On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 23:40:39 +0200
Jochem van Dieten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:49:26 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, since you admitted to being a newbie, I would suggest that
you learn with MySQL. It supports several types of data storage
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 23:34:49 +0200
Jochem van Dieten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:00:12 -0500, Josh Trutwin wrote:
One area where MySQL beat Postgres is in Windows installation.
Installing postgres on Windohs is like pulling your fingernails
off slowly.
It is more
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:00:32 -0500, Josh Trutwin wrote:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 23:34:49 +0200 Jochem van Dieten wrote:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:00:12 -0500, Josh Trutwin wrote:
MySQL's command line interface and programming API also are nicer
for newer users. Why in the world do I need to
Hi all, mr.super newbie here, what is the best for cold fusion development?
I know that NASA uses MySQL but I have also been told that more
'professionals'(???) use PostgreSQL. Let the flaming begin!!
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:
EWAGW wrote:
Hi all, mr.super newbie here, what is the best for cold fusion development?
I know that NASA uses MySQL but I have also been told that more
'professionals'(???) use PostgreSQL. Let the flaming begin!!
No need for flames. I think the two are converging.
PostgreSQL started out with a
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:35:20 -0500, EWAGW [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all, mr.super newbie here, what is the best for cold fusion development?
The best depends on the requirements. You have not told us any
requirements, except that you work with ColdFusion. If that is
*really* the only
3:45 PM
Subject: Re: Difference between PostgreSQL and MySQL
EWAGW wrote:
Hi all, mr.super newbie here, what is the best for cold fusion
development?
I know that NASA uses MySQL but I have also been told that more
'professionals'(???) use PostgreSQL. Let the flaming begin!!
No need
Well, since you admitted to being a newbie, I would suggest that you learn
with MySQL. It supports several types of data storage (memory only, ISAM,
full-relational) and both transacted and non-transacted execution models.
That's just about everything you could want a database to do.
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:45:29 -0400
Brad Tilley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No need for flames. I think the two are converging.
One area where MySQL beat Postgres is in Windows installation. Installing postgres on
Windohs is like pulling your fingernails off slowly. I hear they are close to full
Subject: Re: Difference between PostgreSQL and MySQL
Well, since you admitted to being a newbie, I would suggest that you learn
with MySQL. It supports several types of data storage (memory only, ISAM,
full-relational) and both transacted and non-transacted execution models.
Ehm
No need for flames. I think the two are converging.
One area where MySQL beat Postgres is in Windows installation. Installing
postgres on Windohs is like pulling your fingernails off slowly. I hear
they are close to full Windows support though in the 8.x branch.
FYI:
Thanks a lot Shawn, Josh and Brad for your great advice. The command line
interface you talk about is that in MySQL administrator?
MySQL's command line interface and programming API also are nicer for newer
users. Why in the world do I need to remember to type \d to show my
tables?
That
Thank Jochem as well interesting reply got me thinking
- Original Message -
From: Jochem van Dieten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: Difference between PostgreSQL and MySQL
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:35:20 -0500, EWAGW [EMAIL
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:00:12 -0500, Josh Trutwin wrote:
One area where MySQL beat Postgres is in Windows installation. Installing postgres
on Windohs is like pulling your fingernails off slowly.
It is more like following the manual. Not hard, you just have to take
it one step at a time.
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:49:26 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, since you admitted to being a newbie, I would suggest that you learn
with MySQL. It supports several types of data storage (memory only, ISAM,
full-relational) and both transacted and non-transacted execution
Thanks Emmett and Martijn!!
- Original Message -
From: EWAGW [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: Difference between PostgreSQL and MySQL
Thank Jochem as well interesting reply got me thinking
- Original Message
At 03:35 PM 8/10/2004, you wrote:
Hi all, mr.super newbie here, what is the best for cold fusion development?
I know that NASA uses MySQL but I have also been told that more
'professionals'(???) use PostgreSQL. Let the flaming begin!!
One thing that wasn't mentioned is MySQL requires a license
Foundation or a lawyer as appropriate.
Lachlan
-Original Message-
From: mos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 11 August 2004 7:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Difference between PostgreSQL and MySQL
At 03:35 PM 8/10/2004, you wrote:
Hi all, mr.super newbie here, what
18 matches
Mail list logo
