I use the above, but I am
wondering if I can have a hook that says something like if the e
On Wed Nov24'21 06:21:06PM, Mihai Lazarescu wrote:
> From: Mihai Lazarescu
> Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 18:21:06 +0100
> To: mutt-users@mutt.org
> Subject: Re: [Mutt] help on complicated per-folder or per-sender sending
> email hooks
>
> On Wednesday, November 24, 2021
On Wednesday, November 24, 2021 at 10:23:31 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
set smtp_url="smtp://yourusern...@smtp.example.com:587/"
set smtp_pass="Your1!Really2@AweSome3#Password"
But what do I do about the work email that uses postfix?
If you unset smtp_url mutt should connect to port 25 on loc
the way to go about doing all this is using hooks (which I
have only some basic familiarity with now), but I am a bit lost as to how to go
about doing the above, and looking around
Can someone please point me to some resources, or advice on how to go about
doing this?
I use fetchmail and p
On Sun, Oct 11, 2020, Remco Rnders wrote:
> > save-hook "~C ietf-\\([a-z0-9]+\\)@ietf.org" =%1
> I know it is not a direct answer to your question, but it might perhaps get
> the
> end result you want; Have you considered using procmail or a sieve filter to
> automatically save mail matching you
On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 08:08:07AM +0200, Claus wrote in
<20201011060807.ga46...@kiel.esmtp.org>:
I'm trying to use a more generic approach for some patterns
to handle mailing list, e.g., something like:
save-hook "~C ietf-\\([a-z0-9]+\\)@ietf.org" =%1
instead of having one entry for each maili
On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 08:08:07AM +0200, Claus Assmann wrote:
I'm trying to use a more generic approach for some patterns
to handle mailing list, e.g., something like:
save-hook "~C ietf-\\([a-z0-9]+\\)@ietf.org" =%1
instead of having one entry for each mailing list.
Is that possible with the
I'm trying to use a more generic approach for some patterns
to handle mailing list, e.g., something like:
save-hook "~C ietf-\\([a-z0-9]+\\)@ietf.org" =%1
instead of having one entry for each mailing list.
Is that possible with the current mutt features?
It seems that back-references in regular
On Friday 10 August 2018 08:14,
Dave Woodfall put forth the proposition:
> My ~/Mail is a local maildir mailbox, and I have quite a few
> folder-hooks, some to set different 'from' and 'sendmail' to send via
> various smtp servers and addresses and some set othe
My ~/Mail is a local maildir mailbox, and I have quite a few
folder-hooks, some to set different 'from' and 'sendmail' to send via
various smtp servers and addresses and some set other properties:
folder-hook .* source ~/.mutt/default
folder-hook =Lists/* source ~/.mutt/
Hello,
As we all know, the question of if and how the group entries
in gpg.conf can be used in Mutt or Neomutt crops up periodically and
generally the answer is no, not directly. I finally got around to
making a permanent solution which, as its current location indicates,
will be reference
On Friday 18 May 2018 18:22,
Dave Woodfall put forth the proposition:
When using hooks I find that I sometimes have problems with using
'set' and some variables that need quoting or escaping.
eg: the following work:
folder-hook =Sent 'set index_format="%3C %[!%d/%m/%y]
When using hooks I find that I sometimes have problems with using
'set' and some variables that need quoting or escaping.
eg: the following work:
folder-hook =Sent 'set index_format="%3C %[!%d/%m/%y] %-15.15F %s"'
folder-hook =Folk 'set editor="vim +\&#
manual.html#set-myvar).
>
> Alternatively, you can just spell out the file in both the set and the
> source. (literally, or perhaps by using a user-defined variable to
> reduce duplication).
>
> Details:
>
> Since $alias_file defaults to the value of the muttrc, essent
to the value of the muttrc, essentially each
of your hooks initially will set $alias_file and re-read the muttrc.
They are equivalent to:
folder-hook "foo_folder" "unalias *; set alias_file = +foo_alias; source
muttrc"
folder-hook "bar_folder" "unalias *
set reverse_name
mutt will reply to the message using the address in $alternates that the
message was addressed to.
