Hi,
It works, thanks you for your help :-)
ViSolve DB Team wrote:
Hi Gabriel,
Try as:
mysql select * from forum where topoc like %%;
To search for '\', specify it as ''; this is because the
backslashes are
stripped once by the parser and again when the pattern match is made,
Hi All
I got your mail id from one of the forums.
can u plz tell me tht wht is the capacity of storage of MySQL DB. acutally
we are in the process of making a project on LAMP technology, but the
databse is too large..say 1722 records
this much of records will remain in one table
The second major problem I am running into after the upgrade is the
following error, which did not occur on Development.
Error Executing Database Query. Cannot convert value '-00-00
00:00:00'
from column 4 to TIMESTAMP.
The error occurred on line 8.
MySQL version is: 5.0.27
Thanks in
I'm simply executing a SELECT query that used to work before, same
database, everything the same except a higher version of the MySQL server.
-Original Message-
From: Nuno Oliveira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 22 January 2007 7:33 PM
To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re:
I'm simply executing a SELECT query that used to work before, same
database, everything the same except a higher version of the MySQL
server.
In that case you are probably facing some uncompatible issue between the
versions you used.
Maybe someone else is able to help you more that I :(
Hi Raman,
Is mysql is able to manage this huge amount of data.
MySQL does manage this amount of data very easily.
Can we put this much of data in single table database OR keeping the
data in multiple tables is the good practice.
You can keep this much amount of data in one single MySQL
Hi,
1) In MySQL, the size of the table limits to the storage engine and the file
system size. [minimum -default -2GB]
2) As of our understanding, keeping in multiple tables is a good practice,
that too with perfect normalization. If multiple tables, table sizes are in
hand, limit of file
Здравствуйте, mysql.
Hi all.
I want to ask about low-priority-updates and innodb tables. Does
low-priority-updates=1 affect on priority of select or update query on
innodb type tables?
--
С уважением,
Vitaliy mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For
This is because with version 4.1 and higher the format of timestamp
changes to -00-00 00:00:00. We had this problem, so we had to add a
few lines in the scripts that take this field and work with it
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:
MAFHH (Masoomeen) Cable Network
Website: http://www.mcn786.net
Allah only desires to keep away the uncleanness from you, O people of the
House! and to purify you a (thorough) purifying.{33:33}
Respected Brothers Sisters,
Assalam-o-Alaikum Wa Rahmatullahi Wa Barakatahu
--- ptsSignups --
id int(20) No
mid int(20) No 0
ptsID int(20) No 0
pps double No 0
points double No 0
loginID varchar(255) No
emailConfirm longtext No
time timestamp Yes CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
reasonForDeny longtext No
status int(1) No 1
--- index (timeframe) ---
timeframe
Andrew, can you post the result of EXPLAIN query for your query?
Minus the FORCE INDEX too. Also the structure of the other 2 tables
would be helpful as well.
Thanks,
Dan
On 1/22/07, altendew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- ptsSignups --
id int(20) No
mid int(20) No 0
ptsID int(20) No 0
pps
--- EXPLAIN ---
1 SIMPLE e system cid NULL NULL NULL 0 const row not found
1 SIMPLE s ref sid,status,timeframe status 4 const 20438 Using where; Using
temporary; Using filesort
1 SIMPLE m eq_ref PRIMARY,status PRIMARY 4 sc_72.s.mid 1 Using where
--- members ---
id int(20) No
first
At 3:00 PM +1100 1/22/07, Daniel Kasak wrote:
Hi all.
I'd like to be able to define a stored procedure that returns a
recordset ( I've done this bit ), and then select from this in
another query, eg:
CREATE [EMAIL PROTECTED] PROCEDURE `sp_MyClients`( IN ACCMAN INT )
BEGIN
select * from
Hi thanks for replying.
I can't immediately see the difference between your sample and mine, except
the single quotes are missing, is that it?
Thanks in advance.
