Sorry about that - I approved it to the list without looking at it in depth
(hit Approve to quickly).
Mea Culpa
Mike
On behalf of the NANOG CC
--
Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP
Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksm...@adhost.com
w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050
PGP:
Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksm...@adhost.com
w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050
PGP: B49A DDF5 8611 27F3 08B9 84BB E61E 38C0 (Key ID: 0x9A96777D)
On 2/7/11 7:24 PM, "Michael K. Smith - Adhost" wrote:
>Hello Everyone:
>
>We now have a fully functioning IPv6 web
08B9 84BB E61E 38C0 (Key ID: 0x9A96777D)
On 2/7/11 7:50 PM, "Sean Figgins" wrote:
>Does not seem that the DNS query returns any IPv6 information. And the
>normal page is just blank at the moment...
>
> -Sean
>
>On 2/7/11 8:24 PM, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
>
Hello Everyone:
We now have a fully functioning IPv6 website for http://www.newnog.org.
If you find any site functionality that is broken please let me know!
Many thanks to Owen for pointing out that the site was not reachable via
IPv6, particularly given the recent global allocation event, Rob S
Also not for the board, but it's also likely to be a DBA because of the 501(c)3
election process, which was initiated under the NewNOG name.
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP
Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksm...@adhost.com
w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 40
Hello Brian:
If you go to the Donors page (http://www.newnog.org/donors.php) there is a
PayPal link there.
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP
Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksm...@adhost.com
w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050
PGP: B49A DDF5 8611 27F3 0
Hi Joe:
Good idea. I'll see if the auto-responder can be tweaked for the moderator-bit
to say something a little more user friendly.
Mike
--
Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP
Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksm...@adhost.com
w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050
PGP: B49A
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Abley [mailto:jab...@hopcount.ca]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 1:15 PM
> To: Sean Figgins
> Cc: nanog-futures@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: [Nanog-futures] New Membership-WG Draft
>
>
> On 2010-10-27, at 15:43, Sean Figgins wrote:
>
> > If someone leave
On Oct 4, 2010, at 6:45 PM, "Randy Bush" wrote:
>>> and what about lifers, the other long-term unwindable commitment?
>> Specifically what is your objection to offering life membership?
>
> i thought i was pretty clear, if terse.
>
> we do not have consensus over membership categories. life m
Hello All:
If you are attending NANOG 50 in Atlanta and have free time there is an exhibit
of Salvador Dali's late period works at the High Museum that is incredible. And
if you are here now there will be a discussion with his former students and
models as well as the exhibit curator at 2 EDT.
> In any case, instead, both sides have left the community with a
> transition where
>
> 1) the broader community was not brought along for the ride with
> identified problems and proposed solutions, it was a 'done deal'
> (this would have taken time)
>
> 2) the plan for this new NA
> -Original Message-
> From: William Norton [mailto:bill.nor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 10:57 AM
> To: nanog-futures Futures
> Subject: [Nanog-futures] NANOG Transition - How we got here
>
> Hi all -
>
> I spoke up at the community meeting and during the NANOG Transitio
Hello Everyone:
The NewNOG website is up at http://www.newnog.org. It is definitely in
its nascent stage but more data is being added every day. Please take a
look at the site and look at the documentation that has been posted
already. This includes the Board of Directors information, the
Certi
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Abley [mailto:jab...@hopcount.ca]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 4:57 AM
> To: Sean Figgins
> Cc: Nanog Futures
> Subject: Re: [Nanog-futures] Transition update
>
>
> On 2010-06-09, at 07:08, Sean Figgins wrote:
>
> > I would think that there may also m
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean Figgins [mailto:s...@labrats.us]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 4:09 AM
> To: Nanog Futures
> Subject: Re: [Nanog-futures] Transition update
>
> Randy Bush wrote:
> >
> > but, with no data from our fearless [0] leadership, what else are we
> to
> > do, t
>
>
> but where the heck are pro forma financial projections for the new
> nanog? we were to get them with lead time to actualy study and ask
> questions before now.
>
> randy
The hope is to get the pro forma out before the end of the week. We
just received additional data from Merit that h
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Abley [mailto:jab...@hopcount.ca]
> Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 10:41 AM
> To: Michael K. Smith - Adhost
> Cc: Pete Templin; joel jaeggli; nanog-futures@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: [Nanog-futures] Transition update
>
>
> On 2010
> -Original Message-
> From: Pete Templin [mailto:peteli...@templin.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 4:31 PM
> To: joel jaeggli
> Cc: nanog-futures@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: [Nanog-futures] Transition update
>
> joel jaeggli wrote:
> > Um insofar as I'm aware Andy Rosenzweig is still t
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Joe Provo
wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:51:45AM -0700, Steve Feldman wrote:
[snip]
> Is this really enough of a problem to devote the MLC and Merit's
> energy toward solving it?
>
> I do agree that if this really is worth the effort, filtering on the
> subje
Hello All:
Would it make sense to have a nanog-test list so that people can test for
connectivity issues to the list instead of posting "is this thing on?" to
na...@. Seems to work pretty well for FreeBSD.
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GISP
Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Inter
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Hannigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 11:36 AM
> To: Joel Jaeggli
> Cc: nanog-futures
> Subject: Re: [Nanog-futures] The Peering BOF and the Fallout?
>
> > >> It's distracting when the speaker
> > >> gets verbal time
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Hannigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 10:51 AM
> To: Alex Pilosov
> Cc: nanog-futures@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: [Nanog-futures] Cisco outage
>
> On Nov 28, 2007 1:33 PM, Alex Pilosov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On We
Hello All:
My comments are in line below.
Regards,
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-nanog-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Abley
> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 1:14 PM
> To: nanog-futures Futures
> Subject: proposed NANOG charter amendments
>
23 matches
Mail list logo
