Re: 1/8 and 2/8 (was Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN)

2004-01-19 Thread Petri Helenius
John Palmer wrote: What about 1/8 and 2/8? Are those being reserved for something special 1/8 will be given to the person who most accurately guesses the incoming bitrate when you announce 1/8. :-) Pete

1/8 and 2/8 (was Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN)

2004-01-19 Thread John Palmer
What about 1/8 and 2/8? Are those being reserved for something special - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Owen DeLong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 16:55 Subject: Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARI

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-19 Thread william
I don't know for certain and I'm guessing based on existing pattern (although for 70/8 ARIN did mention at one point it will be allocated to them I think). The pattern is that IANA tries to allocate blocks consequently to RIRs (don't know why, its not like like RIRs would be announcing blocks as

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-19 Thread Owen DeLong
Not to rain on your parade, but, how do you know 71 will go to ARIN and not to RIPE, APNIC, or LACNIC or AfriNIC? Owen --On Monday, January 19, 2004 9:27 -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It has been known for quite some time that next block to be allocated to ARIN is 70/8 (and next one will be 71

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-19 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 10:22:08AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Also as you know I have been running statistics at > http://www.completewhois.com/statistics/ > (note: dont believe about "green" for 70/8, I still have not fixed collection > to ignore occasional single wrong announcements f

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-19 Thread william
Also as you know I have been running statistics at http://www.completewhois.com/statistics/ (note: dont believe about "green" for 70/8, I still have not fixed collection to ignore occasional single wrong announcements from routeviews) Its interesting that 69/8 block is currently only 39% alloca

RE: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-19 Thread McBurnett, Jim
->Perhaps ARIN (or others) could supply their respective portions of ->unallocated space to a common BOGON project? -> ->pt -> Great idea.. HMM.. Rob, how about it? Say take in BGP feed from ARIN, APNIC etc. And then use that for redis? Or go even farther IANA-- Could you give a feed and

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-19 Thread Pete Templin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ARIN could however do more to help, such as providing special temporary test blocks on request Perhaps ARIN (or others) could supply their respective portions of unallocated space to a common BOGON project? pt

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-19 Thread william
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Alternatively, the RIRs might consider doing this sort of thing before > >allocating IPs from new blocks. I know it's not their job to make sure > >IPs are routable (especially not on every remote network), but as holders > >of all the IPs, they ar

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-19 Thread william
It has been known for quite some time that next block to be allocated to ARIN is 70/8 (and next one will be 71/8). It might have been nice if ARIN were to run projections and inform community that by its projections it will be requesting new /8 ip block in say 2 month time. On Mon, 19 Jan 20

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-19 Thread Rob Thomas
Hi, NANOGers. ] Cooperation with the bogon project seems logical too. We at Team Cymru are happy to help in any way we can! Thanks, Rob. -- Rob Thomas http://www.cymru.com ASSERT(coffee != empty);

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-19 Thread Daniel Karrenberg
On 16.01 13:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > ... > Alternatively, the RIRs might consider doing this sort of thing before > allocating IPs from new blocks. I know it's not their job to make sure > IPs are routable (especially not on every remote network), but as holders > of all the IPs, they are

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-19 Thread Michael . Dillon
>Alternatively, the RIRs might consider doing this sort of thing before >allocating IPs from new blocks. I know it's not their job to make sure >IPs are routable (especially not on every remote network), but as holders >of all the IPs, they are in the best position to setup such test sites >that

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-18 Thread jlewis
On Sun, 18 Jan 2004, Petri Helenius wrote: > >It's those dang Nachi-sized ICMP echo/echo-replies. We block those at all > >our transit points and dial-up ports. Nachi was killing our cisco ^^^ > >access-servers until we did thi

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-18 Thread Petri Helenius
Pete Templin wrote: He has a reason: that virus was melting down his network (and was melting down lots of networks). I point to the word "backbone". If your dial servers melt, block the packets at dial servers, don´t launch weapon of mass packet destruction to all traffic. Filtering should be

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-18 Thread Pete Templin
Petri Helenius wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's those dang Nachi-sized ICMP echo/echo-replies. We block those at all our transit points and dial-up ports. Nachi was killing our cisco access-servers until we did this to stop the spread. I know what they are and how to get around them. I

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-18 Thread Petri Helenius
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's those dang Nachi-sized ICMP echo/echo-replies. We block those at all our transit points and dial-up ports. Nachi was killing our cisco access-servers until we did this to stop the spread. Unfortunately, this breaks Windows tracert as it uses 92-byte echo request

Nachi (was Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN)

2004-01-16 Thread Michael Lewinski
On Jan 16, 2004, at 3:31 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's those dang Nachi-sized ICMP echo/echo-replies. We block those at all our transit points and dial-up ports. Nachi was killing our cisco access-servers until we did this to stop the spread. FYI, Nachi is basically dead now from what I

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-16 Thread william
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Petri Helenius wrote: > > > >I wouldn't be surprised if more people are filtering 69/8 now than before, > > >roughly 40% of the spam hitting my servers is from there. > > That's likely going to be true of each newly allocate

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-16 Thread jlewis
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Of course, if they tried to run the test *before* assigning the > block, it should fail, because it should still be in everyone's > bogon filters. ^_^ So before assigning a block, mark it as "Pending assignment" or "Assigned to IANA". > their b

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-16 Thread jlewis
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Petri Helenius wrote: > >I wouldn't be surprised if more people are filtering 69/8 now than before, > >roughly 40% of the spam hitting my servers is from there. That's likely going to be true of each newly allocated block as spammers move around, move into them, or even sca

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-16 Thread Petri Helenius
Matthew S. Hallacy wrote: On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:56:24AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All you early adopters of 69/8 now have somebody to share your pain with I wouldn't be surprised if more people are filtering 69/8 now than before, roughly 40% of the spam hitting my servers i

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-16 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:29:16 PST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > and the block can be used as part of the normal allocation > and assigned as appropriate (would kinda suck to be given > the last assignment from the block, only to be told that > "sorry, your last /24 is actually routed by the RIR, so >

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-16 Thread Matthew S. Hallacy
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:56:24AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > All you early adopters of 69/8 now have somebody to share your pain with I wouldn't be surprised if more people are filtering 69/8 now than before, roughly 40% of the spam hitting my servers is from there. -- Matthew S. H

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-16 Thread matt
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:34:18 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > > > > There are still numerous networks blocking 69/8. Probably more blocking > > > 70/8 as most of the people who were behind the times with their filters > > > blocking 69/8 fixe

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-16 Thread jlewis
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:34:18 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > > There are still numerous networks blocking 69/8. Probably more blocking > > 70/8 as most of the people who were behind the times with their filters > > blocking 69/8 fixed that /8 b

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-16 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:34:18 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > There are still numerous networks blocking 69/8. Probably more blocking > 70/8 as most of the people who were behind the times with their filters > blocking 69/8 fixed that /8 but still don't keep their filters up to date. > > http:/

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-16 Thread jlewis
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:31:37 PST, Steve Conte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > This is to inform you that the IANA has allocated 70/8 to ARIN. > > All you early adopters of 69/8 now have somebody to share your pain with There are still numerou

Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-16 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:31:37 PST, Steve Conte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > This is to inform you that the IANA has allocated 70/8 to ARIN. All you early adopters of 69/8 now have somebody to share your pain with pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN

2004-01-15 Thread Steve Conte
Greetings, This is to inform you that the IANA has allocated 70/8 to ARIN. For a full list of IANA IPv4 allocations please see: . Thanks, Steve --- Steve Conte - IANA [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP KeyID: 0x0972C473