-Original Message-
From: tere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 22 January 2007 9:12 PM
To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
On Sunday 21 January 2007 16:41, Nuno Vaz Oliveira wrote:
Just FYI: you can get the Express version of the VB.Net portion of
Visual Studio for free:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/express/default.aspx That way,
you're much more likely to have a fully supported app. I've not tried
Andrew, couple of suggestions:
1 - where you use
s.status='2'
change it to
s.status=2
otherwise MySQL is likely casting your data from int to string, which
is slow and also precludes using an index.
2 - in this case, instead of using a left join, try using a subquery:
WHERE ...
AND s.mid NOT IN
Thanks for the casting tip.
Dan Buettner-2 wrote:
Andrew, couple of suggestions:
1 - where you use
s.status='2'
change it to
s.status=2
otherwise MySQL is likely casting your data from int to string, which
is slow and also precludes using an index.
2 - in this case, instead of
I want to create a backup for my MySQL database every single night.
I am currently running on a linux box. I have a backup drive located as
/backup
Would it be more effecient to use mysqldump tool, or use the unix command
dump or cp
Andrew
--
View this message in context:
Hi all.
I'm trying to weed out garbage that comes from copying and pasting stuff
from a web page.
Some of the data has spaces, but a *different* kind of space ... a
char(160) kind ... I think ... I figured this out by copying the space
character and pasting it into mysql thus:
select
Hello Fellow MySqueelers!,
SELECT version()
reveals...
4.0.24-nt-max-log
I have looked at the following query a hundred times, and cannot find how MYSQL
can report a syntax error to me.
query string is...
SELECT RAND() AS `RAND`, `prod`.`id`
FROM `prod` JOIN `pack` ON `prod`.`id` =
In the last episode (Jan 23), A Blossom of Paradise said:
SELECT version()
reveals...
4.0.24-nt-max-log
I have looked at the following query a hundred times, and cannot find
how MYSQL can report a syntax error to me.
4.0 does not support subqueries. You will need to upgrade to at
Hello all,
Recently we upgraded from MySQL 4.1.11 to MySQL 5.0.22. The queries are taking
a lot of time to execute in the newer version. The queries which were executing
within 10 secs are now taking more than 100 secs.
Running an expalin on the queries showed that an index_merge optimization
Hi,
Hope I have faced this:
If we copy the files with 'cp' command, the permissions will not be
retained. You have to assign it on restoring. But in the mysqldump
utility, everything are retained as it is. Hope, mysqldump utility provides
more options related to db than that of 'cp'
Thanks,
By how much should I be increasing the thread_cache? currently it is 8...
Currently I can provide the EXPLAIN result of a query using index_merge on
MySQL 5.0.22.
EXPLAIN SELECT IFNULL(TAEM.FLD_FULL_NAME, TFMM.FLD_ASSIGNED_TO) AS ELE1 ,
TFMM.FLD_ASSIGNED_TO AS KEY_ID, SUM(1) AS ELE2,
Hi,
MySQL Dump is logical. Hence it is mostly slower than locking the MyISAM
tables and copying them or shutting down the server and taring the entire
MySQL directory if you are using innodb. If you are using innodb tables only
you can run mysqldump with --single-transaction option to take a
the monitor the threads-connected variable over a period of time and
calcuate the value. you can even look at max used connections status
variable and allot accordingly. BTW, is you application using demand based
connections or connection pooling ? If it is using connection pooling then
bumping
Here is the CREATE TABLE Statement for the table on which the index_merge is
being applied. There will be atleast 10 queries always running on this table
with an index_merge optimization.
We have the max_connections variable set to 100. Also repeatedly checking the
Threads_Connected status
Hi,
Here, threads_connected is considerable and below the preset value.
The threads_connected and threads_running are the good indicators to see how
loaded the server is. In your case it is good numbers.
So use 'iostat'/relavant utility to monitor the DB activity.
Also threads_created is
29 matches
Mail list logo