program late, allowing the previous program to complete. Or
maybe even split the difference. Whatever. I just know that having to
do this manually is less than optimal.
Thots?
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description
for what's on next?
Unfortunately I do not have the time to implement such a feature...
Heh. Me neither. :-(
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
and Low Quality gone into the profile and
removed the checkbox from the Automatically transcode after recording
option, but I still seem be transcoding resulting recordings.
Any ideas why?
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description
Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
programs list and need to add them.
Thanx,
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 13:28 -0600, Mike Daugird wrote:
how do I change the time mythfilldatabase runs?
Dude. Asked and answered only 4 hours ago in this very thread.
b.
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
, Trolltech should be targeting DirectFB with
their Embedded but again AFAIK, they are not. Pity.
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
mythtv-users
. No answer. :-(
Be sure to post here if you find something out.
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users
is perfectly watchable however, so it must be at least some
part valid.
Ideas?
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtranscode:
Couldn't find stream paramters for
'/video/tmp/1006_20051003230800_20051003233000.nuv'
But the stream seems fine in as much as it mythfrontend plays it without
problem.
Any more ideas?
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
I have a slave backend with a MJPEG card in it. I have gone to
Utilities/Setup-Setup/TV Settings-Recording Profiles-Transcoders but
I don't see an entry From MJPEG. How do I add a new transcoder?
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
presses of the power button can be aborted.
I thought that was what kill -9 was for.
That one's not course, it's ruthless. :-)
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- where the
number of ESC's needed to exit are known could work.
Would look ugly though, all the screen flipping just before exiting.
An exit jump point is really what is needed I think.
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description
of the pain.
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv
already done the work, I may as well leverage off of it.
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
is better than just
separating the screens into :0.0 and :0.1.
Thots?
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv
.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
much the size of the screen. So my GUI winds up being
640x480 rather than the 570x430 or so that I have configured in Setup.
I make the GUI smaller than the screen so it fits inside the area of the
640x480 left after overscan.
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J
the screen size from the correct (:0.1)
screen and not :0.0 all would work well.
Ideas?
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
mythtv-users
about where to get it's screen
geometry from.
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http
computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
I am running in clone mode,
with my desktop only 800x600.
Yeah, I don't want this. I want the mythfrontend screen and the deskotp
screen to remain separate.
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
with a 3:2 pulldown deinterlacer.
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi
this would be possible, but alas it is
not. Which is a shame. X for an STB is just a waste.
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
mythtv-users
to run on DirectFB which AFAIK it does not. :-( QT-Embedded (or
whatever it is) is too far in the other direction. It does not have
hardware acceleration (and other video card) suport that DirectFB has.
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
more than the developers of OSS. Most unfortunately.
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
still.
Maybe if digital starts getting put into something other than huge TVs
it will happen quicker, but I really have no desire to give up the space
a 52 TV takes.
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
, mainly for
brightness/windows/daylight issues.
What res. does yours go to? I figure if I'm buying one I'd buy the full
HDTV res. but then those get pretty pricey.
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
day and I had a difficult
time finding one that was *not* digital capable.
What kinds of interfaces?
As for prices,
I saw some as low as $650.
Not so bad then.
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
), projectors that do 1920x1080
will be cheap enough to consider replacing it with.
Yeah. That was the other thing. Never realized that bulbs were such a
significant cost of those suckers. To replace too.
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
at a the least is an incomplete list) for the TV to
display.
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users
. Even if one stream was 5Mb/s, that is only 640KB/s. Not
really that intensive. Even my single 80G ATA drive gets ~15MB/s
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
hardware encoder, no sweat. In software, you are sweating.
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users
for playing with other players like mplayer and xine
and so forth?
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users
-realtime transcoding from MPEG2 to MPEG4 is going to
yield a better quality/bit ratio than the same size file at realtime
MPEG2.
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
is not really MPEG4 compliant MPEG4?
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin
Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
from a tuner card.
Are those in the MPEG4 stream or the NUV container? They probably could
be dropped assuming OGG were better suited to re-containing (i.e. if it
has timestamps, etc.)
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description
not
interested in the other NUV features) that prevents a simple container
conversion or am I again simplifying it too much and should stop beating
a dead horse?
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
of the same reasons
I am not interested in digital cable, so that's not even an option.
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
mythtv-users
in an rpm that were not modified at
checkpoint time from the rpm. So you would need a rollback tool too.
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
information from?
Not that I really care about OSX on x86. Just trying to stop the spread
of mis-information.
b.
