It has been my experience that data center engineers doing NOC support at
Verizon
do speak to paying customers about routing issues for premium data center
services.
-Henry
- Original Message
From: K. Scott Bethke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: nanog@merit.edu
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008
I found this product of particular interest...
http://www.scomobile.com/hipcheck/
-Henry
- Original Message
From: Bowman, Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: nanog@merit.edu
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 10:24:55 AM
Subject: RE: Network Notifcation - SMS via Verizon
I've used 10 digit
I was able to reach the japanse link which provided me with
http://www.ipv6.org/howtos.html and
http://www.wide.ad.jp/
-Henry
- Original Message
From: Steven Haigh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jeroen Massar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Vassili Tchersky [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Alain Durand [EMAIL
I think you are just a rude person and I have been on this list since about
1995 and there is a real
problem with the lastest cpanel upgrade with mysql and it took out 1 of my
server configurations, that we host
peoples businesses on and I wanted to see how many other isp's were affected
and
Every where I go that uses MySql is hozed and I can not access the pages
-Henry
I think this operationally impact some people
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasicarticleId=9001972
-Henry
I still comment here periodically when it is prudent to do so, I set this email
account specifically for Nanog,
anticipating spam
-Henry
sage
From: Dominic J. Eidson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: nanog@merit.edu
Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2006 8:14:58 AM
Subject: Re: NANOG Spam?
On Thu, 6 Jul
There is a new player on the block that I see more and more
http://www.infoblox.com/company/
-Henry
- Original Message
From: Paul Vixie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: nanog@merit.edu
Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2006 11:16:39 AM
Subject: Re: DNS Based Load Balancers
As someone who has also
Personally as a manager I want to know the problem and
then the workable solution. I just don't see that many
bot nets happening anymore.
From my vantage point I do see students writing bot
nets more for programming skills than for malicious
attacks.
With several hundred million people and
This is nothing but a back door tax to stick your
customers, who will have to pay for them being spied
on in the first place, NDA not withstanding
-Henry
--- Fergie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just wanted to bring your attention to an FCC
decsion today
that will most likely touch your
Maintenance windows are common on most network service
providers, have been for years...
-Henry
--- Joel Jaeggli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, Peter Dambier wrote:
If I understand you correctly then it does not
make sense reporting
errors here as long as I dont
https://www.google.com/adsense/ is up and working on
my Silicon Valley end of the network
-Henry
--- John Palmer (NANOG Acct) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK - more: Don't have an answer as to why, but the
website comes up with:
The Google AdSense website is temporarily
unavailable. Please
The only reference I see to this, is this non profit
research org
www.pch.net/inoc-dba/
and a Nanog reference page to the same thing
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0505/upadhaya.html
-Henry
--- Wayne Gustavus (nanog) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
To chime with my own experiences, the few times I
I suggest this should be common across ripe, apnic and
lacnic, Routing Information Service
http://www.ripe.net/ris/riswhois.html
that should help the current situation with services
already in place
-Henry
--- Owen DeLong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IP prefixes are NOT allocated to AS numbers,
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1881303,00.asp
Apparently now all the bluster about people capable
of fixing problems with the internet without a
congressional mandate worked still.
-Henry
Reading some of this is rather disturbing, like if we
live in some kind of control freak society, where
every
comment is we are trying to control terrorism so we
must eliminate everyones right of expression and
distort every means of communication including the
internet.
I disagree that
that would be very uncharacteristic of MCI to do that,
and they do have a katria team down in that area
working on restoring all services.
Your client would know via his sales rep what the
implementation team is doing and pressures would be
brought to deal with that kind of problem, I think
Andre;
Thanks for your review and language skills in this
area, the article translated was even a mess
on babelfish and left more questions than answers
-Henry
--- J. Oquendo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/
From: Andrei Mikhailovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
Utility Error Blamed for L.A. Blackout
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050912/ap_on_re_us/la_power_outage
-Henry
--- Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been dealing with a data center outage due to
this,
and power just came back up a few minutes ago.