For creating new messages (e.g., to a mailing list), you would need to
use hooks, e.g.,
send-hook . 'unmy_hdr From:'
send-hook '~C ^mutt-users@mutt\.org$' 'my_hdr From: Your Name
'
w
I don't thing conditional hooks is the right term.
I've created about 300 aliases that my mta will accept
and deliver to my mail box. For example, each time I
use an online service, I assign them give them a unique
address for our communications. These are not listed as
mutt aliase
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 13:46:42 -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
> The mutt manual describes this behavior of the fcc-hook in the
> section, "Specify Default Fcc: Mailbox When Composing", as
>
> Mutt searches the initial list of message recipients for the
> first matching regexp and uses mailbo
On 2014-06-28, Koralatov wrote:
> (And my understanding of mutt's hook operation was that the last
> instruction overrides any preceding ones, so having the default
> last shouldn't be right anyway.)
Mutt has two types of hooks. One type invokes an operation that can
be
The one you marked as working, doesn't have the dot escaped. All the
other ones do?
-mg
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 06:15:22PM +0100, Koralatov wrote:
> I'm trying to use fcc-hooks to disregard e-mails that I'm sending where
> I'll automatically be delivered back a copy
ox
It looks right now like this:
source ~/Dropbox/Dotfiles/mutt/muttrc
source ~/Dropbox/Dotfiles/mutt/sidebar
source ~/Dropbox/Dotfiles/mutt/gpg.rc
source ~/Dropbox/Dotfiles/mutt/gpg_special
auto_view text/html
I thought now that I could fit in a special file with folder-hooks that
overwrites the
On 17/11, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 10:18:10PM +0100, Niels Kobschaetzki wrote:
Hi,
I am relatively new to mutt but was able to set up some account-hooks.
I have three accounts A, B and C and when I start mutt everything
works as expected. I start in account A and when I
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 10:18:10PM +0100, Niels Kobschaetzki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am relatively new to mutt but was able to set up some account-hooks.
> I have three accounts A, B and C and when I start mutt everything
> works as expected. I start in account A and when I want to c
On 2013-11-16 22:18:10 +0100, Niels Kobschaetzki wrote:
> I am relatively new to mutt but was able to set up some account-hooks. I have
> three accounts A, B and C and when I start mutt everything works as expected.
> I start in account A and when I want to change folders or want to c
Hi,
I am relatively new to mutt but was able to set up some account-hooks. I have
three accounts A, B and C and when I start mutt everything works as expected.
I start in account A and when I want to change folders or want to copy mails I
see the folders of account A. When I send mail it is
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:24:00AM -0400, Matt Rechkemmer wrote:
Lately, I've found myself needing to change my replies' From address and
signature based on which address the original message was sent to. I
thought reply-hooks would be perfect for this, but I kept getting jamme
Lately, I've found myself needing to change my replies' From address and
signature based on which address the original message was sent to. I
thought reply-hooks would be perfect for this, but I kept getting jammed up
on my default send-hook. I dug this gem out of the archive
Sun 12.May'13 at 13:49:32 +0200, Suvayu Ali
> On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 11:24:53AM +0100, James Griffin wrote:
> >
> > This works for me, it may be of some use? The main setting is to have a
> > default hook (folder-hook) that undoes the h
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 11:24:53AM +0100, James Griffin wrote:
>
> This works for me, it may be of some use? The main setting is to have a
> default hook (folder-hook) that undoes the hooks you have set in other
> folder-hooks.
I think that tip helps a lot. I'll try to w
..', composing a new
message leads to a new message with the From address set to the last
hook executed. So composing *before* changing to a new folder leads to
one of my alternates in the from address.
I see that later on the wiki goes on to say:
Note it is generally better to manipula
e regex for matching that folder.
> > Depending on the folder I'm in the correct from address is set with "set
> > from=…"
> > As each IMAP account use different SMTP-Servers these are set via some
> > send-hooks that depend on the from: address. This also matche
hdr From: ..." command in the
> above hooks. I want it to be my personal address.