--
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 15:56 -0400, Tom E. Craddock Jr. wrote:
Thought #1, dont top post, makes reading the whole thread a painyou
read top to bottom, not bottom then top, right?
Not only that, it encourages trimming, so that I don't have to read the
same messages over and over again
On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 16:04 -0400, Andy Pflueger wrote:
#1 Sorry for top-posting.
#2 I did just read right over that step...doh!
I stand corrected. It doesn't seem to promote trimming at all. ~sigh~
b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 15:18 -0500, Juuso H wrote:
Hi
Not exactly mythtv specific... but close enough.
When viewing movies or tv or anything really, my display is not
always updating properly. When there's something big moving,
there is a noticeable horizontal break where upper half is
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 11:15 -0500, Andrew Close wrote:
hmm, i'll have to look at my bill. i'm not gonna be happy if i have
to upgrade packages to get my Stargate, Battlestar Galactica fix. :)
My cableco has been doing this. They have taken away two channels on
analog and made them available
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 13:51 -0400, Scot L. Harris wrote:
Still have that channel here.
Wow. Cableco lied to me. Imagine my surprise.
Currently I have the cable going direct to the PVR-350 and PVR-250.
Yup.
I
assumed this was the basic analog service.
Analog service anyway. Not sure
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 14:38 -0400, Scot L. Harris wrote:
So the S-Video input on the PVR line of cards allows the card to select
the channel on digital cable?
No.
Or do you mean that would be used from
the digital cable box and then an IR blaster has to be used to change
the channels on
Please wrap text. Huge long lines suck.
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 13:42 -0500, Gavin Haslett wrote:
I will say that using external boxes ain't so bad,
So you like having to buy a box for every stream you want to watch, be
it recorders or other TVs in the house?
While I really disagree with the
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 14:56 -0400, Jim Reith wrote:
Not really an investment in cable boxes as the cable company probably
provides at least one with your digital subscription
And what of the additional ones I need for the PVR recording cards (1
each) and the other TVs in the house? They
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 15:32 -0400, Phil Bridges wrote:
Does your cable company not rent cable boxes?
Sure. As if cable was not expensive enough though? Why should I *have*
to pay more for what I am getting today? Cableco likes to advertise
that going digital you get the same channels at the
Is anyone here using Myth to capture from a Bell ExpressVu via any kind
of DVB set up?
I'm not terribly interested in buying more receivers and/or having to IR
blast a receiver so I can record the composite or s-video out.
I understand the Nagrivision issues with it but also understand that
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 08:22 -0700, Joe Votour wrote:
A lot of the existing infrastructure isn't
designed for the bandwidth and routing that it will
require.
Bandwidth need not be a problem. Multicast. Doubt they will use such
an elegant solution, but it's there waiting to be used.
b.
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 08:40 -0700, Joe Votour wrote:
(At this point, we're kind of off-topic.)
Yeah. But but so is 50% of the traffic on this list. :-)
My guess then is that you haven't tried to stream tons
of multicast data through switches then (either
high-end or low-end).
Nope.
Well, I just bought an MSI FX5200-TD128 (i.e. nvidia FX5200) and I am
quite disappointed by it.
Indeed the color is much more sharp than my G400 was. The G400 was very
dull and washed out.
But the picture (when playing recorded content/live tv) does not go
anywhere near filling the 720x480 that
On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 13:54 -0400, Egeekial wrote:
Why does it have to be an NVIDIA card? I have found that ATI's linux
drivers are light years ahead of NVIDIA's... in terms of stability at least.
(SDTV, i.e. s-video, component, composite) TV-Out? Are they actually
doing (ST)TV-Out these
On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 15:22 -0500, Mike Isely wrote:
I have 3 different systems right now with 5200-class Nvidia cards, using
the 1.0.7174 nvidia driver and kernel 2.6.11.10 and all are functioning
well.
Does the video display (actual content, not the OSD) fill the screen?
What resolution(s)
On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 06:32 -0400, Brian Topping wrote:
Hmm, this is starting to look bad. I found the transcode package, see
now how it is different than mythtranscode, but it's still looking very
difficult. All I really want to do is make the file size smaller, but
it's looking like I
On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 08:34 -0700, Wendy Seltzer wrote:
The DC Circuit has ruled in our favor, unanimously throwing out the
FCC's broadcast flag -- the rule that would have prevented pcHDTV and
Air2PC from making HDTV tuner cards in the US after July 1.
Nice.
Next, we'll have to stop the
On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 12:00 -0500, Lane Schwartz wrote:
On 5/6/05, Brian J. Murrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will the DC Circuit's ruling help in any way in stopping something like
this from going through Congress?