Halon dumps are only fun from the
I am seeing no issues here other than the initial poll
Hop IP Address Host Name
Sent Recv RTT Av RTT Min RTT Max RTT
% Loss
168.120.139.144
adsl-68-120-139-144.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net 1
1 1875 ms 1875 ms 1875 ms 1875 ms
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/26/AR2005082601201.html?sub=AR
That was fairly quick
-Henry
Here is an article that addresses some of these very
issues, naturally there is always a costing factor,
because non of the sought for solutions are easy to
come by.
http://www.networkcomputing.com/showitem.jhtml?docid=1616f3
-Henry
--- Daniel Senie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 12:41 PM
I did notice A low number on the index at
http://www.internettrafficreport.com/namerica.htm
-Henry
--- Joel Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ SNIP ]
I think that these things are operational and
belong here. Its'
the level that ras is talking about and the
content. Saying
MCI has a
This software is free at
http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/fairuce
-henry
--- Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mar 23, 2005, at 12:37 PM, RSK wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 10:24:37AM -0800, Andreas
Ott wrote:
The only event that is driving this, is Cisco wants to
dominate the Chinese market and the only way to sell
in China is to manufacture product there, using their
people to manufacture, that is how the game is played
there and for the chinese it makes sense, considering
the government there has
This proposal would be harmful in tracking hack
attacks, ddos attacks and other forms of annoyance,
spyware tracking and things that are beyond the
capability for any agency to handle because of largese
Technical fiefdoms were one of the worries of the 90's
now we are here and that is becoming
http://news.com.com/VeriSign%27s+antitrust+suit+against+ICANN+dismissed/2100-1030_3-5326136.html?tag=nefd.top
--- Mrs Brigit Willem [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
X-Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] via
66.218.79.74; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 08:28:12 -0700
X-YahooFilteredBulk: 82.35.148.130
X-Originating-IP: [82.35.148.130]
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from 82.35.148.130 (EHLO
How strange, I received that in my email too..
-Henry
--- Niels Bakker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking of computers fubar'ed by spyware, I just
found a particularly
nice example of a phishing attempt. SpamAssassin
had tagged it with the
astronomical score of 136.3 thanks to SARE.
I do miss the old days of this list, technical growth
and global participation in events was exciting...
-her
--- Alex Bligh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On 14 August 2004 22:23 +0300 Hank Nussbacher
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Predating this is Bellwether (June 2000):
Indeed. In
One would have to conclude since it is the behavior of
the present. that it shall not subside anytime soon.
Ir was a wonderful time on the internet when we still
had trust and respect for each other's endeaver, now
we
will have to collaborate to get things done with legal
shields, we can all
Redirecting is nothing new and has been around for
years, it was never a real problem until washington
and the media stuck their face into something they
had no clue about, as usual.
I am certain there are ways to prevent redirection and
those should be applied without a congressional
Well if it will harm the community, would it be
possible to auto copyright rfc's, so that the authors
of a concept can prevent someone from sipping their
effort off?
Ignorance at the top doesn't mean we can't be like
always leading the way..
-Henry
--- Stephen J. Wilcox [EMAIL
--- Stephen J. Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
one issue with that might be that the patents are
taken out on variations of the
core idea, imho the variations are not new ideas but
legally they seem to get
away with it
Steve
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Henry Linneweh wrote:
Well
While I disagree with the method of the attacker, I
can understand the reasoning behind an attack on a
company that is considered a spyware company,
doubleclick certainly has turned up more than once on
my version of spybot as a site to block.
-Henry
--- Sean Donelan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Before a big panic starts, they can restore it back to
the way it was if there is an event of such proportion
to totally hoze the entire network or any major
portion of it, until they fix any major issue with
these changes
-Henry
--- Sam Stickland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, a naive
A new twise on phishing...
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1624905,00.asp
-Henry
China's New Generation Of Ipv9 Network Technology
Ready
July 2, 2004
http://www.chinatechnews.com/index.php?action=showtype=newsid=1405
Interesting development
-Henry
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 11:15:06PM -0700, John Obi
wrote:
Hello,
Have you heard
Get in contact with manufacturing vender for a fix,
and then tell us what they did or what they intend
to do to remedy the problem.
