Re: PgSQL vs MySQL

2004-03-13 Thread Kaarel
] Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 1:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mark Warner; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PgSQL vs MySQL As a DBA and someone who has worked both with PostgresQL and MySQL, I think I can answer this knowingly. First, MySQL is significantly faster than PostgresQL and Oracle

Re: PgSQL vs MySQL

2004-03-03 Thread Curtis Maurand
I know, I get it, I was trying for humor. Curtis On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Michael Stassen wrote: > > Curtis Maurand wrote: > > :-) > > > > someflag enum('TRUE','FALSE'); > > > > Not quite boolean, but it works. > > > > Curtis > > > > On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Mark Warner wrote: > > > > > >>The thin

RE: PgSQL vs MySQL

2004-03-03 Thread Jeremy Smith
, March 03, 2004 1:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mark Warner; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PgSQL vs MySQL As a DBA and someone who has worked both with PostgresQL and MySQL, I think I can answer this knowingly. First, MySQL is significantly faster than PostgresQL and Oracle. Second, MySQL is also

Re: PgSQL vs MySQL

2004-03-03 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 10:51:40AM -0800, James Kelty wrote: > As a DBA I have a few questions about what you said here. > > You have worked with both PostgreSQL and MySQL, and yet you say that > MySQL is 'signifigantly' faster than Oracle? Can you PROVE that? For a given set of data and workload

Re: PgSQL vs MySQL

2004-03-03 Thread Kevin Williams
Michael, I couldn't agree more! I didn't even realize there was a boolean issue until now. I don't really understand the issue of using 0 as false, and 1 as true. The way I view it is that "true and false" are merely abstract names for 0 and 1. When the database is accessed using Java, I don't

Re: PgSQL vs MySQL

2004-03-03 Thread Michael Stassen
Curtis Maurand wrote: :-) someflag enum('TRUE','FALSE'); Not quite boolean, but it works. Curtis On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Mark Warner wrote: The thing which bothers me most about MySQL is the lack of a proper boolean. I don't like having to abstract a tinyint(1) into true or false. As much of my

Re: PgSQL vs MySQL

2004-03-03 Thread David Griffiths
ly be fighting with it after a point? Or migrating to something > else? > > Can't argue with the third point at all. > > In all of this, isn't it really InnoDB that you like, and not MySQL > specifically? > > -James > > -Original Message----- > From:

Re: PgSQL vs MySQL

2004-03-03 Thread Mark Warner
>; "Mark Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 10:27 AM Subject: Re: PgSQL vs MySQL As a DBA and someone who has worked both with PostgresQL and MySQL, I think I can answer this knowingly. First, MySQL is significantly fas

Re: Re: PgSQL vs MySQL

2004-03-03 Thread david.best
> I do not approve or disapprove of your choice of Postgres over MySQL. I don't profess to be a postgresql expert, i'm still learning about it.. but a quick glance at the documentation tells me that the only option would be to use pg_dump utility which creates a sql file. I haven't looked at on

RE: PgSQL vs MySQL

2004-03-03 Thread James Kelty
n all of this, isn't it really InnoDB that you like, and not MySQL specifically? -James -Original Message- From: David Griffiths [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 10:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mark Warner; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PgSQL vs MySQL As a

Re: PgSQL vs MySQL

2004-03-03 Thread David Griffiths
. Davi. - Original Message - From: "David Griffiths" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Mark Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 10:27 AM Subject: Re: PgSQL vs MySQL > As a DBA and

Re: PgSQL vs MySQL

2004-03-03 Thread Ray
from the manual it appears that "char(0) null default null" can be used as a boolean, will the values of either null or "". haven't tried it myself, but its documented. http://www.mysql.com/documentation/mysql/bychapter/manual_Column_types.html#Column_types [NATIONAL] CHAR(M) [BINARY | ASCII |

Re: PgSQL vs MySQL

2004-03-03 Thread Karen Abgarian
Hello David, I do not approve or disapprove of your choice of Postgres over MySQL. To best of my knowledge, Postgres does not have media (or point in time) recovery, at all. The only thing possible is a consistent backup, resulting in a SQL dump. No clues how long it will take to restore it.

Re: PgSQL vs MySQL

2004-03-03 Thread David Griffiths
ginal Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mark Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 6:51 AM Subject: Re: PgSQL vs MySQL > > > What advantages, besides ease of setup, does MySQL hold over PostgreSQL? > &

Re: PgSQL vs MySQL

2004-03-03 Thread Curtis Maurand
:-) someflag enum('TRUE','FALSE'); Not quite boolean, but it works. Curtis On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Mark Warner wrote: > The thing which bothers me most about MySQL is the lack of a proper > boolean. I don't like having to abstract a tinyint(1) into true or > false. As much of my work involves b

Re: PgSQL vs MySQL

2004-03-03 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Mar 03), [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > Would you trust anything to developers who do not know what they > > are doing? > > > > As a _novice_ developer I learned the noted aspects of MySQL: it's > > part of knowing how the database works and how to use it, and not > > terribly so

Re: PgSQL vs MySQL

2004-03-03 Thread Mark Warner
The thing which bothers me most about MySQL is the lack of a proper boolean. I don't like having to abstract a tinyint(1) into true or false. As much of my work involves building applications with Yes or No questions, I think I am switching to PostgreSQL. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What advantag

Re: Re: PgSQL vs MySQL

2004-03-03 Thread david.best
> Would you trust anything to developers who do not know what they are doing? > > As a _novice_ developer I learned the noted aspects of MySQL: it's part of knowing > how the database works and how to use it, and not terribly sophisticated. Then you may be a good developer but experience tells

Re: PgSQL vs MySQL

2004-03-03 Thread Martijn Tonies
> >> Are you sure about quality? Check out: > >> > >> http://sql-info.de/mysql/gotchas.html > > Those have nothing to do with the quality of MySQL. No? Why not? With regards, Martijn Tonies Database Workbench - developer tool for InterBase, Firebird, MySQL & MS SQL Server. Upscene Productions

Re: PgSQL vs MySQL

2004-03-03 Thread Eric @ Zomething
David wrote: >> Are you sure about quality? Check out: >> >> http://sql-info.de/mysql/gotchas.html Those have nothing to do with the quality of MySQL. >> I don't think i'd trust it for anything critical >> unless you very confident your developers know what they are doing. Would you trust an

Re: PgSQL vs MySQL

2004-03-03 Thread david.best
> What advantages, besides ease of setup, does MySQL hold over PostgreSQL? > It would seem, to me, that the two are close competitors (both in > quality, and performance). Are you sure about quality? Check out: http://sql-info.de/mysql/gotchas.html You can check out postgresql's on the same

PgSQL vs MySQL

2004-03-03 Thread Mark Warner
What advantages, besides ease of setup, does MySQL hold over PostgreSQL? It would seem, to me, that the two are close competitors (both in quality, and performance). Thanks. -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[