After reading the court's decision, I would say no - Congress could
still
On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 09:48 -0700, Brad Fuller wrote:
Also: correct me if I'm wrong: but this ruling doesn't prohibit asset
owners from inserting the broadcast flag into their streams. Correct?
As far as I understand it, correct. Asset owners could put any number
of whatever flags they want
On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 12:44 -0700, Brad Templeton wrote:
Why wait? Yes, the cards, and PCs and TVs will be cheaper and better
in another year. And the same will be true the year after that and
the year after that.
Because I question the availability of HD signals. AFAIU, an HDTV card
On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 14:17 -0600, Brandon Beattie wrote:
.. They do OTA and Cable (QAM) as long as it's not encrypted QAM.
Heh. What cable vendor is going to do unencrypted signals anymore?
They have North Americans on the treadmill of buying proprietary
equipment in order to get service. I
On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 16:23 -0600, Brandon Beattie wrote:
Roof top directional (Since ATSC is directional...)
Heh. I know squat about antennae (except the plural form :-)
What's directional in contrast to what you see on most people's roofs
for analog tv? Does it have to be tuned to the
On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 06:53 -0700, Wendy Seltzer wrote:
If the court does strike down the FCC's flag, I suspect we'll see heavy
lobbying to Congress to re-impose it.
So what's the point of fighting it then? If this is a merry-go-round
that never stops then the lobbyists surely will always
On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 16:23 +0200, Stef Coene wrote:
Or he can compile his own binary's and resell the HMC, there is nothing they
can do about it.
Yes, he may distribute his own modified (I don't think making a
modification is even a requirement) HMC, however don't omit the
importance of the
Something that I think would be good is an option to stop playing the
thumbnail in the recorded program selector after a selected amount of
idle time has elapsed. This would preserve CPU cycles for transcoding
and commercial flagging when people leave the program selector up but
turn the TV off.
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 10:54 -0500, Michael J. Lynch wrote:
If you are using qt-3.3.4-5.x.x, revert to qt-3.3.4.2.0.2 and the
problem will go away.
Sure seems to be a whole lotta reverting going on to get myth to go.
IIRC there is some fonts package(s) you gotta revert to on FC, and now
_two_
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 12:32 -0400, Isaac Richards wrote:
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 12:00 pm, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
Sure seems to be a whole lotta reverting going on to get myth to go.
IIRC there is some fonts package(s) you gotta revert to on FC, and now
_two_ reasons to revert QT
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 12:57 -0400, Isaac Richards wrote:
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 12:42 pm, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
OK. So we could classify it as a non-backward compatible API change.
In a message yesterday did you not say that with the fix that is in CVS
this will be a problem again
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 13:02 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quick question. How do you revert and rpm backwards? rpm -ivh will not do it
Even though it's OT: rpm -Uvh --oldpackage
b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 15:44 -0400, Isaac Richards wrote:
No. Geez, people, if you can't or don't want to read, don't join a mailing
list.
All due respect Isaac but this is a very high volume list, and what
makes it worse is that the S:N ratio is not really that good. There is,
IMHO, much
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 10:32 -0500, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
I would like an automated backup
to connect to that agent and use the key that's passphrase-protected.
There are (arguably) better ways to do this and security issues with
what you propose.
Hope that makes sense. It's quite
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 10:59 -0500, Neil Watson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 10:43:47AM -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
IMHO, the right way to do this is to use the forced command option in
the authorized_keys file. See the manpage for sshd under the
AUTHORIZED_KEYS FILE FORMAT section
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 12:14 +, Stephen Williams wrote:
Of course, the way to get 'optimal' TV-out from your Nvidia (or other)
card is not to use it's TV-out facilities at all and build a VGA -
SCART converter for SDTVs (see http://www.sput.nl/hardware/tv-x.html
for example).
But my TV
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 09:35 -0500, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
I've done something similar (although I'm
using an analog S-vid chip for NTSC).
Don't hold out on us Corey, do tell more. :-) I'm assuming you built
something that converts interlaced vga to s-video using some kind of
s-video encoding
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 10:15 -0500, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
I've mentioned what I did in the past, starting with
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/users/45910#45910
Basically built up the circuit in the AD724 datasheet.
Seems strange that there is no commercial off the shelf
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 11:36 -0500, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
That's what I thought. I'm happy with the results, but the
annoyance of getting everything right is definately beyond the scope of
what most people are willing to deal with.
Perhaps. Certainly not for the out of the box crowd,
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 12:07 -0500, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
If by properly overscanned you mean not seeing all 720x480, then
yes, it is.