>
> Any ideas how to resolve this conflict between hooks and reverse_name?
My muttrc settings for default from address:
set from=m...@myadress.com
set reverse_name=yes
set use_envelope_from=yes
My
* Suvayu Ali [05-10-13 20:09]:
> On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 08:28:46PM +0200, Andre Klärner wrote:
> >
> > small question: why don't you use "set from=wor...@domain.com" etc?
>
> As far as I'm aware, 'set from=..' and 'my_hdr From ..' serves the same
> purpose.
[...]
http://dev.mutt.org/trac/wiki
> from=…"
> As each IMAP account use different SMTP-Servers these are set via some
> send-hooks that depend on the from: address. This also matches my workflow
> that new mails are edited/sent using a second mutt-instance in a new
> screen-window.
>
> Maybe this g
Hi Patrick,
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 08:23:41AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Suvayu Ali [05-07-13 08:14]:
> > On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 01:58:57PM +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> [...]
> > > This is what I did:
> > >
> > > 1. I removed all reply
he same pattern.
Depending on the folder I'm in the correct from address is set with "set from=…"
As each IMAP account use different SMTP-Servers these are set via some
send-hooks that depend on the from: address. This also matches my workflow
that new mails are edited/sent using a second
* Suvayu Ali [05-07-13 08:14]:
> On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 01:58:57PM +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
[...]
> > This is what I did:
> >
> > 1. I removed all reply and send-hooks, `set reverse_name' (not
> >reverse_name=yes), and then I set an empty default send-hook a
> add as the very first send-hook: send-hook . ""
> > comment out or remove subject reply-hooks
> >
> > Make sure that all of the required "reverse_name"s are defined in
> > "alternates"
>
> This is what I did:
>
> 1. I
Hello Patrick and others,
First, apologies for the delayed response.
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 08:08:48AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>
> Try the following:
> set reverse_name
> add as the very first send-hook: send-hook . ""
> comment out or remove subject r
* Suvayu Ali [01-01-70 12:34]:
> > [...]
> > > Note that I do not have any default send-hook set. I also have the
> > > following reply-hooks so that I can automatically reply with the correct
> > > from address based on which account the email was delive
Hi Patrick,
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 08:28:15AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Suvayu Ali [05-02-13 04:31]:
> [...]
> > Note that I do not have any default send-hook set. I also have the
> > following reply-hooks so that I can automatically reply with the correct
> &g
* Suvayu Ali [05-02-13 04:31]:
[...]
> Note that I do not have any default send-hook set. I also have the
> following reply-hooks so that I can automatically reply with the correct
> from address based on which account the email was delivered to.
>
> reply-hook . my_
Hi Mutt users,
I have been having some problems setting my from address when I'm
responding to my emails in a thread. I have $reverse_name set to yes
and have posted about this before[1]. Since then I have realised my
problem arises from conflicting hooks and I can't think of a way
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 09:53:34AM +0200, Thorsten Scherf wrote:
I did some signature configuration based on folder-hooks and send-hooks.
As default send-hook, I've choosen a specific signature that changes
based on different recipient addresses. I now want to change the
signature also bas
I did some signature configuration based on folder-hooks and send-hooks.
As default send-hook, I've choosen a specific signature that changes
based on different recipient addresses. I now want to change the
signature also based on specific holders, but it looks like the config I
did for
also sprach Javier Rojas [2010.06.13.2055 +0200]:
> The following is a tip to check if you attached a file to a message,
> triggered when you use the "attach" word in the text body.
>
> http://wiki.mutt.org/?ConfigTricks/CheckAttach
>
> It might be a good solution for your problem; it doesn't us
iff/ea36eed7af5f5e0e28b8d60f55abda2997cb1a08
> (also see http://bugs.debian.org/584264).
