of money involved.
>
> /David
>
> > John
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David Axmark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 2:14 PM
> > To: Damir Dezeljin
> > Cc: MySQL List
> > Subject: Re: InterBase vs. Mysql
; John
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Axmark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 2:14 PM
> To: Damir Dezeljin
> Cc: MySQL List
> Subject: Re: InterBase vs. Mysql
>
>
> On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 08:14, Damir Dezeljin wrote:
> > First
On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 21:26, John Griffin wrote:
> Gerald,
>
> One hundred MySQL licenses still works out to $90.00 USD. Even if it
> worked out to half that would still leave me with no margin and so no
> compensation for my time. I am trying to find a way of using MySQL in
> a very low cost mark
ssage-
From: gerald_clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 2:49 PM
To: John Griffin
Cc: David Axmark; Damir Dezeljin; MySQL List
Subject: Re: InterBase vs. Mysql
Well, then I would buy a $50.00 product using MySQL, and then
your $5000.00 product. Oh, and subtract the $5
; Damir Dezeljin; MySQL List
Subject: Re: InterBase vs. Mysql
Buy a hundred at a time.
John Griffin wrote:
>Actually, I am trying to address the problem of having to buy a $200 MySQL license
>for every $50 software product I sell. If you have a solution for this problem I
>would like to
good solution for.
John
-Original Message-
From: gerald_clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 2:49 PM
To: John Griffin
Cc: David Axmark; Damir Dezeljin; MySQL List
Subject: Re: InterBase vs. Mysql
Well, then I would buy a $50.00 product using MySQL, and then
your $50
Well, then I would buy a $50.00 product using MySQL, and then
your $5000.00 product. Oh, and subtract the $500.00 license fee.
I already have a license.
I prefer to pay a flat fee for each license, not a fee based on the
price of your software.
John Griffin wrote:
Hello David,
Since you were k
At 05:27 AM 2/18/2003, you wrote:
Hi,
I am a MySQL admin. I like it very much. It is very quick,stable and
easy in configuration.
But I have a boss, who has been told about InterBase. He told me I should
interest in the InterBase, because it is programmed by russian, who made a
great project and
: Damir Dezeljin
Cc: MySQL List
Subject: Re: InterBase vs. Mysql
On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 08:14, Damir Dezeljin wrote:
> Firstly excuse my poor english ;)))
>
> I read the entire mail thread. I'm useing MySQL for our own data storage
> (I use it to store our oceanographic data for intern
On Tue, 2003-02-18 at 18:06, Ben Clewett wrote:
> This will be my last posting. I don't belive I am being constructive
> and have no wish to instantly be hated by the whole of MySQL.
>
> Michael T. Babcock wrote:
> > Ben Clewett wrote:
> >
> >> MySQL say that this is an extension of the applica
On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 08:14, Damir Dezeljin wrote:
> Firstly excuse my poor english ;)))
>
> I read the entire mail thread. I'm useing MySQL for our own data storage
> (I use it to store our oceanographic data for internal use) - I guess that
> I don't need a commercial license for this.
>
> I ha
Hi!
What to choose - InterBase/FireBird or MySQL - depends on the tasks you are
going to solve with your SQL server. InterBase/FireBird is intended for
managing a quite large and complicate databases, where a lot of business
rules should be realized and stored in common database instead of being
r
Firstly excuse my poor english ;)))
I read the entire mail thread. I'm useing MySQL for our own data storage
(I use it to store our oceanographic data for internal use) - I guess that
I don't need a commercial license for this.
I have another question ... if I will do a commercial program in futu
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 05:06:17PM +, Ben Clewett wrote:
> This will be my last posting. I don't belive I am being constructive
> and have no wish to instantly be hated by the whole of MySQL.
Probably wasn't wise to make a post about how you felt MySQL was
expensive (huh?) and their staff ru
On Tue 2003-02-18 at 17:06:17 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This will be my last posting. I don't belive I am being constructive
> and have no wish to instantly be hated by the whole of MySQL.
[...]
Oh, I do not have anything at all against you. I just tried to correct
what I saw as a miscon
Ben Clewett wrote:
What you say is that the API is in my application. The API is part of
MySQL. Therefore my application is GPL or needs a licence.
Please don't confuse API and library. The libmysql or libmysqld
libraries are GPL'd. Anything linked against them is automatically also
GPL
On Tue 2003-02-18 at 16:11:11 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Benjamin Pflugmann wrote:
[...]
