Like this email list.
Gary Feldman wrote:
>Martin Aliger wrote:
>
>
>>This is another thing worth of "implementation" under 1.0.
>>
>>I'd like something like Miranda-IM has. See http://www.miranda-im.org/ and
>>their "Addons" site.
>>
>>
>>
>That's a nice idea, but I can't imagine how to
Martin Aliger wrote:
> This is another thing worth of "implementation" under 1.0.
>
> I'd like something like Miranda-IM has. See http://www.miranda-im.org/ and
> their "Addons" site.
>
That's a nice idea, but I can't imagine how to justify putting it into
1.0.
Besides, I've never been very f
Gert Driesen wrote:
>
>> rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>> Behalf Of Martin Aliger
>> Hello,
>>
>> agreed - 1.0 soon is a good thing. I see only one big thing
>> which we should
>> addess in 1.0: VS2005 projects. Or MSBuild cooperation. The
>> same thing.
>>
>> Since m
No, XBuild inst another buildsystem. It is only the solution to compile
Visual Studio 2005 projects (csproj,sln) on mono.
To quote Miguel de Icaza (Project manager Mono):
XBuild: the open source msbuild implementation for assisting you in
rebuilding your new projects on Mono.
And here is t
[resent to list]
I don't know anything about xBuild, but NAnt/MSBuild/(xBuild?) etc are
mostly the same (competetive) products, varying in features, syntax,
matureness. I'm not sure whether mono team plan to mimics msbuild syntax or
not. Maybe they just developing another NAnt? Looks like time to
Bugs item #1503678, was opened at 2006-06-09 12:39
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jimhead42
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402868&aid=1503678&group_id=31650
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
Hi,
i think, using msbuild isnt the problem on Windows machines, but what is
with Mono? MsBuild isnt present on Unix or MacOS.
But there is a 4 solution. The Monoproject writes an owen version of
MsBuild called xBuild. Why dont cooperate with them an use the object
model of xBuild to write an
>> FWIW, we just use the task to run MSBuild, using the
>> 2.0 Framework. Works just fine.
>
> Yes - but you give up many features do for you.
> Inter-project
> dependency solving is what I desperatelly need. We have ~300 .csprojs
> (under
> 1 ccnet project) with new ones appearing, and we do
Gert Driesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe 2 distributions: 1.0 compatible, and 2.0, compiled for > 2.0 and with> additional features?This might create too much confusion for (some) users, no ?GertI agree with Gert. 2 Distributions will be confusing instead make sure that the Core keeps w
Mike, Brad,
> FWIW, we just use the task to run MSBuild, using the
> 2.0 Framework. Works just fine.
Yes - but you give up many features do for you. Inter-project
dependency solving is what I desperatelly need. We have ~300 .csprojs (under
1 ccnet project) with new ones appearing, and we do n
> > should addess in 1.0: VS2005 projects. Or MSBuild cooperation. The
> Are people really waiting for this ?
I think so. How many of 1.0 users use task? Same percentage of
2.0 users would want to use simmilar feature under 2.0. Or they have to use
something else...
> Shouldn't we focus on imp
+1 for setting a date (e.g. 1 month from now) for 1.0 final.
I agree with Martin somewhat in that making msbuild support easier is
a big deal, however I think running msbuild.exe is a perfectly decent
way of doing so for 95% of people - we just need to tidy that up a
bit. At the moment I just invo
> Since many developers are migrating (or already using) framework 2.0
> in
> VS2005 and we (currently) do not provide direct tools for projects it
> uses,
> they could either: use plain msbuild (deserters!) or use core
>
> As I see it, we could:
> 1/ state, that new project files used on VS2005
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Martin Aliger
> Sent: vrijdag 14 juli 2006 12:59
> To: 'Gary Feldman'; nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Release 0.85 and beyond
>
> Hello,
>
> agreed - 1.0 soon is
This is another thing worth of "implementation" under 1.0.
I'd like something like Miranda-IM has. See http://www.miranda-im.org/ and
their "Addons" site.
Martin Aliger
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Martin Aliger
> Sent: Tue
Hello,
agreed - 1.0 soon is a good thing. I see only one big thing which we should
addess in 1.0: VS2005 projects. Or MSBuild cooperation. The same thing.
Since many developers are migrating (or already using) framework 2.0 in
VS2005 and we (currently) do not provide direct tools for projects it
Bugs item #1503678, was opened at 2006-06-09 21:39
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by drieseng
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402868&aid=1503678&group_id=31650
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment t
Bugs item #1521489, was opened at 2006-07-12 23:57
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by drieseng
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402868&aid=1521489&group_id=31650
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment t
18 matches
Mail list logo