>
> [snip]
>
> I am now turning to you because you might have better ideas. Can you
> think of a sentinel that is usable in hooks which
>
> a. matches if present, thus making the hook
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 07:57:23PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> Dear mutts,
>
> I am seeking a technical solution to a PEBCAK¹ case routed in my
> inability — at times — to think before I do. ;)
>
> ¹) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebcak
>
> Basically, I would like to instruct mutt to refuse
ricted to those operators which match information Mutt
extracts from the header of the message (i.e., from, to, cc, date,
subject, etc.).
It's a bit ironic that ~h is not usable in hooks, but so be it (see
http://bugs.debian.org/585764).
I am now turning to you because you might have better ide
* E. Prom [2010-01-20 23:04 -0400]:
> Ideally, I would then just "source `external_program`", where
> external_program returns the name of a mutt conf file changing all
> these variables.
>
> [snips]
>
> My problem is that I need to pass this external_program the address
> I'm writing to. And of c
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 04:02:44AM +0100, E. Prom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [snip]
>
> An ugly way would be to write a script that reads the aliases files
> and writes all the hook-lines. Dozens of hooks lines... I don't like
> it.
Hi,
I've had a similar problem: I want
aluated.
My problem is that I need to pass this external_program the address
I'm writing to. And of course, `external_program ~t` does not work.
Things are getting complicated. Is there a way to do that in mutt, or
do I have to look for patches?
An ugly way would be to write a script that
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 05:31:19PM +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> To sum up, it seems that the address matched with ~f stay the same while
> all send-hooks are processed. Is it the expected behaviour?
Yes, this is expected behavior. You want to change the last send-hook
to send2-hook,
ure-domain"'
If the From: address has been changed by the third send-hook, the fourth
one won't match. However, if the From: address has been changed thanks
to reverse_name, then the fourth send-hook will match.
To sum up, it seems that the address matched with ~f stay the same whi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, September 24 at 01:22 PM, quoth martin f krafft:
> also sprach Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.09.23.1523 +0200]:
>> Not really, because it's impossible to know which hooks "apply".
>> Hooks a
urces (e.g.
you do source file foo whose contents could change over time). This is
because a second hook's behaviour at the time it is executed creates a
new state based the state created by the first hook and so forth.
Simply firing the appropriate folder-hooks for the folder you
also sprach Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.09.23.1523 +0200]:
> Not really, because it's impossible to know which hooks "apply".
> Hooks are associated with actions, not with states. The send-hook
> applies whenever you attempt to *send* a message, the messa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, September 23 at 10:58 AM, quoth martin f krafft:
> After re-sourcing my config, all the colouring and similar stuff
> I do in folder_hooks is overwritten. Is it somehow possible to rerun
> all applicable hooks as part of the r
After re-sourcing my config, all the colouring and similar stuff
I do in folder_hooks is overwritten. Is it somehow possible to rerun
all applicable hooks as part of the resourcing?
--
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
seen on an advertising for an elaborate swiss men&#
, and it'll get
caught by the a12 hook. Of course, this only works because there are
only two members of a12.
The real problem here is that the a123 rule (or any group rule with
more than two members) triggers even if only some of the members of
group a123 are present. For example, if you s
igured out I need the '^' to make sure that single addresses only
match the exact addresses. But I can't figure out how I can make the
fcc-hooks for a12 and for a123 such that they only match at the proper
time.
The brackets and pattern matching in the last 2 fcc-hook lines are only
> > the command is to delete from the selected message to
> > bottom, not like without it, to the top message.
>
> What happens if you drop and set $resolve?
>
Exactly this works great! Thank you very much!
Have a nice Sunday. Raphael.
> > the command is to delete from the selected message to
> > bottom, not like without it, to the top message.
>
> What happens if you drop and set $resolve?
>
Hi Alain, I'll read it at the weekend how this work, at the moment,
I don't understand what $resolve is. But, i'll try it...
tha
Hello Raphael,
On Friday, March 21, 2008 at 16:48:11 +0100, Raphael Brunner wrote:
> the command is to delete from the selected message to
> bottom, not like without it, to the top message.
What happens if you drop and set $resolve?