> There is also some middle ground here. Which is the overlap of the two.
No. Either the way you distribute your software is GPL-compliant or
not. If it is not, you need a commercial license, if it is
This will be my last posting. I don't belive I am being constructive
and have no wish to instantly be hated by the whole of MySQL.
Michael T. Babcock wrote:
Ben Clewett wrote:
MySQL say that this is an extension of the application, and therefore
breaks the GPL, and therefore a licence is need
Ben Clewett wrote:
MySQL say that this is an extension of the application, and therefore
breaks the GPL, and therefore a licence is needed. They are however,
the only big GPL user who thinks this way.
No they're not. The issue is not the use of the server (as previously
discussed a few w
I'm not here to slag MySQL, but this point is extremely interesting.
Benjamin Pflugmann wrote:
> Aehem. There seems to be some misconception here. Either your program
> is fine with MySQL being GPL or not.
>
> If it is (and your forking example would work for you) either by using
> MySQL in a way
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I am getting tired of this argument. This is the MySQL Users mail list, not a
list to slagg of MySQL, its features or staff.
Constructive comment is always welcome, but people on this list have chosen to
use MySQL because of what it is and will
On Tue 2003-02-18 at 12:57:04 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> Most benchmark published actually give credit to mysql when it comes to
> Mysql Vs Interbase, but as an end user, the best tests are the one i
> conduct myself in my premises.
> Therefor when i say that mysql Vs interbase defin
Benjamin Pflugmann wrote:
So the speak about university degrees is pointless (aside from that,
why do you think volunteers wouldn't have a degree...).
Any volunteer who actually manages to improve MySQL in some way is good
enough by my books; with or without the degree.
A Comp. Sci. degree
Hi.
On Tue 2003-02-18 at 11:48:53 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hi Maciej,
>
> the only arguments you can get in favour of mysql is that it's free, and
> some of its SQL statement are faster than interbase.
Well, and outstanding support, IMHO.
> Interbase has the advantage of having views,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Inandjo Taurel wrote:
hi Maciej,
the only arguments you can get in favour of mysql is that it's free, and
some of its SQL statement are faster than interbase.
Interbase has the advantage of having views, stored
procedures,triggers,and it's crazily
On Tue 2003-02-18 at 12:02:59 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> This is the main reason why I am looking at PostgreSQL at the moment,
> although I've not looked much at Interbase, any good?
>
> Either that, or fork MySQL into FreeMySQL, as we can do under the GPL,
> and not charge our selv
Hi.
Just a little correction.
On Tue 2003-02-18 at 12:44:39 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Maciej,
>
> I don't know much about Interbase, but MySQL is for some cases a very good
> choice!
> Some database engineers would say MySQL isn't a database because it has no
> transactions by know (i
hi heikki,
thanks for correcting me on the salary aspect.
Most benchmark published actually give credit to mysql when it comes to
Mysql Vs Interbase, but as an end user, the best tests are the one i conduct
myself in my premises.
Therefor when i say that mysql Vs interbase definitely goes to inte
MySQL Licence will cost us more than our product price.
Wow, what a company!! how much do you sell your products ??
MySQL sails staff are rude and unfriendly.
Can't tell, anytime i needed help, i used this forum, and i rather met some
real interesting guyz and dedicated guyz (widenius, egorov,
Inandjo,
> Subject: Re: InterBase vs. Mysql
> From: Inandjo Taurel
> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 11:48:53 +
>
...
> Don't forget that interbase is also written by professionnal on borland
> campus, guyz who completed a university degree and were assessed and were
> judge
Inandjo Taurel wrote:
hi Maciej,
the only arguments you can get in favour of mysql is that it's free,
Free??? Bollocks.
I program for a small company producing commercial programs. We have found:
MySQL Licence will cost us more than our product price.
MySQL sails staff are rude and unfrie
hi Maciej,
the only arguments you can get in favour of mysql is that it's free, and
some of its SQL statement are faster than interbase.
Interbase has the advantage of having views, stored procedures,triggers,and
it's crazily fast.
Don't forget that interbase is also written by professionnal on
At 05:28 AM 6/3/2002, you wrote:
>Hi all.
>
>I'm looking for a comparison between Interbase and MySQL.
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
>Iago.
lago
See
http://lists.mysql.com/php/search.php?ps=10&q=interbase&ps=20&m=and.
Mike
--
33 matches
Mail list logo
