Bugs item #1521489, was opened at 2006-07-12 23:57
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by drieseng
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=402868aid=1521489group_id=31650
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
Bugs item #1503678, was opened at 2006-06-09 21:39
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by drieseng
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=402868aid=1503678group_id=31650
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
Hello,
agreed - 1.0 soon is a good thing. I see only one big thing which we should
addess in 1.0: VS2005 projects. Or MSBuild cooperation. The same thing.
Since many developers are migrating (or already using) framework 2.0 in
VS2005 and we (currently) do not provide direct tools for projects it
This is another thing worth of implementation under 1.0.
I'd like something like Miranda-IM has. See http://www.miranda-im.org/ and
their Addons site.
Martin Aliger
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Martin Aliger
Sent: Tuesday,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Martin Aliger
Sent: vrijdag 14 juli 2006 12:59
To: 'Gary Feldman'; nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Release 0.85 and beyond
Hello,
agreed - 1.0 soon is a good
Since many developers are migrating (or already using) framework 2.0
in
VS2005 and we (currently) do not provide direct tools for projects it
uses,
they could either: use plain msbuild (deserters!) or use core
As I see it, we could:
1/ state, that new project files used on VS2005 are
+1 for setting a date (e.g. 1 month from now) for 1.0 final.
I agree with Martin somewhat in that making msbuild support easier is
a big deal, however I think running msbuild.exe is a perfectly decent
way of doing so for 95% of people - we just need to tidy that up a
bit. At the moment I just
should addess in 1.0: VS2005 projects. Or MSBuild cooperation. The
Are people really waiting for this ?
I think so. How many of 1.0 users use solution task? Same percentage of
2.0 users would want to use simmilar feature under 2.0. Or they have to use
something else...
Shouldn't we focus
Mike, Brad,
FWIW, we just use the exec / task to run MSBuild, using the
2.0 Framework. Works just fine.
Yes - but you give up many features solution do for you. Inter-project
dependency solving is what I desperatelly need. We have ~300 .csprojs (under
1 ccnet project) with new ones
No, XBuild inst another buildsystem. It is only the solution to compile
Visual Studio 2005 projects (csproj,sln) on mono.
To quote Miguel de Icaza (Project manager Mono):
XBuild: the open source msbuild implementation for assisting you in
rebuilding your new projects on Mono.
And here is
Gert Driesen wrote:
rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Martin Aliger
Hello,
agreed - 1.0 soon is a good thing. I see only one big thing
which we should
addess in 1.0: VS2005 projects. Or MSBuild cooperation. The
same thing.
Since many developers are
Martin Aliger wrote:
This is another thing worth of implementation under 1.0.
I'd like something like Miranda-IM has. See http://www.miranda-im.org/ and
their Addons site.
That's a nice idea, but I can't imagine how to justify putting it into
1.0.
Besides, I've never been very fond of
Like this email list.
Gary Feldman wrote:
Martin Aliger wrote:
This is another thing worth of implementation under 1.0.
I'd like something like Miranda-IM has. See http://www.miranda-im.org/ and
their Addons site.
That's a nice idea, but I can't imagine how to justify putting it
13 matches
Mail list logo
