On Friday 09 Nov 2001 03:36, DownloadFAST.com wrote:
Mr. Bobic,
[snip]
The only thing that matters is that every time you respond on the list, you
are only making a fool of yourself in the eyes of the many people who are
lurking. They can see right thru your motives in sending this post
On Friday 09 Nov 2001 12:11, DownloadFAST.com wrote:
Considering the features you want (IIRC you only mentioned the
default values in tables) - why don't you try PostgreSQL instead?
My understanding is it is much slower.
That is what I am hoping for. Or rather, I am hoping that MySQL proves
On Friday 09 Nov 2001 12:08, you wrote:
MySQL
On Friday 09 Nov 2001 11:37, you wrote:
Note on what is going on here...
The paragraph below was from a private email I sent to Gordon. And now
Gordon just responded to it on the public list.
Gordon, I was strongly hinting to you in
DownloadFAST.com wrote:
[...] why don't you try PostgreSQL instead?
My understanding is it is much slower.
No kidding? Why don't you fork the PostGreSQL codebase and apply your
special assembly talents to speed it up by 50% or even 60%?
No kidding? Why don't you fork the PostGreSQL codebase and apply your
special assembly talents to speed it up by 50% or even 60%?
If you're willing to pay for quality, Oracle is an obvious choice.
It's fast, it has all the features, there are numerous advanced tools to
manage and develop your
I just got back in from a nice day in the park with my kids and my parents.
All I can say to defend myself is that I'm sorry I did not bow to you thy King.
And I am sorry if I have my own opinions and personality. I will try to
conform asap to Big Brother's wishes.
And I am sorry that my