Bye!Alain.
--
set honor_followup_to=yes in muttrc
Dear Users
I use this folder-hook at the moment:
folder-hook 999-Trash* 'macro index d
""; \
macro pager d
""'
now, the command is to delete from the selected message to
bottom, not like without it, to the top message.
this works good, only if I'm on the first
> > Nice. What exactly are your settings doing? What my_list_folders does?
>
> Hello Vladimir,
>
> Usage:
> source "alias-hooks.php $alias_file|"
> folder-hook . 'special settings'
> folder-hook $my_list_folders 'other special settings'
Ah, I overlooked that, I thought that it's some secret mutt
On Wed, Feb 20 2008, Vladimir Marek wrote:
> > set my_list_folders = /list1$|/list2$
> > mailboxes =list1 =list2
> > subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Nice. What exactly are your settings doing? What my_list_folders does?
Hello Vladimir,
Usage:
source "alias-hooks.php $alias_fil
> For my personal needs I've written a script to generate hooks from aliases:
> Output:
> fcc-hook '~C [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~C [EMAIL PROTECTED]' +a1a2
> save-hook '~L [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~L [EMAIL PROTECTED]' +a1a2
> fcc-save-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] +a1
> fcc
Hello,
For my personal needs I've written a script to generate hooks from aliases:
Input:
alias a1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Name)
alias a2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Name)
alias a3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Name)
alias a3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Name)
alias a1a2 a1,a2
alias a4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
On Sat, Feb 16 2008, Joseph wrote:
> What hook would you use to set your sig based on the initial user you
> have chosen?
I suppose a send-hook.
Cheers, Peter
--
http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/
On 02/16/08, Peter Münster wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Before making some scripts, I would like to know, if someone has already
> done, what I'm looking for, or something similar:
>
> A script, that generates fcc- and save-hooks automatically from aliases
>
> Example:
&
Hello,
Before making some scripts, I would like to know, if someone has already
done, what I'm looking for, or something similar:
A script, that generates fcc- and save-hooks automatically from aliases
Example:
alias user1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Name)
alias user2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Name)
Am 2007-11-14 11:21:52, schrieb Eric Smith:
> For example, I have the following hook,
> send-hook "~t `cat ~/recipients_list` " 'set signature=...
>
> And I want the matching of everything in the recipients_list file
> to be case insensitive without having to specify each address in
> the file wi
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 05:35:58PM +0100, Eric Smith wrote:
> To my understanding,
> this makes every address listed in the recipients_list lowercase
> but does not solve the problem that in the email header, the
> address might have unpredictable case.
>
> So I want the recipe to match any case
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 05:35:58PM +0100, Eric Smith wrote:
> Michael
>
> To my understanding,
> this makes every address listed in the recipients_list lowercase
> but does not solve the problem that in the email header, the
> address might have unpredictable case.
>
> So I want the recipe to ma
Michael
To my understanding,
this makes every address listed in the recipients_list lowercase
but does not solve the problem that in the email header, the
address might have unpredictable case.
So I want the recipe to match any case in the header.
Also, I should have added that my hook is compo
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 11:21:52AM +0100, Eric Smith wrote:
> For example, I have the following hook,
> send-hook "~t `cat ~/recipients_list` " 'set signature=...
>
> And I want the matching of everything in the recipients_list file
> to be case insensitive without having to specify each address
For example, I have the following hook,
send-hook "~t `cat ~/recipients_list` " 'set signature=...
And I want the matching of everything in the recipients_list file
to be case insensitive without having to specify each address in
the file with a regex.
Thanks
--
- Eric Smith
Hey Karl,
it may have sounded arrogant, but indeed it wasn't intended to sound
that. But...
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 10:35:31AM +1300, Karl. wrote:
> Given that you asked for advice, perhaps you should work on accepting
> all advice _graciously_, rather than being arrogant? You'll find it a
Yo
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 09:37:34PM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 01:39:17PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > ls -la ~/.mutt/return_receipt
>
> You should work on you ability to _read_ mails others write _properly_.
