Re: statistics

2002-01-23 Thread Prahlad Vaidyanathan
Hi, On Tue, 22 Jan 2002 Francis A. Holop spewed into the ether: > > hello, > > > > the outgoing mail could be counted somehow > > > using mutt's capabilities and that's why > > > > Well, as David pointed out, you could just increment a counter, but I > > prefer mailstat's output, as it shows m

Re: statistics

2002-01-18 Thread Prahlad Vaidyanathan
Hi, On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 Francis A. Holop spewed into the ether: > > hello, > > no links on mutt.org for mailing list archives > so i'll just ask my question... > > i was thinking about counting every single > mail i send and get. kind of silly statistics >

Re: statistics

2002-01-18 Thread Gary Johnson
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 10:21:32AM -0800, Michael Elkins wrote: > Francis A. Holop wrote: > > no links on mutt.org for mailing list archives > > so i'll just ask my question... > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mutt-users/ > > Jeremy, perhaps this could be added to the web site? But it's alread

Re: statistics

2002-01-18 Thread Michael Elkins
Francis A. Holop wrote: > no links on mutt.org for mailing list archives > so i'll just ask my question... http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mutt-users/ Jeremy, perhaps this could be added to the web site?

Re: statistics

2002-01-18 Thread darren chamberlain
Francis A. Holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said something to this effect on 01/18/2002: > no links on mutt.org for mailing list archives > so i'll just ask my question... [-- snip --] > the outgoing mail could be counted somehow > using mutt's capabilities and that's why > i am here any ideas? (

Re: statistics

2002-01-18 Thread Gerhard Siegesmund
> i was thinking about counting every single > mail i send and get. kind of silly statistics > that could amaze me when i'm 70. Take a look at mail2clf which creates a log-file of mail-messages it gets. So you could pipe all incoming mails through it to get a log of the incoming

Re: statistics

2002-01-18 Thread David T-G
Fred -- ...and then Francis A. Holop said... % % hello, Hi! % % no links on mutt.org for mailing list archives % so i'll just ask my question... % % i was thinking about counting every single % mail i send and get. kind of silly statistics % that could amaze me when i'm 70

statistics

2002-01-18 Thread Francis A. Holop
hello, no links on mutt.org for mailing list archives so i'll just ask my question... i was thinking about counting every single mail i send and get. kind of silly statistics that could amaze me when i'm 70. one way i was thinking to do this was: for the incoming mail use proc

Re: MUA statistics

2001-11-15 Thread iain truskett
* Stan Ryckman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [15 Nov 2001 16:28]: > iain truskett wrote: > [snip] > > So, a quick analysis of the stats produces: > > > > 1 2182Mutt > > 2 1756Microsoft Outlook Express [...] > > I don't think too many people here will have trouble with those > >

Re: MUA statistics

2001-11-15 Thread Will Yardley
Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > > I've taken the script, added recognition of Pine, and subscribed all > suse mailinglists to one testaccount, and most (all but cvs-all and > similar) FreeBSD Mailinglists to another. also note that if you build pine on freebsd from the ports (at least the most recent

Re: MUA statistics

2001-11-15 Thread Stan Ryckman
iain truskett wrote: [snip] > So, a quick analysis of the stats produces: > > 12182Mutt > 21756Microsoft Outlook Express > 31396Mozilla > 41336eGroups > 51123Internet Mail Service > 6948 Micro

Re: MUA statistics

2001-11-15 Thread Nicolas Rachinsky
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 09:50:50AM +0100, Christoph Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2001-11-06 Ken Weingold wrote: > > Does anyone know of any sites with MUA usage statistics? I would like > > to see where mutt places. > > > > The statistics of the Germ

Re: MUA statistics

2001-11-13 Thread Michael Tatge
Jussi Ekholm muttered: > Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [About random signatures in Mutt] > > Well, this is a bit (a lot?) OT, but here is the line in my .muttrc: > > > > set signature="~/.random_sig/random_sig.py ~/.random_sig/my_sigs|" > > Ah, thank you. Hmm... one thing I d

Re: MUA statistics

2001-11-13 Thread Jussi Ekholm
Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [About random signatures in Mutt] > Well, this is a bit (a lot?) OT, but here is the line in my .muttrc: > > set signature="~/.random_sig/random_sig.py ~/.random_sig/my_sigs|" > > (where my_sigs is a file in the same format as the fortune files, and

Re: MUA statistics

2001-11-10 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 06:20:32PM -0500, David T-G (dis)graced my inbox with: > ...and then Rob 'Feztaa' Park said... > % On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 01:56:28PM +0530, Prahlad Vaidyanathan (dis)graced my >inbox with: > % > > the 161 Web clients is one person (my best friend, he uses a webmail thing)

Re: MUA statistics

2001-11-10 Thread David T-G
Rob, et al -- ...and then Rob 'Feztaa' Park said... % On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 01:56:28PM +0530, Prahlad Vaidyanathan (dis)graced my inbox with: % > > the 161 Web clients is one person (my best friend, he uses a webmail thing). And he's still a friend? I thought you had better taste ;-) % >