-Henry
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last night we configured our equipment to reject
recursive DNS lookups
from non-customers. This morning, soon after
One more feather in our cap :)
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2001968539_spam30.html
This is a very serious list, because it addresses the
basic idea of being able to do business for everyone
without being heald hostage by patents who work
against
the best interests of keeping the interent open
http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,64038,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_2
Maybe Phil Zimmerman should come forth with new toys
for big boys that will be more valient an effort than
pgp with less a threat to his personal liberty. We
definately need some relief from constantly being
criminalized enmasse for actions from citizens of
other
nations and from control freaks
Since all NSP's, ISP's, ALEC's, BLEC's and CLEC's
adhere to this accepted behavior and there are more
than 100 I blieve the court would be on the side of
the plaintiff under the 3rd amendment of the
constitution.
It is my understanding that doing otherwise will cause
an administrative nightmare
http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,9975753%255E1702,00.html
-Henry
--- Scott Call [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Happy Sunday nanogers...
I was doing some follow up reading on the
js.scob.trojan, the latest
hole big enough to drive a truck through exploit
for Internet Explorer.
I think that is a bit irresponsible for the simple
reason that MCI has many co-lo clients and any of
their machines could be vulnerable, I think also that
needs to addressed so that blanket statements are
supported by fact and not the need to competitively
break a company down in hopes the you
I noticed that recently on Geektools also and that
needs to updated and or fixed
-Henry
--- Janet Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas Kernen wrote:
Since I've been hitting a lot of looking glass
sites on traceroute.org
lately that no longer worked, I decided to make my
own list in
That sentence is A joke 15000 subscribers affected
Court Convicts Obscene Text Messager
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=IPQ4NZVA4P24ACRBAELCFEY?type=technologyNewsstoryID=5504916
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And again, much of this comes down to enforcement.
When was
Consider the source of policy makers that make these
decisions, are clueless to networks and infrastructure
themselves. They fail to understand any costing
metrics
by adding another loop of useless people to he cycle
at
the expense of everyone, which will in the long run
be damaging to the
And just when things looked dismal this had to happen
to make it more so
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A1898-2004Jun24.html?referrer=email
-Henry
if the pro-ported bad guys are so swift why would they
use anything packaged anyway?
They have engineers and scientific minds in their
ranks that understand devices, boards and the likes
and could simply create their own data centers and
simply use new protocols to communicate over the
public
It is amazing that one psrson Paul Vixie could be so
intimidating that he must be intimidated and maligned
as a conspirator in order to eliminate him as a
potential threat because of his knowledge.
I find that pretty ironic that a billion dollar
corporation is that weak.
-Henry
--- Patrick
sbc/yahoo and them wee doing upgrades on their email
last night could be moving things around to accomodate
-Henry
--- Drew Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Similar issues with Yahoo on and off since about
8:30am (EST).
-Drew
-Original Message-
From: Leo Bicknell
This is what I was talking about...
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=ROKTUY2SVUOBMCRBAELCFFA?type=internetNewsstoryID=5421215
Wow he has changed and toned down a lot from those
days
-Henry
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
8 to 10 years ago the discussions were dominated
by Karl D(1),
where *everything* was defined as to whether is
was actionable or not.
Googling for Karl Denninger and actionable only
gets 30
Here are a list of very active ports that attempt to
hack into peoples systesm from various parts of the
world China in particular.
I think unassigned ports should be dropped from
routing
tables unless they are registered with the host and or
providers as to their legitimate use
I can agree with that and Randy pointed out when these
idea's were created and writen, security was not part
of the overall plan because there were trusted parties
on either end of the spectrum.
I think that my intent was noble and I am glad I
started a controversy, because this is an issue
Scalable bandwidth is not new and is charged for, what
is the issue about that?
If the network is compromised and it is on the client
end, that is what business insurance is for, so that
everyone gets their's (payments, otherwise other types
of arrangements need to be made, according to the
E-crime = E-crap another media driven dribbled label.
There are many students, even housewives who in their
spare time write botnets and other software mechanisms
simply for the purpose of learning how to program, in
C and C++ or even learn how to script in Perl, Python
and tcl. To make a
Well between completewhois and netlantis my day is
made
-henry
--- Pascal Gloor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello ppl,
as you probably have noticed, netlantis is down
since a while. Netlantis had
critical performance problems and we decided to
re-write some of the core
scripts to
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=storycid=1093e=2u=/pcworld/20040527/tc_pcworld/116307
I'm curious here, don't photons cause a lot of
reflective jitter because of their large size ??