Given that you asked for advice, perhaps you should
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 01:39:17PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> ls -la ~/.mutt/return_receipt
You should work on you ability to _read_ mails others write _properly_.
I told you, that the file _is_ executable. And as you eventually noticed
someone else already pointed the right solution out to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Patrick Schoenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-24-07 11:01]:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:53:23PM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> > What information do you expect me to presentate? Eventually my whole mutt
> > configuration just to ask why one specifi
=- Patrick Schoenfeld wrote on Wed 24.Oct'07 at 17:18:54 +0200 -=
> and waits for an input ("read yn"), but mutt adds its "Press any
> key to continue...". So it seems that mutt already answers the
> question (what it shouldn't do). Also if I do press return to that
> question, it restarts the scr
=- Patrick Schoenfeld wrote on Wed 24.Oct'07 at 16:40:33 +0200 -=
> Why? According to what I read this works for macros, why shouldn't
> it work for message hooks?
Because macros operate on functions, while hooks operate on muttrc
commands. See http://WIKI.mutt.org/ -> Mutt
dlessly?
Just a guess, but maybe after running an external script, mutt re-runs the
hooks; after all, it is still "Before mutt displays (or formats for replying
or forwarding) a message". The muttrc man page, at least, is not very
specific (AFAICT) about when the hooks get run.
In
Hi Patrick!
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 05:30:45PM +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> > If you have used I think your stdin has changed to the
> > messages you piped. And read expects your answer from that filehandle.
> > So you might try explicitly s
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 05:30:45PM +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> If you have used I think your stdin has changed to the
> messages you piped. And read expects your answer from that filehandle.
> So you might try explicitly setting your tty with read yn
Hi Patrick!
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:56:13PM +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> > Do you mind formating your message with a width < 80 chars?
>
> no, thats no problem.
>
> > Depending on what your want try either or
>
> Hm. That and what Dav
e. For me it wouldn't because w/o the question
> _I_ would forget to send the return receipt). Something like this
> can automatically be triggered only by message hooks. But as the
> solution is extern (= a script), how do i call it from within the
> message hook? I added a hook lik
Hi Christian,
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:56:13PM +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> Do you mind formating your message with a width < 80 chars?
no, thats no problem.
> Depending on what your want try either or
Hm. That and what Dave Evans wrote works, at least partially. Now the
script is lau
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:53:23PM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> What information do you expect me to presentate? Eventually my whole mutt
> configuration just to ask why one specific message-hook (which I presentated)
> is not working?
There is only one information that I see that I really m
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:40:33PM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> message-hook "~h Return-Receipt-To:" "|/home/schoenfeld/.mutt/return_receipt"
>
> And even though the specified file is a valid executable script mutt says
> (when
> I open this mail in the pager):
>
> |/home/schoenfeld/.mutt/
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 10:47:58AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Patrick Schoenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-24-07 10:42]:
> > And even though the specified file is a valid executable script mutt says
> > (when
> > I open this mail in the pager):
>
> first *guess* w/b that ~/.mutt/return_recei
ouldn't because w/o the question _I_ would forget to send
> the return receipt). Something like this can automatically be triggered only
> by message
> hooks. But as the solution is extern (= a script), how do i call it from
> within
> the message hook? I added a hook like
. For me it wouldn't because w/o the question _I_ would forget to send
the return receipt). Something like this can automatically be triggered only by
message
hooks. But as the solution is extern (= a script), how do i call it from within
the message hook? I added a hook like this:
message-ho
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 12:19:00PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
> 'limit' is a function, not a command. folder-hooks execute commands
Ahh. I understand. Thanks for pointing this out.
> not functions. However, the 'push' and 'exec' commands will execute
&g
e possible to enable this
>> limit for folders by default, by using folder-hooks.
>
> folder-hook . 'push all'
actually, in this case, you don't need the default command above.
the following should suffice:
> folder-hook =Mailinglisten.mutt-users 'push ~N&#
1 - 100 of 391 matches
Mail list logo