Re: MUA statistics

2001-11-10 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 01:56:28PM +0530, Prahlad Vaidyanathan (dis)graced my inbox with: > > I'm pretty sure I don't know that many people. You need to implement > > some way of not counting the same guy twice. I'd be willing to bet that > > the 161 Web clients is one person (my best friend, he

Re: MUA statistics

2001-11-10 Thread Prahlad Vaidyanathan
Sat, 10 Nov 2001 13:50:27 +0530 Hi, On Fri, 09 Nov 2001 Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spoke thusly: [-- snip --] > I'm pretty sure I don't know that many people. You need to implement > some way of not counting the same guy twice. I'd be willing to bet that > the 161 Web clients is one person (my bes

Re: MUA statistics

2001-11-09 Thread Magnus Bodin
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 05:20:07PM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: > On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 10:32:14AM +0530, Prahlad Vaidyanathan (dis)graced my inbox >with: > > > Is this program something you wrote? I would love to run it on my > > > stuff, since I am on a lot of car and music related lists.

Re: [mutt-users] Re: MUA statistics

2001-11-09 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 02:19:33PM +0100, Thorsten Haude (dis)graced my inbox with: > >I use NEdit on occaision. I don't like it because it's the only program > >i've found that doesn't support my mouse wheel. > I does now. Still doesn't beat vim, imho ;) -- Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: MUA statistics

2001-11-09 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 10:32:14AM +0530, Prahlad Vaidyanathan (dis)graced my inbox with: > > Is this program something you wrote? I would love to run it on my > > stuff, since I am on a lot of car and music related lists. I am sure > > it would be VERY different from your results. > > Attache

Re: MUA statistics

2001-11-09 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 02:16:32PM +0100, Thorsten Haude (dis)graced my inbox with: > Hi, > > * Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-11-09 04:15]: > >On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 10:29:32AM +0100, Thorsten Haude (dis)graced my inbox with: > >> You'd be surprised. I'm just trying to write a sigdae

Re: MUA statistics

2001-11-09 Thread David T-G
Thorsten, et al -- ...and then Thorsten Haude said... % Hi, Hello! % % * Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-11-09 04:15]: % >On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 10:29:32AM +0100, Thorsten Haude (dis)graced my inbox with: % >> You'd be surprised. I'm just trying to write a sigdaemon with Perl. It %

Re: MUA statistics

2001-11-09 Thread Cristiano Reis Monteiro
Em Fri, 09 Nov 2001, Prahlad Vaidyanathan escreveu: > Fri, 09 Nov 2001 10:28:48 +0530 > > Hi, > > On Thu, 08 Nov 2001 Ken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spoke thusly: > > Is this program something you wrote? I would love to run it on my > > stuff, since I am on a lot of car and music related lists. I am

Re: MUA statistics

2001-11-09 Thread Prahlad Vaidyanathan
Fri, 09 Nov 2001 10:28:48 +0530 Hi, On Thu, 08 Nov 2001 Ken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spoke thusly: > Is this program something you wrote? I would love to run it on my > stuff, since I am on a lot of car and music related lists. I am sure > it would be VERY different from your results. Attached a l

Re: MUA statistics

2001-11-09 Thread Thorsten Haude
Hi, * Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-11-09 04:15]: >On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 10:29:32AM +0100, Thorsten Haude (dis)graced my inbox with: >> You'd be surprised. I'm just trying to write a sigdaemon with Perl. It >> should work from a config file and should also feed more than one FIFO >>

Re: [mutt-users] Re: MUA statistics

2001-11-09 Thread Thorsten Haude
Hi, * Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-11-09 04:29]: >On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 10:52:05PM +0100, Thorsten Haude (dis)graced my inbox with: >> You should try NEdit. Full GUI, full keyboard support, macro language, >> the works. >I use NEdit on occaision. I don't like it because it's the on

Re: [mutt-users] Re: MUA statistics

2001-11-08 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 10:52:05PM +0100, Thorsten Haude (dis)graced my inbox with: > >I certainly agree. The customizeability you can get with mutt and a few > >good scripts cannot possibly be beaten by some checkboxes in a GUI ;) > You should try NEdit. Full GUI, full keyboard support, macro lan

Re: MUA statistics

2001-11-08 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 10:32:06AM +0100, Thorsten Haude (dis)graced my inbox with: > >It works. I refer to DOS as Unix's retarded brother. Since I use NT > >as my desktop (and more and more Mac OS X) at work, I use the DOS > >shell a lot. > You have a high pain threshold. Why not use bash? I'

Re: MUA statistics

2001-11-08 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 10:29:32AM +0100, Thorsten Haude (dis)graced my inbox with: > Hi, > > * Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-11-07 23:43]: > >On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 11:29:47AM +0100, Thorsten Haude (dis)graced my inbox with: > >> >>> Speaking of why kmail is bad... does anybody know

Re: [mutt-users] Re: MUA statistics

2001-11-08 Thread Thorsten Haude
Moin, * Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-11-07 23:47]: >On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 12:55:42PM +0100, Thorsten Haude (dis)graced my inbox with: >> No; you name advantages of GUI apps, which I am aware of (I'm writing >> this with NEdit). What I called GUI-damaged user are however *not* >> aw