-henry
--- Mikael Abrahamsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 25 May 2004, Peter Lothberg wrote:
You can run the same distance as you do with your
10G system.
It;s mostly driven by
Yeah I was connected to AIM and my connection dropped
like a rock and popup came up telling me I lost my
connection
-Henry
--- Owens, Loren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
South East (Central Florida specifically) is seeing
major problems as
well. Cfl.rr.com has stopped routing through ATDN
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1594815,00.asp
You do not have to steal the code, you can buy a cisco
router from an equipment reseller and have all the
access you want.
-Henry
--- Alexei Roudnev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, it's all interesting. EFnet IRC again...
Does anyone have a full logs of EFnet IRC
conversations? We
It is amazingly simply to pull an ethernet cable out
of the back of your box to update a box from a CD
especially in a suspect environment where you have
had many problems.
I have had the displeasure of having had to go from
box to box and clean each individually and while many
problems were
I miss this essential toolset now that I do not have
it
-Henry
W32.Sasser.Worm
http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.sasser.worm.html
Microsoft Windows LSASS Buffer Overrun Vulnerability
http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/security/Content/10108.html
Latest virus threats
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Backdoor.Sdbot.Z
W32.Gaobot.AFW
W32.Gaobot.AFJ
Hopefully this case will have a positive outcome to
send and very clear message to providers and spammers
http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/stories/I/INTERNET_SPAM?SITE=FLTAMSECTION=HOMETEMPLATE=DEFAULT
http://www.internetnews.com/infra/article.php/3343561
For people still in a panic
-Henry
There are network equipment manufactures who offer
last mile protection at the chip level which forces
authentication or the packets get dropped, this has
been around for about 4 years now and people should
seriously look at that as a solution, fast changeable
FPGA designs can accommodate such
Cisco warns of new hacking toolkit
http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/03/29/HNhackingtoolkit_1.html
exploit location
http://www.blackangels.it/
-Henry
Now I am curious
-Henry
AOL Blocks Spammers' Web Sites
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A9449-2004Mar19.html
I think this is noteworthy and may help...
-Henry
This entire fiasco needs to migrate off line, please
-HenryWilliam Warren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
could this be taken offlist please?Dave Howe wrote: Joshua Brady wrote: The "Child" you speak of caused destruction over a network, the sameapplied for the 2 hackers here who were sent over
I believe under USC18 there is a section that clearly states hacking a government computer can get you a maximum of 30 years in federal prison and a $250,000.00 fine
Please correct me if that postscription of law has been vacated.
-Henry
Dan Hollis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 17 Mar
That reads more like a person who is customer centric with an acceptable idea...
-HenrySean Donelan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, James Edwards wrote: I see a lot of unicast UPnP traffic on my networks. UPnP seems like a train wreck waiting to happen, to me.Yep. Giving insecure
I want to thank everyone on this for the excellant response :)
-Henry"Sturgeon, Jon" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
william(at)elan.net wrote: Don't forget to add 69.6.64.0/20 to your access list - they recently got this addition and quickly moved quite some number of spam servers there.Much thanks,
I have received almost 200 different spam messages from domains hosted by this
provider from russain domains attempting to sell pharmacueticals and other unsolicited
services that I do not want tekmailer.com and moosq.com are 2 of the primary
abusers from this hosting company
-Henry
Message
Here is some insight on this issue
What is Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF)? Can a default route 0.0.0.0/0 be used to perform a uRPF check?
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/44.html#Q18
-Henry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1
Everyday there is a new, news article on this and every day everyonepanics and eeryday some one says tell the government to make a law, it is timeto realize that no law is going to do anything for anyone soon. In the past wejust took care of the problem
Consumers are not interested in certificates, they want solutions that are
packaged. Front end services when people sign up for accounts should include
allthe tools necessary for survive on any network you provider access to.
