Martin Aliger wrote:
> Uhm. I'm not sure, I know what you are speaking about. You're refering to IM
> (instant messaging) itself? The purpose of the miranda program is irrelevant
> in my referal. I just like their web site layout, ideas and mainly addons
> site. I think NAnt's task site should be s
> > I'd like something like Miranda-IM has. See
> http://www.miranda-im.org/
> > and their "Addons" site.
> >
> That's a nice idea, but I can't imagine how to justify
> putting it into 1.0.
For someone with enough website administration experience it should be
matter of day or two. Of cours
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Like this email list.
>
No, email is synchronous - you get to choose when to read email (except
when that's a job requirement). IM on the other hand is intended for
immediate response.
Gary
Like this email list.
Gary Feldman wrote:
>Martin Aliger wrote:
>
>
>>This is another thing worth of "implementation" under 1.0.
>>
>>I'd like something like Miranda-IM has. See http://www.miranda-im.org/ and
>>their "Addons" site.
>>
>>
>>
>That's a nice idea, but I can't imagine how to
Martin Aliger wrote:
> This is another thing worth of "implementation" under 1.0.
>
> I'd like something like Miranda-IM has. See http://www.miranda-im.org/ and
> their "Addons" site.
>
That's a nice idea, but I can't imagine how to justify putting it into
1.0.
Besides, I've never been very f
> Behalf Of Martin Aliger
> Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 4:44 PM
> To: 'Jay Flowers'; 'Shmarya Rubenstein'; 'Gert Driesen'
> Cc: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Nant contributions or where nant is going?
>
> :-)
&
PM
> To: Shmarya Rubenstein
> Cc: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net; Gert Driesen
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Nant contributions or where nant is going?
>
> bleh?
>
> On 7/4/06, Shmarya Rubenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > bleh
> >
> >
> > On 7/4/06, Ja
.0, we'd be able to support
> running
> > > unit tests on MS.NET 1.0.
> > >
> > > This can ofcourse not be achieved when using the NUNit API.
> > >
> > >
> > > Gert
> > >
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
inal Message -----> From: Shmarya Rubenstein> To: Gert Driesen> Cc:
nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net>> Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 11:34 AM> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Nant contributions or where nant is going?
>> Hi Gert...>> If you want, I can fold the Telnet c
hmarya Rubenstein
> To: Gert Driesen
> Cc: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 11:34 AM
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Nant contributions or where nant is going?
>
> Hi Gert...
>
> If you want, I can fold the Telnet code into the Nant.Telnet
urse not be achieved when using the
NUNit API.
Gert
- Original Message -
From:
Shmarya Rubenstein
To:
Gert Driesen
Cc:
nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 11:34
AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Nant
contributions or where nant is go
: Gert Driesen
Cc: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 11:34
AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Nant
contributions or where nant is going?
Hi Gert...If you want, I can fold the Telnet code into
the Nant.Telnet assembly. This will get rid of the extra
depend
benstein
To:
Gert Driesen
Cc:
nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 11:22
AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Nant
contributions or where nant is going?
Suggestion:Why don't you give a list of open issues
that are up for grabs and let people pick so
esday, July 04, 2006 11:22
AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Nant
contributions or where nant is going?
Suggestion:Why don't you give a list of open issues
that are up for grabs and let people pick something to try?PS: I tried
to submit a task to nant-contrib a while back (telnet tas
]> wrote:
> -Original Message-> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On> Behalf Of Flex> Sent: maandag 3 juli 2006 11:10> To: Gert Driesen; nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Nant contributions or where nant is going?>> H
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Flex
> Sent: maandag 3 juli 2006 11:10
> To: Gert Driesen; nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Nant contributions or where nant is going?
>
Hey, thanks for the answer, I was about to get desperate ;)
Can you clear this one:
> We definitely have a lack of contributors. With this I'm not talking about
> people that post new tasks, but we need developers & designers for improving
> the NAnt core.
>
> NAnt core is indeed pretty stable,
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Flex
> Sent: donderdag 29 juni 2006 11:50
> To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [nant-dev] Nant contributions or where nant is going?
>
> Guys, I&
Guys, I'm completely newbie both to nant and to the mailing lists. I
enjoy nant much and have converted big project to use it and plan to do
such with every other. However there is something that disturbs me - the
future of nant. I have read the archives and came to several conclusions:
- newsgr
19 matches
Mail list logo