Sweet. I am totally jealous dude.
It's actually pretty easy to change the horizontal
overscanning by just padding the sides with black, but keeping
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 10:55 -0700, Shawn Willden wrote:
I have kids and a brand-new 50 DLP HDTV, which has a bulb that will
eventually burn out. In case the conflict there isn't obvious, the kids
have a tendency to leave the TV on, wasting electricity and reducing the
bulf lifespan.
Hrm.
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 12:01 -0700, Shawn Willden wrote:
I responded privately to this in some detail. Publicly I'll just say
that while this suggestion is good in theory, and certainly something we
attempt to do, anyone who has raised a few children understands that
teaching them
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 14:12 -0500, Mark L. Cukier wrote:
Isn't this topic better suited to the child-rearing list? :-) I find 300
on-topic messages per day is enough for me
Yeah, me too. But this list seems to set the Reply-to: to the list
making it a PITA to have to cut and paste e-mail
On Sat, 2005-03-05 at 14:35 -0500, Will Dormann wrote:
After tweaking settings for quite a bit,
here's how I achieved what I believe to be the optimal output.
Hrm. Optimal meaning as good as it can get with this card but not
quite ultimate?, or do you believe you have a TV-Out signal that
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 23:20 +0100, Jeroen Brosens wrote:
You probably don't know how bob works too well. Using bobdeint is the
*only* way to achieve the original field rate of the broadcast, as played
on a TV. Just outputting frames that are captured by the MPEG2 encoder
(which are a
On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 08:39 -0800, Geoff Scott wrote:
Is there we start the drive to put a firefox-like add in the NYT?
I hate the flag, and I hate the greed it's come to represent.
The problem with this issue and all like it (CSS for example just as the
article mentions) is that most
On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 11:47 -0500, Maverick wrote:
Will MythTV obey the broadcast flag if it where to become law? Being
an open source project, seems like everyone would just remove that
section of code using illegal patches.
You are missing the point of the problem. Software like Myth will
On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 12:24 -0500, Maverick wrote:
OK, so the software decoding driver on the pcHDTV would have to be
patched?
cracked you mean? to strip the flag? i guess that would fall under the
category of the legislation that says that a manufacturer of a device
needs to make it not
On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 09:44 -0800, Geoff Scott wrote:
Can't we just use scare tactics?
What would you scare the average consumer with? If you have an idea,
you might have the magic bullet.
b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 08:00 -0800, Dan wolf wrote:
Overscan is a bitch. Fucking worst idea _ever_ in the TV area. I
dont give a shit if the sides of the picture look wierd, show me the
whole god damn pciture or let me adjust it! Arg!
Geez dude. Don't beat around the bush. Tell us how you
On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 16:42 -0500, Donavan Stanley wrote:
Have you built a seektable for them?
I searched and read. The only reference I could find to building a seek
table for a video is to run commflag on them. Is that what you are
referring to?
b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 09:54 -0500, Thom Paine wrote:
Actually, the TV part is still off the screen.
Of course, you realize that the normal broadcast television picture is
larger than you see on your television, right? This is called
overscan and is normal.
Try comparing what you are seeing
On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 15:19 -0600, Josh Burks wrote:
MythVideo.
Copy your files into the directory specifed in MythVideo setup, use
the Video Manager to add them to your library.
Indeed. I would like to use the Internal Player for these however my
experience is that it does not play them
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 07:59 -0500, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
TVout solutions are a wildcard with any card. Most suck and are
unknown as far as how they operate internally.
That is true, for most, but not for the g400 -- with DirectFB. I
understand what you are saying about the unknown
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 08:28 -0500, Donavan Stanley wrote:
So rather than follow established terminology
Established where? Here? I guess I have not been hanging out here long
enough to know that while the world of set-top-boxes calls the display
that it shows on the TV the OSD, myth folks
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 09:52 -0500, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
Some of them can suck less, and may in fact be quite good. What I
am saying is that unless you run a genlocked, synchronous 29.97 resolution
with a 1:1 pixel-mapped input/output characteristic
So, before we get into another
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 10:21 -0700, Greg Miller wrote:
This is the most interesting thread I've followed for a long time. For what
it's worth I am running Mythtv with DVB in Canada
How are you capturing the DVB signal in Canada? Expressvu is
(apparently) encrypted with a nagrivision variant
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 12:40 -0500, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
That's not necessary... I believe you. I do not agree that
cannot visually see a difference equivalent to perfect, however.
Maybe this is so, but what do I really care beyond it looks perfect?
Which I can get with the G400 and
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
