Your innodb data file just auto-extended until you either reached its max or
ran out of disk space if you had no max.
The only way I know to reduce it is to dump all the innodb tables, drop the
innodb data file and logs (and drop the innodb tables if you're using
file-per-table), restart mysql, le
I recently tried to run
INSERT INTO general_log SELECT * FROM mysql.general_log;
but that failed a few hours in because I ran out of disk space.
'SELECT COUNT(*) FROM general_log' returns 0, yet ibdata1 is still
49GB (started at 3GB before the INSERT; the source mysql.general_log,
a CSV table,
Sirs,
Because one table will hold the large amount of data, only the recent data will
be used for transactions; so rest of the old records are remain same with out
any transaction. So we have decided to go for year based storage; here even old
records can be taken out by join queries.
I hope
Ya, that one is helpful... just trying to land on a solution like I've seen in
other DB's that have index-advisor that listens and creates what it thinks is
the perfect indexes ... but thx...
From: mos [mo...@fastmail.fm]
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010
At 03:28 PM 2/23/2010, you wrote:
Is there still no such thing anywhere for Mysql as an index analyser?
Many others have such a thing that will sit and monitor db activity over a
poeriod of time and suggest the exact indexes on each table based on what
it has seen to improve performance
An
On Tue, February 23, 2010 1:28 pm, Cantwell, Bryan wrote:
> Is there still no such thing anywhere for Mysql as an index analyser?
> Many others have such a thing that will sit and monitor db activity over a
> poeriod of time and suggest the exact indexes on each table based on what
> it has seen to
Is there still no such thing anywhere for Mysql as an index analyser?
Many others have such a thing that will sit and monitor db activity over a
poeriod of time and suggest the exact indexes on each table based on what it
has seen to improve performance
Anyone got that for MySQL?
From: vegiv...@gmail.com [mailto:vegiv...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Johan De
Meersman
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 5:52 AM
To: Jerry Schwartz
Cc: MY SQL Mailing list
Subject: Re: Partitioning
that's very much gonna depend on what your selects look like. For example, a
low-cardinality but
>-Original Message-
>From: John Daisley [mailto:mg_s...@hotmail.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 6:07 AM
>To: jschwa...@the-infoshop.com ; mysql@lists.mysql.com
>Subject: RE: Partitioning
>
>Hi Jerry,
>
>I guess modification of the table is needed! What are you trying to achieve
>by
Securich - Security Plugin for MySQL
http://forge.mysql.com/wiki/Securich_-_Security_Plugin_for_MySQL
This Thursday (February 25th, 13:00 UTC - way earlier than usual!),
Darren Cassar will present Securich - Security Plugin for MySQL.
According to Darren, the author of the plugin, "Securich is an
You might want to read the comments to this posting:
http://www.bitbybit.dk/carsten/blog/?p=116
Several tools/methods for controlling and analyzing the slow query log are
suggested there.
Best,
/ Carsten
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:09:30 +0530, Ananda Kumar
wrote:
> slow query log wil
Hi Jerry,
I guess modification of the table is needed! What are you trying to achieve by
partitioning?
If the primary key is rarely used then maybe adding another column with a
numeric value based on `prod_id` and adding that column to the primary key
would work and at least let you do some ha
that's very much gonna depend on what your selects look like. For example, a
low-cardinality but often-where'd field makes an interesting candidate, as
such a partitioning will take the size of your table scans down. If you know
that you'll mostly access just last month's data, partition on year+mo
slow query log will also have sql's which are not using indexes(doing full
table scan).
May be those queries with "ZERO SECOND" run on small table without using
indexes.
regards
anandkl
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Machiel Richards wrote:
> Hi All
>
>
>
>I found my problem an
Hi All
I found my problem and this was kind of a blonde moment for
me...
When configuring the log_slow_queries parameter, it was
configured as follows: log_slow_queries=1
This the file being created is called 1 and the 1 does not
mean it
> From: machi...@rdc.co.za
> To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
> Subject: slow queries not being logged
> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:59:13 +0200
>
> Good day all
>
>
>
> I hope you can assist me with this one...
>
>
>
> We have a client where the slow query log wa
16 matches
Mail list logo