-Henry"Patrick W.Gilmore" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 1, 2004, at
You wanna know about USB read this and that doesn't take an MSCEhttp://www.usb.org/faq
Andy Dills [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Christopher Aldridge wrote: know", should really investigate this certification. Some of the things you asked were extremely basic. What "things" were
good while doing that add [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the list of spammers that bug
people
-Henry
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Daniel Reed wrote: On 2004-02-15T17:33-0500, Sean Donelan wrote: ) The unfortunate fact is lots of people like to operate open, anonymous ) services and then expect other people to
I am interested in problems in this area and what nanog members are part of this
emerging market and are generating a profit.
-Henry
Merry Christmas All and Happy New Year
-Henry"Braun, Mike" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To all on Nanog,
Have a happy holiday season and a great new year :-)
Mike Braun
"MMS firstam.com" made the followingannotations on 12/24/2003 11:22:29
there are many irc networks you might say which one these are on.
on Efnet there is a channel #dmsetup that will handle infected users
andclean them if you point them in that direction...
-HenryMike Damm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some folks might want to jump on the IRC server in question and
Any good software out there for cable documenting and even routing and for
ECO when things are changed?
-Henry
Alex Yuriev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do you do good cabling in dynamic, real environments? :-)It is not that difficult *if* the money is spent in a short term to makesure that no
Trying to remember back that far is quite a task circa 1977 arpanet, the greatest authority of the time was Jon Postal since he had the uncanny ability to remember all of the things that made it work, so when he spoke it was like Moses coming down from the
mountain presenting the 10 commandments
Looks sane to me once I resolved the name
Dns resolved neulevel.biz to 209.173.53.163
[IPv4 whois information on 209.173.53.163 ][Query Origin: Main Whois Query ][whois.arin.net]
OrgName: NeuStar, Inc. OrgID: NEUSAddress: 45980 Center Oak PlazaAddress: Network Operations CenterCity:
This group didn't need anyones permission to form and share idea's and methods
that benefits the entire industry, and it was in the time of great need when these
things came to pass
I see the word's law and legislation and I see people without a clue making law
that only benefits those that
It takes a good combination of both ISP and end user to fight spam, I have a tool
in this editor for reading msg that allows me to tag a spammer and block the '
[EMAIL PROTECTED] that gets by the isp scan tool.
Common sense, in these times shows you to not open emails from strangers
especially
The latest Zone Alarm Pro also invites subscribed users to participate in creating a
more robust solution
-HenryNiels Bakker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Cox) [Mon 24 Nov 2003, 20:30 CET]: The latest version of Zone Alarm Pro does stop all applications from
While there are some smitherings about 10GigE, there are technical reasons and
market reasons it is not really ready for prime yet, that is not to say it's not going
to happen, it is just not going happen now.
-HenryMikael Abrahamsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Deepak Jain
10GigE fiber will be the better choice in the long run
-HenryDeepak Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=42956site=lightreading http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/10GBCX4/ Regarding the first URL, I am curious how many networks will be interested in
The backbone at the time of my original work that I participated in was 40Gits/in and 40Gbits/out unless that has changed 10GigE is not practical or cost effective if it is limited to local area's and provate connections. That doesn't mean from A design
perspective thatA cost effective solution
Anyway before this becomes a bunch of different language, here is a page
to keep you posted on 10GigE development and some of the players
http://www.10gea.org/Deepak Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the risk of over simplifying this.
1) Deploying anything 4x faster than what you need is not
Not having seen the entire cut, I would have to imagin the entirebundle was
cut and the poor splicers had their hands full.
-Henry"Vincent J. Bono" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The quesiton isn't so much how someone cut a fiber strand, but why the failure of a single fiber strand had such an impact
ad network design. As a rule, phone companies and capacitysuppliers build very robust systems. Douglas S. PeeplesTechnology Assurance Labs-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf OfBrian BrunsSent: Monday, November 03, 2003 7:39 AMTo: Henry Linneweh; Vince
After having read many of these posts I realized there are chips out there now,
oboard that do last mile protection at the gate level which eliminates any of
this and the products can come preconfigured for this or not depends on what
you want to pay for.
-Henry[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This
I agree that changing one's computer is not the ISP or even the Corp IT departments
job, and could compromise valuable work and or personal information for the individual
user, depending on their setup, security software etc and other applications.
I also would preceive that as a real threat to
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
